Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T00:49:57.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sex and the mission: the conflicting effects of early Christian missions on HIV in sub-Saharan Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2020

Julia Cagé
Affiliation:
Sciences Po Paris and CEPR, Paris, France
Valeria Rueda*
Affiliation:
School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: valeria.rueda@nottingham.ac.uk

Abstract

This paper investigates the long-term impact of historical missionary activity on HIV in sub-Saharan Africa. On the one hand, missionaries were the first to invest in modern medicine in the region. On the other hand, Christianity influenced sexual beliefs and behaviors that affect the risk of contagion. We build a new geocoded dataset locating Protestant and Catholic missions in the early 20th century, as well as the health facilities they invested in, that we combine with individual-level Demographic and Health Survey data. With these data, we can address separately these two channels, within regions close to historical missionary settlements. First, we show that proximity to historical missionary health facilities decreases the likelihood of HIV; persistence in healthcare provision and safer sexual behaviors in the region explain this result. Second, we show that regions close to historical missionary settlements exhibit higher likelihood of HIV. This effect is driven by the Christian population in our sample. This suggests conversion to Christianity as a possible explanatory channel. Our findings are robust to alternative specifications addressing selection.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain 2020
Figure 0

Figure 1. HIV prevalence estimates at the subnational level. Note: The figure shows the average HIV prevalence rates at the subnational level computed by the DHS geographic data repository.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Plates representing all (Catholic and Protestant) missionary stations. Note: The figure reproduces a plate locating Catholic missionary stations (top) and a plate locating Protestant missionary stations (bottom).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Catholic and Protestant mission stations with and without health investments. Note: This map is a digitized and geocoded version of two geography atlas. For Protestant missions, we used digitized and geocoded plates 14 to 18 of Dennis, Beach, and Fahs (1903), from Cagé and Rueda (2016). Health investments include dispensaries and hospitals. For Catholic missions, the map is a digitized and geocoded version of the 1929 Atlas Hierarchicus. The geocoding was conducted by the authors. Health investments include hospitals.

Figure 3

Table 1. Determinants of the location of the health investments

Figure 4

Table 2. Determinants of the location of the health investments: precolonial marital structures

Figure 5

Figure 4. DHS locations. Note: The figure shows the location of DHS clusters in sub-Saharan Africa that report both HIV biomarker data and GPS information.

Figure 6

Table 3. Missionary investments and HIV prevalence: baseline specification

Figure 7

Figure 5. Effect of distance to a missionary station with a health investment on HIV. Local polynomial regression.

Figure 8

Figure 6. Effect of distance to a missionary station on HIV. Local polynomial regression.

Figure 9

Figure 7. Summary statistics. Comparing missions with health facilities and those without before and after matching. Note: The figure reports the confidence intervals of the difference in means between the sample of missions without a health facility and those with one (control group − treatment group).

Figure 10

Figure 8. Map of treated and matched missions.

Figure 11

Table 4. Missionary investments and HIV prevalence: matching

Figure 12

Table 5. Presence of health services around missions with and without health facilities

Figure 13

Table 6. Persistence in health care: effect of missions and colonial health investments

Figure 14

Figure 9. Missionary investments and sexual behaviors. Note: The figures report OLS estimates. The point represents the estimated effect and the lines represent the 90% confidence interval. The unit of observation is an individual. The dependent variables vary for each graph and are reported in the legend. Standard errors are clustered at the town level. Controls are described in the text. All regressions restrict the analysis to regions at least 100 km close to missions.

Figure 15

Table 7. Descriptive statistics: HIV prevalence and sexual behaviors, Christians vs. non-Christians (t-test)

Figure 16

Table 8. Descriptive statistics: HIV prevalence and sexual behaviors, Catholics vs. Protestants

Figure 17

Table 9. Individual level OLS: distance to mission, religion interactions, and HIV status

Supplementary material: PDF

Cagé and Rueda supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Cagé and Rueda supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 726.7 KB