Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T01:06:54.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ultra-wide band flexible antenna applicable for dual-band on-body communications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2022

Walaa M. Hassan
Affiliation:
Microwave Engineering Department, Electronics Research Institute (ERI), El-Nozha El-Gadida, Cairo 11843, Egypt
Ayman Ayd R. Saad
Affiliation:
Kosseir Radio, Telecom Egypt, Kosseir 84712, Egypt
Ahmed A. Ibrahim*
Affiliation:
Communications and Electronics Engineering Department, Minia University, Minia, Egypt
*
Author for correspondence: Ahmed A. Ibrahim, E-mail: ahmedabdel_monem@mu.edu.eg
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, an ultra-wideband printed flexible monopole antenna is proposed for indoor wireless communications. A flexible Rogers RO3003 is used as a substrate, and its performance is estimated for a flat state and when subject to bending along the y-axis. A 2.45 and 5.8 GHz dual-band textile artificial magnetic conductor (AMC) surface consisting of a 4 × 4 unit-cell array was integrated into antenna design with optimum separation distance to extend its potential applications to wearable on-body communications. The specific absorption rate (SAR) levels were numerically investigated using the Hugo human voxel model at both frequencies to evaluate the on-body safety level. Detailed analysis is presented for antenna designs of flat and bent states in free space and on the human body. The proposed UWB flexible antenna has the size of 41 × 38 × 0.25 mm (0.33λ0 × 0.31λ0 × 0.002λ0 at 2.45 GHz). It was added at a distance of 3 mm above a textile AMC surface of 99 × 99 mm. The integrated model is fabricated and experimentally characterized. Measured data and numerical results show that the impedance matching and radiation characteristics are slightly affected by introducing the bending and human body loading. With these remarkable features, the integrated model can be utilized for wireless indoor and wearable applications.

Information

Type
Antenna Design, Modeling and Measurements
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The geometry of the proposed UWB flexible monopole antenna. (a) Top-view. (b) Bottom-view.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Simulated |S11| of the suggested UWB flexible monopole antenna in a flat state and when subject to bending along the y-axis.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Simulated normalized radiation patterns of the flexible antenna in a flat state (solid line) and when subjected to bending for Ry = 60 mm (dashed line) at (a) 2.45 GHz, (b) 5.8 GHz.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Simulated peak gain versus frequency of the proposed UWB flexible monopole antenna in a flat state and when subjected to bending for Ry = 60 mm.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Geometry and dimensions of the proposed dual square-loop AMC unit-cell (L = 25 mm, W = 25 mm, lo = 18.6 mm, li = 8.6 mm, g = 0.45 mm, and d = 2.1 mm).

Figure 5

Fig. 6. AMC unit-cell (a) Numerical simulation model and (b) Simulated reflection phase of the AMC surface.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Surface current distribution of the dual square-loop AMC unit-cell at (a) 2.45 and (b) 5.8 GHz.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Geometry of the proposed UWB flexible monopole antenna above 4 × 4 AMC surface. (a) Flat state. (b) Bent state with Ry = 60 mm.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Simulated |S11| of the UWB flexible monopole antenna above 4 × 4 AMC surface at flat and bent states with Ry = 60 mm.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. The integrated antenna is placed on the back and arm of a CST Hugo voxel model of the human body.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Simulated |S11| characteristics of the integrated antenna in the vicinity of the human back and human arm in comparison to that evaluated in free space.

Figure 11

Fig. 12. Simulated radiation patterns of the flat integrated antenna placed on the human back (solid line) in comparison to that of free space (dashed line) at (a) 2.45 and (b) 5.8 GHz.

Figure 12

Fig. 13. Simulated radiation patterns of the bent integrated antenna placed on the human arm (solid line) in comparison to that of free space (dashed line) at (a) 2.45 and (b) 5.8 GHz.

Figure 13

Fig. 14. SAR evaluation of the flat antenna placed on the human back at 2.45 and 5.8 GHz. (a) Without AMC surface. (b) With AMC surface.

Figure 14

Fig. 15. SAR evaluation of the bent antenna (Ry = 60 mm) placed on the human arm at 2.45 and 5.8 GHz. (a) Without AMC surface. (b) With AMC surface.

Figure 15

Fig. 16. Photograph of the fabricated antenna prototypes. (a) Standalone antenna in a flat state. (b) Standalone antenna in a bent state (Ry = 60 mm). (c) Integrated antenna in a flat state. (d) Integrated antenna in a bent state (Ry = 60 mm).

Figure 16

Fig. 17. Simulated and measured |S11| against frequency for the fabricated standalone antenna prototype in flat and bent (Ry = 60 mm) states.

Figure 17

Fig. 18. Simulated and measured |S11| against frequency for the fabricated integrated antenna prototype in flat and bent (Ry = 60 mm) states.

Figure 18

Fig. 19. Measured 2D gain radiation patterns of the standalone antenna in the flat state (solid line) and when subjected to bending (dashed line) at (a) 2.45 GHz and (c) 5.8 GHz.

Figure 19

Fig. 20. Measured 2D gain radiation patterns of the integrated antenna in the flat state (solid line) and when subjected to bending (dashed line) at (a) 2.45 GHz and (c) 5.8 GHz.

Figure 20

Fig. 21. Measurement set up of radiation characteristics of the fabricated antenna prototypes inside a StarLab 18 anechoic chamber. (a) Standalone antenna in a flat state. (b) Standalone antenna in a bent state (Ry = 60 mm). (c) Integrated antenna in a flat state. (d) Integrated antenna in a bent state (Ry = 60 mm).

Figure 21

Table 1. Simulated and measured peak gain and radiation efficiency of the proposed antenna designs at 2.45 and 5.8 GHz

Figure 22

Fig. 22. On-body measurement set up of frequency response of the integrated antenna prototype placed on (a) Human back. (b) Human arm.

Figure 23

Fig. 23. Simulated and measured reflection coefficient |S11| characteristics against the frequency of the integrated antenna prototype placed on the vicinity of the human back.

Figure 24

Fig. 24. Simulated and measured reflection coefficient |S11| characteristics against the frequency of the integrated antenna prototype placed on the vicinity of the human arm.

Figure 25

Table 2. Proposed wearable antenna versus selected recently designs