INTRODUCTION
Host parasite co-evolution acts to maintain polymorphism and/or increase the rate of molecular evolution (Lively, Reference Lively1987; Dybdahl and Lively, Reference Dybdahl and Lively1998; Lively and Jokela, Reference Lively and Jokela2002; Decaestecker et al. Reference Decaestecker, Gaba, Raeymaekers, Stocks, van Kerckhoven, Ebert and De Meester2007; Woolhouse et al. Reference Woolhouse, Webster, Domingo, Charlesworth and Levin2002; Paterson et al. Reference Paterson, Vogwill, Buckling, Benmayor, Spiers, Thomson, Quail, Smith, Walker, Libberton, Fenton, Hall and Brockhurst2010). With the majority of all free-living animals hosting at least 1 parasite taxon (Price, Reference Price1980), populations without parasites represent a rare opportunity to understand the effects of host-parasite co-evolution. Island populations may experience reduced selection pressures due to decreased parasite diversity, prevalence and intensity (e.g. Lindström et al. Reference Lindström, Foufopoulos, Pärn and Wikelski2004), similar to invasive species that are released from their natural enemies in novel environments (Liu and Stiling, Reference Liu and Stiling2006). A special case of ‘enemy release’ may be experienced by populations in extreme environments in which hosts may find refuge from their parasites (Tobler et al. Reference Tobler, Schlupp, García de León, Glaubrecht and Plath2007). The adaptive forces in these hostile habitats are often well defined (Amils Pibernat et al. Reference Amils Pibernat, Ellies-Evans and Hinghofer-Szalkay2007), yet, their effects on parasites infecting hosts inhabiting such environments are rarely assessed, even though they can have a major impact on the host-parasite relationships. Populations of guppies with little or no parasites are rare (see Fraser and Neff, Reference Fraser and Neff2010), but preliminary investigations indicate that the Pitch Lake may be one such habitat (Cable, Reference Cable, Evans, Pilastro and Schlupp2011).
The Pitch Lake (Fig. 1) consists of a natural upwelling of oils that contain hydrocarbons, sulphur, metals and volcanic ash at concentrations usually considered toxic to living organisms (Peckham, Reference Peckham1895; Ponnamperuna and Pering, Reference Ponnamperuma and Pering1967; Burgess et al. Reference Burgess, McMahon, Price, Grier and Uribe2005; World Health Organization Concise International Chemical Assessment Document, 2005; Marković et al. Reference Marković, Marković, McCrindle and Simonović2007). It is the largest asphalt lake in the world (ca. 0·8 km2), resembling a volcano crater, located on the south west coast of Trinidad. Only 4 other asphalt lakes exist worldwide: the La Brea tar pits, the McKittrick tar pits, Carpinteria tar pits (all 3 in California, USA) and Lake Guanoco (Venezuela). Although such lakes have been the focus of many paleoecological studies (e.g. Coltrain et al. Reference Coltrain, Harris, Cerling, Ehleringer, Dearing, Ward and Allen2004), little is published on their extant biodiversity (Kadavy et al. Reference Kadavy, Plantz, Shaw, Myatt, Kokjohn and Nickerson1999; Ali et al. Reference Ali, Haque, Ramsubhag, Guinan and Schulze-Makuch2006; Schulze-Makuch et al. Reference Schulze-Makuch, Haque, Resendes de Sousa, Ali, Hosein, Song, Yang, Zaikova, Beckles, Guinan, Lehto and Hallam2010) or on the evolution of species in this habitat (but see Tezuka et al. Reference Tezuka, Yamamoto, Yokoyama, van Oosterhout and Kawata2011). Despite its hostile environment, freshwater pools amongst the pitch folds of the encrusted Pitch Lake surface are a habitat for plants (e.g. Nymphaea and Nitella; personal observations), bacteria (e.g. Pseudomonas; see Ali et al. Reference Ali, Haque, Ramsubhag, Guinan and Schulze-Makuch2006; Schulze-Makuch et al. Reference Schulze-Makuch, Haque, Resendes de Sousa, Ali, Hosein, Song, Yang, Zaikova, Beckles, Guinan, Lehto and Hallam2010), invertebrates (e.g. dragon fly larvae, aquatic beetles; personal observations), the amphibian Pseudis paradoxa (personal observations) and fish (e.g. Poecilia reticulata, Rivulus hartii, see Burgess et al. Reference Burgess, McMahon, Price, Grier and Uribe2005; and Polycentrus schomburgkii, personal observations).
The Pitch Lake, Trinidad. Insert: a close-up on one of the pools where guppies were collected for this study.
The guppy (Poecilia reticulata), a small, hardy freshwater fish, is found throughout Trinidad and Tobago as well as in Venezuela, Guyana and Surinam (Magurran, Reference Magurran2005). Throughout their natural habitat, guppies are parasitized by the ectoparasitic, hermaphroditic gyrodactylids (for exceptions, see Martin and Johnson, Reference Martin and Johnson2007; Fraser and Neff, Reference Fraser and Neff2010). Despite being helminths, Gyrodactylus species are regarded as microparasites (Scott and Anderson, Reference Scott and Anderson1984) due to their multi-modal, hyperviviparous reproductive system (Cable and Harris, Reference Cable and Harris2002; Bakke et al. Reference Bakke, Cable and Harris2007). In natural populations of guppies, gyrodactylids often occur at prevalences of up to 75% (van Oosterhout et al. Reference van Oosterhout, Mohammed, Hansen, Archard, McMullan, Weese and Cable2007). Such high parasite occurrence is mainly characteristic of lowland guppy populations, whereas the Trinidadian upland populations are occasionally free of gyrodactylids (Martin and Johnson, Reference Martin and Johnson2007; Fraser and Neff, Reference Fraser and Neff2010). The difference in gyrodactylid load may be explained by the fact that upland host populations are relatively small in census population size and have arisen from founder events, whilst being connected by a very limited amount of upstream migration (Barson et al. Reference Barson, Cable and van Oosterhout2009). Furthermore, given that parasitized guppies are more likely to be flushed downstream (van Oosterhout et al. Reference van Oosterhout, Mohammed, Hansen, Archard, McMullan, Weese and Cable2007) some upland populations appear to be parasite-free, either due to failure of parasite establishment or subsequent parasite population extinction. Hence, the guppies in some upland populations such as the Upper Naranjo have been shown to be devoid of gyrodactylids for almost a decade (personal observations) and can be regarded as naive to these parasites.
In the present study, we compare parasite burdens in the field with published data and assess the importance of the pitch environment for the health of guppies using experimentally infected fish. In Part 1, parasite infections are assessed for the Pitch Lake guppy population. Having confirmed the absence of Gyrodactylus spp. in the Pitch Lake, we hypothesized that Pitch Lake water had significant anti-parasitic properties. Therefore, in Part 2, we experimentally investigated the effect of Pitch Lake water on fungal and/or bacterial (from hereon: microbial) and helminth infections in guppies. Firstly, we exposed Pitch Lake guppies to aquarium water and Gyrodactylus bullatarudis infected fish to Pitch Lake water. Secondly, we directly exposed G. turnbulli infected, ornamental guppies to dechlorinated aquarium water containing solid pitch or to artificially produced pitch water of varying ages. By producing pitch water of varying ages, we also tested whether the antihelminthic compounds are chemically unstable or volatile to provide an overview of the anti-parasitic properties of Pitch Lake water.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study was approved by the Cardiff University Animal Ethics Committee and regulated by a UK Home Office licence (PPL 30/2357).
Sampling sites
Guppies (SL: 9·1–22·4 mm) were collected from the Pitch Lake (grid reference UTM 20P: 650341.45 E, 1131668.93 N; Fig. 1) in 2004 and 2006–2008, and from the Upper Naranjo in 2008. Pitch Lake pools in which fish were caught varied widely in their water physio-chemistry (pH, temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen and conductivity measured with an YSI pH 100 and YSI 85 Multi Probe) and differ from 3 riverine reference sampling sites (Table 1).
Minimum and maximum water physico-chemistry values of the Pitch Lake and three riverine sites in Trinidad recorded in different seasons between 2003 and 2012
For the parasite prevalence analysis on Pitch Lake guppies (Part 1), variable numbers of live fish (n) collected in randomly chosen pools in February 2004 (n = 64), June 2006 (n = 54) and June 2007 (n = 25) were euthanized on site with an overdose (0·04%) of MS222 and individually stored in 1·5 ml Eppendorf tubes containing 90% ethanol. In total, 5 representative pools of varying sizes were sampled, all of which contained guppies and which were spread across the lake. For Transfer Experiment 1 (Part 2), pitch water and live guppies were collected at the Pitch Lake in June 2008 (n = 10) and transported to the laboratory in Trinidad. The guppies originated from different pools that were all interconnected. A control sample of guppies (n = 10) for Experiment 1 plus 20 guppies for Experiment 2 (Part 2) were collected from the Upper Naranjo (UTM 20P: 692498.44 E, 118257.53 N), a tributary of the Aripo River that originates in the Northern mountain range of Trinidad and flows into the Caroni drainage.
Part 1: Natural parasite fauna
For the parasite analysis of Pitch Lake guppies, samples from 2004, 2006 and 2007 were analysed for gyrodactylid prevalence, mean intensity and range. The preserved fish were transferred to a Petri dish and completely immersed in ethanol. Using a dissecting microscope the surface of the fish was scanned and any parasites recorded. The ethanol in which the fish had been originally fixed was also screened for any dislodged parasites. Gyrodactylid parasites were removed from their host using insect pins and transferred onto a microscope slide. Specimens were mounted in ammonium picrate glycerine after partial digestion (Harris et al. Reference Harris, Cable, Tinsley and Lazarus1999) and examined for differences in haptor morphology to identify worms to species level.
Part 2: Experimental transfer
To monitor gyrodactylid infections in Experiments 1 and 2 guppies were anaesthetized with 0·02% MS222 and their sex and standard length were recorded. Fish were screened for external parasites using a fibre-optic light and a stereo-microscope according to the methods described by Schelkle et al. (Reference Schelkle, Shinn, Peeler and Cable2009). Fish were maintained individually in 1L pots throughout the duration of the experiment and were fed on Aquarian® fish flakes once daily. Additionally, uninfected fish were exposed to the same treatments in both experiments as mortality controls. For routine maintenance, fish and parasite cultures were kept at 25 ± 1 °C, a 12 h light : 12 h dark cycle and guppies were fed at least once daily with Aquarian® fish flakes.
In Experiment 1, we examined (a) the effect of replacing Pitch Lake water with dechlorinated aquarium water on the health of Pitch Lake guppies and (b) the effect of original Pitch Lake water on the mean intensity of G. bullatarudis parasites (isolated from Lower Aripo guppies; Cable and van Oosterhout, Reference Cable and van Oosterhout2007) on guppies originating from the Upper Naranjo. To test the former, 10 guppies from the Pitch Lake (with no gyrodactylid infection) were removed from the original Pitch Lake water and then they were kept in aquarium water and maintained individually over 8 days. After 4 days of acclimatization, fish were screened for signs of microbial infection daily until the experiment finished on Day 8. Controls originating from the Pitch Lake (n = 10) were maintained for the same period in the original pitch water. To examine the effect of Pitch Lake water on the presence of gyrodactylid parasites, wild, naive guppies from the Upper Naranjo were exposed to infected conspecifics from the Lower Aripo to acquire G. bullatarudis infections naturally (mean±s.e. 11·9 ± 1 parasites per fish). Infected fish (n = 10) were then exposed to 25% original pitch water collected at the Pitch Lake and diluted with dechlorinated aquarium water. After 48 h, the Pitch Lake water concentration was raised to 50% and maintained at this concentration until the end of the experiment. The stepped increase in Pitch Lake water concentration allowed the fish to acclimatize and prevent osmotic problems. Uninfected and infected control guppies (n = 10 each) were maintained in dechlorinated water. For Experiment 1, pitch water was used within 24 h of collection and trials were carried out at 21 ± 2 °C.
Experiment 2 tested the efficacy of pitch and pitch water preparations against G. turnbulli (Gt3, isolated from pet shop guppies in 1997; see van Oosterhout et al. Reference van Oosterhout, Harris and Cable2003) infections on ornamental guppies (total n = 84), acquired through exposure to infected conspecifics. Parasite loads on guppies were assessed by screening fish before and after the 8-day treatment period. The Pitch Lake water and pitch were collected in June 2009. In total, there were 5 treatments: (a) solid pitch, (b) fresh pitch water, (c) old pitch water, (d) ancient pitch water, and (e) aquarium water as a control. Pitch water was prepared from solid pitch and dechlorinated aquarium water 1–3 months after the field collection of pitch. Pitch was added to the bottom of a 1 L pot containing 250 ml of dechlorinated water for the pitch treatment (32·5 g was regarded as safe for guppies after preliminary trials, and was moulded to a thickness of 0·5 cm to increase surface area: ca. 173 cm2). For the 3 pitch water treatments, the pitch was removed from the water after 24 h. Fresh pitch water was used directly after pitch removal, whereas old and ancient pitch water was left to stand for 41 and 82 days, respectively, at 15–25 °C. These aged pitch water preparations resulted in the loss of unstable and volatile compounds narrowing down the possible chemical characteristics of the active compound before starting spectroscopic analyses, which were used to confirm the presence of volatile and/or unstable compounds. To identify any complex organic species which may be present in pitch and responsible for the observed anti-parasitic properties, proton and carbon Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectra were measured (Bruker Avance, 250, recording at 1H 250 MHz; 62·5 MHz 13C, 5 mm tube) on extracts of pitch samples, using deuterium oxide (heavy water, D2O) and deuterated chloroform (CDCl3) as extractants. Additionally, Infra Red (IR) spectra (Jasco 380, thin film) were analysed to identify organic functional groups.
Since not all fish were tested at the same time, the solid pitch treatment method was used in 2 small experiments before and after the main study to confirm that pitch efficacy against gyrodactylids remained constant throughout the experimental period despite the storage of pitch in plastic containers between individual sets of tests. Naive fish from a 10-year-old inbred stock were infected by exposing individual fish to an infected donor for 3–4 days. For every set of tests, near equal numbers of replicates (15 ± 3 per treatment) were tested at 25 ± 1 °C, with fish containers randomly placed within the experimental laboratory space including 27 control treatments.
Statistical analyses
Differences in the frequency of microbial infections and mortalities in Pitch Lake guppies exposed to aquarium water compared to their counterparts in Pitch Lake water (Experiment 1) were confirmed using a Fisher's Exact Test. The infection trajectories for Experiment 2 were assessed using a General Linear Mixed Model (GLMM). Treatment (pitch or aquarium water) and time were included in the model as independent variables with animal ID as random effect factor.
As a measure of efficacy of solid pitch and artificial pitch water treatments in Experiment 2 the relative decrease in parasite load (ΔE t) was calculated to account for the initial variation in parasite loads between fish as well as the repeated measurement of parasite load before and after treatment on the same individual:
ΔE t=(L 0−Lt)/L 0, for L t < L 0, and
ΔE t=0 for L t ⩾ L 0,
where L 0 is the initial parasite burden at day 0 and L t is the parasite burden at day t (Schelkle et al. Reference Schelkle, Doetjes and Cable2010). When parasite load increased rather than decreased, the treatment was not efficient and was defined as ΔE t=0.
A Generalized Linear Model (GLM) fitted with a quasibinomial error distribution and a logit link function was conducted to assess differences in efficacy with treatment, fish sex and standard length as independent variables plus a fish sex*standard length interaction. Standardized residuals for all models were assessed using a Shapiro-Wilk test additionally to visual examination of histograms and normality plots, and both random and fixed model terms were reduced using stepwise deletions based on the Log-Likelihood method with α = 0·05. All data were analysed in R v. 2.9.2 (R Development Core Team, 2011).
RESULTS
Part 1: Natural parasite fauna
No helminth infections were found on the guppies sampled from the Pitch Lake population (n = 143), with the exception of 3 worms recovered on 3 individual fish in 2004 belonging to a newly described genus of the Gyrodactylidae, Ieredactylus rivulus (Schelkle et al. 2011), a parasite usually found on Rivulus hartii.
Part 2: Experimental transfer
Exposure of Pitch Lake guppies to aquarium water led to a 66·7% increase in unspecified microbial infections. As a result, 7 out of 10 Pitch Lake fish were infected or died from the infection in aquarium water, compared to 1 out of 10 in the control with original Pitch Lake water (Fisher's Exact Test: P = 0·01). The symptoms were consistent with fin rot and cotton-like growth characteristic of opportunistic Saprolegnia and Flavobacterium spp. infections. No further analyses were conducted to identify the specific infections.
When experimentally infected guppies from the Upper Naranjo were exposed to original Pitch Lake water they lost all their gyrodactylid parasites within 48 h of exposure, whereas the parasite population on fish in aquarium water remained stable (GLMM: treatment t = 4·017, d.f. = 18, P < 0·001; time t = −5·080, d.f. = 71, P < 0·001; Fig. 2).
Gyrodactylus bullatarudis parasite load (±s.e.) on guppies (Poecilia reticulata) originating from the Upper Naranjo river exposed to original Pitch Lake (PL) water diluted to 25% up to 12 h and 50% between 12 and 48 h (closed circles) or dechlorinated aquarium water (open circles) over time. N = 10 for each treatment.
In Experiment 2, the only treatment that was effective in removing parasites was the solid pitch in water treatment (94·4% efficacy), whereas the efficacies of fresh (14·1%), old (24·7%) and ancient (19%) pitch water treatments were not significantly different from the control (7·3%) (GLM: treatment F4,74=14·594, P < 0·001; Fig. 3). Efficacy was also influenced by a fish sex*standard length interaction: efficacy increases with decreasing size in adult fish, but is constant in juveniles (GLM: fish sex*standard length F2,74 = 3·966, P=0·023).
Mean efficacy (± s.e.) of solid pitch, fresh pitch water (PW), old pitch water, ancient pitch water and aquarium (aq.) water against Gyrodactylus turnbulli infections in ornamental strain guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Efficacy (ΔE t=(L 0−L t)/L 0, for L t<L 0, and ΔE t=0 for L t⩾L 0): 1 = effective; 0 = not effective. N = number of replicates.
Spectroscopic analysis (proton 1H and carbon 13C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Infrared) indicated that while the majority of the pitch consists of simple hydrocarbons which did not transfer to the water phase, there were signals indicative of the presence of aromatic, phenolic and ketonic species, and trapped methane gas (Table 2). These were only observed following extraction into organic solvent (CDCl3) with the levels of any species extracted into D2O below the detection limits of the techniques by attempting to mimic the pitch water experiments.
Chemicals and their suggested assignments based on the molecule's functional group from spectroscopic analysis (proton and carbon nuclear magnetic resonance: 1H and 13C NMR, respectively; infrared: IR) of pitch
DISCUSSION
The water in the Pitch Lake in Trinidad is dominated by simple linear and branched hydrocarbons, and displays extreme chemical properties. Yet, it supports 3 species of freshwater fish (Poecilia reticulata, Rivulus hartii and Polycentrus schomburgkii). We found that Pitch Lake guppies are not naturally infected with Gyrodactylus species (Part 1) and that gyrodactylid-infected control guppies lose their infections when transferred to Pitch Lake water (Part 2). Furthermore, Pitch Lake fish that are removed from Pitch Lake water rapidly develop microbial infections (Part 2).
Gyrodactylus species are highly prevalent in natural populations of guppies (Martin and Johnson, Reference Martin and Johnson2007; van Oosterhout et al. Reference van Oosterhout, Mohammed, Hansen, Archard, McMullan, Weese and Cable2007; Fraser and Neff, Reference Fraser and Neff2010) making the observation of their absence in the Pitch Lake population unusual, particularly since hydrocarbons have been associated with an increase of gyrodactylids on infected fish (Kahn and Kiceniuk, Reference Kahn and Kiceniuk1988; Khan, Reference Khan1990). In addition, we did not detect any internal macroparasites in a sample of 25 guppies from Pitch Lake (McMullan, Reference McMullan2010). However, a previously unknown monogenean genus, Ieredactylus, was found which only occurs on guppies in the Pitch Lake (Schelkle et al. 2011). Ieredactylus rivulus normally infects Hart's Rivulus, a fish that can migrate over land; hence, the parasite is thought to be hardy and robust (Schelkle et al. 2011).
The extreme conditions in the Pitch Lake habitat may act as a defence for guppies against gyrodactylid and microbial infections originating from outside the Pitch Lake region. The isolation and genetic divergence of Pitch Lake guppies (Willing et al. Reference Willing, Bentzen, Hoffmann, van Oosterhout, Cable, Breden, Weigel and Dreyer2010) indicates that this asphalt lake may act as a refuge, similar to the limestone caves in Mexico which are thought to be a refuge from parasites for Atlantic mollies (P. mexicana, see Tobler et al. Reference Tobler, Schlupp, García de León, Glaubrecht and Plath2007). Such low parasite prevalence within guppy populations elsewhere in Trinidad has only been observed in small, relatively isolated upland populations (Martin and Johnson, Reference Martin and Johnson2007; Fraser and Neff, Reference Fraser and Neff2010). Possibly, the physical isolation in combination with the small population size could also have contributed to the lack of ectoparasites on the Pitch Lake guppies. In addition to this, colonization of the Pitch Lake by gyrodactylids will be severely hindered by the extreme environmental conditions that appear to be lethal, at least to the Gt3 strain of these parasites, either through direct exposure to pitch components and/ or indirectly through increased host mucus production causing the parasites to be sloughed off (for review on fish mucus; see Shephard, Reference Shephard1994). Ideally, we would have tested whether Pitch Lake guppies were susceptible to infection with Gyrodactylus spp., but as Pitch Lake fish die in normal aquarium water and gyrodactylids cannot survive in pitch water this was not possible.
In the Pitch Lake, guppy evolution appears to be primarily driven by the harsh environmental conditions. Although some dead guppies were observed in the pools with extreme pH (2·8 and 8·4; cf. Dunson et al. 1997), Pitch Lake guppies are adapted to this environment. Studies on the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC), a multigene family associated with immune functioning in vertebrates, show that the MHC polymorphism is low but remarkably diverged in the Pitch Lake guppy population compared to other Trinidadian guppy populations (McMullan, Reference McMullan2010). A low MHC variation could account for the increased pathogen susceptibility of these fish when in aquarium water (6 out of 7 guppies were infected or dead at the end of the experiment), as could the multitude of mutagenic and teratogenic hydrocarbons in Pitch Lake water that are known to suppress the immune system (World Health Organization Concise International Chemical Assessment Document, 2005). We cannot rule out though that potential stress associated with changes in the water physio-chemistry caused chronic endemic infection in the guppies to become acute or opportunistic pathogens in the water to infect fish. However, an argument against this is that to maintain Pitch Lake guppies in the laboratory in dechlorinated aquarium water, they need to be continuously treated with anti-fungal and anti-bacterial medication (personal observations).
Exposing gyrodactylid infected fish to ‘original’ Pitch Lake water and solid pitch showed high anti-parasitic characteristics of the treatments, but artificial pitch water preparations were not effective in reducing ectoparasite burdens in guppies. This suggests that the anti-parasitic agent(s) within the Pitch Lake are volatile or unstable compound(s), which is supported here by the spectroscopic analyses. Hence, the anti-parasitic pitch properties are probably not associated with simple hydrocarbon toxicity. It seems more likely that an unidentified chemical entity of high specific toxicity is transferred to the water at a concentration below Nuclear Magnetic Resonance detection limits, which is either unstable in water/air or is of low enough molecular mass that it is volatile and lost from the water (Pan and Raftery, Reference Pan and Raftery2007). The spectroscopic techniques used in the current study are mostly insensitive to simple inorganic ions, such as sulphides or selenides (Lawrence et al. Reference Lawrence, Davis and Compton2000). However, inorganic compounds such as sulphides or selenides are stable ions, so they can be disregarded as potential anti-parasitic compounds due to its apparent instability or volatility (Lawrence et al. Reference Lawrence, Davis and Compton2000).
The fast degradation of the active compound against parasites might explain the high efficacy of original pitch water and solid pitch against gyrodactylids: original pitch water in the lake is constantly enriched with soluble pitch compounds, so concentrations of unstable/volatile chemicals are likely to reach high levels. Indeed, the dissolved pitch compounds accumulated to a harmful concentration that required dilution for non-Pitch Lake guppies used in Experiment 1 (Part 2). The low efficacy of artificial pitch water preparations implies that water cycling in the Lake, as a consequence of the continual upwelling of fresh pitch (Peckham, Reference Peckham1895; Ponnamperuma and Pering, Reference Ponnamperuma and Pering1967), is essential for the enrichment of original pitch water to give it its anti-parasitic properties.
The discovery of a habitat with an apparently low parasite fauna such as the Pitch Lake opens up interesting possibilities for research on host-parasite co-evolution and immunogenetics. By relaxing the parasite selection pressures, the adaptive evolution of the MHC genes is predicted to differ from that in other parasite-rich environments, although confounding effects of the environment (including mutagenic effects and immune-suppressing effects) need to be taken into consideration.
In conclusion, local water chemistry is essential for the survival of Pitch Lake guppies since these fish appear to depend heavily on its anti-parasitic properties. Volatile or unstable compounds derived from pitch might be protecting these guppies from gyrodactylid and microbial infections, thus parasite-mediated selection may be relatively relaxed in the Pitch Lake environment. Further detailed analyses on changes in microbial community of pathogens with the corresponding changes in the direction of the evolutionary arms race in host immune genes are warranted to better understand the consequences of oil pollution on the macro-evolution of vertebrates.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Sarah Müller and Linda Erlandsson for technical assistance. Financial support was provided by a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/D526137/1) CASE Studentship to B.S. and a European Community Framework Programme 6 Marie Curie Host Fellowship for Transfer of Knowledge (MTKD-CT-2005-030018).
