Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T01:11:06.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructural evolution and functional fatigue of a Ti–25Ta high-temperature shape memory alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2017

Hans Jürgen Maier*
Affiliation:
Institut für Werkstoffkunde (Materials Science), Leibniz Universität Hannover, Garbsen 30823, Germany
Elvira Karsten
Affiliation:
Institut für Werkstoffkunde (Materials Science), Leibniz Universität Hannover, Garbsen 30823, Germany
Alexander Paulsen
Affiliation:
Institut für Werkstoffe, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum 44780, Germany
Dennis Langenkämper
Affiliation:
Institut für Werkstoffe, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum 44780, Germany
Peer Decker
Affiliation:
Institut für Werkstoffe, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum 44780, Germany
Jan Frenzel
Affiliation:
Institut für Werkstoffe, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum 44780, Germany
Christoph Somsen
Affiliation:
Institut für Werkstoffe, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum 44780, Germany
Alfred Ludwig
Affiliation:
Institut für Werkstoffe, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum 44780, Germany
Gunther Eggeler
Affiliation:
Institut für Werkstoffe, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum 44780, Germany
Thomas Niendorf*
Affiliation:
Institut für Werkstofftechnik, Universität Kassel, Kassel 34125, Germany
*
a) Address all correspondence to these authors. e-mail: maier@iw.uni-hannover.de

Abstract

Titanium–tantalum based alloys can demonstrate a martensitic transformation well above 100 °C, which makes them attractive for shape memory applications at elevated temperatures. In addition, they provide for good workability and contain only reasonably priced constituents. The current study presents results from functional fatigue experiments on a binary Ti–25Ta high-temperature shape memory alloy. This material shows a martensitic transformation at about 350 °C along with a transformation strain of 2 pct at a bias stress of 100 MPa. The success of most of the envisaged applications will, however, hinge on the microstructural stability under thermomechanical loading. Thus, light and electron optical microscopy as well X-ray diffraction were used to uncover the mechanisms that dominate functional degradation in different temperature regimes. It is demonstrated the maximum test temperature is the key parameter that governs functional degradation in the thermomechanical fatigue tests. Specifically, ω-phase formation and local decomposition in Ti-rich and Ta-rich areas dominate when T max does not exceed ≈430 °C. As T max is increased, the detrimental phases start to dissolve and functional fatigue can be suppressed. However, when T max reaches ≈620 °C, structural fatigue sets in, and fatigue life is again deteriorated by oxygen-induced crack formation.

Figure 0

FIG. 1. DSC charts at heating and cooling rates of 20 °C/min for recrystallized Ti–25Ta prior to thermomechanical cycling.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. Strain–temperature curves obtained for Ti–25Ta during thermomechanical cycling with heating and cooling rates of 20 °C/s at 100 MPa between (a) 40–430 °C, (b) 40–520 °C, and (c) 40–620 °C; in the latter case, the superimposed stress was reduced to 0 MPa in the austenitic regime, see main text for details.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. XRD profiles showing relative intensities at room temperature for Ti–25Ta (a) after a thermomechanical fatigue test conducted at 100 MPa between (a) 40 °C and 430 °C and (b) 40 °C and 520 °C; heating and cooling rates were 20 °C/s.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. TEM images of Ti–25Ta after thermo-mechanical cycling between 40–430 °C under a superimposed stress of 100 MPa: (a) HAADF STEM image, (b) bright-field image, and (c) two times filtered high resolution detail showing the needle-like precipitation (α-phase) and the surrounding matrix (α″-phase).

Figure 4

FIG. 5. Back-scattered electron image of Ti–25Ta after thermomechanical cycling between 40–520 °C under superimposed stress of 100 MPa with heating and cooling rates of 20 °C/s.

Figure 5

FIG. 6. TEM images of Ti–25Ta after thermomechanical cycling between 40 °C and 520 °C under a superimposed stress of 100 MPa: (a) annular dark-field image in STEM mode, (b) selected area diffraction pattern for [102]β TiTa showing reflections from the ω-phase, and (c) corresponding dark-field image.

Figure 6

FIG. 7. SEM images of Ti–25Ta after thermomechanical cycling between 40 °C and 620 °C under a superimposed stress of 100 MPa: (a) back-scattered electron image and corresponding elemental distribution map for (b) titanium and (c) tantalum.

Figure 7

FIG. 8. Schematic illustration of microstructural evolution that result in functional degradation of Ti–25Ta during thermomechanical cycling; (a) schematic DSC chart including the key microstructural features, (b), (c) and (d): corresponding strain-temperature hysteresis loops; see main text for details.