Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T13:56:52.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

GRAFTING FOR IMPROVING NET PHOTOSYNTHESIS OF COFFEA ARABICA IN FIELD IN SOUTHEAST OF BRAZIL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2011

PAULA NOVAES*
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Departamento de Botânica, Laboratório de Fisiologia Vegetal, Via Washington Luis, km 235, 13565-905, São Carlos-SP, Brazil
JOÃO PAULO SOUZA
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Departamento de Botânica, Laboratório de Fisiologia Vegetal, Via Washington Luis, km 235, 13565-905, São Carlos-SP, Brazil
CARLOS HENRIQUE BRITTO ASSIS PRADO
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Departamento de Botânica, Laboratório de Fisiologia Vegetal, Via Washington Luis, km 235, 13565-905, São Carlos-SP, Brazil
*
‡Corresponding author. paulanovaes.botanica@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Leaf gas exchange and leaf water potential (Ψleaf) were measured seasonally on non-grafted and grafted Coffea arabica on Coffea canephora in the field to investigate whether grafting would be able to protect the carbon balance against the rise of in vapour pressure deficit (VPD) and air temperature (Tair) under future climate change. The net maximum photosynthetic rate obtained from the net photosynthesis (PN) curve as a function of photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) in wet and dry periods was used to estimate the integrated potential diurnal net CO2 assimilation (IPPN) around midday. The difference between IPPN and the integrated values of PN during diurnal courses (IPN) was measured to test grafting as suitable practice for minimizing midday depression of PN. Higher values of PN in grafted plants around midday showed that grafting was important even when environmental conditions were favourable in field conditions. Reduced susceptibility of grafted plants to midday depression was revealed by lower values of Ψleaf associated with higher values of PN and leaf transpiration (E) on sunny days in summer and spring, and by higher values of stomatal conductance (gs) around midday in autumn, winter and spring. The differences of E, gs, PN and Ψleaf between non-grafted and grafted plants were higher in dry periods in winter and spring. In addition, the ratio IPN/IPPN in grafted was double that in non-grafted plants around midday in sunny summer and in spring. Indeed, PN and gs of non-grafted plants showed higher dependence on VPD than grafted ones. The lower susceptibility of grafted plants to water stress demonstrated the graft efficiency for increasing positive components of leaf carbon balance of C. arabica in the field, especially under high VPD in projected future climate conditions.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
Figure 0

Figure 1. Monthly average values of maximum (Tmax), medium (Tmed) and minimum (Tmin) air temperature (symbols), and monthly total rainfall (columns) from January 2002 to March 2003. Sunny diurnal courses of leaf gas exchange and leaf water potential were measured in summer (March), autumn (May), winter (August) and spring (October). The cloudy diurnal course was measured in summer 2003 (March). Arrows indicate the diurnal course dates.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Net photosynthesis (PN) as a function of photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) on leaves of non-grafted (●) and grafted (○) C. arabica over C. canephora during early morning in summer (March 2002, wet period) and spring (October 2002, dry period). The values of maximum net photosynthesis (PNmax, μmol m−2 s−1) and light saturation point (Ls, μmol m−2 s−1) are shown at the bottom in each panel. Two curves were merged in each panel before adjustment. Significant differences (p < 0.05) in PN and Ls values between treatments in the same period are indicated by different letters.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Diurnal courses of photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) and vapour pressure deficit (VPD) on leaves of non-grafted (●) and grafted (○) individuals of C. arabica on cloudy (March 2003, A and F) and sunny (March 2002, B and G) summer days, and during sunny days in autumn (May 2002, C and H), winter (August 2002, D and I), and in spring (October 2002, E and J). The numbers in brackets represent the total hours of sunshine in each day. Circles represent average values, bars denote s.e. and asterisks indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between non-grafted and grafted treatments at each time of the diurnal courses.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Diurnal courses of leaf transpiration (E) and stomatal conductance (gs) in leaves of non-grafted (●) and grafted (○) individuals of Coffea arabica on cloudy (March 2003, A and F) and sunny (March 2002, B and G) summer days, and during sunny days in autumn (May 2002, C and H), winter (August 2002, D and I), and in spring (October 2002, E and J). Circles represent average values, bars denote s.e. and asterisks indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between non-grafted and grafted treatments at each time of the diurnal courses.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Diurnal courses of leaf water potential (Ψleaf) and net photosynthesis (PN) in leaves of non-grafted (●) and grafted (○) individuals of C. arabica on cloudy (March 2003, A and F) and sunny (March 2002, B and G) summer days, and during sunny days of autumn (May 2002, C and H), winter (August 2002, D and I) and spring (October 2002, E and J). Symbols represent average values, bars denote s.e. and asterisks indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between non-grafted and grafted treatments at each time of the diurnal courses.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Diurnal courses water use efficiency (WUE) in leaves of non-grafted (●) and grafted (○) individuals of Coffea arabica on cloudy (March 2003, A) and sunny (March 2002, B) summer days, and during sunny days of autumn (May 2002, C), winter (August 2002, D) and spring (October 2002, E). Symbols represent average values, bars denote standard error and asterisks indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between non-grafted and grafted treatments at each time of the diurnal courses.

Figure 6

Table 1. Integrated net photosynthesis (IPN) and integrated potential net photosynthesis (IPPN) from 10:00 to 16:00 hours during sunny days of summer and spring, when average values of net photosynthesis (PN) were significantly different (p < 0.05) between non-grafted (NG) and grafted (G) individuals of Coffea arabica.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Average values of net photosynthesis (PN) and stomatal conductance (gs) as a function of vapour pressure deficit (VPD) on leaves of non-grafted (●) and grafted (○) individuals of Coffea arabica. Data were obtained during cloudy and sunny days in summer and during sunny days in autumn, winter, and spring under field conditions. n.s = not significant.