Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T04:43:20.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stapedotomy using skeeter drill and self-retaining ear canal retractor: a single surgeon's 1000-plus surgical procedure experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2022

N Vishnu Swaroop Reddy
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck and Facial Plastic Surgery, Care hospitals, Hyderabad, India
M Sharma*
Affiliation:
Community Health Centre, Nakaha, India
S Shekhar
Affiliation:
ENT Department, Care Hospitals, Hyderabad, India
Priyanka Sharma
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, District Hospital, Lakhimpur Kheri, India
Rushil Narapareddy
Affiliation:
College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, USA
Punit Sharma
Affiliation:
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Manoj Sharma, Department of ENT, Community Health Centre, Block Road, Nakaha, Lakhimpur Kheri, Uttar Pradesh 262701, India E-mail: dr.sharmamanoj@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term hearing outcomes in stapedotomy surgery using skeeter oto-drill and to assess safety in difficult situations.

Method

A retrospective study was conducted with 944 patients who underwent 1007 stapedotomy procedures over 16 years, performed by a single surgeon using a trans-canal approach and a self-retaining ear canal retractor. Hearing thresholds were calculated over four frequencies. Air–bone conduction hearing thresholds were obtained at 1, 5 and 10 years post-operatively and compared to the pre-operative records.

Results

Out of 1007 operated ears with one year follow up, 98.61 per cent of cases showed a negligible air–bone gap of equal to or less than 5 dB, 1.19 per cent of cases showed an air–bone gap equal to or more than 5 dB but less than 10 dB, and only 0.2 per cent of cases showed an air–bone gap of more than 10 dB.

Conclusion

In this study, using skeeter drill with a 0.6 mm diamond burr to make the fenestra was constant in all the cases and one of the safest techniques, showing persistent long-term hearing results.

Information

Type
Main Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Photographs showing (a) Mahadevaiah's self-retaining ear canal retractor placed in the right ear, (b) right ear microscopic view demonstrating a 0.6 mm fenestra (arrow) made using skeeter drill in the stapes footplate, (c) right ear microscopic view demonstrating a Teflon piston anchored to the long process of incus and inserted into the fenestra that was made and (d) right ear microscopic view demonstrating dehiscent overhanging horizontal segment of the facial nerve in contact with shaft of Teflon piston. LP = long process of incus; FE = fenestra in the posterior half of the stapes footplate; F = horizontal segment of the dehiscent facial nerve.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (a) Image from a 17-year-old female patient with congenital conductive hearing loss with anomalous course of the facial nerve running inferior to the stapes footplate in the left ear and (b) ossicular anomaly in the right ear with absent stapes superstructure and a dehiscent horizontal segment of the facial nerve occupying the anatomical site of the oval window. FP = footplate of the stapes, left ear; IS = incudostapedial joint; F = horizontal segment of the facial nerve (image (a) shows left ear with facial nerve inferior to the footplate, and image (b) shows right ear with completely dehiscent facial nerve); CH = chorda tympani nerve; M = neck of the malleus; P = Teflon-wire malleus to vestibule piston anchored to the neck of the malleus and inserted in to the neo-oval window created by using 0.6 mm diamond skeeter drill; LP = long process of incus and absent lenticular process; N = neo-oval window created using 0.6 mm diamond skeeter drill to see the relation and short distance to the round window; RW = round window niche

Figure 2

Table 1. Distribution of the study population by age and sex

Figure 3

Table 2. Distribution of disease among operated ears*

Figure 4

Table 3. Pre-operative and post-operative mean air conduction, bone conduction and air–bone gap values at various hearing frequencies after one year's follow up

Figure 5

Table 4. Pre-operative and post-operative mean air conduction, bone conduction and air–bone gap values at various hearing frequencies after 5 years’ follow up

Figure 6

Table 5. Pre-operative and post-operative mean air conduction, bone conduction and air–bone gap values at various hearing frequencies after 10 years’ follow up

Figure 7

Fig. 3. Pattern of hearing outcome in post-operative cases one year after surgery. AC = air conduction