Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-th4rj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T22:54:34.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of transient increases in atmospheric CO2 onthe accumulation and mass balance of the Antarctic ice sheet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Siobhan P. O’Farrell
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research, Private Bag No. 1, Aspendale, Victoria 3195, Australia
John L. McGregor
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research, Private Bag No. 1, Aspendale, Victoria 3195, Australia
Leon D. Rotstayn
Affiliation:
Antarctic and Southern Ocean Environment CRC, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252-80, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia
William F. Budd
Affiliation:
Antarctic and Southern Ocean Environment CRC, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252-80, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia
Christopher Zweck
Affiliation:
Antarctic and Southern Ocean Environment CRC, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252-80, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia
Warner Roland
Affiliation:
Antarctic and Southern Ocean Environment CRC, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252-80, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The response of the Antarctic ice sheet to climate change over the next 500years is calculated using the output of a transient-coupled ocean-atmospheresimulation assuming the atmospheric CO2 value increases up tothree times present levels. The main effects on the ice sheet on thistime-scale include increasing rates of accumulation, minimal surfacemelting, and basal melting of ice shelves. A semi-Lagrangian transportscheme for moisture was used to improve the model’s ability to representrealistic rates of accumulation under present-day conditions, and therebyincrease confidence in the anomalies calculated under a warmer climate. Theresponse of the Antarctic ice sheet to the warming is increased accumulationinland, offset by loss from basal melting from the floating ice, andincreased ice flow near the grounding line. The preliminary results of thisstudy show that the change to the ice-sheet balance for thetransient-coupled model forcing amounted to a minimal sea-level contributionin the next century, but a net positive sea-level rise of 0.21 m by 500years. This new result supercedes earlier results that showed the Antarcticice sheet made a net negative contribution to sea-level rise over the nextcentury. However, the amplitude of the sea-level rise is still dominated Inthe much larger contributions expected from thermal expansion of the oceanof 0.25 m for 100 years and 1.00 m for 500 years.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1997
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Accumulation (mm a−1)for (a) Mk1 simulation; (b) simulation, R21 resolution; (c) Mk2 simulation, R42 resolution. Calculated from 20 year control simulations.

Figure 1

Table 1.Comparison of global (GL) and Southern-Hemisphere (SH) warming at 2 × CO2 (in °C), annual accumulation (in mm a−1) and percentage increase in accumulation for Mk1 (Eulerian), Mk2 (Semi-Lagrangian), R42 and transient CO2 doubling experiments. The Mk1 model has annual average accumulation of 396 mm a−1 in the Antarctic region with an average increase of 17% under doubled CO2 conditions, while in the Mk2 model, the accumulation is 267 mm a−1 and the increase under doubled CO2 conditions is 30%

Figure 2

Fig. 2.External forcing imposed on an ice-sheet model for 3 × CO2 conditions. (a) Accumulation anomaly (mm d−1); (b) Air temperature anomaly; (c) Ocean temperature anomaly above 100 m; (d) Ocean temperature anomaly below 100 m.

Figure 3

Fig. 3.Grounded ice-sheet volume time series for control (dashed line), increased precipitation only (M0, dotted line), transient increase (MT, dash-dotted line), 1°C anomaly (M1, solid line) and 2°C anomaly (M2, long dashed line).

Figure 4

Table 2.Comparison of ice-volume (106 km3) changes from present conditions of total, grounded and floating ice, and the contribution to sea level (cm), between transient warming scenarios (MNL, ML), and idealized cases (M0, precipitation only; M1, 1°C warming under ice shelves; M2, 2°C warming)