Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rngvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T17:12:19.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Evidence for a Mid- to Late-Holocene Change in the Marine Reservoir Effect Across the South Pacific Gyre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2019

Fiona Petchey
Fiona Petchey*
Affiliation:
Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory, Division of Health, Engineering, Computing and Science, University of Waikato, New Zealand ARC Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, College of Arts, Society and Education, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, Australia
*
Corresponding author. Email: fpetchey@waikato.ac.nz.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Holocene climate change in the South Pacific is of major interest to archaeologists and Quaternary researchers. Regional surface ocean radiocarbon (14C) values are an established proxy for studying changing oceanographic and climatic conditions. Unfortunately, radiocarbon variability in the marine environment over the period of specific importance to human colonization of the remote Pacific islands—the last 3500 years—has been poorly studied. In order to build robust and accurate archaeological chronologies using shell, it is important to rectify this. In this paper, radiocarbon marine reservoir offsets (ΔR) are presented from eight archaeological sites, ranging in age from 350 cal BP to 3000 cal BP, and compared to coral datasets from the east Australian coastline. The results indicate that a significant decrease in the South Pacific Gyre ΔR occurred between 2600 and 2250 cal BP, most likely caused by changes in ocean circulation and climate. Accurately recording the timing of variability in reservoir offset is critical to untangling changes in society that took place in the Pacific, in particular, the development of Ancestral Polynesian Society.

Keywords

archaeologymarine reservoir correctionSouth Pacific

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 62 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 127 - 139
Copyright
© 2019 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

INTRODUCTION

The marine reservoir age “R” is the offset in 14C age between the atmosphere and the global ocean with regional offsets from R termed the local marine reservoir age or ΔR (Stuiver et al. Reference Stuiver, Pearson and Braziunas1986). Calibration of marine 14C dates involves application of a ΔR to the marine calibration curve (Marine13; Reimer et al. Reference Reimer, Bard, Bayliss, Beck, Blackwell, Bronk Ramsey, Buck, Cheng, Edwards, Friedrich, Grootes, Guilderson, Haflidason, Hajdas, Hatteé, Heaton, Hoffmann, Hogg, Hughen, Kaiser, Kromer, Manning, Niu, Reimer, Richards, Scott, Southon, Staff, Turney and van der Plicht2013) to account for these regional offsets. A ΔR can be calculated from “paired” (contemporaneous) terrestrial and marine samples excavated from archaeological sites or from isochrons such as tephra deposited offshore (e.g., Sikes et al. Reference Sikes, Samson, Guilderson and Howard2000). A regional reservoir offset can also be calculated from known-age shells or coral collected prior to atmospheric bomb testing (e.g., Petchey et al. Reference Petchey, Anderson, Zondervan, Ulm and Hogg2008b), or from samples where independently measured calendar ages can be obtained, such as paired U/Th, 14C dates (e.g., Clark et al. Reference Clark, Quintus, Weisler, St Pierre, Nothdurft, Feng and Hua2016a). No matter what materials are used for determining the ΔR, they must comply with a set of prerequisites (see Petchey Reference Petchey, Allen, Addison and Anderson2009). For archaeological shell samples, the age is determined by dating short-lived—identified to species and/or element—“paired” terrestrial materials from contemporaneous contexts.

In the modern Pacific Ocean, a gradient exists between older reservoir ages in the tropical east and younger ages in subtropical regions and the tropical west that reflects the surface flow of the South Equatorial Current (SEC) (Petchey et al. Reference Petchey, Anderson, Hogg and Zondervan2008a; Burr et al. Reference Burr, Beck, Corrège, Cabioch, Taylor and Donahue2009) (Figure 1). This gradient is indicative of the upwelling of older 14C-depleted waters in the east (Toggweiler et al. Reference Toggweiler, Dixon and Broecker1991; Ortlieb et al. Reference Ortlieb, Vargas and Saliège2011), the subsequent modification of the water by air-sea exchange, and a deepening thermocline as this water flows westward across the Pacific. Traditionally, R and ΔR for any given location have been assumed to be broadly constant over time (Stuiver et al. Reference Stuiver, Pearson and Braziunas1986). However, as more information becomes available this assumption does not hold up to scrutiny. Abrupt shifts have been recorded in early to mid-Holocene samples across the South Pacific (e.g., Paterne et al. Reference Paterne, Ayliffe, Arnold, Cabioch, Tisnerat-Laborde, Hatté, Douville and Bard2004; Fairbanks et al. Reference Fairbanks, Mortlock, Chiu, Cao, Kaplan, Guilderson, Fairbanks, Bloom, Grootes and Nadeau2005; Yu et al. Reference Yu, Hua, Zhao, Hodge, Fink and Barbetti2010; Ortlieb et al. Reference Ortlieb, Vargas and Saliège2011; Hua et al. Reference Hua, Webb, Zhao, Nothdurft, Lybolt, Price and Opdyke2015). Possible causes for these temporal reservoir shifts include a change in 14C content and frequency of upwelled waters in the eastern tropical Pacific, variation in ocean circulation associated with La Niña/El Niño conditions, change in the intensity of easterly trade winds, and movement of the Inter-tropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) and the associated South Pacific Convergence Zone (SPCZ)—where northern and southern air masses converge and control the spread of these upwelled waters to western regions (Hua et al. Reference Hua, Webb, Zhao, Nothdurft, Lybolt, Price and Opdyke2015)Footnote 1.

Figure 1

Map of the Pacific Ocean showing major circulation patterns and sites mentioned in the text. The dashed line shows the salinity front on the eastern edge of the Western Pacific Warm Pool. Surface currents: SEC = South Equatorial Current; EAC = East Australian Current; NGCC = New Guinea Coastal Current; ACC = Antarctic Circumpolar Current. Four-pointed stars represent black sampling locations from Komugabe-Dixson et al. (Reference Komugabe-Dixson, Fallon, Eggins and Thresher2016).

Most research on this subject has concentrated on the early to mid-Holocene, with little work investigating change over the last 3500 years; the period of human settlement of the South Pacific (Kirch Reference Kirch1997; Kirch and Green Reference Kirch and Green2001). Moreover, only 16 data points were reported in the references given above for this time period, and no values from central/western Pacific archaeological sources were considered. This is because reliable ΔR from archaeological sites has been limited by material availability and inherent problems with site disturbance (cf. Ortlieb et al. Reference Ortlieb, Vargas and Saliège2011; Clark et al. Reference Clark, Quintus, Weisler, St Pierre, Nothdurft and Feng2016b; Petchey et al. Reference Petchey, Clark, Lindeman, O’Day, Southon, Dabell and Winter2018), but also reflects disproportionate levels of funding for broad-scale paleoenvironmental research over archaeological interests. One study specifically designed to investigate the issue of change was undertaken by Petchey et al. (Reference Petchey, Allen, Addison and Anderson2009). Using “paired” terrestrial/marine samples from a range of archaeological sites, they noted little change in ΔR over the last 750 years for sites in American Sāmoa (dated to ca. 600 cal BP), the southern Cook Islands (ca. 670 cal BP), or the Marquesas Islands (ca. 380 and 670 cal BP). Generally, however, archaeological dating in this region has had to largely rely on ΔR values calculated from modern (pre-AD 1950) validation studies (e.g., Petchey et al. Reference Petchey, Anderson, Hogg and Zondervan2008a, Reference Petchey, Anderson, Zondervan, Ulm and Hogg2008b, Phelan Reference Phelan1999). A clever solution to overcoming the issue of disjunction between the terrestrial and marine samples was reported by Clark et al. (Reference Clark, Quintus, Weisler, St Pierre, Nothdurft, Feng and Hua2016a) using U/Th, 14C pairs from archaeologically derived Acropora spp. coral branches from Ofu Island, American Sāmoa, dated to ca. 2300 cal BP. The negative ΔR-value obtained (–101 ± 72 14C years) was interpreted as possibly being caused by spatial and/or temporal changes to the marine environment.

More recently, information for this period of interest has become available from a sequence of paired U/Th, 14C dates from black coral collected from the southeastern coast of Australia (Komugabe-Dixson et al. Reference Komugabe-Dixson, Fallon, Eggins and Thresher2016). Komugabe-Dixson et al. (Reference Komugabe-Dixson, Fallon, Eggins and Thresher2016:976-978) noted two distinct intervals when ΔR was significantly lower; between 4000 and 3300 cal BP (ΔR = –132 ± 79 14C years) and between 2700 to 1900 cal BP (ΔR = –156 ± 79 14C years). They attributed these negative values to increased penetration of well-ventilated gyre waters southward into the South Tasman Sea in response to strong and abrupt El Niño events that reduced upwelling in the southeast Pacific (as recorded by Ortlieb et al. Reference Ortlieb, Vargas and Saliège2011) and displaced the salinity front that separates fresher Western Pacific Warm Pool water from saltier and cooler waters in the east, enabling increased westward flow of gyre waters into the Tasman Sea. Interconnectivity between western and eastern sides of the South Pacific (Figure 1) means that significant reservoir changes should be expected in the central gyre as well and, therefore, adds further doubt to the validity of using a constant ΔR-value to calibrate marine shell 14C dates from this region.

Held within the archaeological literature are a host of shell/charcoal 14C pairs which can assist with this problem. Unfortunately, the interpretation of marine shell 14C dates has been complicated by diet and habitat differences that rarely reflect open marine conditions. Research along the southern coast of Papua New Guinea at Caution Bay (Petchey et al. Reference Petchey, Ulm, David, McNiven, Asmussen, Tomkins, Richards, Rowe, Leavesley, Mandui and Stanisic2012, Reference Petchey, Ulm, David, McNiven, Asmussen, Tomkins, Dolby, Aplin, Richards, Rowe, Leavesley and Mandui2013) identified species-specific ΔR variation of up to 600 14C years in deposits dated to 2150–2000 cal BP. They attributed this to the possible incorporation of carbon from limestone in the hinterland but also observed that the magnitude of variation depended on the taxa dated. More recent research into shell taxa variation (Petchey et al. Reference Petchey, Clark, Lindeman, O’Day, Southon, Dabell and Winter2018) has provided methods to cull unreliable shell samples using δ13C and δ18O to identify carbon source. This has been successful in identifying estuarine-specific signals in some bivalves and, in areas where water has percolated through limestone, can help identify shells that are influenced by 14C-depleted hardwater (Petchey and Clark Reference Petchey and Clark2011; Petchey et al. Reference Petchey, Clark, Lindeman, O’Day, Southon, Dabell and Winter2018). This work, combined with archaeological ΔR values reported in the literature, has enabled the reinvestigation of change in ΔR over time in the central Pacific Gyre region presented below.

METHOD

For this evaluation, sample pairs from published archaeological sources and from unpublished ΔR research by the author have been collated. All radiocarbon and stable isotope information is given in Table 1. Additional constraints to the archaeological dataset have been applied, as outlined below:

Table 1

Archaeological ΔR terrestrial/marine pairs from the central South Pacific Gyre.

# M = Marine environmental influence; G = gastropod; V = Volcanic environment; L = Limestone environment.

Lab prefixes: OZT – ANSTO, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation; Wk = University of Waikato.

  1. 1. Region: The region of interest is encircled by the South Pacific Subtropical Gyre, a circulatory system driven by the combined effects of the tropical trade winds and westerly winds in the subtropical regions, the combined results of which are the high-latitude eastward-flowing Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) and the mid-latitude westward-flowing South Equatorial Current (SEC). The SEC transports water from the gyre center and bifurcates on the east coast of Australia, feeding both the East Australian Current (EAC) and the New Guinea Coastal Current (NGCC) (Figure 1). This circulatory system is considered to create relatively stable surface conditions at the center of the gyre (Rougerie and Wauty Reference Rougerie and Wauty1993) but upwelling and mixing of water occur at the edge of the gyre and where large island chains disturb the flow of surface waters (Petchey et al. Reference Petchey, Anderson, Zondervan, Ulm and Hogg2008). Consequently, we have avoided ΔR values from island locations at the edge of the gyre. This includes the Solomon Islands (Petchey et al. Reference Petchey, Phelan and White2004, Reference Petchey, Anderson, Hogg and Zondervan2008a), Papua New Guinea (Petchey et al. Reference Petchey, Ulm, David, McNiven, Asmussen, Tomkins, Richards, Rowe, Leavesley, Mandui and Stanisic2012, Reference Petchey, Ulm, David, McNiven, Asmussen, Tomkins, Dolby, Aplin, Richards, Rowe, Leavesley and Mandui2013), Norfolk and Kermadec Islands, New Zealand and the Chatham Islands (Petchey et al. Reference Petchey, Anderson, Zondervan, Ulm and Hogg2008b).

  2. 2. Shell taxa: Most shellfish precipitate their shells in equilibrium with the isotopic signature of dissolved inorganic carbon from the waters they live in (McConnaughey et al. Reference McConnaughey, Burdett, Whelan and Paull1997). This can, however, be complicated by dietary and habitat preferences of the animal studied. Many gastropods directly ingest sediment via algal grazing or by direct ingestion of the sediment. Therefore, 14C results from algal grazing or herbivorous gastropods are only included if the island group in question is volcanic. In limestone locations, such as Tongatapu Island, only those bivalves with δ13C values equivalent to, or higher than, the modern ocean average (ca. 1.7‰) are selected (cf., Petchey et al. Reference Petchey, Clark, Lindeman, O’Day, Southon, Dabell and Winter2018). This minimizes the likelihood of incorporating bicarbonate ions that incorporate ancient carbon from the calcareous strata.

  3. 3. Context: We have not considered any archaeological ΔR values calculated using Bayesian methodologies (e.g., Macario et al. Reference Macario, Souza, Aguilera, Carvalho, Oliveira, Alves, Chanca, Silva, Douka, Decco, Trindade, Marques, Anjos and Pamplona2015). Such methods enable the ΔR to be calculated from archaeological evidence that is temporally constrained despite strict contemporaneity being unknown (Jones et al. Reference Jones, Petchey, Green, Sheppard and Phelan2007). Few archaeological chronologies in the South Pacific have been constructed with sufficient numbers of stratigraphically secure dates to achieve sufficiently precise results using this approach (see however Petchey et al. [Reference Petchey, Spriggs, Bedford and Valentin2015] who use this methodology for gastropod shells from the limestone island of Efate, Vanuatu).

Archaeological Samples (Figure 1, Table 1)

American Sāmoa (Manu’a Group): Three ΔR values derived from U/Th dated corals (Acropora spp.) have been identified from pre-2300 cal BP archaeological deposits on Va’oto, Ofu Island (Clark et al. Reference Clark, Quintus, Weisler, St Pierre, Nothdurft, Feng and Hua2016a). Two of the corals come from pre-colonization contexts and are unmodified; the third has been used as an abrader. Although mixing of the cultural deposit is likely (a second unmodified coral fragment from the exact same context as sample 2014-22 [2375 ± 11 cal BP] gave a different age [i.e., sample 2014-23; 2503 ± 7 cal BP; Clark et al. Reference Clark, Quintus, Weisler, St Pierre, Nothdurft and Feng2016b:270]), the use of U/Th to obtain a calendar age on the same 14C dated sample negates the need for stratigraphic contemporaneity.

A single ΔR-value is reported by Petchey et al. (Reference Petchey, Allen, Addison and Anderson2009) using a Turbo spp. shell/charcoal pair from the Ta’u Hospital site, on Ta’u Island, dating from ca. 500 cal BP onwards. Turbo spp. gastropods are herbivorous with a recorded preference for calcium carbonate strata (Beesley et al. Reference Beesley, Ross and Wells1998:675, 768), but because Ta’u Island is the remnant of a basaltic caldera (Stearns Reference Stearns1944) this ΔR result is considered to be reliable.

Previously reported archaeological ΔR values from sites in Western Sāmoa (Kirch Reference Kirch, Kirch and Hunt1993; Cleghorn and Shapiro Reference Cleghorn and Shapiro2000) are excluded from this evaluation because the paired charcoals selected for dating were not identified as short-lived.

Kingdom of Tonga: Dating of Tonga is much more problematic because all main occupied islands are dominated by limestone (Burley Reference Burley1998). Tongatapu is especially problematic because of the long residence time of water in the central Fanga Uta Lagoon which has contributed to a long-recognized hardwater effect for this island (Spennemann and Head Reference Spennemann and Head1998, Petchey and Clark Reference Petchey and Clark2011). ΔR research has been carried out at two archaeological sites; Talasiu, located within the eastern arm of the lagoon with material dated to ca. 2580 cal BP, and Heketa located on the ocean side of the lagoon, dated to ca. 1200 cal BP (Petchey and Clark Reference Petchey and Clark2011).

ΔR values obtained from Tridacna sp. and Chama sp. shellfish are available from Heketa. Both taxa dislike brackish waters and are found on reef flats (Hart et al. Reference Hart, Bell and Foyle1998, Beesley et al. Reference Beesley, Ross and Wells1998:309). Turbo and Strombus 14C results reported by Petchey and Clark (Reference Petchey and Clark2011) are not included in this evaluation since both may ingest sediment while feeding. A ΔR calculated from Conus sp. shell is also available from Talasiu. Conus are carnivorous reef-dwelling animals (Beesley et al. Reference Beesley, Ross and Wells1998:852–3) and therefore should more closely reflect ocean reservoir offsets, but no comprehensive 14C study has been carried out on this animal so this value is included with caution. A large number of Anadara and Gafrarium shellfish 14C dates have been obtained from the Talasiu midden. These may be affected by hardwater, as indicated by depleted δ13C values for these shells (Petchey and Clark Reference Petchey and Clark2011:545), and are not considered further here. A single unpublished Pinctada sp. shell ΔR-value is also available for Talasiu (Wk-48576) and has a stable isotope value that confirms a marine influence (δ13C = 2.7‰).

Fiji Islands: Two archaeological ΔR values have been published for Fiji; one from the site of Bourewa, Viti Levu (Nunn and Petchey Reference Nunn and Petchey2013) dated to between 2866 and 2613 cal BP (95% prob.), and a second from the site of Matanamuani on Naigani Island dated to between 3220 and 2860 cal BP (95% prob.) (Irwin et al. Reference Irwin, Worthy, Best, Hawkins, Carpenter and Matararaba2011). Nunn and Petchey (Reference Nunn and Petchey2013:29) identified one short-lived terrestrial/marine pairing from Bourewa; a sample of Anadara scapha from Pit A1A paired with nutshell charcoal from adjacent Pit A1D. Although limestone was noticed in the hinterland, the δ13C (2.6 ± 0.2‰) indicates this shellfish was likely influenced by fully marine sources. Trochus—an algal grazing gastropod (Beesley et al. Reference Beesley, Ross and Wells1998:683)—was dated from Matanamuani. This value is considered reliable because the island is predominantly volcanic, with the only limestone found on the opposite side of the island (Irwin et al. Reference Irwin, Worthy, Best, Hawkins, Carpenter and Matararaba2011).

Cook Islands: Aitutaki Island is a remnant volcanic cone (Stoddart, Reference Stoddart, Stoddart and Gibbs1975) located in the southern Cook Islands. Initial occupation at the site of Ureia occurred ca. 725–520 cal BP (68% prob.) (Allen and Wallace Reference Allen and Wallace2007). Investigation of the regional reservoir offset around the Cook Islands, undertaken on material from Ureia, is reported by Petchey et al. (Reference Petchey, Allen, Addison and Anderson2009) and includes a ΔR obtained from a Pinctada sp. bivalve shell and another from Holocentridae sp. bone, an inshore fish species. Very little reservoir work has been undertaken using fishbone (see Petchey and Clark [Reference Petchey and Clark2010:242] for reservoir work on Scaridae sp. fish remains from Palau), but it is thought that the 14C predominantly reflects dietary protein sources that are in equilibrium with marine dissolved organic carbon.

Marquesas Islands: The Marquesas chain consists of ten main volcanic islands (Chubb Reference Chubb1930) at the eastern edge of the Pacific Gyre, of which Nuku Hiva Island is the largest. Reservoir offset values measured using Pinctada margarifigera and Periglypta reticulata shells from the site of Teavau’ua, Layer IV (661–518 cal BP) and Layer IIIb (543–153 cal BP, 95% prob.), are reported in Petchey et al. (Reference Petchey, Allen, Addison and Anderson2009).

ΔR Calculation

ΔR values for both 14C and U/Th dated pairs (Table 1) have been calculated using the online tool found at http://calib.org/deltar/(Reimer and Reimer Reference Reimer and Reimer2017), which first calibrates the terrestrial 14C age with the appropriate calibration curve and then reverse-calibrates discrete points of the resulting probability density function with the marine calibration curve (Marine13; Reimer et al. Reference Reimer, Bard, Bayliss, Beck, Blackwell, Bronk Ramsey, Buck, Cheng, Edwards, Friedrich, Grootes, Guilderson, Haflidason, Hajdas, Hatteé, Heaton, Hoffmann, Hogg, Hughen, Kaiser, Kromer, Manning, Niu, Reimer, Richards, Scott, Southon, Staff, Turney and van der Plicht2013). Because the islands under consideration lie within the SPCZ, which merges with the ITCZ to the west (Figure 1), we have opted to use the Northern Hemisphere calibration curve (IntCal13; Reimer et al. Reference Reimer, Bard, Bayliss, Beck, Blackwell, Bronk Ramsey, Buck, Cheng, Edwards, Friedrich, Grootes, Guilderson, Haflidason, Hajdas, Hatteé, Heaton, Hoffmann, Hogg, Hughen, Kaiser, Kromer, Manning, Niu, Reimer, Richards, Scott, Southon, Staff, Turney and van der Plicht2013) following the recommendations of Petchey et al. (Reference Petchey, Fairbairn, O’Connor and Marwick2009), though a gradient from north to south is likely (Buntgen et al. Reference Buüntgen, Wacker, Diego Galván, Arnold, Arseneault, Baillie, Beer, Bernabei, Bleicher, Boswijk, Bräuning, Carrer, Ljungqvist, Cherubini, Christ, Christie, Clark, Cook, D’Arrigo, Davi, Eggertsson, Esper, Fowler, Gedalof, Gennaretti, Grießinger, Grissino-Mayer, Grudd, Gunnarson, Hantemirov, Herzig, Hessl, Heussner, Jull, Kukarskih, Kirdyanov, Kolář, Krusic, Kync, Lara, LeQuesne, Linderholm, Loader, Luckman, Miyake, Myglan, Nicolussi, Oppenheimer, Palmer, Panyushkina, Pederson, Rybníček, Schweingruber, Seim, Sigl, Churakova (Sidorova), Speer, Synal, Tegel, Treydte, Villalba, Wiles, Wilson, Winship, Wunder, Yang and Young2018) and a mixed Northern/Southern Hemisphere calibration may be more appropriate at certain time periods (cf., Marsh et al. Reference Marsh, Bruno, Fritz, Baker, Capriles and Hastorf2018). ΔR values calculated using SHCal13 (Hogg et al. Reference Hogg, Hua, Blackwell, Niu, Buck, Guilderson, Heaton, Palmer, Reimer, Reimer, Turney and Zimmerman2013) are also given in Table 1 for comparison. Calendar ages derived from U/Th measurements are similarly reverse-calibrated using the marine calibration curve. The new archaeological ΔR values are overlain on the black coral values from the east Australian coastline (Hua et al. Reference Hua, Webb, Zhao, Nothdurft, Lybolt, Price and Opdyke2015 and Komugabe-Dixson et al. Reference Komugabe-Dixson, Fallon, Eggins and Thresher2016) and modern (pre-AD 1950) shell ΔR values from the South Pacific Gyre (Petchey et al. 2008; Ulm et al. Reference Ulm, Petchey and Ross2009), both recalculated from published raw data using the online ΔR calculation tool.

RESULTS

The results are presented in Figure 2. Slightly more negative ΔR values occur between ca. 500 and 750 cal BP which give way to a positive inflection starting ca. 750 cal BP. The ΔR value of 98±46 14C years for Chama sp. shell from Heketa could theoretically be influenced by hardwater and represents the potential danger of dating shell from such locations, but this trend towards higher ΔR values is also apparent in the more extensive coral datasets. Between 2600 and 2250 cal BP results from the archaeological samples follow the same trend as the coral datasets—towards lower ΔR (ΔR average = –160 ± 11 14C years [χ2 9:0.05 = 13.99 < 16.92: GSD = 48]). The combined shell/coral average ΔR for the period between 3100 and 2600 cal BP increases to –48 ± 10 14C years (χ2 10:0.05 = 33.82 < 16.92: GSD = 82). The same trend is evident when the SHCal13 calibration dataset is used to calculate the ΔR-value (Table 1). These results also suggest that there is no regional offset, with island groups from west of the salinity front (i.e., American Sāmoa and Tonga) found in both ΔR groupings.

Figure 2

Change in ΔR across the South Pacific over the last 3500 years. Large squares and circles = archaeological ΔR values mentioned in text. Trendline based on a 4-point moving average.

DISCUSSION

Using material from archaeological contexts, comparable temporal ΔR trends have been identified in the central Pacific Gyre to those measured in coral from the southeast coast of Australia (Komugabe-Dixson et al. Reference Komugabe-Dixson, Fallon, Eggins and Thresher2016; Hua et al. Reference Hua, Webb, Zhao, Nothdurft, Lybolt, Price and Opdyke2015) (Figure 2). Komugabe-Dixson et al. (Reference Komugabe-Dixson, Fallon, Eggins and Thresher2016:977–978) argued that considerable ENSO variability between the present day and 1000 years ago was responsible for the increased influence of 14C-depleted water from equatorial waters and/or from the eastern boundary of the South Pacific where high ΔR values (between 355 ± 105 and 253 ± 207 14C years) were attributed to increased influence of upwelled 14C-depleted water (cf., Ortlieb et al. Reference Ortlieb, Vargas and Saliège2011). It is possible that black coral from further south was differentially affected during periods such as the Little Ice Age (ca. AD 1600–1860) when the EAC was weakened and increased advection of cooler sub-Antarctic waters from the Subtropical Front caused an increase in the reservoir age and ΔR-value. Both shell and coral proxies have identified a significant negative shift in ΔR between ca. 2600 and 2250 cal BP. Komugabe-Dixson et al. (Reference Komugabe-Dixson, Fallon, Eggins and Thresher2016) attributed this change to strong and abrupt El Niño events. To the far eastern boundary, a similar depression in ΔR occurred between 5180 and 1160 cal BP, which Ortlieb et al. (Reference Ortlieb, Vargas and Saliège2011) also interpreted as being caused by the increased influence of subtropical water and diminished coastal upwelling processes.

The shift to more negative ΔR values between ca. 2600 and 2250 cal BP occurs at a critical time in the Pacific—a time when sea-level was falling rapidly (see Dickinson Reference Dickinson2001), interaction between different populations took place (Posth et al. Reference Posth, Nägele, Colleran, Valentin, Bedford, Kami, Shing, Buckley, Kinaston, Walworth, Clark, Reepmeyer, Flexner, Maric, Moser, Gresky, Kiko, Robson, Auckland, Oppenheimer, Hill, Mentzer, Zech, Petchey, Roberts, Jeong, Gray, Krause and Powell2018) and archaeological evidence points to significant cultural change that has been attributed to a developing Ancestral Polynesian Society (Kirch and Green Reference Kirch and Green2001). Moreover, initial human colonization in West Polynesia followed close on the heels of falling sea-levels. To evaluate whether a regional forcing mechanism, independent of societal drivers, was primarily responsible for any societal changes (cf., Nunn and Carson Reference Nunn and Carson2015) it is necessary to obtain precise dates for these events. With the development of the first temporal model of changing ΔR, we are only now entering a phase where 14C may be able to answer these questions. Recent dating of the early Polynesian site of To’aga, American Sāmoa (Petchey and Kirch Reference Petchey and Kirch2019) using a time-dependent ΔR has highlighted the limitations of previous colonization models which have been put forward to account for apparent large gaps in the chronology caused by limited dating and widespread uncertainty in the reliability of shell dates.

An alternative to using ΔR when calibrating marine samples has recently been proposed by Butzin et al. (Reference Butzin, Koehler and Lohmann2017) who present simulations for spatial and temporal variability in the global marine reservoir age calculated from ocean circulation and temporally specific climate models. A regional marine reservoir age curve for the central South Pacific Gyre has subsequently been produced by Alves et al. (Reference Alves, Macario, Urrutia, Cardoso and Ramsey2019, fig 10c). While this model displays a similar pattern in reservoir age to the archaeological samples from the central South Pacific Gyre and black coral from the South Tasman Sea, it does not reproduce the very low values recorded in these datasets. This contradicts the findings of Alves et al. (Reference Alves, Macario, Urrutia, Cardoso and Ramsey2019:132–133) who noted that modeled data worked best in open-ocean areas of the Pacific, as evidenced by similarity to measured coral values recorded by Burr et al. (Reference Burr, Haynes, Shen, Taylor, Chang, Beck, Nguyen and Zhou2015) for the Solomon Islands. This disjunction with the black coral/archaeological pairs could be caused by poor resolution and/or inaccurate inclusion of carbon cycle and ocean circulation changes in the reservoir age model (cf., Alves et al. Reference Alves, Macario, Urrutia, Cardoso and Ramsey2019:136). Moreover, the Burr et al. (Reference Burr, Haynes, Shen, Taylor, Chang, Beck, Nguyen and Zhou2015) dataset has only 6 measured values for the time period of interest here and originates from the edge of the gyre where ΔR variability is likely to be masked (Petchey et al. Reference Petchey, Anderson, Zondervan, Ulm and Hogg2008b). This is clearly something to investigate further.

CONCLUSION

Evidence obtained from archaeological materials demonstrate that between 2600 and 2250 cal BP the marine 14C reservoir offset (ΔR) across the central South Pacific Gyre was lower than the present. This observation matches coral U/Th, 14C paired data collected from the east coast of Australia. This central South Pacific Gyre ΔR dataset fills a gap in ocean circulation and climate reconstructions between 3500 and 1000 cal BP—a key period that incorporates initial human settlement across the region and the subsequent development of Polynesian culture. The inclusion of shell ΔR values into extant datasets has been made possible because of advances in our understanding of 14C uptake by shellfish, which has enabled the recognition of marine versus estuarine influences and, therefore, the exclusion of shells where the age has been affected by depleted 14C from hardwater. To develop a more accurate and precise model of human colonization across this region it is essential that more ΔR values are obtained.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This paper developed from an observation that reservoir ages calculated on coral from archaeological deposits in American Samoa did not conform to established geographical ΔR divisions for the region. This single observation enabled me to revisit the many marine 14C reservoir projects undertaken over the last 15 years and provide context to information that appeared muddled. Special thanks go to all the Pacific archaeologists who have provided shell and charcoal samples for this research.

Footnotes

1 During La Niña events, the SPCZ moves south-westward and limits old salty waters from the east reaching the western Pacific sites. In contrast, during El Niña events, the SPCZ moves north-eastward and the SEC strengthens, allowing more of these older waters to spread to the west (Hua et al. Reference Hua, Webb, Zhao, Nothdurft, Lybolt, Price and Opdyke2015:41).

References

REFERENCES

Allen, MS, Wallace, R. 2007. New evidence from the East Polynesian gateway: Substantive and methodological results from Aitutaki, southern Cook Islands. Radiocarbon 49(3):1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alves, EQ, Macario, KD, Urrutia, FP, Cardoso, RP, Ramsey, CB. 2019. Accounting for the marine reservoir effect in radiocarbon calibration. Quaternary Science Reviews 209:129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beesley, PL, Ross, GJB, Wells, A, editors. 1998. Mollusca: The Southern Synthesis. Fauna of Australia. Vol. 5. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing. 1234 p.Google Scholar
Buüntgen, U, Wacker, L, Diego Galván, J, Arnold, S, Arseneault, D, Baillie, M, Beer, J, Bernabei, M, Bleicher, N, Boswijk, G, Bräuning, A, Carrer, M, Ljungqvist, FC, Cherubini, P, Christ, M, Christie, DA, Clark, PW, Cook, ER, D’Arrigo, R, Davi, N, Eggertsson, O, Esper, J, Fowler, A.M, Gedalof, Z, Gennaretti, F, Grießinger, J, Grissino-Mayer, H, Grudd, H, Gunnarson, BE, Hantemirov, R, Herzig, F, Hessl, A, Heussner, K-U, Jull, AJT, Kukarskih, V, Kirdyanov, A, Kolář, T, Krusic, PJ, Kync, T, Lara, A, LeQuesne, C, Linderholm, HW, Loader, NJ, Luckman, B, Miyake, F, Myglan, VS, Nicolussi, K, Oppenheimer, C, Palmer, J, Panyushkina, I, Pederson, N, Rybníček, M, Schweingruber, FH, Seim, A, Sigl, M, Churakova (Sidorova), O, Speer, JH, Synal, H-A, Tegel, W, Treydte, K, Villalba, R, Wiles, G, Wilson, R, Winship, LJ, Wunder, J, Yang, B, Young, GHF. 2018. Tree rings reveal globally coherent signature of cosmogenic radiocarbon events in 774 and 993 CE. Nature Communications 9(3605): doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06036-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burley, DV. 1998. Tongan archaeology and the Tongan past, 2850–150 B.P. Journal of World Prehistory 12(3):337–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burr, GS, Beck, JW, Corrège, T, Cabioch, G, Taylor, FW, Donahue, DJ. 2009. Modern and Pleistocene reservoir ages inferred from South Pacific corals. Radiocarbon 51:319–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burr, G, Haynes, C, Shen, C, Taylor, F, Chang, Y, Beck, J, Nguyen, V, Zhou, W. 2015. Temporal variations of radiocarbon reservoir ages in the south Pacific Ocean during the Holocene. Radiocarbon 57(4):507–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butzin, M, Koehler, P, Lohmann, G. 2017. Marine radiocarbon reservoir age simulations for the past 50,000 years. Geophysical Research Letters 44(16):8473–8480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chubb, LJ. 1930. Geology of the Marquesas Islands. Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 68. Honolulu, Hawai’i.Google Scholar
Clark, J, Quintus, S, Weisler, M, St Pierre, E, Nothdurft, L, Feng, Y, Hua, Q. 2016a. Marine reservoir correction for American Samoa using U-series and AMS dated corals. Radiocarbon 58(4): doi:10.1017/RDC.2016.53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J, Quintus, S, Weisler, M, St Pierre, E, Nothdurft, L, Feng, Y. 2016b. Refining the chronology for west Polynesian colonization: New data from the Samoan archipelago. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 6:266–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleghorn, P, Shapiro, W. 2000. Archaeological data recovery report for the proposed Ta‘u road reconstruction, at Faga and Fitiuta, Ta‘u Island, Manu‘a, American Samoa. Prepared for U.S. Army Corp of Engineers. Pacific Legacy, Inc.Google Scholar
Dickinson, WR. 2001. Paleoshoreline record of relative Holocene sea levels on Pacific islands. Earth-Science Reviews 55:191–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairbanks, RG, Mortlock, RA, Chiu, T-C, Cao, L, Kaplan, A, Guilderson, TP, Fairbanks, TW, Bloom, AL, Grootes, PM, Nadeau, M-J. 2005. Radiocarbon calibration curve spanning 0 to 50,000 years BP based on paired 230Th/234U/238U and 14C dates on pristine corals. Quaternary Science Reviews 24:1781–1796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, AM, Bell, JD, Foyle, TP. 1998. Growth and survival of the giant clams, Tridacna derasa, T. maxima and T. crocea, at village farms in the Solomon Islands. Aquaculture 165:203e220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, AG, Hua, Q, Blackwell, PG, Niu, M, Buck, CE, Guilderson, TP, Heaton, TJ, Palmer, JG, Reimer, PJ, Reimer, RW, Turney, CSM, Zimmerman, SRH. 2013. ShCal13 Southern Hemisphere calibration, 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55(4):1889–1903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hua, Q, Webb, GE, Zhao, JX, Nothdurft, L, Lybolt, M, Price, GJ, Opdyke, BN. 2015. Large variations in the Holocene marine radiocarbon reservoir effect reflect ocean circulation and climate changes. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 422:33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, G, Worthy, TH, Best, S, Hawkins, S, Carpenter, J, Matararaba, S. 2011. Further investigations at the Naigani Lapita site (VL 21/5), Fiji: excavation, radiocarbon dating and palaeofaunal extinction. Journal of Pacific Archaeology 2:66–78.Google Scholar
Jones, M, Petchey, F, Green, R, Sheppard, P, Phelan, M, 2007. The marine ΔR for Nenumbo: a case study in calculating reservoir offsets from paired sample data. Radiocarbon 49(1):95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirch, PV. 1993. Radiocarbon chronology of the To’aga Site. In: Kirch, PV, Hunt, TL, editors. The To’aga site: Three millennia of Polynesian occupation in the Manu’a Islands, American Samoa. Berkeley: Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility No. 51. p. 85–92.Google Scholar
Kirch, P. 1997. The Lapita Peoples: Ancestors of the Oceanic World. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kirch, P, Green, R. 2001. Hawaiki: Ancestral Polynesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komugabe-Dixson, A, Fallon, S, Eggins, S, Thresher, R. 2016. Radiocarbon evidence for mid-late Holocene changes in southwest Pacific Ocean circulation. Paleoceanography 31:971–985. doi:10.1002/2016PA002929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macario, KD, Souza, RCCL, Aguilera, OA, Carvalho, C, Oliveira, FM, Alves, EQ, Chanca, IS, Silva, EP, Douka, K, Decco, J, Trindade, DC, Marques, AN, Anjos, RM, Pamplona, FC. 2015. Marine reservoir effect on the southeastern coast of Brazil: Results from the Tarioba shellmound paired samples. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 143:14–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsh, EJ, Bruno, MC, Fritz, SC, Baker, P, Capriles, JM, Hastorf, CA. 2018. IntCal, SHCal, or a mixed curve? Choosing a 14C calibration curve for archaeological and paleoenvironmental records from tropical South America. Radiocarbon. doi:10.1017/RDC.2018.16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnaughey, TA, Burdett, J, Whelan, JF, Paull, CK. 1997. Carbon isotopes in biological carbonates: respiration and photosynthesis. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 61:611–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunn, PD, Carson, MT. 2015. Sea-level fall implicated in profound societal change about 2570 cal yr BP (620 BC) in western Pacific island groups. Geography and Environment 2:17–32. doi:10.1002/geo2.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunn, PD, Petchey, F. 2013. Bayesian re-evaluation of Lapita settlement in Fiji: radiocarbon analysis of the Lapita settlement at Bourewa and nearby sites on the Rove Peninsula, Viti Levu Island. Journal of Pacific Archaeology 4(2):21–34.Google Scholar
Ortlieb, L, Vargas, G, Saliège, J-F. 2011. Marine radiocarbon reservoir effect along the northern Chile–southern Peru coast (14–24°S) throughout the Holocene. Quaternary Research 75:91–103. doi:10.1016/j.yqres.2010.07.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paterne, M, Ayliffe, LK, Arnold, M, Cabioch, G, Tisnerat-Laborde, N, Hatté, C, Douville, E, Bard, E. 2004. Paired 14C and 230Th/U dating of surface corals from the Marquesas and Vanuatu (sub-equatorial Pacific) in the 3000 to 15,000 cal yr interval. Radiocarbon 46:551–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petchey, F. 2009. Dating marine shell in Oceania: Issues and prospects. In: Fairbairn, A, O’Connor, S, Marwick, B, editors. New Directions in Archaeological Science. ANU: E Press. p. 157–172.Google Scholar
Petchey, F, Clark, G. 2010. A ΔR for the Palau Islands: An evaluation of extant and new ΔR values and their application to archaeological deposits at Ulong. Journal of Island Archaeology 5:236–252. doi:10.1080/15564890903155935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petchey, F, Clark, G. 2011. Tongatapu hardwater: investigation into the 14C marine reservoir offset in lagoon, reef and open ocean environments of a limestone island. Quaternary Geochronology 6:539–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petchey, F, Kirch, PV. 2019. The importance of shell: Re-dating of the To’aga site (Ofu Island, Manu’a) and a revised chronology for the Lapita to Polynesian Plainware Transition in Tonga and Samoa. PLos One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0211990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petchey, F, Allen, MS, Addison, DJ, Anderson, A. 2009. Stability in the South Pacific marine 14C reservoir over the last 750 years. Evidence from American Samoa, the southern Cook Islands and the Marquesas. Journal of Archaeological Science 36(10):2234–2243.Google Scholar
Petchey, F, Anderson, A, Hogg, A, Zondervan, A. 2008a. The marine reservoir effect in the Southern Ocean: an evaluation of extant and new ΔR values and their application to archaeological chronologies. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 38(4):243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petchey, F, Anderson, A, Zondervan, A, Ulm, S, Hogg, A. 2008b. New marine ΔR values for the South Pacific subtropical gyre region. Radiocarbon 50(3):373–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petchey, F, Clark, G, Lindeman, I, O’Day, P, Southon, J, Dabell, K, Winter, O. 2018. Shellfish isotopic insight into changing sea-level and associated impact on the first settlers of the Mariana Archipelago. Quaternary Geochronology. doi:10.1016/j.quageo.2018.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petchey, F, Phelan, M, White, P. 2004. New ΔR values for the southwest Pacific Ocean. Radiocarbon 46(2):1005–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petchey, F, Ulm, S, David, B, McNiven, IJ, Asmussen, B, Tomkins, H, Richards, T, Rowe, C, Leavesley, M, Mandui, H, Stanisic, J. 2012. Radiocarbon marine reservoir variability in herbivores and deposit-feeding gastropods from an open coastline, Papua New Guinea. Radiocarbon 54(3–4):1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petchey, F, Ulm, S, David, B, McNiven, IJ, Asmussen, B, Tomkins, H, Dolby, N, Aplin, K, Richards, T, Rowe, C, Leavesley, M, Mandui, H. 2013. High-resolution radiocarbon dating of marine materials in archaeological contexts: radiocarbon marine reservoir variability between Anadara, Gafrarium, Batissa, Polymesoda and Echinoidea at Caution Bay, Southern coastal Papua New Guinea. Archaeological and Anthological Science 5(1):69–80.Google Scholar
Petchey, F, Spriggs, M, Bedford, S, Valentin, F. 2015. The chronology of occupation at Teouma, Vanuatu: Use of a modified chronometric hygiene protocol and Bayesian modelling to evaluate midden remains. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 4:95–105. doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.08.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelan, MB. 1999. A ΔR correction value for Sāmoa from known-age marine shells. Radiocarbon 41(1):99–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posth, C, Nägele, K, Colleran, H, Valentin, F, Bedford, S, Kami, KW, Shing, R, Buckley, H, Kinaston, R, Walworth, M, Clark, GR, Reepmeyer, C, Flexner, J, Maric, T, Moser, J, Gresky, J, Kiko, L, Robson, KJ, Auckland, K, Oppenheimer, S.J, Hill, AVS, Mentzer, AJ, Zech, J, Petchey, F, Roberts, P, Jeong, C, Gray, RD, Krause, J, Powell, A. 2018. Language continuity despite population replacement in Remote Oceania. Nature Ecology and Evolution. doi:10.1038/s41559-018-0498-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, C, Cheng, H, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Haflidason, H, Hajdas, I, Hatteé, C, Heaton, TJ, Hoffmann, DL, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, Manning, SW, Niu, M, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Scott, EM, Southon, JR, Staff, RA, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55(4):1869–1887. doi:10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, RW, Reimer, PJ. 2017. An online application for ΔR calculation. Radiocarbon 59(5):1623–1627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rougerie, F, Wauty, B. 1993. L’océanographie du Pacifique Central Sud. In: Atlas de Polynésie Française. ORSTOM editions. p. 20–1. In French.Google Scholar
Spennemann, DHR, Head, MJ. 1998. Tongan pottery chronology, 14C dates and the hardwater effect. Quaternary Geochronology 17:1047–1056.Google Scholar
Sikes, EL, Samson, CR, Guilderson, TP, Howard, WR. 2000. Old radiocarbon ages in the southwest Pacific Ocean during the last glacial period and deglaciation. Nature 405:555–559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stearns, H. 1944. “Geology of the Sāmoan Islands”. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 55(November):1312–1313. doi:10.1130/gsab-55-1279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoddart, DR. 1975 . Scientific studies in the southern Cook Islands: Background and bibliography. In: Stoddart, DR, Gibbs, PE, editors. Almost-atoll of Aitutki: reef studies in the Cook Islands, South Pacific. Atoll of Aitutaki: Reef studies in the Cook Islands, South Pacific. Atoll Research Bulletin 190. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution. p. 1–30.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Pearson, GW, Braziunas, T. 1986. Radiocarbon age calibration of marine samples back to 9000 cal yr BP. Radiocarbon 28(2B):980–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toggweiler, JR, Dixon, K, Broecker, WS. 1991. The Peru upwelling and the ventilation of the South Pacific thermocline. Journal of Geophysical Research 96:20,467–20,497. doi:10.1029/91JC02063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulm, S, Petchey, F, Ross, A. 2009. Marine reservoir corrections for Moreton Bay, Australia. Archaeology in Oceania 44:160–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, K, Hua, Q, Zhao, J-X, Hodge, E, Fink, D, Barbetti, M. 2010. Holocene marine 14C reservoir age variability: evidence from 230Th-dated corals from South China Sea. Paleoceanography 25: PA3205. doi:10.1029/2009PA001831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1 Map of the Pacific Ocean showing major circulation patterns and sites mentioned in the text. The dashed line shows the salinity front on the eastern edge of the Western Pacific Warm Pool. Surface currents: SEC = South Equatorial Current; EAC = East Australian Current; NGCC = New Guinea Coastal Current; ACC = Antarctic Circumpolar Current. Four-pointed stars represent black sampling locations from Komugabe-Dixson et al. (2016).

Figure 1

Table 1 Archaeological ΔR terrestrial/marine pairs from the central South Pacific Gyre.

Figure 2

Figure 2 Change in ΔR across the South Pacific over the last 3500 years. Large squares and circles = archaeological ΔR values mentioned in text. Trendline based on a 4-point moving average.