Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T03:14:25.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transnasal inferior meatal antrostomy with a mucosal flap for post-Caldwell–Luc mucoceles in the maxillary sinus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2019

M Suzuki*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nagoya City University, Japan
T Matsumoto
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nagoya City University, Japan
M Yokota
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nagoya City University, Japan
K Toyoda
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nagoya City University, Japan
Y Nakamura
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nagoya City University, Japan
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Motohiko Suzuki, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nagoya City University, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan E-mail: suzu-mo@med.nagoya-cu.ac.jp Fax: +81 52 851 5300
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

Transnasal inferior meatal antrostomy is increasingly used for the treatment of post-Caldwell–Luc mucoceles in maxillary sinus. This study aimed to report the outcomes after inferior meatal antrostomy with a mucosal flap for recurrent mucoceles.

Method

The records of patients who had undergone transnasal inferior meatal antrostomy with or without a mucosal flap were reviewed.

Results

Transnasal endoscopic inferior meatal antrostomy with or without a mucosal flap was performed in 21 and 49 patients, respectively. No complications were observed. A closing of the antrostomy was found in 9 (18.4 per cent) of the 49 patients who underwent antrostomy without a mucosal flap. No closings were observed in the 21 patients who underwent antrostomy with a mucosal flap. There was a significant difference in the rate of closing for surgery with and without the mucosal flap.

Conclusion

Transnasal endoscopic inferior meatal antrostomy with a mucosal flap is a safe method for the treatment of post-Caldwell–Luc maxillary mucoceles that effectively prevents recurrence.

Information

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited, 2019 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Preparation of the mucosal flap for the left maxillary mucocele during the surgery and view after the surgery. (a) Incision into the lateral wall of the inferior meatus. (b) Exfoliation of the mucosal flap off the lateral nasal wall of the inferior meatus. (c) Cutting of the bottom of the mucosal flap. (d) Cutting of the top of the mucosal flap. (e) Mucosal flap. (f) Rotation of the mucosal flap. (g) Mucosal flap, which covers the bone of the posterior edge of the opening. (h) Endoscopic view of the opening into the maxillary sinus after the surgery. IT = inferior turbinate; F = flap; C = cyst

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Computed tomography scan (a) before and (b) after inferior meatal antrostomy with a mucosal flap, in patients with a maxillary mucocele. IT = inferior turbinate; C = cyst

Figure 2

Table 1. Relationship between mucosal flap and recurrence