Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T06:30:15.050Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A taxonomic revision of Caloplaca herbidella and C. furfuracea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2009

Ulf ARUP
Affiliation:
Botanical Museum, Lund University, Östra Vallgatan 18, SE-223 61 Lund, Sweden.
Elin ÅKELIUS
Affiliation:
Botanical Museum, Lund University, Östra Vallgatan 18, SE-223 61 Lund, Sweden.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Caloplaca herbidella (Hue) H. Magn. and C. furfuracea H. Magn. are two isidiate, epiphytic species in the large genus Caloplaca. Caloplaca herbidella in a strict sense is normally grey and fertile with thick, somewhat coralloid isidia, but orange, sterile forms with thin isidia also occur. Caloplaca furfuracea is superficially similar morphologically to C. herbidella s. str. but has thinner, more granular isidia and generally a darker grey colour. Doubts have been raised as to whether C. furfuracea should be acknowledged as a proper species or incorporated in C. herbidella. Using morphometric methods and molecular analysis of the nrITS DNA gene we show that C. herbidella and C. furfuracea are two clearly separated species. Furthermore, the mainly sterile, orange form of C. herbidella can be regarded as a separate species that is here described as C. coralliza Arup & Åkelius. All three species are described in detail, including photographs and notes on their ecology. Finally, new distribution maps for Europe show that C. herbidella and C. coralliza are widespread in Europe, but the latter is probably less common than the former. Caloplaca furfuracea is clearly very rare in Europe with only few collections from Switzerland and Sweden, but seems to be more common in North America.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Lichen Society 2009
Figure 0

Fig. 1. One of 13 most parsimonious trees from the phylogenetic analysis based on nrDNA ITS data. Numbers below branches are bootstrap values.

Figure 1

Table 1. Location, collector and GenBank accession numbers of sequences of Caloplaca species used in the analyses. Specimens in bold were already available from previous studies. Specimens are from (LD) if not stated otherwise.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Principal component analysis, projection of specimens onto the first and second components. •, C. herbidella; □, C. coralliza.

Figure 3

Table 2. Character loadings for the first two components of the Principal Component Analysis

Figure 4

Table 3. Comparison of morphological and anatomical characters for all three Caloplaca species. All measured characters recorded as mean (standard deviation) followed by range from lowest to highest mean value measured for each species

Figure 5

Fig. 3. Caloplaca coralliza (upper left) and C. herbidella (lower right) growing together on the same piece of bark, (Nordin 2877, UPS). Scale = 1 mm.

Figure 6

Fig. 4. Caloplaca, habitus of treated species. A. C. coralliza (Frödén 44, LD), typical specimen with orange delicate, coralloid isidia in thick cracked areolate crust; B. C. coralliza (Magnusson 142, GB) grey form with delicate isidia in slightly thinner crust almost without cracks; C. C. furfuracea (Jonsson 2541, LD) typical form with small, grey, scattered, granular isidia and abundant apothecia; D. C. furfuracea (1917 Vrang, UPS) with dark grey, slightly thicker isidiate crust of granular isidia; E. C. herbidella (Arup L06103, LD) with robust, granular to rod-shaped, light grey isidia and irregularly shaped apothecia; F. C. herbidella (Hafellner 49276, GZU) with more scattered, slightly thinner and clustered isidia and well developed apothecia. Scales: A–F = 1 mm.

Figure 7

Fig. 5. Distribution map for C. coralliza based on the material studied.

Figure 8

Fig. 6. Distribution map for C. furfuracea in Europe based on the material studied.

Figure 9

Fig. 7. Distribution map for C. herbidella based on the material studied.