Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T19:16:07.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative performance of the stable isotope signatures of carbon, nitrogen and oxygen in assessing early vigour and grain yield in durum wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2013

J. BORT*
Affiliation:
Plant Biology Department, Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, Diagonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
M. BELHAJ
Affiliation:
INRAT, Field Crops Laboratory, Rue Hédi Karray, 2049 Ariana, Tunisia
K. LATIRI
Affiliation:
INRAT, Field Crops Laboratory, Rue Hédi Karray, 2049 Ariana, Tunisia
Z. KEHEL
Affiliation:
Biodiversity and Integrated Gene Management, International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), PO Box 5466, Aleppo, Syria
J. L. ARAUS
Affiliation:
Plant Biology Department, Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, Diagonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: jordi.bort@ub.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The present paper studied the performance of the stable isotope signatures of carbon (δ13C), nitrogen (δ15N) and oxygen (δ18O) in plants when used to assess early vigour and grain yield (GY) in durum wheat growing under mild and moderate Mediterranean stress conditions. A collection of 114 recombinant inbred lines was grown under rainfed (RF) and supplementary irrigation (IR) conditions. Broad sense heritabilities (H2) for GY and harvest index (HI) were higher under RF conditions than under IR. Broad sense heritabilities for δ13C were always above 0·60, regardless of the plant part studied, with similar values for IR and RF trials. Some of the largest genetic correlations with GY were those shown by the δ13C content of the flag leaf blade and mature grains. Under both water treatments, mature grains showed the highest negative correlations between δ13C and GY across genotypes. Flag leaf δ13C was negatively correlated with GY only under RF conditions. The δ13C in seedlings was negatively correlated, under IR conditions only, with GY but also with early vigour. The sources of variation in early vigour were studied by stepwise analysis using the stable isotope signatures measured in seedlings. The δ13C was able to explain almost 0·20 of this variation under RF, but up to 0·30 under IR. In addition, nitrogen concentration in seedlings accounted for another 0·05 of variation, increasing the amount explained to 0·35. The sources of variation in GY were also studied through stable isotope signatures and biomass of different plant parts: δ13C was always the first parameter to appear in the models for both water conditions, explaining c. 0·20 of the variation. The second parameter (δ15N or N concentration of grain, or biomass at maturity) depended on the water conditions and the plant tissue being analysed. Oxygen isotope composition (δ18O) was only able to explain a small amount of the variation in GY. In this regard, despite the known and previously described value of δ13C as a tool in breeding, δ15N is confirmed as an additional tool in the present study. Oxygen isotope composition does not seem to offer any potential, at least under the conditions of the present study.

Information

Type
Crops and Soils Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Weather conditions during the growing season in Nabeul, where irrigation events are shown (clear bars) Estimates of Penman evaporation were calculated, and amounts of water supply (rainfall and irrigation) are shown in 2-weeks periods, from October 2004 to July 2005.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Experimental design of the trial: unreplicated augmented design, with a commercial cultivar surrounding the trial. Coloured plots indicate those with 6 control cultivars (cvars Mrb5, pink; Gidara-2, green; Hau, orange; Krf, grey and Waha, green). Plot numbers 143 and 144 correspond to the parents of the genotype collection (Lahn and Cham-1, respectively). White plots correspond to the 112 RILs. The design was repeated for the two water treatments: the only difference between RF and IR was how the 112 RILs were distributed within the white plots. (Colour version available online.)

Figure 2

Table 1a. Descriptive statistics under the two environmental conditions for the agronomical traits studied in a collection of 114 RIL of durum wheat. All statistics were calculated after data adjustment. Column P shows the probability relating to differences between the RF and IR environments. s.e.m.is the standard error of the mean of the 228 values

Figure 3

Table 1b. Descriptive statistics under the two environmental conditions for the stable isotope traits studied in a collection of 114 RIL of durum wheat. All statistics were calculated after data adjustment. Column P shows the probability relating to differences between the RF and IR environments. s.e.m. is the standard error of the mean of the 228 values

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Relationships across the 114 RILs between δ18O and δ15N measured in mature grain and GY, under the two water treatments.

Figure 5

Table 2. Pearson correlation coefficients between C isotope compositions measured at three different developmental stages (6L, flag leaf blade at anthesis and mature grain) and GY plus a number of yield components and physiological traits, under the two environmental conditions. Correlations were calculated from adjusted data

Figure 6

Table 3. Heritabilities and genetic correlations under the two environmental conditions for the main traits studied: grain yield, biomass and harvest index, and isotope compositions for the different developmental stages. Heritabilties and genetic correlations were calculated from adjusted data

Figure 7

Table 4. Stepwise analysis explaining GY variation from δ13C, δ15N, δ18O, N concentration and accumulated biomass on three different developmental stages. Top: only δ13C and δ15N were used in the models. Bottom: δ13C, δ15N, N concentration and biomass were used in the models

Figure 8

Table 5. Stepwise analysis explaining early vigour (biomass at 6L) variation from δ13C, δ15N and N concentration measured at three development stages