Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rngvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T02:00:10.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Formation of Clay Minerals in the Mudflats of Bolivian Salars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Jennifer L. Bentz*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen’s University, 36 Union Street, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
Ronald C. Peterson
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen’s University, 36 Union Street, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
*
*E-mail address of corresponding author: jennifer.bentz@queensu.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Understanding clay-mineral assemblages forming in saline lakes aids in reconstructing paleoenvironments on Earth and other terrestrial planets; this is because authigenic phyllosilicates are sensitive to the prevailing geochemical conditions present during formation. In most geochemical models, evaporative concentration favors sepiolite with increasing silica and Mg2+ concentrations without considering the role of the biogenic removal of silica from solution by diatoms. In the present study, phyllosilicates occurring in the mudflats of Bolivian salars were investigated to aid in understanding the geochemical factors that control mineral assemblages forming in (SO42–)- and (Cl–)-rich environments in relation to dissolved silica. From transects across the mudflats, the physical, chemical, and mineralogical characteristics of the bulk sediment and the <2 μm fraction of each sedimentary layer were analyzed. From these analyses, three types of sediments were identified: (1) regolith sediments dominated by Al-dioctahedral smectite, illite, and chlorite; (2) detritus-rich mudflat sediments with Mg-trioctahedral smectite and Al-dioctahedral smectite along with illite and chlorite; and (3) authigenic mudflat sediments dominated by poorly formed Mg-trioctahedral smectite, kerolite, and biogenic silica. The absence of sepiolite-palygorskite in the salars is the result of excessively high Mg:Si ratios within the waters. In the surface water Mg becomes enriched relative to Si as diatoms remove dissolved Si from solution through biologically mediated uptake. The geochemical conditions present within the salars that act to preserve the diatom frustules and prevent their dissolution include: neutral–slightly alkaline pH solutions, cold temperatures, shallow water, and high salinity. Under these conditions the formation of sepiolite is restricted by the small amount of dissolved silica, despite the silica-rich environment. The formation of Mg-smectite and kerolite is favored under these conditions.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 2020
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Location of the study site in the Sur Lipez region of Potosi, Bolivia, and the locations of the six salars. Image of the western Sur Lipez region on a Tri-Decadal Global Landsat Orthorectified ETM+Pan Mosaic (1999–2003) acquired on January 14, 2002. Image courtesy of the US Geological Survey

Figure 1

Table 1. Location, maximum depth, and range of characteristics of each salar from 1983–current study; data from Badaut and Risacher 1983; Servant-Vildary and Roux 1990; Risacher and Fritz 1991; Dejoux 1993; Sylvestre et al. 2001

Figure 2

Table 2. Generalized mineralogy of the surface evaporites, regolith, and mudflat sediments from the surrounding sediment, Laguna Canapa (CAN), Laguna Hedionda (HED), Laguna Ramaditas (RAM), Laguna Honda (HON), Laguna Chiar Khota (CHKT), and Laguna Chulluncani (CHU)

Figure 3

Table 3. Sediment class, pH, and clay mineral characteristics of each sample from Laguna Canapa (CAN), Laguna Hedionda (HED), Laguna Ramaditas (RAM), Laguna Honda (HON), Laguna Chiar Khota (CHKT), and Laguna Chulluncani (CHU). Clay References and Source Clays used for comparison are included

Figure 4

Fig. 2. Representative XRD patterns from the oriented <2 μm fraction samples after glycolation, air-drying, 400°C, and 550°C treatments for: (a) REG-1 representing regolith clay minerals. Regolith clay samples are composed of smectite (S) with varying degrees of interstratification with illite, discrete illite (I), and chlorite (C); (b) for CAN-15 representing detritus-rich mudflat samples. Detritus-rich mudflat clay samples are composed of smectite (S), illite-smectite (I-S), illite (I), and chlorite (C); and (c) RAM-43 representing authigenic mudflat samples. Authigenic clay samples are composed of smectite (S) characterized by high layer charge and kerolite (Ker)

Figure 5

Fig. 3. Box and whisker plot of the integral breadth (βi) of glycolated (001) smectite reflections from oriented <2 μm fraction XRD patterns by sediment class. The clay mineral Source Clays (n = 11) measured had the smallest βi measured characteristic of large coherent scattering domains (Table 2); regolith (n = 10) and detrital (n = 17) clays had similar βi, with detrital clays exhibiting slight broadening of the (001) reflection; Authigenic (n = 33) clays displayed the largest range and largest βi characteristics of small coherent scattering domains from extremely small crystallite size and/or disorder

Figure 6

Fig. 4. Representative NIR reflectance spectra of the <2 μm fraction from each sediment class. The dotted lines identify the location of diagnostic absorption bands for clay minerals around 1410 nm (7092 cm–1), 1910 nm (5236 cm–1), 2210 nm (4525 cm–1), and 2310 nm (4329 cm–1). Regolith sediments from dry depression and slopes exhibit absorption bands for Al-dioctahedral smectite (2208 nm); detrital mudflat sediments with >10% detritus exhibit absorption bands for Al-dioctahedral smectite (2208 nm) and Mg-trioctahedral smectite (2313 nm); authigenic mudflat sediments with <10% igneous detritus exhibit absorption bands for Mg-trioctahedral smectite (2312 nm); sediments dominated by diatom frustules exhibit a broad absorption from hydrated silica (2200–2300 nm)

Figure 7

Fig. 5. Location of major absorption bands in the NIR reflectance spectra for the <2 μm fraction separated from regolith samples. Absorption bands are present at 1414 nm (7072 cm–1) from OH2v and H2O2v overtones, 1908 nm (5241 cm–1) from H2Ov+δ combination stretching, and 2208 nm (4529 cm–1) from Al–OH combinations. All NIR spectra confirm that Al-dioctahedral smectite is the dominant clay mineral

Figure 8

Fig. 6. Location of major absorption bands in the NIR reflectance spectra for the <2 μm fraction separated from detritus-rich mudflats samples. Absorption bands are present at 1415 nm (7067 cm–1) from OH2v and H2O2v overtones, 1910 (5236 cm–1) from H2Ov+δ combination stretching, 2208 nm (4529 cm–1) from Al–OH combinations, and 2313 (4323 cm–1) from Mg–OH combinations. The NIR spectra confirm that Al-dioctahedral smectite and Mg-trioctahedral smectite are present. Broad bands in the range 2200–2300 nm indicate biogenic silica

Figure 9

Fig. 7. Location of major absorption bands in the NIR reflectance spectra for the <2 μm fraction separated from authigenic mudflats samples. Absorption bands are present at 1414 nm (7072 cm–1) from OH2v and H2O2v overtones, 1910 nm (5236 cm–1) from H2Ov+δ combination stretching, and 2312 (4325 cm–1) from Mg–OH combinations. The NIR spectra confirm Mg-trioctahedral smectite is the dominant clay mineral present. Broad bands between 2200–2300 nm designate indicate silica

Figure 10

Fig. 8. Representative BSED-SEM images of the <2 μm fraction from each detrital class: (a) regolith clay samples display well defined particulates characteristic of weathering from igneous minerals; (b) detritus-rich mudflat samples display a mix of well defined particulates and conglomerated masses rich in Mg and Si from EDS data; (c-d) authigenic mudflat samples display poor–moderately well preserved diatom frustules and fluffy masses, rich in Mg and Si from EDS data; (e-f) authigenic detritus-poor mudflat samples taken from the sediment–water interface below the surface water display predominantly well-preserved diatom frustules. * Due to the low density of the diatom frustules (<0.12–0.25 g cm–3) the large siliceous skeletons remained in suspension during the clay separation

Figure 11

Fig. 9. Ternary diagrams of <2 μm fraction compositions separated from regolith sediments (squares), detritus-rich mudflat sediment (triangles), and authigenic mudflat sediments (circles). (a) The Al:Fe:Mg ternary diagram displays increasing Mg-enrichment within the mudflats where authigenic clays forming in detritus-poor environments are dominated by Mg-rich chemistries. (b) The Fe:K:Li ternary diagram displays increasing K and Li content in authigenic clays forming in detritus-poor environments

Figure 12

Fig. 10. Box and whisker plots of the Mg:Si ratio of inflow waters compared to salar surface waters from 1983–current study; (data from Badaut and Risacher 1983; Servant-Vildary and Roux 1990; Risacher and Fritz 1991; and Dejoux 1993). For all the salars, evaporative concentration of the inflow waters results in significant enrichment of Mg relative to Si in the surface waters of the salars

Figure 13

Fig. 11. Box and whisker plots displaying the range of pH values measured from surface water samples from each salar from 1983–current study; (data from Badaut and Risacher 1983; Servant-Vildary and Roux 1990; Risacher and Fritz 1991; Dejoux 1993; and Sylvestre et al. 2001). The salars range from neutral to alkaline over the years of study; however, the pH of HED, RAM, and CHKT has never increased above the threshold for Mg-silicate neoformation despite the evidence of Mg-smectite within the mudflats of these salars