Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T13:20:52.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SIX NEW SPECIES OF TETRAPTERYS (MALPIGHIACEAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2016

C. Anderson
Affiliation:
University of Michigan Herbarium, 3600 Varsity Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48108, USA. E-mail: chra@umich.edu

Abstract

Six new species of the Neotropical genus Tetrapterys (Malpighiaceae) are described and illustrated: T. amazonica C.E.Anderson (Brazil, Colombia and Peru), T. andersonii C.E.Anderson (Mexico), T. callejasii W.R.Anderson (Colombia), T. molinae W.R.Anderson (Honduras), T. rzedowskii W.R.Anderson (Mexico) and T. steyermarkii W.R.Anderson (Colombia and Venezuela). All have 4(–6)-flowered umbels as the ultimate inflorescence units, glabrous yellow petals, and samaras with a small dorsal wing in addition to the four large lateral wings.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (2016) 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Tetrapterys andersonii C.E.Anderson. A, Fruiting branch; B, node with portion of leaf and inflorescence in bud; C, detail showing abaxial vesture of lamina and marginal glands; D, detail of node showing a pair of stipules; E, flower, posterior petal uppermost; F, gynoecium, anterior style at left; G, samara, adaxial view; H, samara, abaxial view. Scale bars: A, 4 cm; B, 2 cm; C and D, 4 mm; E, 8 mm; F, 2.7 mm; G and H, 1.3 cm. A, D, G and H based on Anderson & Laskowski 4255 (MICH); B and C on Breedlove 10662 (DS); and E and F on Clarke 120 (DS).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Tetrapterys rzedowskii W.R.Anderson. A, Flowering branch; B, node with interpetiolar stipules; C, glands on leaf margin, abaxial view; D, flower bud on pedicel subtended by peduncle with bracteoles at apex and floriferous bract at base; E, sepal, abaxial view; F, flower, posterior petal uppermost; G, posterior petal; H, lateral petal; I, androecium laid out, abaxial view with anthers reflexed, the stamen fifth from right opposite posterior petal; J, gynoecium, anterior style in centre; K, distal portions of styles, lateral (left) and anterior (right); L, samaras, abaxial view (left) and adaxial view (right). Scale bars: A, 4 cm; B and C, 4 mm; D, 5.7 mm; E, 4 mm; F, 8 mm; G and H, 5.7 mm; I and J, 2.7 mm; K, 1 mm; L, 2 cm. A–K based on Rubio 716, MICH; and L on Loredo M. 24, MICH.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Tetrapterys molinae W.R.Anderson. A, Flowering branch; B, large leaf, abaxial view; C, abaxial surface of lamina to show vesture and marginal glands; D, node with triangular interpetiolar pair of connate stipules; E, node showing interpetiolar scar after fall of pair of connate stipules; F, flower bud in umbel of four; G, flower, posterior petal uppermost; H, portion of androecium laid out, abaxial view, stamen at left opposite posterior petal; I, gynoecium, lateral view, anterior style at left; J, distal portions of anterior style (left, lateral view) and posterior style (right, adaxial view); K and L, samaras from different plants, abaxial views. Scale bars: A and B, 4 cm; C–E, 4 mm; F, 6.7 mm; G, 8 mm; H and I, 2.7 mm; J, 1.3 mm; K and L, 2 cm. A–J based on Molina 25532, NY; K on Molina 6273, F; and L on Molina 24294, NY.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Tetrapterys amazonica C.E.Anderson. A, Flowering branch; B, node in inflorescence with connate pair of interpetiolar stipules; C, older node with scar from loss of connate pair of interpetiolar stipules; D, glands on abaxial base of lamina; E, flower bud to show keeled petals; F, umbel with three of the four flowers and petals removed; G, flower, posterior petal uppermost; H, stamens, lateral view (left), adaxial view (centre) and abaxial view (right); I, gynoecium, anterior style to left; J, lateral views of distal portions of styles, anterior style (above) and lateral style (below); K, samara, abaxial view; L, enlargement of nut of samara, abaxial view. Scale bars: A, 4 cm; B–D, 8 mm; E, 6.7 mm; F and G, 8 mm; H and I, 2 mm; J, 1.3 mm; K, 2 cm; L, 8 mm. A and C–J based on Rudas & del Aguila 1252, MICH; B on Gentry et al. 29818, MO; and K and L on Prance et al. 12387, NY.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Tetrapterys callejasii W.R.Anderson. A, Flowering branch; B, adaxial surface of lamina enlarged; C, abaxial surface of lamina enlarged; D, node with connate pair of interpetiolar stipules; E, umbel of flower buds; F, flower bud; G, flower, posterior petal uppermost; H, two stamens, abaxial view, the one with longer filament opposite a sepal; I, gynoecium, anterior style in centre; J, distal portion of anterior style (left) and posterior style (right); K, samara, adaxial view; L, enlargement of nut of samara, abaxial view; M, embryo. Scale bars: A, 4 cm; B–D, 4 mm; E, 8 mm; F, 2.7 mm; G, 5.7 mm; H and I, 2.7 mm; J, 1 mm; K, 2 cm; L, 1 cm; M, 4 mm. A–J based on Cogollo & Brand 367, MO; and K–M on Cárdenas et al. 2555, MICH.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Tetrapterys steyermarkii W.R.Anderson. A, Flowering branch; B, small leaf, abaxial view; C, lamina, abaxial view, showing tiny inframarginal glands; D, apical node, showing scar left by tiny stipule pair; E, umbel of four flower buds with three buds removed above bracteoles; F, flower, posterior petal uppermost; G, partial androecium laid out, abaxial view, the stamen third from left opposite posterior petal; H, gynoecium, anterior style at left; I, distal portions of styles, anterior style (above) and posterior style (below); J, samaras, adaxial view (left) and abaxial view (right); K, enlargement of nut of samara, abaxial view. Scale bars: A and B, 4 cm; C–F, 8 mm; G and H, 2.7 mm; I, 1.3 mm; J, 1.3 cm; K, 8 mm. A–I based on Bunting 5396, MICH; and J and K on Steyermark & Braun 94706, US.