Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T21:56:02.994Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characteristic mode-based compact circularly polarized metasurface antenna for in-band RCS reduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2019

Puneeth Kumar Rajanna*
Affiliation:
Electronics and Communication, National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Srinivasanagar post, Surathkal, Mangalore, Surathkal, Karnataka, India
Karthik Rudramuni
Affiliation:
E&C, National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal, Karnataka, India
Krishnamoorthy Kandasamy
Affiliation:
E&C, National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal, Karnataka, India
*
Author for correspondence: Puneeth Kumar Rajanna E-mail: Puneeth.tc@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents a novel design of a low profile circularly polarized (CP) metasurface (MTS) antenna with in-band radar cross-section (RCS) reduction property. The MTS is loaded as a superstrate on slot antenna and it can be viewed as a polarization-dependent MTS (PDMTS). The rectangular patch-based PDMTS is analyzed using characteristic mode analysis to find two orthogonal degenerate modes, which produces CP waves. Linearly polarized slot antenna is used to excite the PDMTS. The performance of PDMTS loaded slot antenna is analyzed numerically using full-wave analysis method. The PDMTS CP antenna is fabricated and its performance is tested experimentally. The proposed antenna has a compact structure and it has an overall size of $0.52{\lambda _0}\times 0.52{\lambda _0} \times 0.078{\lambda _0}$ (where ${\lambda _0}$ is the free space wavelength). The measured results show that the PDMTS antenna achieves $-10\,{\rm dB}$ impedance bandwidth of 29.41$\%$, 3-dB axial ratio bandwidth of 9.05$\%$, broadside gain of 6.34 dB, and monostatic RCS reduction of $-30.2\,{\rm dBsm}$ at the resonant frequency of 5.86 GHz. The simulated results are in well agreement with the measured results and it is well suited for C-band Radar and Satellite communication.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2019 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Geometry of the proposed PDMTS. (b) Open radiation boundary set up with $-Z$ direction as PEC. $L_g=27\,{\rm mm}$, $L_p=8.5\,{\rm mm}$, $W_p=6\,{\rm mm}$, $W_s=0.3\,{\rm mm}$, $h_s=3.454\,{\rm mm}$.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Simulated modal significance and characteristic angle of first four modes(J1–J4) of PDMTS.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Simulated modal significance and characteristic angle of first two modes(J1, J2) of PDMTS.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Simulated modal current distribution of PDMTS. (a) J1, (b) J2, (c) J3, (d) J4.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Simulated modal radiation pattern of PDMTS. (a) J1, (b) J2, (c) J3, (d) J4.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Effect of $W_p$ on simulated (a) modal significance and (b) characteristic angle.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Effect of $W_s$ on simulated (a) modal significance and (b) characteristic angle.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Proposed antenna structure: (a) front view, (b) side view, (c) back view.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Simulated surface current distribution at different time instant: (a) t = 0, (b) $t=T/4$, (c) $t=T/2$, (d) $t=3T/4$.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Effect of $L_f$ and $W_f$ on simulated $S_{11}$ and axial ratio (a and b) $L_f$, (c and d) $W_f$.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Effect of $W_s$ and $W_p$ on simulated $S_{11}$ and axial ratio (a and b), $W_s$ (c and d) $W_p$.

Figure 11

Fig. 12. (a) Simulated absorptivity magnitude of metal backed PDMTS. (b) Simulated monostatic RCS variation of PDMTS loaded slot antenna over oblique incidence. (c) Simulated frequency response of the monostatic RCS versus oblique incidence. (d) Simulated and measured monostatic RCS versus angle at 5.86 GHz for y polarized wave. (e) Simulated and measured frequency response for y polarized wave at broadside direction.

Figure 12

Fig. 13. Prototype of the fabricated antenna: (a) front view(MTS), (b) back view(slot), (c) micro-strip line feed.

Figure 13

Fig. 14. Simulated and measured $S_{11}$, axial ratio, and gain: (a) $S_{11}$, (b) axial ratio and gain.

Figure 14

Fig. 15. Simulated and measured RHCP and LHCP. Radiation pattern at 5.86 GHz: (a) xz plane, (b) yz plane.

Figure 15

Fig. 16. Simulated and measured RHCP and LHCP. Radiation pattern at 6.3 GHz: (a) xz plane, (b) yz plane.

Figure 16

Table 1. The performance comparison of the proposed antenna.