Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T05:46:50.774Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The lack of impact of peri-implantation or late gestation nutrient restriction on ovine fetal renal development and function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2011

L. M. Braddick
Affiliation:
Institute of Developmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
D. M. Burrage
Affiliation:
Institute of Developmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
J. K. Cleal
Affiliation:
Institute of Developmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
D. E. Noakes
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Reproduction, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, North Mymms, Hatfield, UK
M. A. Hanson
Affiliation:
Institute of Developmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
L. R. Green*
Affiliation:
Institute of Developmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr L. R. Green, Institute of Developmental Sciences, 887 Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, Hampshire SO16 6YD, UK. (Email L.R.Green@soton.ac.uk)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Unbalanced nutrition during critical windows of development is implicated in determining the susceptibility to hypertension and cardiovascular disease in adult life, but the underlying mechanisms during fetal life have not been fully elucidated. We investigated the effects of moderate nutritional restriction during critical windows in gestation on late gestation fetal sheep growth, cardiovascular and renal renin-angiotensin system function. Ewes were fed 100% nutrient requirements (control), or 40–50% nutrient requirements during the peri-implantation period (1–31 days gestation (dGA), PI40 and PI50), or 50% nutrient requirements in late gestation (104–127 dGA). At 125 ± 2 dGA, fetal cardiovascular and renal function were measured at baseline, and during frusemide, angiotensin II (Ang II), phenylephrine and hypoxia challenges. Maternal undernutrition had no effect on fetal biometry, kidney weight, nephron number, basal cardiovascular function or cardiovascular and renal responses to frusemide. Fetal blood pressure response to Ang II was blunted in PI50 (P < 0.05), but not in PI40 groups. There was no difference between groups in the cardiovascular or endocrine response to hypoxia. The lack of effect of moderate undernutrition within key developmental windows of fetal kidney development on fetal renal structure and function suggests that renal mechanisms do not underlie our previous observations of cardiovascular dysfunction in adulthood following early-life undernutrition.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 2011
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Plan of studies to show timing of maternal dietary restrictions (filled grey bars), surgery, experiments and postmortems in days (d) gestational age (where term is 147 d) for studies 1 and 2. C1 and C2, control groups; PI50 and PI40, peri-implantation restriction to 50% and 40% control, respectively; and L, late gestation restricted.

Figure 1

Table 1 Fetal biometry, and body and organ weights

Figure 2

Table 2 Baseline fetal blood nutrients and metabolites

Figure 3

Table 3 Fetal blood nutrients and metabolites in response to hypoxia

Figure 4

Fig. 2 The fetal cardiovascular effects of frusemide (infusion onset at time 0 indicated by dotted line) in control (C1 and C2, open circle, both n = 9), peri-implantation-restricted (PI50/40, triangle, both n = 9) and late gestation-restricted (L, square, n = 6) groups. Values are mean ± s.e.m. Data were analysed by repeated-measures two-way ANOVA and a Bonferroni post hoc test where appropriate (using dietary group as a between-subject factor). *P < 0.05 significantly different from baseline (all animals together). There was no difference between dietary groups in study 1 or 2.

Figure 5

Table 4 The effect of hypoxia on fetal renal function and plasma hormones

Figure 6

Table 5 The effect of frusemide on fetal renal function and the renin-angiotensin system

Figure 7

Fig. 3 The change in fetal mean arterial blood pressure from baseline in response to angiotensin II in control (C, open, n = 9), peri-implantation-restricted (PI50/40, filled, n = 10/9) and late gestation-restricted (L, hatched, n = 5) groups from studies 1 and 2. Values are mean ± s.e.m. Data were analysed by repeated-measures two-way ANOVA and a Bonferroni post hoc test where appropriate. *P < 0.05 compared to control values. In study 2, there was no difference between dietary groups.

Figure 8

Fig. 4 The effect of hypoxia on fetal cardiovascular parameters in study 2 control (C, open circle, n = 7), peri-implantation-restricted (PI40, triangle, n = 8) and late-restricted (L, square, n = 4) groups. Shaded area denotes the 30-min period of hypoxia. Values are mean ± s.e.m. For each study, data were analysed by repeated-measures two-way ANOVA and a Bonferroni post hoc test where appropriate (using dietary group as a between-subject factor). *P < 0.05 significantly different from baseline (all animals together). There was no difference between dietary groups.