Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T01:36:27.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reversals of Sudden Gains Made During Cognitive Therapy with Depressed Adults: A Preliminary Investigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2010

Paul Manning ,
Gillian Hardy  and
Stephen Kellett
Paul Manning
Affiliation:
Centre for Psychological Services Research, University of Sheffield, UK
Gillian Hardy
Affiliation:
Centre for Psychological Services Research, University of Sheffield, UK
Stephen Kellett*
Affiliation:
Centre for Psychological Services Research, University of Sheffield, UK
*
Reprint requests to Stephen Kellett, IAPT Programme Director, Clinical Psychology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK. E-mail: s.kellett@sheffield.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: This study investigated sudden reversals during cognitive therapy (CT), through the comparison of “in-session” activity and “out-of-session” life events. Method: The sample comprised 20 clients who experienced sudden gains during CT for depression: 10 who subsequently suffered a reversal of this gain and 10 matched clients who maintained progress. Measures of client resistance and therapist responses were scored by judges from session transcripts and clients completed measures of life events and depression at each session. This enabled the Reversal and Non-Reversal groups to be compared during pre-sudden gain, pre-reversal or matched sessions. Results: No differences were apparent between the Reversal and Non-reversal groups or between the pre-gain and pre-reversal sessions in terms of client or therapist “in-session” activities. In the Reversals group, 6 out of 10 clients recovered their level of symptom improvement, following the reversal. Therapists showed higher levels of reflection and self-disclosure with clients who did not recover their symptom gain following the Reversal than with clients who did recover their symptom gain following the Reversal. Conclusions: The study is discussed in terms of the manner by which reversals can be more effectively measured and researched.

Keywords

Sudden reversalssudden gainsdepressionoutcomes

Information

Type
Brief Clinical Reports
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , July 2010 , pp. 491 - 495
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2010

Introduction

Sudden gains were initially described as the occasions when depressed clients make precipitous and substantial symptom improvement, in single between-session intervals during a trial of cognitive therapy (CT) (Tang and DeRubeis, Reference Tang, DeRubeis and 1999). Subsequent studies have replicated the sudden gain phenomenon in routine practice and for differing disorders (see Hardy et al., Reference Hardy, Cahill, Stiles, Ispan, Macaskill and Barkham2005 for an example). However, all subsequent studies have illustrated sudden gains to be less stable than originally depicted. Whereas Tang and DeRubeis (Reference Tang, DeRubeis and 1999) reported reversals in sudden gains in 17% of their 24 sudden gain clients, in other studies reversals have been reported in up to 57% of clients who showed sudden gains (Gaynor et al., Reference Gaynor, Weersing, Kolko, Birmaher, Heo and Brent2003). The mechanisms dictating both sudden gains and reversals in CT are still unclear (Busch, Kanter, Landes and Kohlenberg, Reference Busch, Kanter, Landes and Kohlenberg2006) but are of great clinical importance, in terms of both safety and effectiveness. Three potential factors have been associated with reversals: client resistance or non-compliance, therapist response, and life events.

Client resistance has been implicated in failure to respond in CT and has been associated with poor outcome (Beutler, Moleiro and Talebi, Reference Beutler, Moleiro and Talebi2002). Bischoff and Tracey (Reference Bischoff and Tracey1995) demonstrated that increased therapist directive behaviour (defined as statements that confront the client, or lead, direct or control the therapeutic dialogue) produce resistance in clients. Similarly, Mahalik (Reference Mahalik1994) detailed the therapist responses associated with greater levels of resistance, which included the use of closed questions and over-providing information. Negative life events are likely to maintain depression, whilst positive events may create rapid improvements in depressive symptoms and facilitate eventual recovery, through the action of “fresh start” events (Harris, Brown and Robinson, Reference Harris, Brown and Robinson1999). The study hypotheses were therefore; (Ho1) that clients experiencing reversals will have higher levels of resistance within pre-reversal sessions than in pre-sudden gain sessions or matched sessions of clients who do not experience a reversal; (Ho2) that greater levels of ineffective or directive therapist response will be evident in pre-reversal sessions for clients who experience reversals than in pre-sudden gain or matched, no reversal sessions; and (Ho3) clients who experience a reversal will experience a greater number of adverse life events pre-reversal compared to matched sessions of clients who do not experience reversals.

Method

Participants

All clients scored 22 or greater on the BDI (or 26 or greater on the BDI-II) at assessment and met the DSM-IV (APA, 1994) criteria for the presence of a major depressive episode. Participants consisted of the 20 clients identified by Hardy et al., (Reference Hardy, Cahill, Stiles, Ispan, Macaskill and Barkham2005) as experiencing a sudden gain during CT. Ten clients experienced a reversal at some point during therapy following their experience of a sudden gain; in future text these clients are referred to as the “Reversals group”. Matched controls were derived from the remaining clients who experienced sudden gains but, crucially, no reversals. This “Non-Reversals” control group were matched on the following criteria: (a) session of sudden gain (± 2 sessions); (b) initial symptom severity measured using the BDI-II (± 5 BDI-II points); (c) sex; and (d) age. The Reversals group consisted of 8 females and 2 males, with a mean age of 31 years 8 months (age range 20–50 years), and a mean BDI-II score of 33.60 prior to therapy. The mean size of sudden gain for the Reversals group was a reduction in symptoms of 11.90 BDI-II points (range 8–17 BDI-II points), and the mean size of reversal was a gain of 9.60 BDI-II points (range 5–18 BDI-II points). The Non-Reversals group consisted of 6 females and 4 males, with a mean age of 39 years and 9 months (age range 24–49), and a mean BDI-II score of 32.30 prior to therapy. The mean size of sudden gain in the Non-Reversals group was a reduction of 14.20 BDI-II points (range 8–31 BDI-II points).

Identifying sudden gains and reversals

Sudden gains were defined using the Tang and DeRubeis (Reference Tang, DeRubeis and 1999) criteria: (a) a difference between the pre-gain and after-gain BDI-II scores of at least 8-points (exceeding the reliable change index of 7.16 points for the BDI-II); (b) a nominally significant t-value [t(4) ≥ 2.50, p <.05] comparing the three pre-gain scores with the three after-gain scores and (c) a nominally significant t-value [t(3) ≥ 3.00, p <.05], if only two pre-gain or two after-gain scores were available. Reversals were defined as a 50% reduction in symptom improvement, following sudden gain (Tang and DeRubeis, Reference Tang, DeRubeis and 1999).

Measures

The BDI-II (Beck, Steer and Brown, Reference Beck, Steer and Brown1996) is a 21-item measure of depressive symptomology; clients completed the BDI-II prior to each session. Life Events Questionnaire (LEQ; Llewelyn, Elliott, Shapiro, Hardy and Firth-Cozens, Reference Llewelyn, Elliott, Shapiro, Hardy and Firth-Cozens1988) measures life events through a brief written description and scaling of events occurring between sessions. Client Resistance Scale (CRS; Mahalik, Reference Mahalik1994) measures resistance in psychotherapy sessions regardless of modality by clinical judges across 5 dimensions; opposing expression of painful affect, opposing recollection of material, opposing the therapist, opposing change, and opposing insight. Helping Skills System (HSS; Hill, Reference Hill2004) categorizes therapists’ verbal responses by clinical judges on 12 categories; approval/reassurance, closed questions, open questions, restatement, reflection of feelings, challenge, interpretation, self-disclosure, immediacy, information, direct guidance, and other. The HSS is a generic verbal response mode system and is not specific to any particular psychotherapy modality.

Session transcripts

For the Reversals group, the first and last 10 minutes of each therapy tape of each pre-sudden gain and pre-reversal session were transcribed. For the Non-Reversal group, the first and last 10 minutes of the pre-sudden gain session and a “matched” session were transcribed. To identify the matched session, each Non-Reversal client was matched with a Reversal client. The number of sessions between the pre-sudden gain and pre-reversal sessions were calculated and used to identify the “matched session” for each Non-reversal client. Cronbach's alphas for the CRS were satisfactory; Opposing Expression of Painful Affect, α.78; Opposing Recollection of Material, α.95; Opposing the Therapist, α.79; Opposing Change, α.70; Opposing Insight, α.72. The inter-rater reliability of the HSS was good, κ.96. Data for all measures resulted in non-normal distributions, and therefore a randomization method of data analysis (RANOVA; Manly, Reference Manly1991) was employed.

Results

No significant differences were found between the Reversal and Non-Reversal groups or between the pre-gain and pre-reversal sessions in terms of levels of client resistance and therapist responses; there was also no significant difference in resistance or therapist response over time between the groups. No significant interaction effects were found across the therapist or client behaviours. A significant interaction was found in relation to positive life events (F = 4.12, p < 0.05), with the Reversals group experiencing a greater frequency of positive life events pre-reversal, as compared to pre-sudden gain; this difference was not significant for the Non-Reversals group.

In the Reversals group, following the reversal, 6 out of 10 clients went on to recover their level of symptom improvement achieved after sudden gain by the end of therapy. Potential differences were investigated between identified “recovery” and “non-recovery” clients in the Reversals group. RANOVA demonstrated significant group effects for therapist behaviours of reflection (F = 9.06, p = 0.008), self-disclosure (F = 6.32, p = 0.04) and other (F = 5.65, p = 0.02), with higher frequencies of these responses associated with the “non-recovery” clients. No significant differences were apparent for reported life events.

Discussion

These findings contradicted the hypotheses that client and therapist “in-session” behaviours and “out-of-session” external life events would be associated with reversals. The Reversals group experienced a significantly greater number of positive life events pre-reversal than pre-sudden gain. These results are intriguing and should be interpreted with necessary caution, due to the small number of life events actually reported. The results support the findings by Hardy et al. (Reference Hardy, Cahill, Stiles, Ispan, Macaskill and Barkham2005) that sudden gains are not linked to life events but rather may be more of a reflection of clients’ psychological change processes (Goodridge and Hardy, Reference Goodridge and Hardy2009). The data support that reversals are not static phenomena, with 6 out of 10 clients recovering their symptom losses. Such temporary reversals may reflect clients going through an assimilation process (Stiles et al., Reference Stiles, Elliott, Llewelyn, Firth-Cozens, Margison, Shapiro and Hardy1990), whereby distress is naturally heightened in the early stages of accommodating necessary psychological change. The current preliminary evidence adds to findings by Tang, DeRubeis, Hollon, Amsterdam and Sheldon (Reference Tang, DeRubeis, Hollon, Amsterdam and Shelton2007) that sudden gain responders have a 74% lower relapse risk than non-sudden gain responders.

The Non-Recovery group received CT with greater levels of therapist reflection and self-disclosure: the latter factor is a therapeutic technique fraught with potential boundary violation issues (Palombo, Reference Palombo1987), but also at times associated with higher levels of client improvement (Barrett and Berman, Reference Barrett and Berman2001). The small sample size in the current study means that the results need to be treated with caution. The “in session” activity of the cognitive-behavioural therapists was achieved using a measure of helping suitable across the psychotherapy modalities. The appropriateness of such a generic measure for indexing CBT specific helping is a potential confound and CBT-specific helping process measures need to be developed and validated. Reversals were defined using the extant standard (Tang and DeRubeis, Reference Tang, DeRubeis and 1999); whether this criterion captures true reversals or merely vacillation in assimilation processes needs to be addressed. The existing reversal criterion may mean that the size of reversals identified does not exceed the benchmark for a clinically reliably negative change; a “false positive reversal”. It is proposed that the definition of reversals should incorporate the concept of negative reliable clinical change (Jacobson and Truax, Reference Jacobson and Truax1991) in order to clearly identify reversals from assimilation, and thereby facilitate further, more detailed and valid investigations. Continued investigations into sudden gain reversals are necessary to further understanding of how CT techniques and processes can be maximized to ensure client progress.

References

American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Barrett, M. S. and Berman, J. S. (2001). Is psychotherapy more effective when therapists disclose information about themselves? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 597–603.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A. and Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory – 2nd edn. (BDI-II). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Beutler, L. E., Moleiro, C. and Talebi, H. (2002). Resistance in psychotherapy: what conclusions are supported by research? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 207–217.Google Scholar
Bischoff, M. M. and Tracey, T. J. G. (1995). Client resistance as predicted by therapist behavior: a study of sequential dependence. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 487–495.Google Scholar
Busch, A. M., Kanter, J. W., Landes, S. J. and Kohlenberg, R. J. (2006). Sudden gains and outcome: a broader temporal analysis of cognitive therapy for depression. Behavior Therapy, 37, 61–68.Google Scholar
Goodridge, D. and Hardy, G. E. (2009). Patterns of change in psychotherapy: an investigation of sudden gains in cognitive therapy using the assimilation model. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 113–123.Google Scholar
Gaynor, S. T., Weersing, R., Kolko, D. J., Birmaher, B., Heo, J. and Brent, D. A. (2003). The prevalence and impact of large sudden improvements during adolescent therapy for depression: a comparison across cognitive-behavioural, family and supportive therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 386–393.Google Scholar
Hardy, G. E., Cahill, J., Stiles, W. B., Ispan, C., Macaskill, N. and Barkham, M. (2005). Sudden gains in cognitive therapy for depression: a replication and extension. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 59–67.Google Scholar
Harris, T., Brown, G. W. and Robinson, R. (1999). Befriending as an intervention for chronic depression among women in an inner city: 2: role of fresh-start experiences and baseline psychological factors in remission from depression. British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 225–232.Google Scholar
Hill, C. E. (2004). Helping Skills: facilitating exploration, insight, and action (2nd edn.) Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Jacobson, N. S. and Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12–19.Google Scholar
Llewelyn, S. P., Elliott, R. K., Shapiro, D. A., Hardy, G. E. and Firth-Cozens, J. (1988). Client perceptions of significant events in prescriptive and exploratory periods of individual therapy. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27, 105–114.Google Scholar
Mahalik, J. R. (1994). Development of the client resistance scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41, 58–68.Google Scholar
Manly, B. F. J. (1991). Randomization and the Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. London: Chapman.Google Scholar
Palombo, J. (1987). Spontaneous self disclosure in psychotherapy. Clinical Social Work Journal, 15, 107–120.Google Scholar
Stiles, W. B., Elliott, R., Llewelyn, S. P., Firth-Cozens, J. A., Margison, F. R., Shapiro, D. A. and Hardy, G. (1990). Assimilation of problematic experiences by clients in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 27, 411–420.Google Scholar
Tang, T. Z. and DeRubeis, , , R. J. (1999). Sudden gains and critical sessions in cognitive-behavioural therapy for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 894–904.Google Scholar
Tang, T. Z., DeRubeis, R. J., Hollon, S. D., Amsterdam, J. A. and Shelton, R. C. (2007). Sudden gains in cognitive therapy of depression and depression relapse/recurrence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 404–408.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.