Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-6grmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-04T08:16:53.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Winter wheat yield and nitrous oxide emissions in response to cowpea-based green manure and nitrogen fertilization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2019

Tanka P. Kandel*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK74078, USA
Prasanna H. Gowda
Affiliation:
Forage and Livestock Production Research Unit, USDA-ARS Grazinglands Research Laboratory, El Reno, OK73036, USA
Brian K. Northup
Affiliation:
Forage and Livestock Production Research Unit, USDA-ARS Grazinglands Research Laboratory, El Reno, OK73036, USA
Alexandre C. Rocateli
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK74078, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: tanka.kandel@okstate.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of cowpea green manure and inorganic nitrogen (N) fertilizers on yields of winter wheat and soil emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O). The comparisons included cowpea grown solely as green manure where all biomass was terminated at maturity by tillage, summer fallow treatments with 90 kg N ha−1 as urea (90-N), and no fertilization (control) at planting of winter wheat. Fluxes of N2O were measured by closed chamber methods after soil incorporation of cowpea in autumn (October–November) and harvesting of winter wheat in summer (June–August). Growth and yields of winter wheat and N concentrations in grain and straw were also measured. Cowpea produced 9.5 Mg ha−1 shoot biomass with 253 kg N ha−1 at termination. Although soil moisture was favorable for denitrification after soil incorporation of cowpea biomass, low concentrations of soil mineral N restricted emissions of N2O from cowpea treatment. However, increased concentrations of soil mineral N and large rainfall-induced emissions were recorded from the cowpea treatment during summer. Growth of winter wheat, yield, and grain N concentrations were lowest in response to cowpea treatment and highest in 90-N treatment. In conclusion, late terminated cowpea may reduce yield of winter wheat and increase emissions of N2O outside of wheat growing seasons due to poor synchronization of N mineralization from cowpea biomass with N-demand of winter wheat.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019
Figure 0

Table 1. Yield and chemical composition of cowpea biomass at termination

Figure 1

Figure 1. Mean monthly (a) air temperature and (b) total precipitation during the study year (September 2017 to August 2018; gray bars) compared to the long-term means in the study area (1981–2010; black circles).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Dynamics of (a) soil organic carbon (C), (b) total nitrogen (N), and (c) C:N ratio in the 0–0.15 m soil depth in response to N treatments. Error bars represent the spatial variations at plot scale (standard error, n = 3). Unidirectional error bars are shown for clarity. Note the break in x-axis between the periods of planting and harvesting of winter wheat.

Figure 3

Figure 3. (a) Average soil temperatures at 0–0.05 m depth during flux measurement, (b) dynamics of daily precipitation and water-filled pore space (WFPS) measured at 0–0.05 cm soil depth during flux measurement. Dynamics of soil (c) nitrate (NO3−) and (d) ammonium (NH4+) N in the 0–0.15 m soil depth. Dynamics of (e) CO2 and (f) N2O fluxes. Error bars (c–f) represent the spatial variations at plot scale (standard error, n = 3). Unidirectional error bars are shown for clarity. Note the break in x-axis between the periods of planting and harvesting of winter wheat.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Cumulative estimates of N2O emissions during planting (40 days from 6 October to 15 November 2017) and after harvesting (55 days from 25 June to 19 August 2018) of winter wheat in response to N treatments. Error bars represent the spatial variations at plot scale (standard error, n = 3). The statistical differences (p < 0.05) of total cumulative emissions among the treatments are indicated by different letters on the top of bars.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Dynamics of ratio vegetation index (RVI) as a proxy for green biomass of winter wheat in response to N treatments. Error bars represent the spatial variations at plots (standard error, n = 3). Unidirectional error bars are shown for clarity.

Figure 6

Figure 6. (a) Aboveground dry matter and (b) grain yields of winter wheat in response to N treatments. Error bars represent the spatial variations at plots (standard error, n = 3). The statistical differences (p < 0.05) among the treatments are indicated by different letters on the top of bars.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Yield attributing characters of winter wheat in resposne to N treatments. Error bars represent the spatial variations at plots (standard error, n = 3). The statistical differences (p < 0.05) among the treatments are indicated by different letters on the top of bars.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Nitrogen concentrations in the (a) grain and (b) straw of winter wheat. (c) Total amount of nitrogen in the grain and straw of winter wheat in response to N treatments. Standard error (SE) bars represent spatial variations at plot scale (n = 3). The statistical differences (p < 0.05) among the treatments are indicated by different letters on the top of bars.