Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T06:11:30.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of laser beam intensity profile on propagation dynamics of laser-blow-off plasma plume

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2010

Ajai Kumar*
Affiliation:
Institute for Plasma Research, Gandhinagar, India
Sony George
Affiliation:
ISP, Cochin University of Science and Tech., Cochin, India
R.K. Singh
Affiliation:
Institute for Plasma Research, Gandhinagar, India
V.P.N. Nampoori
Affiliation:
ISP, Cochin University of Science and Tech., Cochin, India
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Ajai Kumar, Institute for Plasma Research, Bhat, Gandhinagar-382 428, India. E-mail: ajai@ipr.res.in, ajaiipr@yahoo.com

Abstract

Effect of intensity profile of the ablating laser on the dynamics of laser-blow-off (LBO) plume has been studied by fast imaging technique. This work emphasizes the geometrical aspect of the LBO plume, which is an important parameter for various applications. Visualization of the expanding plume reveals that geometrical shape and directionality (divergence) of the plume are highly dependent on the laser intensity profile. Present results demonstrate that the Gaussian profile laser produces a well-collimated, low divergence plasma plume as compared to the plume formed by a top-hat profile laser. The sequence of film removal processes is invoked to explain the role of energy density profile of the ablating laser in LBO mechanism.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (Color online) Recorded intensity profiles of laser; Gaussian beam profile, “GP” and top hat profile, “THP.”

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (Color online) The sequence of images of expanding LBO plume in vacuum formed by THP and GP laser at different time delays. The integration time of ICCD was fixed as 4 ns. Color bar shows the normalized intensity in arbitrary unit.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Observed plume length versus time plot for the THP and GP laser generated plumes. The solid lines represent the linear fit for the experimental data.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Variation of plume width as a function of time delay for the both THP and GP laser.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Angular dependence of emission intensity of the LBO plumes produced by THP and GP laser at 800 ns time delay.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Ion distributions of the LBO plumes as function of radial distance for the both THP and GP laser. The distance between the ion probe and target plate is set as 45 mm.