Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rngvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T16:19:38.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multiproxy reconstruction of environmental change from the late Pliocene to the Late Pleistocene in the Sauce Grande River basin, Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2026

Lara Manoccio*
Affiliation:
CONICET–UNLP, Centro de Investigaciones Geológicas, La Plata, Argentina Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, UNLP, Cátedra de Geología de Minas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Elisa Beilinson
Affiliation:
CONICET–UNLP, Centro de Investigaciones Geológicas, La Plata, Argentina Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, UNLP, Cátedra de Sedimentología Especial, La Plata, Argentina
María Sol Raigemborn
Affiliation:
CONICET–UNLP, Centro de Investigaciones Geológicas, La Plata, Argentina Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, UNLP, Cátedra de Pedología General de Suelos, La Plata, Argentina
*
Corresponding author: Lara Manoccio: Email: lmanoccio@cig.museo.unlp.edu.ar
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Sauce Grande River Basin (Buenos Aires Province, Argentina) presents a late Pliocene–Holocene sedimentary succession that preserves key evidence of Quaternary paleoenvironmental change in the southern Pampas. This study integrates stratigraphy, sedimentology, paleopedology, geochemistry, mineralogy, and stable isotope data to reconstruct paleoenvironmental evolution from the late Pliocene to the Late Pleistocene. Three paleosol types (Calcisols, Calcic Protosols, and Protosols) were identified and characterized through field descriptions, micromorphology, and molecular indices. Their development reflects shifts in landscape stability, sediment supply, and soil moisture regimes, consistent with glacioeustatic fluctuations and climatic oscillations during the late Plio-Pleistocene transition and the Quaternary. Stable isotope analyses of pedogenic carbonates reveal a trend from C₃-dominated vegetation under more humid conditions in the late Pliocene–Early Pleistocene, to more arid Late Pleistocene–Holocene environments, with increased δ13C values indicating reduced vegetation density and a higher potential contribution of C₄ plants. These findings align with palynological and faunal evidence, highlighting the value of paleosols as sensitive indicators of environmental change. The multiproxy approach adopted here provides new insights into soil formation dynamics and Quaternary palaeoecological transitions in non-glaciated midlatitude settings of South America.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Quaternary Research Center.
Figure 0

Figure 1. Location map of the Sauce Grande River basin in Argentina. Red stars indicate localities studied: 1, Balneario Saldungaray; 2, La Toma; 3, Corte Ruta 72; 4, Chacra La Blanqueada; 5, El Divisorio; 6, Bajo San José.Figure 1 long description.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Late Pliocene to Holocene stratigraphy of the study area in the Sauce Grande River basin in Argentina (modified from Manoccio et al., 2024). Ages range for BSJ and BS taken from Rabassa, 1989. LT, La Toma; CR72, Corte Ruta 72; ChLB, Chacra La Blanqueada; ED, El divisorio; BSJ, Bajo San José; BS, Balneario Saldungaray. P1, Calcisols; P2, Calcic Protosols; P3, Protosols.Figure 2 long description.

Figure 2

Table 1. Facies and facies associations in the Sauce Grande River basin, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina.Table 1 long description.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Stratigraphic profiles with pedotypes and locations of the stable isotopes and geochemistry analysis for the study area in the Sauce Grande River basin in Argentina.Figure 3 long description.

Figure 4

Table 2. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of paleosol samples from the Sauce Grande River basin, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina.Table 2 long description.

Figure 5

Table 3. Main characteristics of the pedotypes in the Sauce Grande River basin, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina.Table 3 long description.

Figure 6

Figure 4. Pedotype 1 (P1): (A) field photograph of The La Toma site; (B) outcrops, macrofeatures, representative profile, and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis; (C) outcrops, macrofeatures, representative profile and XRD analysis; (D) Micritic and microsparitic calcite coating (XN); (E) alveolar-septal structure and peloidal microaggregates (PN); (F) sparitic nodules and Fe and Mn oxides (XN); (G) planar voids indicated with a yellow arrow and Fe and Mn oxide hypo-coatings marked with an orange arrow (PN); (H) granostriated b-fabric in the Bk horizon (XN); (I) needle-fiber calcite and microsparitic calcite coatings; (J) complete microsparitic calcite infilling indicated with a yellow arrow, micritic coating with a blue arrow, and Fe and Mn oxide nodules with a red arrow; (K) microphotograph of microsparitic calcite halos around voids and aggregates, and micritic nodules (XN). PN, parallel nicols; XN, crossed nicols.Figure 4 long description.

Figure 7

Table 4. Geochemical samples of the different horizons with the percentage weight of major oxides and pedogenetic indices of each horizon in the Sauce Grande River basin, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina.Table 4 long description.

Figure 8

Figure 5. Pedotype 2 (P2): (A) representative profiles of Pedotype 2 include details of clay mineralogy via X-ray diffraction (XRD); (B) ACk horizon with branched carbonate rhizoliths; (C) Fe-Mn oxide nodules in ACk horizons, highlighted with yellow dashed circles; (D) carbonate nodules indicated by yellow arrows; (E) microsparitic calcite coatings in voids, marked with a yellow arrow (PN); (F) sparitic and micritic carbonate nodules with edges outlined by yellow dashed lines (XN); (G) void coatings of Fe-Mn oxides (XN); (H) Typical Fe-Mn oxide nodules (PN). PN, parallel nicols; XN, crossed nicols.Figure 5 long description.

Figure 9

Figure 6. Pedotype 3 (P3): (A) representative profile of the pedotype P3a, including details of total rock mineralogy and clay mineralogy (X-ray diffraction [XRD] analysis); (B) Bw horizon with blocky aggregates; (C) striated b-fabric (PN); (D) planar voids forming wedge-shaped aggregates (PN); (E) micritic carbonate hypo-coatings, indicated by a yellow arrow (PN); (F) representative profile of the pedotype P3b, including details of total rock mineralogy and clay mineralogy (XRD analysis); (G) field photograph of the Bw horizon; (H) Fe-Mn oxide nodules in hand sample; (I) fabric-porosity and grain-striated features, with blue and orange arrows indicating the arrangement of clays (XN); (J) chambers with illuvial clay coatings (PN); (K) illuvial clay cutans marked with blue arrows, compound cutans, illuvial clay, Fe-Mn oxides with marked with yellow arrows, and Fe-Mn oxide nodules marked with red arrows (PN). PN, parallel nicols; XN, crossed nicols.Figure 6 long description.

Figure 10

Figure 7. Integrated chronostratigraphic and paleoenvironmental framework for the late Pliocene–Holocene of the Sauce Grande River Basin in Argentina: chronostratigraphy (period/epoch); geomagnetic polarity; sea-level variation for the Plio-Pleistocene period (Miller et al., 2020); stage/age (Cione and Tonni, 2001); stratigraphic units; Patagonian glaciations (Rabassa et al., 2005) (LG, last glaciation; GPG, Great Patagonian Glaciation); pollen zones (Borromei, 1995); paleosols in this study; stable isotope compositions of pedogenic carbonates. Samples from the La Toma Formation (P1) are shown in blue, and those from the Agua Blanca Formation (P2) in orange, consistently across the δ13C and δ1⁸O columns and in the lower-right δ13C–δ1⁸O cross-plot.Figure 7 long description.

Figure 11

Table 5. Pedogenic processes based on macro and microfeatures of the different pedotypes in the Sauce Grande River basin, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina.Table 5 long description.

Figure 12

Figure 8. Schematic paleoenvironmental reconstruction of the Sauce Grande River Basin in Argentina during the late Pliocene to the Holocene. Bottom, Late Pliocene–Early Pleistocene: deposits of the La Toma Formation under a low-sinuosity fluvial system developed in a relatively stable landscape. Calcisols (P1) formed on well-drained floodplains under semiarid conditions dominated by C3 vegetation. Center, Late Pleistocene: development of the Agua Blanca Formation, characterized by increased fluvial dynamism, braided channels, and more variable moisture conditions. Weakly developed Calcic Protosols (P2) formed on floodplains and overbank deposits during drier and colder climatic conditions. Top, Late Pleistocene–Holocene: reduced sediment input and increased landscape stability favored the formation of Protosols (P3) within the Saavedra Formation.Figure 8 long description.