Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T04:03:07.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) interference in simulated sweetpotato plant beds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2020

Stephen L. Meyers*
Affiliation:
Associate Extension/Research Professor, North Mississippi Research and Extension Center–Pontotoc Ridge-Flatwoods Branch Experiment Station, Mississippi State University, Pontotoc, MS, USA; current: Assistant Professor, Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
T. Casey Barickman
Affiliation:
Assistant Research Professor, North Mississippi Research and Extension Center–Horticultural Unit, Mississippi State University, Verona, MS, USA
Jeffrey L. Main
Affiliation:
Research Associate, North Mississippi Research and Extension Center–Pontotoc Ridge-Flatwoods Branch Experiment Station, Mississippi State University, Pontotoc, MS, USA
Thomas Horgan
Affiliation:
Senior Research Associate, North Mississippi Research and Extension Center–Horticultural Unit, Mississippi State University, Verona, MS, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Stephen L. Meyers, Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN47907. (Email: slmeyers@purdue.edu)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse experiments were conducted in 2016 at Pontotoc and Verona, MS. On March 3 (Pontotoc) and March 7 (Verona), landscape fabric was placed in the bottom of polyethylene lugs, each 0.22 m2, then approximately 5 cm of a 1:1 (v/v) blend of soilless potting media and masonry sand was added. ‘Beauregard’ sweetpotato [Ipomoea batatas (L). Lam.] storage roots weighing between 85 and 227 g, and several with emerging sprouts ≤1 cm, were placed longitudinally in a single layer on the substrate, then covered with an additional 3 cm of the substrate. Sprouted yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.) tubers were transplanted equidistantly into sweetpotato-containing lugs at six densities: 0, 18, 36, 73, 109, and 145 m−2. Trials were terminated 55 and 60 d after planting at Pontotoc and Verona, respectively. Predicted total sweetpotato stem cuttings (slips) decreased linearly from 399 to 312 m−2 as C. esculentus density increased from 0 to 145 m−2. Predicted total slip dry weight at a C. esculentus density of 145 m−2 was reduced 21% compared with 0 m−2. Predicted rotten sweetpotato storage roots increased from 2.6 to 11.3 m−2 as C. esculentus density increased from 0 to 145 m−2. In response to increasing C. esculentus density, sweetpotato seed roots exhibited increased proximal-end dominance.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2020
Figure 0

Figure 1. From left to right, sweetpotato slips separated into those ≥25 to 35 cm, ≥15 to <25 cm, and ≥10 to <15 cm at Pontotoc, MS, in 2016.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Effect of Cyperus esculentus density on sweetpotato slip yield and C. esculentus shoot number pooled across Pontotoc and Verona, MS, in 2016. Points represent observed mean data. Lines represent predicted values from Equations 1 (linear) and 3 (three-parameter exponential). Parameter estimates are followed by SE values in parentheses.

Figure 2

Table 1. Observed and predicted sweetpotato slip and Cyperus esculentus shoot dry weight response to C. esculentus density pooled across Pontotoc and Verona, MS, locations in 2016.

Figure 3

Table 2. Observed and predicted sweetpotato sprouting rating, rotten seed roots, node number, and stem caliper in response to Cyperus esculentus density pooled across Pontotoc and Verona, MS, locations in 2016.

Figure 4

Figure 3. Effect of sweetpotato sprouting rating on total sweetpotato slip yield pooled across Pontotoc and Verona, MS, in 2016. Points represent predicted mean data. Lines represent predicted values from Equation 4 (three-parameter logistic model). Parameter estimates are followed by SE values in parentheses. Sweetpotato sprouting rating:0 = no sprouts produced; 1 = sprouting at the proximal one-third only; 2 = sprouting at the proximal one-third and middle one-third of the root; and 3 = sprouting at the proximal one-third, middle one-third, and distal one-third of the root.

Figure 5

Figure 4. Effect of Cyperus esculentus density on relative end-of-study increase of C. esculentus shoot number and total tuber number per originally planted tuber pooled across Pontotoc and Verona, MS, in 2016. Points represent mean data. Lines represent predicted values from Equation 3 (three-parameter exponential model). Parameter estimates are followed by SE values in parentheses.

Figure 6

Figure 5. Effect of Cyperus esculentus density on C. esculentus tuber production pooled across Pontotoc and Verona, MS, in 2016. Points represent observed mean data. Lines represent predicted values from Equation 3 (three-parameter exponential model). Parameter estimates are followed by SE values in parentheses.