Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T09:43:45.104Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dissipation of radiation energy in concentrated solid-solution alloys: Unique defect properties and microstructural evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2019

Yanwen Zhang
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA; Zhangy1@ornl.gov
Takeshi Egami
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, and Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA; egami@utk.edu
William J. Weber
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, and Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA; wjweber@utk.edu

Abstract

The effort to develop metallic alloys with increased structural strength and improved radiation performance has focused on the incorporation of either solute elements or microstructural inhomogeneities to mitigate damage. The recent discovery and development of single-phase concentrated solid-solution alloys (SP-CSAs) has prompted fundamental questions that challenge established theories and models currently applicable to conventional alloys. The current understanding of electronic and atomic effects, defect evolution, and microstructure progression suggests that radiation energy dissipates in SP-CSAs at different interaction strengths via energy carriers (electrons, phonons, and magnons). Modification of electronic- and atomic-level heterogeneities and tailoring of atomic transport processes can be realized through tuning of the chemical complexity of SP-CSAs by the selection of appropriate elements and their concentrations. Fundamental understanding of controlling energy dissipation via site-to-site chemical complexity reveals new design principles for predictive discovery and guided synthesis of new alloys with targeted functionalities, including radiation tolerance.

Information

Type
Technical Feature
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Single-phase concentrated solid-solution alloys (SP-CSAs) are alloys with tailored chemical complexity tunable via the intrinsic elemental disorder. The chemical complexity may be tuned by increasing the number of multiple principal elements (from 1 to 5, shown from the lower left to the upper right corner in the background arrow), by replacing the principal elements (e.g., in the ternaries of NiCrCo and NiFeCo by replacing Cr with Fe), and by modifying the concentration in the alloys (e.g., from Ni0.5Fe0.5 to Ni0.7Fe0.3 or Ni0.9Fe0.1, or varying concentration of all elements of 20 ± 5% in quinternaries of NiCoFeCrMn and NiCoFeCrPd). The tunable chemical complexity (e.g., left: a subset of SP-CSAs) represents a powerful tool for dramatically modifying properties at the level of electrons and atoms (middle: electronic structure and energy landscapes in pure nickel and CSAs) and ultimately enhancing radiation tolerance (right: schematic drawing of an atomic collision and the radiation-induced swelling from step-height measurements).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Fermi surfaces (Γ-Χ-W plane in arbitrary units) of majority- and minority-spin channels in NiCo and NiFeCoCrMn alloys, respectively. The spin channels are distinguished using ↑ and ↓.17

Figure 2

Figure 3. Electron density contour plot showing that a Cr interstitial defect in NiCoCr induces transition from the t2g(σ) orbital extending along [111] to the eg(π) orbital extending along [100] of Cr electronic states. For defect-free Cr atoms, t2g states—shown as a diagonal elongation of electronic density—are dominant. Introduction of a Cr interstitial leads to a transition to eg states (along axial directions). This electron deformation capability is attributed to partially filled electrons of Cr compared with Ni/Co.12

Figure 3

Figure 4. The pair-distribution function (PDF) of body-centered-cubic TiZrNbHf CSA determined by high-energy x-ray diffraction.22 The red line is the PDF calculated for the average lattice and the green lines are differences. The calculated PDF fits well beyond 4 Å, but fails to describe the first and second peaks.

Figure 4

Figure 5. The relation between charge transfer and Wigner–Seitz volume, a sphere whose volume is equal to the mean volume per atom in a solid. Correlations between atomic volumes and charge transfer of t2g (upper panel) and eg (lower panel) orbitals for body-centered-cubic concentrated solid-solution alloys of TiZrNbHfTa (a, f), TiZrNbHf (b, g), TiZrNbV (c, h), TiVNbTa (d, i), and TiVNbMo (e, j).22 Charge transfer occurs only for t2g orbitals, but not for eg orbitals.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Schematic atomic arrangements: random structure of a multielement concentrated solid-solution alloy (CSA) (left). In a solid-solution NiCoCr alloy, short-range order is found, showing that Cr atoms favorably bond with Ni and Co atoms, as indicated by the two circles (right).

Figure 6

Figure 7. Solid-solution strength of concentrated solid-solution alloys (CSAs) is proportional to (a) the variation in atomic-level pressure and (b) electronegativity difference.30 Note: R2, accuracy of linear fit.

Figure 7

Figure 8. The dependence of calculated stacking fault energies from density functional theory, γDFT, on the charge density redistribution at bond critical points, Δρ at CPS, for NiCo, NiFe, and NiCoCr. The results calculated in pure Ni and larger supercells for NiFe (i.e., 3 × 5 rather than 2 × 3 in the x−y plane) are also indicated. The red pentagon denotes values in pure Ni.31

Figure 8

Figure 9. Simulated heating of atomic vibrations by fast laser using standard Langevin dynamics (left) and electron–phonon molecular dynamics (EPH-MD) (right). The EPH-MD results show differential heating—slow for long-wavelength mode (Γ) and fast for short-wavelength mode (X).

Figure 9

Figure 10. Residual damage in simulation cells. (a) Snapshot of molecular dynamic simulation cells 20 ps after the ion impact. The solid–melt interface is shown by the solid line, and electron temperatures are shown in color. (b) Melt–solid interface when molten radius is at its maximum. Small atom fragments are vacancies.37

Figure 10

Figure 11. Distribution of migration barrier heights in NiCoFeCr, for interstitials (e.g., Ni and Co) and vacancies (e.g., VNi and VCo).12 The vertical axis shows the counts in modeling, proportional to probability. The lines indicate the barrier heights in pure Ni.

Figure 11

Figure 12. Disorder at damage peak as a function of both Ar-ion fluence (bottom axis) and local dose (top axis) in displacements per atom (dpa) for Ni, NiFe, and NiFeCoCr irradiated with 500 keV Ar ions at 16 K. For better visibility of data, (a) logarithmic and (b) linear scales are used.45

Figure 12

Figure 13. Cross-sectional transmission electron microscope image showing void distributions in Ni and NiCoFeCrMn irradiated with 3 MeV Ni ions to 5 × 1016 cm–2 at 773 K. The significant swelling resistance in NiCoFeCrMn is attributed to the 3D migration mode of the interstitial clusters.

Figure 13

Figure 14. Closer migration energies of interstitials and vacancies (a) promote annihilation of vacancies (b), which leads to suppressed growth of helium bubbles (c).