Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T11:35:02.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In vitro activities of fluconazole, itraconazole and voriconazole against otomycotic fungal pathogens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2009

G Yenişehirli*
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziosmanpaşa University, Tokat, Turkey
Y Bulut
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziosmanpaşa University, Tokat, Turkey
M Güven
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziosmanpaşa University, Tokat, Turkey
E Günday
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziosmanpaşa University, Tokat, Turkey
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Gülgün Yenişehirli, Gaziosmanpaşa University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Clinical Microbiology, 60100 Tokat, Turkey. Fax: +90 356 2133176 E-mail: gulguny@gop.edu.tr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To determine the causative pathogens of otomycosis, and to evaluate the in vitro activity of antifungal agents against these pathogens.

Materials and methods:

A total of 96 fungal isolate were taken from 92 patients suspected of otomycosis. The in vitro activity of fluconazole, itraconazole and voriconazole against otomycotic pathogens was tested using the E-test method.

Results:

The most common pathogen was Aspergillus fumigatus (40.6 per cent), followed by A niger (35.4 per cent), A flavus (12.5 per cent) and Candida albicans (11.5 per cent). All Aspergillus species were found to be resistant to fluconazole (minimum inhibitory concentration ≥256 µg/ml). The mean minimum inhibitory concentrations of voriconazole for A fumigatus, A niger, A flavus and C albicans were significantly lower than those of itraconazole for the same pathogens.

Conclusion:

This study found that the most common otomycotic fungal pathogen was A fumigatus, and that voriconazole had more potent in vitro activity than itraconazole against all Aspergillus species as well as against C albicans.

Information

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2009
Figure 0

Table I Distribution of fungal species isolated

Figure 1

Table II MIC50, MIC90, MIC range and mean MIC of fluconazole, itraconazole and voriconazole for fungal species isolated*

Figure 2

Fig. 1 In vitro antifungal susceptibility profiles of isolated otomycotic pathogens, showing distribution of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antifungal agents for each fungal species isolated. Fluconazole data are not shown for Aspergillus species, since all these species were found to be resistant. The mean MICs of voriconazole were significantly lower than those of itraconazole (p < 0.01, comparing results for all four species; Student's t-test).