Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zsp5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T01:19:58.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Molecular characterization of Moniezia sichuanensis in captive musk deer (Moschus berezovskii)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2017

J. Xu,
H. Lin,
J. Chen,
Y. Cai,
W. Fu,
H. Wang,
X. Gu,
W. Lai,
X. Peng and
G. Yang
J. Xu
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
H. Lin
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
J. Chen
Affiliation:
Sichuan Institute of Musk Deer Breeding, Dujiangyan 611830, China
Y. Cai
Affiliation:
Sichuan Institute of Musk Deer Breeding, Dujiangyan 611830, China
W. Fu
Affiliation:
Sichuan Institute of Musk Deer Breeding, Dujiangyan 611830, China
H. Wang
Affiliation:
Fengchun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Chengdu 610081, China
X. Gu
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
W. Lai
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
X. Peng
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, College of Life and Basic Science, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an 625014, China
G. Yang*
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
*
*E-mail: guangyou1963@aliyun.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The musk deer (Moschus berezovskii) is an economically important species from which musk is extracted and used in perfumes and medicines. Cestodes (parasitic flatworms) of the genus Moniezia are important parasites that infect this endangered species and can cause high mortality in young deer. In 1982, Moniezia (S.) sichuanensis sp. nov. was described from a specimen obtained from wild musk deer. The new species was distinct from the other described species of Moniezia by the sawtooth-shaped interproglottidal glands, the thick vagina and the absence of a cirrus spine. In the present study, 12 cestodes collected from musk deer were examined morphologically and confirmed to be M. sichuanensis. Molecular characterization was performed by amplifying and comparing the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) and 5.8S rRNA gene (ITS1–5.8S) of ribosomal DNA with available sequences from other Moniezia species. The amplified sequences ranged from 761 to 764 bp and similarity ranged from 98.7–100%, compared to 67.8–92.4% with other Moniezia spp. Construction of a phylogenetic tree using the neighbour-joining method indicated that all 12 ITS1–5.8S sequences formed a single clade, confirming M. sichuanensis as a separate species. This study provides novel molecular insight into M. sichuanensis that could prove useful for future diagnosis and control of monieziasis in musk deer.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 92 , Issue 4 , July 2018, pp. 477 - 483
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Introduction

The musk deer (Moschus berezovskii), which is unique to Asia, is both rare and medicinally useful. It is categorized as endangered in the IUCN Red List (Wang & Harris, Reference Wang and Harris2008) and is a Class I nationally protected wildlife species (Smith et al., Reference Smith, Xie, Hoffmann, Lunde, MacKinnon, Wilson and Wozencraft2010). It is also an economically important species due to its musk, harvested from the scent gland of mature males (Green, Reference Green1986), which is used in perfumes as well as in around 300 traditional Chinese medicine prescriptions (Sheng & Liu, Reference Sheng and Liu2007). Due to the high value of musk, a programme of artificial rearing began in China in the late 1950s. Techniques for obtaining musk without harming the animals were developed to ensure conservation of the deer and the sustainable use of musk. To date, more than 10,000 musk deer have been raised in various provinces, including Sichuan and Shaanxi, and these two provinces account for the majority of musk deer (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Hao and Liu2010a; Li & Jiang, Reference Li and Jiang2014; Cai et al., Reference Cai, Lin, Cheng, Wang, Fu, Zhu, Wu and Yang2016).

Cestodes of the genus Moniezia in the family Anoplocephalidae are an important parasite of herbivorous ruminant animals, including musk deer, causing monieziasis in domestic and wild animals, especially juveniles. These parasites have a worldwide distribution and are present in 30 provinces in China, including Inner Mongolia, Xinjiang, Qinghai, Guizhou, Sichuan and Tibet (Lin & He, Reference Lin and He1975; Shen, Reference Shen2005; Yang & Zhang, Reference Yang and Zhang2013). Monieziasis poses a great threat to artificial breeding programmes by causing high mortality of young deer (Yang et al., Reference Yang, Cai, Sha, Chen and Chen2002). In 1982, a tapeworm found in wild musk deer in Barkam, Sichuan Province, was defined as the new species Moniezia (S.) sichuanensis sp. nov. in a new subgenus (Sinicamoniezia subgen. nov.) of Moniezia, based on the unusual sawtooth-shaped interproglottidal glands situated at the anterior part of each proglottid, the thick vagina and the absence of a cirrus spine (Wu, Reference Wu1982). Subsequent research has focused on the morphological characteristics, biology and epidemiology of M. sichuanensis, as well as controlling monieziasis induced by this species in captive musk deer (Yang et al., Reference Yang, Chen, Cai, Sha and Chen2001a, b). However, genetic information for the genus Moniezia is of limited availability, making it difficult to explore the molecular characteristics of this species. Genetic information has been reported recently for M. expansa, M. benedeni and M. monardi (Ohtori et al., Reference Ohtori, Mikiko and Itagaki2015), as well as two undefined Moniezia species (Wickström et al., Reference Wickström, Haukisalmi, Varis, Hantula and Henttonen2005), making it possible to study M. sichuanensis.

In this study, 12 M. sichuanensis specimens were collected from musk deer in five distinct areas. To better understand the molecular characteristics of M. sichuanensis, the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) and 5.8S rRNA gene (ITS1–5.8S) of ribosomal DNA were amplified and analysed.

Materials and methods

Tapeworm collection and staining

Twelve tapeworms were isolated from newly retrieved faeces of 12 musk deer after conventional deworming using praziquantel tablets (25 mg/kg body weight, single oral administration). Tapeworms were placed immediately in disposable plastic bags, labelled and shipped to Sichuan Agricultural University. A single M. expansa tapeworm from a goat was provided by the Department of Parasitology, Sichuan Agricultural University. Specific information about the tapeworm samples is shown in table 1 and fig. 1. Each individual cestode was washed in saline and divided into two parts (mature and immature). Mature segments were fixed in 70% alcohol and stained with carmine for morphological examination of the interproglottid region and reproductive organs (Wu, Reference Wu1982; Yang et al., Reference Yang, Sha, Cai, Chen and Chen2001b; Yang & Zhang, Reference Yang and Zhang2013). Immature segments were frozen and stored at −70°C for DNA extraction.

Fig. 1.

Sampling sites from which the 12 M. sichuanensis specimens were collected from musk deer raised in Sichuan and Shaanxi provinces, China.

Table 1.

Species information and GenBank accession numbers of the ITS1–5.8S sequences for Moniezia spp.

DNA extraction, PCR amplification and amplicon sequencing

Total DNA was extracted from immature segments of the 13 samples (12 from musk deer and one from goat) using a QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Primers ITS1-F (5′-GCTGCTACCCGCATGATGTT-3′) and ITS1-R (5′-GGCAAGCCTATAGCCGCAAT-3′) (Nguyen et al., Reference Nguyen, Le, Huynh, Nguyen, Nguyen and Vu-Khac2012) were used to amplify the ITS1–5.8S region of ribosomal DNA. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed in a 25-μl reaction volume containing 12.5 μl of Taq PCR Master Mix (Tiangen Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), 8.5 μl of double-distilled water (ddH2O), 2 μl of DNA template and 1 μl of each forward and reverse primer (working concentration = 10 pmol/l). Reaction cycles consisted of an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 5 min; followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 45 s, 56°C for 30 s and 72°C for 45 s; with a final extension of 72°C for 10 min. PCR products were visualized by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis using GoldenView staining. Amplicons of expected size were purified and cloned into the pMD19-T vector and introduced into Escherichia coli (DH5α). To ensure maximum accuracy, three positive colonies of each sample were sent for commercial sequencing (Invitrogen, Shanghai, China). Consensus sequences were utilized for subsequent analyses.

Phylogenetic analysis

The BLAST program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) was used to compare the obtained nucleotide sequences with published gene sequences from other Moniezia spp. deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). The corresponding sequences are listed in table 1. Multiple sequence alignment was performed using DNAMAN software package, 2005 (Lynnon Corporation, San Ramon, California, USA) and the genetic similarities between species were also determined using this software. Phylogenetic trees of relevant species were constructed by the neighbour-joining method using MEGA 5.0 (http://www.megasoftware.net) based on genetic distances calculated by the Kimura 2-parameter model. The robustness of the tree was tested by bootstrapping with 1000 replicates. Phylogenetic analysis was performed using sequences generated from PCR analysis of the ~760 bp ITS1–5.8S fragment along with sequences obtained from NCBI (table 1). Dipylidium caninum (GenBank accession number: AM_491338) was used as the outgroup.

Results

The interproglottidal glands from all 12 specimens from musk deer had a clear sawtooth shape, the cirrus spine was absent and the vagina was thick. Based on previously published work (Wu, Reference Wu1982) (fig. 2), all 12 specimens from the five areas were identified as M. sichuanensis via morphological analysis. A 761–764 bp ITS1–5.8S fragment and a 754 bp ITS1–5.8S fragment were successfully amplified. All sequence information has been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers KX377878–KX377890.

Fig. 2.

Line drawings of Moniezia (S.) sichuanensis sp. nov.: (a) scolex; (b) mature proglottid; (c) mature proglottid (reproductive organs magnified); (d) interproglottidal glands; and (e) eggs. Drawings and interpretation are based on previously published work (Wu, Reference Wu1982).

Multiple alignment showed that ITS1–5.8S sequences amplified from the 12 M. sichuanensis specimens shared between 98.7 and 100% similarity, and 67.8–92.4% similarity with other Moniezia spp. Similarity among the seven samples from Sichuan province was between 99.2 and 100%, and similarity was 99.6–100% among the five samples from Shaanxi province. As shown in table 2, nucleotide indels and substitutions were observed in the ITS1–5.8S sequences of the 12 M. sichuanensis specimens. According to the phylogenetic tree based on ITS1–5.8S sequences (fig. 3), the 12 M. sichuanensis samples clustered together (98.7–100% similarity), and also with M. monardi (92% similarity), M. expansa (77% similarity), M. benedeni (81% similarity), and two other unnamed Moniezia cestodes (77% and 74% similarity) in another branch. Based on the morphological observations and phylogenetic analyses, M. sichuanensis was confirmed as a separate species distinct from known species.

Fig. 3.

Phylogenetic relationships between cestodes isolated from musk deer and other species of the genus Moniezia. Phylogeny was inferred based on the amplified ITS1–5.8S fragment using the neighbour-joining method. Numbers on nodes indicate bootstrap values resulting from phylogenetic analysis, and values less than 50% are not shown.

Table 2.

Multiple sequence alignment of ITS1–5.8S fragment amplified from the 12 M. sichuanensis specimens.

Specimen ID and nucleotide positions of point mutations are shown. 5.8S starts from nucleotide 633 in MEK01. Only variable positions are shown: ’.’ indicates that the nucleotide position corresponds to the MEK01 reference isolate, and ‘–’ represents an alignment gap.

Discussion

Defining species within the genus Moniezia has proved controversial, and in an attempt to simplify the systematics of this genus, it was divided into three subgenera based on the presence or absence and shape of interproglottidal glands: (1) M. baeriezia (interproglottidal glands absent), including M. mettami, M. rugosa and M. baeri; (2) M. moniezia (rosette-shaped interproglottidal glands) including M. expansa and M. monardi; (3) Moniezia blanchariezia (line-shaped interproglottidal glands) including M. benedeni and M. pallida (Skrjabin & Schulz, Reference Skrjabin and Schulz1937). In his revision of the Anoplocephalidae tapeworms, Spassky (Reference Spassky1951) approved this division and concluded that the above-named species were valid. Although at least 12 Moniezia species have been reported in domestic and wild ruminants, it is difficult to distinguish them at the species level based on morphology alone. Among these, M. expans a and M. benedeni are the most widespread and harmful species (Schmidt, Reference Schmidt1986). Currently, morphological classification of Moniezia is mainly based on the size of adult worms and the morphology of the scolex, interproglottidal glands, reproductive organs and eggs (Machida et al., Reference Machida, Matsumura and Watanabe1974; Liu et al., Reference Liu, Wang and Bo2008; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Liu and Bo2010b).

Using pathogens to detect monieziasis relies on the identification of eggs and/or a gravid proglottid. However, the shape of eggs is similar among closely related Moniezia species. In addition, excreted eggs are sometimes deformed, preventing morphological differentiation at the species level (Taylor, Reference Taylor1967; Chilton et al., Reference Chilton, O'Callaghan, Beveridge and Andrews2007). Identification via the proglottids is difficult because some individuals lack interproglottidal glands, and the proglottids excreted in the faeces sometimes lack interproglottidal glands.

In recent years, molecular methods have been introduced that help the classification and determination of Moniezia spp., with cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COX1) and ITS genes being the most frequently used markers (Nguyen et al., Reference Nguyen, Le, Huynh, Nguyen, Nguyen and Vu-Khac2012; Diop et al., Reference Diop, Yanagida, Hailemariam, Menkir, Nakao, Sako, Ba and Ito2015; Ohtori et al., Reference Ohtori, Mikiko and Itagaki2015). ITS could serve as a good genetic marker because it can differentiate M. expansa and M. benedeni recovered from cattle, goats and sheep (Nguyen et al., Reference Nguyen, Le, Huynh, Nguyen, Nguyen and Vu-Khac2012). In addition, ITS can discriminate M. monardi from Japanese serows, M. benedeni from cattle and M. expansa from sheep (Ohtori et al., Reference Ohtori, Mikiko and Itagaki2015). Due to sequence variation caused by the rapid evolution of ITS genes, this gene could contribute to our understanding of the intra- and interspecific phylogenetic relationships among Moniezia spp., as well as the identification of a new species at the molecular level (Bowles et al., Reference Bowles, Blair and McManus1995; Fazaeli et al., Reference Fazaeli, Carter and Pennington2000).

In the present study, the ITS1–5.8S sequences obtained from the 12 M. sichuanensis specimens showed some nucleotide variation. However, the similarity ranged from 98.7 to 100%, and between 67.8 and 92.4% when compared with other Moniezia spp. The phylogenetic trees showed that all 12 samples were closely related to each other and clustered together in the same strain. Moniezia monardi, sharing a similarity of 92.4%, was the species most closely related to M. sichuanensis. However, the original description of this species was based on material found in a reedbuck in Angola (the original paper is not available), while the genetic information was reported from Japanese serow (Capricornis crispus) (Machida et al., Reference Machida, Matsumura and Watanabe1974; Ohtori et al., Reference Ohtori, Mikiko and Itagaki2015). It is worth noting that the main feature that distinguishes Moniezia spp. is the interproglottidal glands. The interproglottidal glands of M. expansa and M. monardi are grouped around depressions that open to the surface of the segment (rosette type) (Machida et al., Reference Machida, Matsumura and Watanabe1974; Liu et al., Reference Liu, Wang and Bo2008; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Liu and Bo2010b; Ohtori et al., Reference Ohtori, Mikiko and Itagaki2015). However, genetic analysis showed that these two species are in different branches (75% identity), indicating a distant relationship (fig. 3). This is consistent with the report of Ohtori et al. (Reference Ohtori, Mikiko and Itagaki2015). Although a relatively high sequence similarity was observed between M. monardi and M. sichuanensis (92.4%), this variation exceeded the intraspecies variation (98.7–100%) within the M. sichuanensis group. Additionally, due to the shape of the interproglottidal glands (rosette-shaped vs. sawtooth-shaped), M. monardi and M. sichuanensis were thought to be different species belonging to different subgenera of the genus Moniezia.

In summary, this study reports the first molecular information on M. sichuanensis, thereby improving our understanding of the taxonomy and phylogenetic relationships of species in the genus Moniezia. Moreover, the combined morphological and molecular information on M. sichuanensis could facilitate the future identification of Moniezia spp. and the control of monieziasis.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Baojian Wang for his help in data analysis and Keling Jian for kindly providing the cestode specimen from a goat.

Financial support

This work was supported by the Sichuan Science and Technology Support Program (grant numbers 2014|SZ0132, 2014Zc2733).

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical standards

All procedures were reviewed and approved by the Animal Welfare Committee of China. During faecal collection, animal welfare was ensured throughout the sampling process.

Authors’ contributions

J.X. and H.L. participated in the design of the study, performed all experiments, collected and analysed the data and wrote the manuscript; J.C., W.F., Y.C. and H.W. helped in collecting the faecal samples; X.G., W.L. and X.P. participated in the processing of specimens; G.Y. devised the study, participated in its design and coordination, helped to interpret the results and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Footnotes

†

These authors contributed equally to this work.

References

Bowles, J., Blair, D. & McManus, D. (1995) A molecular phylogeny of the genus Echinococcus. Parasitology 110, 317–328.Google Scholar
Cai, Y., Lin, H., Cheng, J., Wang, Y., Fu, W., Zhu, P., Wu, J. & Yang, G. (2016) Prevalence of endo-parasites in captive musk deer of China. Sichuan Journal of Zoology 35, 74–77.Google Scholar
Chilton, N.B., O'Callaghan, M.G., Beveridge, I. & Andrews, R.H. (2007) Genetic markers to distinguish Moniezia expansa from M. benedeni (Cestoda: Anoplocephalidae) and evidence of the existence of cryptic species in Australia. Parasitology Research 100, 1187–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diop, G., Yanagida, T., Hailemariam, Z., Menkir, S., Nakao, M., Sako, Y., Ba, C.T. & Ito, A. (2015) Genetic characterization of Moniezia species in Senegal and Ethiopia. Parasitology International 64, 256–260.Google Scholar
Fazaeli, A., Carter, P. & Pennington, T. (2000) Intergenic spacer (IGS) polymorphism: a new genetic marker for differentiation of Toxoplasma gondii strains and Neospora caninum. Journal of Parasitology 86, 716–723.Google Scholar
Green, M.J.B. (1986) The distribution, status and conservation of the Himalayan musk deer Moschus chrysogaster. Biological Conservation 35, 347–375.Google Scholar
Li, X. & Jiang, X. (2014) Implication of musk deer (Moschus spp.) depletion from hunter reports and dung transect data in northwest Yunnan, China. Journal for Nature Conservation 22, 474–478.Google Scholar
Lin, Y. & He, Y. (1975) Studies on the development of Moniezia expansa (Rudolphi, 1810), its epidemiology and biology of its vectors. Journal of Xiamen University (Natural Science) (2), 91–123.Google Scholar
Liu, J., Wang, K. & Bo, X. (2008) Observation and comparison of reproductive organs morphology of Moniezia benedeni and Moniezia expansa. Chinese Journal of Veterinary Parasitology 16, 6–11.Google Scholar
Machida, M., Matsumura, A. & Watanabe, S. (1974) A rare cestode, Moniezia monardi (Anoplocephalidae), from the Japanese serow. Bulletin of the National Science Museum Tokyo 17, 157–161.Google Scholar
Nguyen, T., Le, Q., Huynh, V., Nguyen, S., Nguyen, T. & Vu-Khac, H. (2012) The development of PCR methodology for the identification of species of the tapeworm Moniezia from cattle, goats and sheep in central Vietnam. Journal of Helminthology 86, 426–429.Google Scholar
Ohtori, M., Mikiko, A. & Itagaki, T. (2015) Sequence differences in the internal transcribed spacer 1 and 5.8S ribosomal RNA among three Moniezia species isolated from ruminants in Japan. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 77, 105–107.Google Scholar
Schmidt, G.D. (1986) CRC handbook of tapeworm identification. Boca Raton, Florida, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Shen, J. (2005) A list of parasites for livestock and poultry in Chinese supplement III. Chinese Journal of Animal Infectious Diseases 13, 16–19.Google Scholar
Sheng, H.L. & Liu, Z.X. (2007) The musk deer in China. Shanghai, The Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers.Google Scholar
Skrjabin, K. & Schulz, R. (1937) Helminthology. Moscow.Google Scholar
Smith, A.T., Xie, Y., Hoffmann, R.S., Lunde, D., MacKinnon, J., Wilson, D.E. & Wozencraft, W.C.E. (Eds) (2010) A guide to the mammals of China. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Spassky, A. (1951) Anaplocaphalata cestodes of domestic and wild animals. Osnovy tsestodologii 1, 735.Google Scholar
Taylor, E.L. (1967) Moniezia, a genus of cestode worms, and the proposed reduction of its species to three. Proceedings of the US National Museum 74.Google Scholar
Wang, K., Hao, X. & Liu, S. (2010a) The summary of developing status and economic benefit analysis of Moschus berezovskii breeding in China. Chinese Journal of Animal Science 46, 14–17.Google Scholar
Wang, K., Liu, J. & Bo, X. (2010b) Comparison on the morphology of Moniezia benedeni and Moniezia expansa. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences 47, 612–618.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. & Harris, R.B. (2008) Moschus anhuiensis, Moschus berezovskii, Moschus chrysogaster and Moschus fuscus. In IUCN (2013) IUCN Red List of threatened species. Available at www.iucnredlist.org (accessed 30 February 2013).Google Scholar
Wickström, L.M., Haukisalmi, V., Varis, S., Hantula, J. & Henttonen, H. (2005) Molecular phylogeny and systematics of anoplocephaline cestodes in rodents and lagomorphs. Systematic Parasitology 62, 83–99.Google Scholar
Wu, J. (1982) Study of Moniezia (S.) sichuanensis sp. nov. (Cestoda. Anoplocephalidae). Zoological Research S2, 48–51.Google Scholar
Yang, G. & Zhang, Z. (2013) Parasitic diseases of wildlife. pp. 526–538. Beijing, Science Press.Google Scholar
Yang, G., Chen, W., Cai, Y., Sha, G. & Chen, J. (2001a) The effectiveness of praziquantel in eliminating Moniezia sichuanensis from captive musk deer (Moschus berezovskii). Chinese Journal of Animal Infectious Diseases 9, 59–60.Google Scholar
Yang, G., Sha, G., Cai, Y., Chen, J. & Chen, W. (2001b) Pathogen morphology observation of Moniezia sichuanensis in captive musk deer (Moschus berezovskii). Livestock and Poultry Industry, 49.Google Scholar
Yang, G., Cai, Y., Sha, G., Chen, W. & Chen, J. (2002) The epidemiology of Moniezia sichuanensis in captive musk deer (Moschus berezovskii). Progress in Veterinary Medicine 23, 60–62.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Sampling sites from which the 12 M. sichuanensis specimens were collected from musk deer raised in Sichuan and Shaanxi provinces, China.

Figure 1

Table 1.Species information and GenBank accession numbers of the ITS1–5.8S sequences for Moniezia spp.

Figure 2

Fig. 2.Line drawings of Moniezia (S.) sichuanensis sp. nov.: (a) scolex; (b) mature proglottid; (c) mature proglottid (reproductive organs magnified); (d) interproglottidal glands; and (e) eggs. Drawings and interpretation are based on previously published work (Wu, 1982).

Figure 3

Fig. 3.Phylogenetic relationships between cestodes isolated from musk deer and other species of the genus Moniezia. Phylogeny was inferred based on the amplified ITS1–5.8S fragment using the neighbour-joining method. Numbers on nodes indicate bootstrap values resulting from phylogenetic analysis, and values less than 50% are not shown.

Figure 4

Table 2.Multiple sequence alignment of ITS1–5.8S fragment amplified from the 12 M. sichuanensis specimens.