Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T23:54:02.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New developments in probing and targeting protein acylation in malaria, leishmaniasis and African sleeping sickness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2017

MARKUS RITZEFELD
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
MEGAN H. WRIGHT
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
EDWARD W. TATE*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Department of Chemistry, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. E-mail: e.tate@imperial.ac.uk

Summary

Infections by protozoan parasites, such as Plasmodium falciparum or Leishmania donovani, have a significant health, social and economic impact and threaten billions of people living in tropical and sub-tropical regions of developing countries worldwide. The increasing range of parasite strains resistant to frontline therapeutics makes the identification of novel drug targets and the development of corresponding inhibitors vital. Post-translational modifications (PTMs) are important modulators of biology and inhibition of protein lipidation has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy for treatment of parasitic diseases. In this review we summarize the latest insights into protein lipidation in protozoan parasites. We discuss how recent chemical proteomic approaches have delivered the first global overviews of protein lipidation in these organisms, contributing to our understanding of the role of this PTM in critical metabolic and cellular functions. Additionally, we highlight the development of new small molecule inhibitors to target parasite acyl transferases.

Information

Type
Special Issue Review
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Workflow of the ABE approach to identify S-acylated proteins. Free thiols in protein lysates are blocked with NEM followed by selective cleavage of thioesters using HA and labelling of the liberated thiols with HPDP-biotin. Next, a typical proteomics workflow that includes affinity enrichment of the biotinylated proteins, proteolytic digest and analysis of the peptide fragments by MS enables the identification of S-acylated proteins. A control sample that still contains the intact thioesters and therefore no biotin tags facilitates the identification of non-specifically enriched proteins.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (A) Workflow of MTCC approach. Analogues of the investigated PTM (e.g. compounds shown in B) are fed to cells and incorporated into the corresponding proteins. After cell lysis, an affinity tag is attached to the analogue using bio-orthogonal CuAAC. Affinity enrichment followed by tryptic digestion and analysis of the peptide fragments by MS facilitates the identification of proteins that exhibit this specific PTM. (B) Myristic and palmitic acid probes that have been applied in an MTCC approach in protozoan parasites.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. (A) Comparison of P. falciparum proteins identified via ABE and MTCC (with 17-ODYA (4); workflows: Figs 1 and 2A) techniques in the study of Jones et al. (B) Comparison of T. gondii proteins identified in the studies of Caballero et al. and Foe et al. which used an ABE approach (Fig. 1) and a global analysis of 17-ODYA (4) tagged proteins in the presence and absence of HA, respectively. Total rather than high-confidence hits were used for the analysis shown. (C) Comparison of the 321 putative P. falciparum palmitoyl proteins (from Jones et al.2012) that have T. gondii orthologues with putative T. gondii palmitoyl proteins (Foe et al.2015; Caballero et al.2016). (D) Likely dual acylated proteins in P. falciparum (see also Supplementary Table S1). Numbers in the Venn diagrams may differ slightly from those reported in the primary literature due to revisions in sequence databases over time, ID mapping issues (e.g. between the two Tg species analysed in B), and, in diagram C, the manner in which the protein inference problem has been handled; most proteomic analyses group proteins when they cannot be distinguished by MS, but here each protein was treated independently.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. (A) YnMyr-CoA crystallized in the Myr-CoA binding pocket of PvNMT (PDB: 2YNC). (B) YnMyr (1) is incorporated into proteins via both amide (NaOH-insensitive) and ester (NaOH-sensitive) linkages. Proteomics revealed the base-sensitive incorporation to be on GPI-anchored proteins. (C) Dose–response of YnMyr (1) incorporation upon co-incubation with NMT inhibitor DDD85646 (19). In-gel fluorescence read-out (graph on the right: quantification of fluorescence intensity) following the workflow shown in Fig. 2A and including a basic hydrolysis step to remove GPI anchor labelling. Figure adapted from: (Wright et al.2014).

Figure 4

Fig. 5. (A) Comparison of MTCC (workflow: Fig. 2A) with palmitate analogue YnPal (2) and myristate analogue YnMyr (1) in BSF T. brucei. (B) In-gel fluorescence read-out of the effect of NMT inhibition with DDD85646 (19) on YnMyr (1) labelling in BSF parasites. YnMyr (1) incorporation into GPI-anchored proteins, such as the VSG (Variant Surface Glycoprotein; indicated by arrow), is unaffected but incorporation into N-myristoylated proteins drops. Figure adapted from (Wright et al.2016).

Figure 5

Fig. 6. (A) Comparison of T. brucei proteins identified via ABE and MTCC (with YnMyr (1); workflows: Figs 1 and 2A) techniques in the studies of Emmer et al. and Wright et al. (B) Comparison of high-confidence T. brucei myristoyl proteins that have T. cruzi orthologues with high-confidence T. cruzi myristoyl proteins. (C) Comparison of high-confidence T. brucei myristoyl proteins that have L. donovani orthologues with high-confidence L. donovani myristoyl proteins. Numbers in the Venn diagrams may differ slightly from those reported in the primary literature due to revision of sequence databases over time and, in B and C, the manner in which the protein inference problem has been handled (see Fig. 3). (D) Candidate dual acylated proteins in T. brucei (high-confidence NMT substrates also identified by both palmitoyl proteome studies (Emmer et al.2011; Wright et al.2016)). (E) High-confidence N-myristoyl proteins conserved across all three organisms (Supplementary Table S2). etc: further protein IDs - see Table S2.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Studying protein N-myristoylation in Leishmania parasites. YnMyr (1) was incubated with parasites, in some cases in the presence of NMT inhibitors 19 or 19a. Following incorporation into proteins, click chemistry was used to append a fluorophore or affinity handle; in-gel fluorescence analysis (A) provided a simple read-out for inhibitor activity in cells, and quantitative chemical proteomics (B) enabled the identification of proteins and lipidation sites. This study also compared different life stages of the parasite: promastigotes (Pro.) and amastigotes (Am.). MG = protein contains an N-terminal glycine (possible NMT substrate). Figure adapted from (Wright et al.2015).

Figure 7

Fig. 8. (A) Superposition of the crystal structures of the quinoline (5) and the 1,2,4-oxadiazole (16) based inhibitors in complex with PvNMT (PDB code: 4A95, compound 5, orange; 4B14, compound 16, blue) and biological activity of the quinoline compounds 5 and 6 against PvNMT, HsNMT1, and HsNMT2 (Yu et al.2015). (B) Superposition of the crystal structures of aminoacylpyrrolidine 7, piperidinylindole 8, and the corresponding hybridization product 9 in complex with LdNMT (PDB code: 4cgl, compound 7, green; 4cgn, compound 8, blue; 4cyo, compound 9, red) and biological activity of 7, 8, and 9 against LdNMT, HsNMT1 and antiparasitic activity against extracellular amastigotes of L. donovani (Hutton et al.2014). The piperidinylindole 8 and the hybridization product 9 show an interaction of a basic centre with the C-terminal carboxylate of NMT. Additionally, all compounds show interactions with a set of aromatic amino acids.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. (A) Biological activity against PfNMT and HsNMT1 and antiparasitic activity against P. falciparum 3D7 of NMT inhibitors derived from R0-09-4609 (10) by scaffold-hopping. The superposition of the crystal structures of the benzo[b]furan based derivative 12 and the scaffold simplified analogue 16 in complex with PvNMT indicates competitive binding of the inhibitors with the peptide substrate (PDB code: 4UFV, compound 12, orange; 4B14, compound 16, blue) (Yu et al.2015). (B) Crystal structure of the N-myristoylated inhibitor product in complex with PvNMT. The peptidomimetic inhibitor (18) is shown in orange and the myristic acid moiety in blue (Pdb code: 4c7h). Additionally, 20% of the electron density corresponds to the CoA by-product (in red), providing structural evidence for a product complex in NMT for the first time (Olaleye et al.2014).

Figure 9

Fig. 10. (A) Biological activity against TbNMT and HsNMT1, antiparasitic cell activity against BSF T. brucei parasites, and BBB permeability (B:B = brain-to-blood ratio, ND = not determined) of TbNMT lead inhibitors (Brand et al.2014; Spinks et al.2015). (B) Superpositions of the crystal structures of DDD85646 (19) (PDB code: 2WSA, red) with, respectively, lead compounds of the thiazolidinone (21) (PDB code: 5AG6, green) and benzomorpholinone (22) (PDB code: 5AGE, blue) series in complex with the TbNMT surrogate LmNMT reveal that the two new inhibitor classes (21 and 22) exhibit a different binding mode than the sulphonamides (19) (Spinks et al.2015).

Supplementary material: File

Ritzefeld supplementary material

Ritzefeld supplementary material 1

Download Ritzefeld supplementary material(File)
File 159.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Ritzefeld supplementary material

Ritzefeld supplementary material 2

Download Ritzefeld supplementary material(File)
File 87.8 KB