Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T22:55:45.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of parasitological, immunological and molecular methods for evaluation of fecal samples of immunosuppressed rats experimentally infected with Strongyloides venezuelensis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2015

LEILANE A. CHAVES
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU), Av. Pará 1720, Uberlândia, 38400-902 Minas Gerais, Brazil
ANA LÚCIA R. GONÇALVES
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU), Av. Pará 1720, Uberlândia, 38400-902 Minas Gerais, Brazil
FABIANA M. PAULA
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Investigação Médica, Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
NEIDE. M. SILVA
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU), Av. Pará 1720, Uberlândia, 38400-902 Minas Gerais, Brazil
CLÁUDIO V. SILVA
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU), Av. Pará 1720, Uberlândia, 38400-902 Minas Gerais, Brazil
JULIA M. COSTA-CRUZ
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU), Av. Pará 1720, Uberlândia, 38400-902 Minas Gerais, Brazil
MICHELLE A. R. FREITAS*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU), Av. Pará 1720, Uberlândia, 38400-902 Minas Gerais, Brazil
*
* Corresponding author: Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Avenida Pará 1720, 38400-902 Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil. E-mail: mfreitas@icbim.ufu.br

Summary

Definitive diagnosis of strongyloidiasis in humans is typically achieved by detection of larvae in fecal samples. However, limitations on sensitivity of parasitological methods emphasize the need for more robust diagnostic methods. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of three methods: eggs per gram of feces (EPG), coproantigen detection by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and DNA detection by conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The assays were performed at 0 and 5, 8, 13, 21 and 39 days post-infection (dpi) using fecal samples from experimentally infected immunocompetent and immunosuppressed rats. In immunocompetent rats, eggs were detected in feces on days 5, 8 and 13 dpi; coproantigen detection and PCR amplification were successful at all post-infection time points (5, 8, 13, 21 and 39 dpi). In immunosuppressed rats, eggs were detected at 5, 8, 13 and 21; coproantigen detection and PCR amplification were successful at all post-infection time points. In conclusion, these results suggest that coproantigen detection and PCR may be more sensitive alternatives to traditional methods such as EPG for diagnosis of Strongyloides venezuelensis infection.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Total number of eggs per gram in feces of immunocompetent and immunosuppressed rats infected with Strongyloides venezuelensis on 0 and 5, 8, 13, 21 and 39 dpi *P < 0·05 and ***P < 0·001. Abbreviation: dpi, days post-infection.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Detection of coproantigen, with antigen levels expressed as ELISA-index in fecal samples from immunocompetent and immunosuppressed rats infected with Strongyloides venezuelensis on 0 and 5, 8, 13, 21 and 39 dpi **P < 0·01 and ***P < 0·001. Fecal supernatants were diluted 1:8 and incubated with anti-L3 polyclonal antibody. Abbreviations: dpi, days post-infection; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Electrophoretic profiles of PCR products from fecal samples of rats infected with Strongyloides venezuelensis. (A) Immunocompetent and (B) immunosuppressed groups. MW lane: 100 base pairs ladder (Life Technologies); Lane 1: ~405 base pairs (positive control, S. venezuelensis L3 DNA); Lane 2: ~440 base pairs (corresponding to the Syphacia muris); Lane 3: ~480 base pairs (non-infected Rattus norvegicus fecal sample day 0); Lanes (4–8): ~405 base pairs. (pooled DNA from fecal samples collected 5, 8, 13, 21 and 39 dpi. Lane 9: negative control (without DNA). Abbreviations: dpi, days post-infection; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; MW, molecular weight.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Alignment of products amplification from Strongyloides venezuelensis L3 larvae and feces samples from experimental groups with gene sequence of the subunit 18S rRNA of S. venezuelensis deposited in NCBI database. Abbreviations: NCBI, National Center for Biotechnology Information.

Figure 4

Table 1. Comparison of eggs per gram of feces (EPG), coproantigens detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplified bands using fecal samples from immunocompetent and immunosuppressed rats infected with Strongyloides venezuelensis