Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T05:05:37.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surface functionalization of polypropylene and polyethylene films with allylamine by γ radiation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2018

M. Pérez-Calixto
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria 04510, CDMX, Mexico
G. González-Pérez
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria 04510, CDMX, Mexico
N. Dionisio
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria 04510, CDMX, Mexico
E. Bucio
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria 04510, CDMX, Mexico
G. Burillo*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria 04510, CDMX, Mexico
L. García-Uriostegui
Affiliation:
CONACyT—Wood, Cellulose and Paper Research Department, University of Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44100, Jalisco, Mexico
*
Address all correspondence to G. Burillo at burillo@nucleares.unam.mx

Abstract

Allylamine (AA)-functionalized surfaces for cell adhesion and tissue engineering generated by plasma reactions present several disadvantages, such as amine degradation after 1 week of storage in air and difficulty in achieving a highly specific surface functionalization. In this work, polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene (PE) films were functionalized with AA by γ irradiation to enhance adhesion and compatibility without changing intrinsic bulk properties, thus avoiding the disadvantages of plasma synthesis. Irradiation grafting was realized by a direct and pre-irradiation oxidation method. The effect of different parameters studied were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectra, thermogravimetric analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, scanning electron microscopy, and contact angle measurements.

Information

Type
Research Letters
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Grafting reaction of AA onto PE by pre-irradiation and direct methods.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Grafting percentages as a function of dose by direct method, at different radiation conditions. PP: (a) AA concentration 30%, 1% redox; (b) AA concentration 30%, 2% redox; (c) AA concentration 40%. PE: (d) AA concentration 40%, (e) AA 40% concentration, 2% redox; (f) 50% AA concentration, 2% redox; (g) AA concentration 33%, phosp salt.

Figure 2

Table I. Grafting percentages of monomers onto AA by pre-irradiation method under different radiation conditions. R denotes redox agent, and phosp. represents phosphate salt.

Figure 3

Table II. Grafting percentages of AA by direct method under different radiation conditions.

Figure 4

Figure 3. SEM micrographs of (a) PP; (b) PP-g-AA (8.8% graft); (c) PE; (d) PE-g-AA (8.24% graft). AFM (5 µm × 5 µm) projection area: 25 µm2 of (e) PE; (f) PE-g-AA 1.2% graft; (g) PP; (h) PP-g-AA 1.2% graft.

Figure 5

Table III. EDS analysis of PE and PP grafted.

Figure 6

Table IV. AFM roughness of studied systems at different grafting percentages.

Figure 7

Table V. Contact angle as a function of graft percentage on PP and PE.

Figure 8

Figure 4. A. FTIR spectra of PP, PP-g-AA (1.08% graft), PE and PE-g-AA (8.05% graft).

Supplementary material: File

Pérez-Calixto et al. supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Pérez-Calixto et al. supplementary material(File)
File 337.8 KB