Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T14:56:27.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic variation in Drosophila melanogaster pathogen susceptibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2006

M. C. TINSLEY
Affiliation:
Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK
S. BLANFORD
Affiliation:
Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK
F. M. JIGGINS
Affiliation:
Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Genetic variation in susceptibility to pathogens is a central concern both to evolutionary and medical biologists, and for the implementation of biological control programmes. We have investigated the extent of such variation in Drosophila melanogaster, a major model organism for immunological research. We found that within populations, different Drosophila genotypes show wide-ranging variation in their ability to survive infection with the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana. Furthermore, striking divergence in susceptibility has occurred between genotypes from temperate and tropical African locations. We hypothesize that this may have been driven by adaptation to local differences in pathogen exposure or host ecology. Genetic variation within populations may be maintained by temporal or spatial variation in the costs and benefits of pathogen defence. Insect pathogens are employed widely as biological control agents and entomopathogenic fungi are currently being developed for reducing malaria transmission by mosquitoes. Our data highlight the need for concern about resistance evolution to these novel biopesticides in vector populations.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2006 Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Mortality of flies from different populations following exposure to Beauveria bassiana spores. African and non-African populations differ significantly (filled and open symbols respectively). Zimbabwe (filled diamonds), Kenya (filled triangles), Gabon A (filled circles), Gabon B (filled squares), Pennsylvania (open circles), Netherlands (open squares). Symbols are offset slightly to allow interpretation of error bars. The graph shows least squares means from mixed models together with standard errors.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Mortality of different genotypes (males on day 15) belonging to each population after exposure to Beauveria bassiana spores. Variation between genotypes within populations is significant (see text). Genotype means (diamonds) and standard errors (error bars) are derived from raw data rather than being model residuals. Horizontal bars display population means, but are not directly comparable with those in Fig. 1 where means are calculated from the whole data set using mixed models and arc-sine transformation.