Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T03:31:02.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Light-triggered modulation of cell antioxidant defense by polymer semiconducting nanoparticles in a model organism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2018

Maria Moros
Affiliation:
Istituto di Scienze Applicate e Sistemi Intelligenti “E. Caianiello”, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Campi Flegrei 34, 80078 Pozzuoli, Italy
Anna Lewinska
Affiliation:
Department of Cell Biochemistry, Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Rzeszow, Pigonia 1, 35-310 Rzeszow, Poland
Giada Onorato
Affiliation:
Istituto di Scienze Applicate e Sistemi Intelligenti “E. Caianiello”, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Campi Flegrei 34, 80078 Pozzuoli, Italy
Maria Rosa Antognazza
Affiliation:
Center for Nano Science and Technology @PoliMi, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Pascoli 70/3, 20133 Milano, Italy
Francesca Di Maria
Affiliation:
Istituto per la Sintesi Organica e la Fotoreattivita’, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via P. Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy
Martina Blasio
Affiliation:
Istituto di Scienze Applicate e Sistemi Intelligenti “E. Caianiello”, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Campi Flegrei 34, 80078 Pozzuoli, Italy
Guglielmo Lanzani
Affiliation:
Center for Nano Science and Technology @PoliMi, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Pascoli 70/3, 20133 Milano, Italy Department of Physics, Politecnico di Mila, P.zza L. da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy
Angela Tino
Affiliation:
Istituto di Scienze Applicate e Sistemi Intelligenti “E. Caianiello”, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Campi Flegrei 34, 80078 Pozzuoli, Italy
Maciej Wnuk
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Rzeszow, Pigonia 1, 35-310 Rzeszow, Poland
Claudia Tortiglione*
Affiliation:
Istituto di Scienze Applicate e Sistemi Intelligenti “E. Caianiello”, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Campi Flegrei 34, 80078 Pozzuoli, Italy
*
Address all correspondence to Claudia Tortiglione at claudia.tortiglione@cnr.it

Abstract

Photovoltaic organic semiconductors are emerging in many therapeutic applications, including drug delivery and optical control of cell function. However, for their safe use the possible concomitant elicitation of undesired responses in target cells need to be carefully evaluated. Here we describe molecular responses activated by semiconducting polymer nanoparticles based on poly(3-hexyl)thiophene (P3HT) in the model Hydra vulgaris, previously shown to respond to P3HT-NP photostimulation and showed a decrease in the total antioxidant capacity and an increase in the DNA and protein oxidation levels, paving the way to a novel use of photovoltaic devices to control intracellular redox equilibrium.

Information

Type
Research Letters
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Photostimulation of living animals with P3HT-NPs. (a) Living Hydras were incubated with 50 µM P3HT-NPs for 24 h, and then exposed to white light for 4 or 24 h before processing for DNA and protein extraction. (b, c) Laser scanning confocal microscopy shows efficient internalization of nanoparticles into Hydra tissue, both in (b) the head of the animals, and (c) in the lower body including the foot. In each panel, both fluorescence and bright field images are reported, respectively, on the left and right part. Scale bar, 200 µm.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Total anti-oxidant capacity (TAC) of animals after P3HT-NP photostimulation. Comparison of TAC among protein extracts prepared from groups of animals in the four experimental conditions relative to the exposure of P3HT-NP and Light, indicated by the sign + and − below the graph, i.e. NP/Light −/−, −/+,+/−, and +/+. Animals were illuminated under a continuous white light LED for 4 h (light gray bars) or 24 h (dark gray bars) before extracting the proteins. Proteins were also extracted from animal before starting the illumination (time zero, white bars). TAC was expressed as trolox equivalent anti-oxidant capacity. Bars indicate SD, n = 3, ***P < 0.001 compared with control (−/−) at appropriate time point (ANOVA and Dunnett's a posteriori test).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Impact of P3HT-NP photostimulation on Cu–Zn SOD protein expression and protein oxidative damage. (a) Modulation of Cu–Zn SOD levels as the effect of P3HT-NP photostimulation—Protein extracts were prepared from groups of animals in the four experimental conditions as above and compared to control animals. (b) Cu–Zn SOD expression levels were quantified by densitometry analysis relative to β-actin expression. (c) Oxyblot analysis of total protein carbonylation. M and NC have been included as a positive and negative controls, respectively. (d) Densitometry quantification of the 43 kDa band was performed considering controls (NP/Light, −/−) at appropriate time points as 1.0.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Effect of P3HT-NP photostimulation on protein and DNA. Protein and DNA extracts were prepared from groups of animals treated with either P3HT-NP and/or Light, as indicated by the sign + and − below the graphs, i.e. NP/Light: −/−,−/+,+/−, and +/+. (a) Protein aggregation was estimated by using PROTEOSTAT® Protein Aggregation kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. Protein extracts at 24 h were compared with experimental control condition at time 0. (b) Detection of DNA damage by means of 8-OHdG. DNA extracts were prepared from animals treated as above at 4 and 24 h time points, and compared with controls at time 0. Bars indicate SD, n = 3, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 compared with control at the appropriate time point (ANOVA and Dunnett's a posteriori test).

Supplementary material: File

Moros et al. supplementary material

Moros et al. supplementary material 1

Download Moros et al. supplementary material(File)
File 133.8 KB