Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T09:10:30.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multifunctional, self-assembled oxide nanocomposite thin films and devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2015

Wenrui Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, USA; zhwrican@tamu.edu
Ramamoorthy Ramesh
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, USA; and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA; rramesh@berkeley.edu
Judith L. MacManus-Driscoll
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, UK; jld35@cam.ac.uk
Haiyan Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, USA; wangh@ece.tamu.edu

Abstract

Complex oxides provide an ideal playground for exploring the interplay among the fundamental degrees of freedom: structural (lattice), electronic (orbital and charge), and magnetic (spin). In thin films and heterostructures, new states of matter can emerge as a consequence of such interactions. Over the past decade, the ability to synthesize self-assembled nanocomposite thin films of metal oxides has provided another pathway for creating new interfaces and, thus, new physical phenomena. In this article, we describe examples of such materials systems explored to date and highlight the fascinating multifunctional properties achieved. These include enhanced flux pinning in superconductors, strain-enhanced ferroelectricity, strain- and charge-coupled magnetoelectrics, tunable magnetotransport, novel electrical/ionic transport, memristors, and tunable dielectrics.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) A 0–3-type nanocomposite of BaZrO3 (BZO) nanoparticles in a YBa2Cu3O7−x (YBCO) matrix; a 1–3-type vertically aligned nanocomposite (VAN) of (b) Sm2O3 nanopillars in a BaTiO3 matrix; (c) CoFe2O4 nanopillars in a BiFeO3 matrix; and (d) a 2–2-type laminated structure formed in heteroepitaxial nanocomposite films of YBCO (Y) and BZO (B). The notation indicates whether connectivity of the nanomaterial (first number) and matrix (second number) is in zero, one, two, or three dimensions. (e) Pillar dimension as a function of growth temperature in 1–3-type VAN structures with various morphologies. The different symbols represent actual nanopillar shapes (columnar, square, triangular, and hexagonal). Numbers in parentheses represent the molar fraction of the secondary phase; (111) represents the out-of-plane growth orientation. (a) Reproduced with permission from Reference 20. © 2012 Nature Publishing Group. (b) Reproduced with permission from Reference 21. © 2011 Nature Publishing Group. (c) Reproduced with permission from Reference 36. © 2006 Wiley-VCH. (d) Reproduced with permission from Reference 37. © 2014 Wiley-VCH.

Figure 1

Table I. Epitaxial nanocomposite heterostructures grouped by crystal structure and functionality.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) Critical current density Jc/Jcsf of pure YBa2Cu3O7−x (YBCO) and YBCO- BaZrO3 (BZO) nanocomposite films on SrTiO3 (STO) as a function of the applied magnetic field μ0H, where Jc and Jcsf represent the critical current density with and without an applied magnetic field (sf, self-field), respectively. (b) Magnetic-field-dependent Jc values of YBCO-BZO nanocomposite films with different compositions, measured at 77 K and with an out-of-plane magnetic field. Inset: Cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of 4 vol% BZO nanopillars in YBCO. (c) Cross-sectional TEM image of a 3.6-μm-thick YBCO-BaSnO3 (BSO) nanocomposite film. Inset: Corresponding top-view scanning electron microscopy image. (d) Jc values of YBCO-BSO nanocomposite films with different thicknesses compared with that of a 300-nm-thick pure YBCO film and NbTi as a standard reference. (a) Reproduced with permission from Reference 18. © 2004 Nature Publishing Group. (b) Reproduced with permission from Reference 55. © 2013 Nature Publishing Group. (c–d) Reproduced with permission from Reference 56. © 2008 American Institute of Physics.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Schematics of (a) substrate-induced biaxial strain and (b) vertical lattice strain in vertically aligned nanocomposites (VANs), where a + Δa and b – Δb represent strain-induced lattice parameters. Temperature-dependent (c) in-plane and (d) out-of-plane strain phase diagrams of BaTiO3 (BTO) films. TP, TF, OF, and MF represent tetragonal paraelectric, tetragonal ferroelectric, orthorhombic ferroelectric, and monoclinic ferroelectric phases, respectively, and Pi represents the corresponding polarization vector. The notations of aa, c, and r represent orthorhombic, tetragonal and monoclinic phase, respectively. (e) Temperature dependence of lattice parameters of pure BTO film and BTO-Sm2O3 (SmO) VAN films (filled symbols, out-of-plane lattice parameter c; hollow symbols, in-plane parameter a). (f) Ferroelectric polarization-voltage hysteresis loop of 1-μm BTO-SmO thin-film capacitors at room temperature and 330°C. (a–b) Reproduced with permission from Reference 16. © 2014 Elsevier. (c) Reproduced with permission from Reference 69. © 2006 American Institute of Physics. (d) Reproduced with permission from Reference 70. © 2013 Springer. (e–f) Reproduced with permission from Reference 21. © 2011 Nature Publishing Group.

Figure 4

Figure 4. (a) Plan-view transmission electron microscopy image of a La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 (LSMO)-ZnO vertically aligned nanocomposite (VAN) film showing an alternative arrangement of LSMO (L) and ZnO (Z) phases. Inset: Schematic of this nano-maze structure. (b) Normalized resistivities (ρH/ρ0) of LSMO-ZnO VAN films with different compositions as a function of magnetic field (H). (c) Summary of maximum magnetoresistance (MR) at 1 T and corresponding peak temperatures (Tp) of LSMO-ZnO VAN films with different growth parameters and on Si or SrTiO3 (STO) substrates. (a) Reproduced with permission from Reference 48. © 2013 American Institute of Physics. (b) Reproduced with permission from Reference 29. © 2013 American Chemical Society.

Figure 5

Figure 5. (a) Current–voltage (I–V) curves measured with a conductive atomic force microscope near and off the vertical interface in BiFeO3-CoFe2O4 (BFO-CFO) vertically aligned nanocomposite films. Inset: Positions where measurements were made. Local conduction current images (b) without electric-field poling and (c) with ±8 V poling. The dark square area shows that the local conduction diminishes under negative bias, indicating a nonvolatile redistribution of oxygen vacancies at the interface. Insets: Schematics showing the electric modulation of the conduction behavior at the interface through the control of oxygen vacancies (P represents the direction of ferroelectric polarization). (d) Conductance (G) of SrTiO3-Sm2O3 (STO-SmO) nanocomposite films measured from 20°C to 550°C. (e) Resistance (R) of nanoscaffold STO-SmO thin-film capacitors as a function of voltage (V) at room temperature. (f) Cyclability measurements of the electroresistance behavior in an STO-SmO nanoscaffold device. (a) Reproduced with permission from Reference 30. © 2012 Wiley-VCH. (b–c) Reproduced with permission from Reference 82. © 2013 American Chemical Society. (d–f) Reproduced with permission from Reference 32. © 2014 Wiley-VCH.

Figure 6

Figure 6. (a) Cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy image of a La2CoMnO6 (LCMO)-ZnO vertically aligned nanocomposite film. (b) Magnetization curves of a 100-nm-thick LCMO-ZnO film. Inset: Corresponding magnetization versus temperature curve with an in-plane magnetic field of 1000 Oe. (c) Magnetization curves at 120 K for different electric fields applied to a 200-nm-thick LCMO-ZnO film. (a–c) Reproduced with permission from Reference 23. © 2013 American Chemical Society.

Figure 7

Figure 7. (a) Schematic drawing showing the vertical strain in Ba0.6Sr0.4TiO3 (BSTO) using the stiffer Sm2O3 (SmO) phase as the matrix. (b) Tunability versus loss tangent for BSTO-SmO vertically aligned nanocomposite films with different film compositions (C and C0 are the capacitance with and without an electric field, respectively). (a–b) Reproduced with permission from Reference 34. © 2012 American Chemical Society.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Research prospects for multifunctional heteroepitaxial nanocomposite films that can be engineered from growth control to functionalities and solid-state devices. Note: LSMO, La0.7Sr0.3MnO3; BFO, BiFeO3; AFM, antiferromagnetic; FM, ferromagnetic; SE, superexchange. P is the ferroelectric polarization, Vt is the tip bias. V+ and V– represent the external positive and negative voltage applied on the vertically aligned nanocomposite film, respectively.