Introduction
While mental health problems are increasingly recognized as a global health priority, debate continues over the relevance of cultural variation for the application of psychiatric diagnoses and treatments (Chisholm et al. Reference Chisholm, Flisher, Lund, Patel, Saxena, Thornicroft and Tomlinson2007; Collins et al. Reference Collins, Patel, Joestl, March, Insel and Daar2011; Patel et al. Reference Patel, Collins, Copeland, Kakuma, Katontoka, Lamichhane, Naik and Skeen2011; Whitley, Reference Whitley2015). This debate has taken on renewed importance with recent calls by global mental health advocates for rapid scale-up of mental health services in low- and middle-income countries (Patel et al. Reference Patel, Collins, Copeland, Kakuma, Katontoka, Lamichhane, Naik and Skeen2011, Reference Patel, Chisholm, Parikh, Charlson, Degenhardt, Dua, Ferrari, Hyman, Laxminarayan, Levin, Lund, Medina Mora, Petersen, Scott, Shidhaye, Vijayakumar, Thornicroft and Whiteford2016; Bhugra et al. Reference Bhugra, Tasman, Pathare, Priebe, Smith, Torous, Arbuckle, Langford, Alarcón, Chiu, First, Kay, Sunkel, Thapar, Udomratn, Baingana, Kestel, Ng, Patel, De Picker, McKenzie, Moussaoui, Muijen, Bartlett, Davison, Exworthy, Loza, Rose, Torales, Brown, Christensen, Firth, Keshavan, Li, Onnela, Wykes, Elkholy, Kalra, Lovett, Travis and Ventriglio2017). Cultural and contextual factors are now understood to influence every aspect of mental health and illness (Alarcón et al. Reference Alarcón, Becker, Lewis-Fernández, Like, Desai, Foulks, Gonzales, Hansen, Kopelowicz, Lu, Oquendo and Primm2009; Kirmayer, Reference Kirmayer2013; Napier et al. Reference Napier, Ancarno, Butler, Calabrese, Chater, Chatterjee, Guesnet, Horne, Jacyna, Jadhav, Macdonald, Neuendorf, Parkhurst, Reynolds, Scambler, Shamdasani, Smith, Stougaard-Nielsen, Thomson, Tyler, Volkmann, Walker, Watson, de Williams, Willott, Wilson and Woolf2014). Diagnostic and treatment guidelines and frameworks for mental health systems recognize cultural variation in the manifestation of distress and disorders and call for culturally appropriate interventions (Psychosocial Working Group, 2003; Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC), 2007; American Psychiatric Association, 2013; World Health Organization, 2013b; Khenti et al. Reference Khenti, Fréel, Trainor, Mohamoud, Diaz, Suh, Bobbili and Sapag2016).
Yet critics have pointed to a gap between the rhetoric of global mental health, which recognizes the importance of social and cultural context, and practice, in which local knowledge is often overlooked in favor of a generic biomedical psychiatric or psychosocial approach (Watters, Reference Watters2010; Campbell & Burgess, Reference Campbell and Burgess2012; Summerfield, Reference Summerfield2012; Clark, Reference Clark2014; Fernando, Reference Fernando2014; Mills, Reference Mills2014; Bracken et al. Reference Bracken, Giller and Summerfield2016). There is continued concern over whether methods of research, diagnosis, and treatment that have been developed primarily in urban, high-income, and industrialized settings will meet the needs of populations in which the greatest mental health disparities are found. Failure to adequately address social and cultural contexts may limit the effectiveness of interventions and have other negative impacts, including promoting the medicalization of social suffering and undermining indigenous knowledge and support systems (Desjarlais et al. Reference Desjarlais, Eisenberg, Good and Kleinman1995; Argenti-Pillen, Reference Argenti-Pillen2003; Clark, Reference Clark2014; Whitley, Reference Whitley2015). The literatures of medical anthropology and sociology contain rich descriptions of many settings where global mental health is active; however, the generalizability of these accounts and their relevance to current mental health issues are not always clear to practitioners (Greene et al. Reference Greene, Jordans, Kohrt, Ventevogel, Kirmayer, Hassan, Chiumento, van Ommeren and Tol2017).
Nepal offers a useful case study in this discussion because it has seen many decades of social science research and there is a current need for information to guide ongoing efforts to scale up mental health services. A small landlocked country of about 29 million people with the third lowest human development rating in South Asia (United Nations Development Programme, 2016), Nepal has about 110 psychiatrists, 15 clinical psychologists, and 400–500 paraprofessional psychosocial workers (Luitel et al. Reference Luitel, Jordans, Adhikari, Upadhaya, Hanlon, Lund and Komproe2015; Sherchan et al. Reference Sherchan, Samuel, Marahatta, Anwar, Van Ommeren and Ofrin2017). Government investment in mental health in Nepal has historically been very limited (around 0.7% of the health budget), with more than half of available services provided by non-governmental organizations (NGOs) [World Health Organization (WHO), 2011; Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) Reference Group for Mental Health and Psychosocial Support in Emergency Settings, 2015].
The development of formal mental health services in Nepal has been led by an array of local and international humanitarian actors over the past four decades. The WHO began mental health work in Nepal in 1980 and the United Mission to Nepal launched the first community mental health services in 1984 (Acland, Reference Acland, Cohen, Kleinman and Saraceno2002). The first mental health NGOs were established in the 1990s to treat those affected by the ongoing Maoist insurgency and the mass influx of refugees from Bhutan (Jordans & Sharma, Reference Jordans and Sharma2004; Tol et al. Reference Tol, Jordans, Regmi and Sharma2005; Jordans et al. Reference Jordans, Keen, Pradhan and Tol2007; Center for Victims of Torture Nepal, 2011). With the end of the civil conflict in 2006, mental health NGOs and advocates shifted their focus to strengthening the mental health system (Upadhaya et al. Reference Upadhaya, Luitel, Koirala, Ramesh, Gurung, Shrestha, Tol, Brandon and Jordans2014). Nepal became an implementation site for several high-profile global mental health projects (Hanlon et al. Reference Hanlon, Luitel, Kathree, Murhar, Shrivasta, Medhin, Ssebunnya, Fekadu, Shidhaye, Petersen, Jordans, Kigozi, Thornicroft, Patel, Tomlinson, Lund, Breuer, De Silva and Prince2014; Mendenhall et al. Reference Mendenhall, De Silva, Hanlon, Petersen, Shidhaye, Jordans, Luitel, Ssebunnya, Fekadu, Patel, Tomlinson and Lund2014; Kohrt et al. Reference Kohrt, Ramaiya, Rai, Bhardwaj and Jordans2015; Jordans et al. Reference Jordans, Luitel, Pokhrel and Patel2016). In 2015, Nepal was struck by a major earthquake, inspiring a proliferation of mental health and psychosocial projects (Seale-Feldman & Upadhaya, Reference Seale-Feldman and Upadhaya2015). The financial resources and political will elicited by the disaster contributed to advancing national global mental health agendas (Chase et al. Reference Chase, Marahatta, Sidgel, Shrestha, Gautam, Luitel, Dotel and Samuel2018).
While Nepal has been a popular site for research on social, cultural, and ritual aspects of healing, few attempts have been made to consolidate this body of work or explore its relevance to ongoing health development initiatives. A desk review published shortly after the 2015 earthquake drew attention to existing literature on cultural aspects of mental health in Nepal (IASC Reference Group for Mental Health and Psychosocial Support in Emergency Settings, 2015). However, this review was not conducted with the methodological rigor of a scholarly report and did not capture publications produced during the period of heightened interest and investment in mental health following the disaster. The present scoping review, completed 2 years after the earthquake, takes stock of the current state of scholarship on culture and mental health in Nepal, including relevant literature from across the health and social sciences.
Methods
We employed a scoping review methodology (Arksey & O'Malley, Reference Arksey and O'Malley2005) with the guiding research question: ‘What knowledge exists on the relationship between culture and mental health in Nepal?’ For the purposes of this review, mental health was interpreted as encompassing mental health/wellbeing and mental illness/disorder, where ‘psychiatric’, ‘psychological’, and ‘psychosocial’ were acceptable replacements for ‘mental’. Culture was interpreted as ‘values, beliefs, knowledge, norms, and practices and the notion that these are shared among a specific set of people’ (Hruschka & Hadley, Reference Hruschka and Hadley2008, p. 947). Publications addressing social and structural issues that exist in many societies (e.g. gender inequality and mental health stigma) that were not explicitly linked to Nepali culture in some way were excluded. Publications addressing culture among ethnic minority groups in Nepal and ethnically Nepali Bhutanese refugees were included, while those focused exclusively on populations living outside Nepal were excluded.
Searches were carried out in collaboration with a medical librarian in PsycINFO, Web of Science, Medline, and Proquest Dissertation. Terms used to study mental health and illness in both social science (e.g. ‘healing’) and clinical (e.g. ‘treatment’) fields were included, as were transliterated Nepali words commonly referenced in the mental health literature [e.g. sato, meaning ‘spirit or soul’ as used in the Nepali idiom ‘soul loss’ (see Kohrt & Hruschka, Reference Kohrt and Hruschka2010); chhopne, literally ‘to catch, to get hold of, and to cover by someone or something’, used to describe experiences of dissociation or possession (Sapkota et al. Reference Sapkota, Gurung, Neupane, Shah, Kienzler and Kirmayer2014, p. 645); NB: definitions may vary according to the context and ethnic/linguistic group]. The following search terms were used in all databases: (Mental* OR Madness OR Psycholog* OR Distress* OR Idioms* OR Caus* OR Cultur* OR Belief* OR help seeking OR Healing OR Somatic* OR Possession OR Soul* OR Spirit* OR Sato* OR Rog* OR Dokh OR Psychosocial* OR Counsel* OR Witch* OR Ritual OR Chhopne OR Ethno* OR Festival OR Treatment) AND Nepal*. Texts published up to 22 May 2017, when the searches were completed, were included in this review.
Results from the searches were screened according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) English or Nepali; (2) peer-reviewed journal article, book/book chapter, or doctoral thesis; and (3) substantial original discussion of culture in relation to mental health in Nepal. Initial screening of titles and abstracts was carried out by bilingual (English/Nepali) team members with graduate training in transcultural psychiatry. All full texts of publications appearing to meet criteria were then screened by two team members. When there was disagreement among reviewers on whether a publication met inclusion criteria, additional coauthors reviewed the full text and consensus was reached through discussion. Additional items were identified by screening the reference lists of all included texts, the aforementioned desk review (IASC Reference Group for Mental Health and Psychosocial Support in Emergency Settings, 2015), and a bibliography of psychological research in Nepal (Maharjan, Reference Maharjan2012).
Texts meeting inclusion criteria were divided among team members for ‘charting’ (Arksey & O'Malley, Reference Arksey and O'Malley2005): key information was extracted using a form covering methods, focus, and key findings; reviewers also indicated whether the text reflected an applied orientation, defined as including discussion of how findings could inform or improve mental health services for culturally Nepali populations. Finally, texts were collated and summarized (Arksey & O'Malley, Reference Arksey and O'Malley2005) by the first author with input from other team members.
Results
The search yielded 6488 results, of which 38 met inclusion criteria (see Fig. 1 and Table 1 for an overview of the search process and included texts). To facilitate practical use of this review, we have collated publications into four thematic categories.
Search strategy.
Overview of texts included in the review
(1) Cultural determinants of mental health problems
Six publications addressed how culture influences the etiology of mental distress and disorder, in particular by shaping patterns of social organization and inequality. Kohrt et al. (Reference Kohrt, Speckman, Kunz, Baldwin, Upadhaya, Acharya, Sharma, Nepal and Worthman2009) examined the correlation between low caste and rates of depression and anxiety, identifying poverty, lack of social support, and stressful life events as mediators. In a related article, Kohrt (Reference Kohrt2009) interpreted associations between low caste and psychological morbidity though a policy analysis, highlighting the role of restrictions in social life and access to resources that affect low caste groups in the Nepali context. A book chapter by Jack et al. (Reference Jack, Pokharel, Subba, Jack and Ali2010) described how traditional Hindu Brahmanical models of the ‘good woman’ may lead to self-silencing and consequently contribute to depression among women in Nepal. Similarly, Kohrt & Bourey (Reference Kohrt and Bourey2016) explored how cultural norms related to gender (e.g. perceived lack of autonomy, lack of social support for women leaving a marriage) contribute to the risk for comorbid maternal mental illness by influencing exposure to intimate partner violence.
Two articles considered how cultural values contribute to the development of mental health problems. Furr's (Reference Furr2005) sociological study found that ‘Western orientation’, as measured through a self-developed questionnaire assessing attitudes toward gender and caste norms and language/media preferences, was associated with lower depression scores. In a comparative study, Boehnke et al. (Reference Boehnke, Stromberg, Regmi, Richmond and Chandra1998) found that Asian samples (Nepali and Fijian) valued tradition, conformity, and power more highly than Europeans (German) and had more microsocial (personal) than macrosocial (e.g. national or environmental) worries. In Nepal, microsocial worries were negatively related to mental wellbeing, but there was no direct relationship between cultural values and wellbeing.
(2) Culture and mental illness experience
A second set of 14 publications framed culture as a set of beliefs and values that shape mental illness experience. Several focused specifically on the ways that mental health problems manifest or are expressed in Nepali cultural contexts. Sharma & van Ommeren (Reference Sharma and van Ommeren1998) identified salient ‘idioms of distress’ (Nichter, Reference Nichter1981) among Bhutanese refugee torture survivors, including emotion-related idioms (e.g. dukha lāgyo or sadness) and somatic idioms (e.g. headache, dizziness); many attributed their suffering to bad deeds committed in previous lives (karmako phal). Hoge et al. (Reference Hoge, Tamrakar, Christian, Mahara, Nepal, Pollack and Simon2006) found that Nepalis with generalized anxiety disorder showed more somatic symptoms and fewer psychological symptoms compared with Americans and offered possible explanations related to cultural differences in stigma, mind–body distinctions, introspection, and acceptable means of expressing distress. By contrast, Kohrt et al.’s (Reference Kohrt, Kunz, Baldwin, Koirala, Sharma and Nepal2005) work on jhum-jhum (a common somatic complaint in Nepal involving numbness or tingling) among depressed patients found that once the local burden of physical illness had been accounted for, rates of somatization in Nepal were comparable to those in Western settings.
Five studies explored how culture mediates the interpretation of particular symptoms and behaviors as deviant or pathological. Furr (Reference Furr2004) found that teachers with a more ‘Western’ orientation according to the aforementioned measure (Furr, Reference Furr2005) were more likely to pathologize deviant child behavior. Adhikari et al. (Reference Adhikari, Upadhaya, Gurung, Luitel, Burkey, Kohrt and Jordans2015) identified behaviors commonly reported as problematic among children in Nepal (e.g. addiction, negligence of studies, anger); these were mainly attributed to the social environment and intervention strategies ranged from talking to physical punishment. Burkey et al. (Reference Burkey, Ghimire, Adhikari, Wissow, Jordans and Kohrt2016b) identified local social goals and gender norms that influenced when specific child behaviors were deemed pathological. Heys et al.’s (Reference Heys, Alexander, Medeiros, Tumbahangphe, Gibbons, Shrestha, Manandhar, Wickenden, Shrestha, Costello, Manandhar and Pellicano2017) study of Nepali understandings of autism identified beliefs that could interfere with help-seeking, especially attributions to poor parenting. Finally, Kim et al. (Reference Kim, Tol, Shrestha, Kafle, Rayamajhi, Luitel, Thapa and Surkan2017) examined which manifestations of grief among Nepali widows were locally considered pathological, finding some overlap with criteria for persistent complex bereavement disorder (e.g. prolonged duration, role/identity confusion, impaired daily functioning, mistrust).
More generally, Böker (Reference Böker1992) explored concepts of mental illness among mental hospital patients (likely suffering from severe/psychotic disorders) and their relatives. Most attributed the illness to spirit possession, physical problems in the body, fever, and separation or conflicts within the family. Pach III's (Reference Pach, Skinner, Pach and Holland1998) book chapter explored Nepali villagers’ perceptions of individuals described as being baulāhā (mad), finding that afflicted individuals experienced social marginality that constrained their access to care and was at times more distressing than the illness itself. Kaplan's (Reference Kaplan1999) doctoral thesis explored the meaning of psychiatric symptomatology in rural Nepal, including common supernatural attributions (e.g. witchcraft, the intervention of ghosts and spirits), as well as treatment modalities believed to address these causes. Clarke et al. (Reference Clarke, Saville, Bhandari, Giri, Ghising, Jha, Jha, Magar, Roy, Shrestha, Thakur, Tiwari, Costello, Manandhar, King, Osrin and Prost2014) studied Nepali mothers’ concepts of psychological distress; distress was often attributed to family- and gender-related factors and women's responses to it were shaped by a fatalistic worldview.
Finally, two publications addressed indigenous illness categories. Sapkota et al. (Reference Sapkota, Gurung, Neupane, Shah, Kienzler and Kirmayer2014) examined mental health factors associated with unintentional spirit possession. They argue that rather than mapping onto a single diagnostic category, spirit possession may function as an idiom of distress facilitating expression of ‘suffering related to mental illness, socio-political violence, traumatic events, and the oppression of women’ (p. 643). Evers et al. (Reference Evers, Van Der Brug, Van Wesel, Krabbendam, Amsterdam, Studies and Amsterdam2016) used the case of ‘soul loss’ in the wake of Nepal's civil conflict to illustrate how socially and spiritually anchored conceptions of the self influence the experience of psychopathology and the course of healing.
(3) Cultural knowledge of mental health and healing
A third set of 11 publications explored cultural knowledge on mental health and healing in Nepal. Several of these document aspects of Nepali ‘ethnopsychology’, or ‘cultural concepts of self, mind-body divisions, emotions, human nature, motivation, and personality’ (Kohrt & Maharjan, Reference Kohrt and Maharjan2009, p. 115). Kohrt & Harper (Reference Kohrt and Harper2008) elaborated elements of self that are ‘central to understanding conceptions of mental health and psychological wellbeing and subsequent stigma’ (p. 468) in Nepal, including the soul, heart–mind, brain–mind, body, and social status. In a 2009 publication, Kohrt and Maharjan provided an overview of Nepali concepts of child development and the perceived effects of violence and psychological trauma. Kohrt & Hruschka (Reference Kohrt and Hruschka2010) explored Nepali concepts of psychological trauma and associated idioms of distress and emotion terms. They highlight how the attribution of traumatic experiences to one's actions in a past or present life (karma) can lead to blame and stigma, with implications for help-seeking.
Three studies explored cultural concepts of and pathways to wellbeing. Bragin et al. (Reference Bragin, Onta and Nzeyimana2014) identified locally salient domains of wellbeing in three conflict-affected countries (including, specific to Nepal, having all basic needs met and freedom of movement) and describe the influence of spiritual traditions on understanding wellbeing, evident in the use of terms such as ānanda (transcendent bliss). Chase & Bhattarai (Reference Chase and Bhattarai2013) explored resilience among Bhutanese refugees in the USA and Nepal; they present idioms of wellbeing and describe processes that promote resilience, such as daily worship (pūjā) and involvement in community groups. Finally, a book chapter by Kohrt (Reference Kohrt, Hinton and Hinton2015) describes how the practice of certain Nepali traditional rituals can promote psychosocial wellbeing, particularly during reintegration of child soldiers. For example, Swasthāni, a fasting ritual performed by women for the wellbeing of male relatives and atonement of sins, may lead to increased acceptance of girl soldiers.
Several publications addressed expert or esoteric cultural knowledge – that of practitioners of indigenous healing systems. Peters’ article (1978) and subsequent book (1981) on the Tamang ethnic group draws parallels between techniques used by shamans and those of Western psychotherapy, including mediation in social conflict, facilitation of catharsis, and providing a symbolic structure for understanding illness. Skultans (Reference Skultans1988) compared the practice of a psychiatric outpatient clinic with that of a ‘tāntrik healer’ – a type of healer known for ‘sweeping away the negative forces believed to account for ill health or misfortune, and blowing on the positive and regenerative forces in their place’ (jhar-phuk; Dietrich, Reference Dietrich1998, p. ix). The healer had adopted elements of psychiatric practice (e.g. speed and standardization) but offered causal attributions that were more likely to reinforce family support. Soubrouillard's doctoral thesis (1995) explored how Nepali shamans understand, assess, attribute and treat madness; diagnostic methods including divination are described in detail. Finally, Jolly (Reference Jolly1999) described how a Nepali soldier in the British army was cured of psychiatric symptoms by visiting a traditional healer, noting parallels with the practice of mental health professionals. The study by Böker (Reference Böker1992) described above also discusses treatment-seeking pathways, including preferences for traditional healers.
(4) Culturally informed mental health care
Finally, six publications explored how attention to culture can be integrated into the detection and treatment of mental health problems. With regard to detection, Kohrt et al. (Reference Kohrt, Jordans, Tol, Luitel, Maharjan and Upadhaya2011) proposed six evaluation questions to guide cross-cultural validation of instruments for child mental health research. Using the examples of the Depression Self-Rating Scale (DSRS) and Child PTSD Symptom Scale (CPSS), they demonstrate how these questions can guide effective translation of instruments by trained mental health paraprofessionals and discuss adaptations made (e.g. incorporation of pictographic scales). Kohrt et al. (Reference Kohrt, Luitel, Acharya and Jordans2016) adapted the PHQ-9 for use in Nepal, developed two additional questions based on local idioms of distress, and validated these among primary care patients. They determined that an algorithm involving initial screening for heart–mind problems and impaired functioning could improve the efficiency and accuracy of screening with PHQ-9. Burkey et al. (Reference Burkey, Ghimire, Adhikari, Kohrt, Jordans, Haroz and Wissow2016a) explored the overlap between local categories of problematic behavior and Western diagnostic criteria as reflected in the Disruptive Behavior international Scale-Nepal version (DBIS).
With regard to treatment, Harper's (Reference Harper2014) book chapter examined how United Mission to Nepal introduced psychiatric services and psychotropic drugs in Nepal, describing how diagnostic procedures were adapted to the local cultural context; for example, the label of ‘nerves disease’ (nasā rog) was used to make depression treatment more socially acceptable. Jordans et al. (Reference Jordans, Tol, Sharma and van Ommeren2003) described cultural adaptations made by the Centre for Victims of Torture, Nepal (CVICT; see also Sharma & van Ommeren, Reference Sharma and van Ommeren1998) in training psychosocial counsellors, including demonstrating respect for clients’ social status, applying indirect ways of questioning, and specialized training modules focused on stigmatization and supernatural attributions. Tol et al. (Reference Tol, Jordans, Regmi and Sharma2005) outlined some ‘cultural challenges’ CVICT faced in establishing psychosocial counselling in Nepal, as well as adaptations made to address issues related to the therapeutic relationship, illness beliefs, locus of control, and views of the self and introspection. Finally, Kohrt et al. (Reference Kohrt, Maharjan, Timsina and Griffith2012) discuss possible adaptations to cognitive behavior therapy, interpersonal therapy, and dialectical behavior therapy to accommodate Nepali ethnopsychology, with the goal of improving care of Bhutanese refugees.
Discussion
This scoping review identified a modest body of literature on culture and mental health in Nepal. Publications represented a range of disciplines and research methods. Culture was investigated variously as a contributor to mental illness, a set of beliefs and values that shape mental illness experience and help-seeking, a repository of indigenous knowledge about mental health, and a factor that could be effectively integrated in mental health research and service design. Much of the literature in this area published before 2015 was synthesized in the post-earthquake desk review (IASC Reference Group for Mental Health and Psychosocial Support in Emergency Settings, 2015). However, it is striking that nearly 25% of identified texts were published since the beginning of 2015. This may reflect growing interest in the critical role of social context in mental health and illness (Tol et al. Reference Tol, Kohrt, Jordans, Thapa, Pettigrew, Upadhaya and de Jong2010) as well as the increased attention to mental health issues occasioned by disasters (World Health Organization, 2013a).
Nearly 75% of included publications reflected an applied orientation. Many of these were published within the past 15 years by researchers affiliated with Nepali mental health NGOs. Some applied work strived to directly integrate culture into mental health research and practice with the goal of improving quality of and access to services. Other studies conducted in affiliation with these NGOs adopted a broader focus, contributing to our understanding of Nepali concepts of distress, pathology, trauma, child development, and resilience.
At the same time, we noted that applied research (with a few important exceptions such as the work on ethnopsychology) tended to be structured around concepts emerging from globalized psychiatric knowledge, with accounts of culture often reduced to one or two dimensions that shaped or interfered with conventional methods of research and practice. Only three studies were framed around indigenous illness categories (Kohrt et al. Reference Kohrt, Kunz, Baldwin, Koirala, Sharma and Nepal2005; Sapkota et al. Reference Sapkota, Gurung, Neupane, Shah, Kienzler and Kirmayer2014; Evers et al. Reference Evers, Van Der Brug, Van Wesel, Krabbendam, Amsterdam, Studies and Amsterdam2016). All of the included research on traditional healing was conducted prior to the year 2000, despite the fact that these healers continue to be the primary source of treatment for mental health problems in Nepal (Luitel et al. Reference Luitel, Jordans, Adhikari, Upadhaya, Hanlon, Lund and Komproe2015). In some cases, narrow and essentializing conceptualizations of ‘Nepali culture’ were evident. For example, Furr (Reference Furr2004, Reference Furr2005) considered willingness to support female political leaders to be an indication of ‘Western’ (as opposed to ‘Nepali’) cultural orientation – yet, Nepal has now elected a female president well in advance of many Western countries. Moreover, there is evidence that cultural beliefs and idioms take on new meanings when instrumentalized within mental health diagnosis and service provision, raising questions about the limits of culturally adapted interventions (Abramowitz, Reference Abramowitz2010). There remains a need for long-term ethnographic research that examines local understandings and experiences of mental health problems. In addition to improving our understanding of the contexts and consequences of global mental health interventions, studies of this nature may shed light on underlying processes of psychopathology and intervention strategies grounded in local ethnopsychologies and indigenous healing systems that can contribute to a truly global psychiatry (Chase & Sapkota, Reference Chase and Sapkota2017).
The body of literature outlined here can and should inform mental health policy and practice in Nepal (Kirmayer & Pedersen, Reference Kirmayer and Pedersen2014). This review comes at a critical historical moment: Nepal's government has allocated a budget for mental health care at the district level for the first time, revised mental health policy is pending after 20 years, and the Ministry of Health has demonstrated a commitment to addressing mental health in the context of its action against non-communicable diseases (Chase et al. Reference Chase, Marahatta, Sidgel, Shrestha, Gautam, Luitel, Dotel and Samuel2018; Government of Nepal, 2014). Findings may be relevant to a range of stakeholders involved in the anticipated scaling up of services. The national baseline psychiatric epidemiological study that is currently being planned may use instruments described here that have undergone a culturally informed validation process. The wealth of information identified in this review about idioms of distress, concepts of causality, and indigenous illness categories could enhance the assessment of mental health problems, and should thus inform future revisions of the Standard Treatment Protocol for mental health in primary care as well as efforts to improve and contextualize medical school curricula on mental health and mhGAP-based trainings for physicians. Clinicians working in Nepal should consider incorporating the cultural adaptations to psychological and psychosocial treatments documented above.
One possible barrier to the application of research findings is disciplinary variation in jargon and writing conventions; social scientists seeking to inform practitioners should consider publishing versions of their findings in clear accessible language (Greene et al. Reference Greene, Jordans, Kohrt, Ventevogel, Kirmayer, Hassan, Chiumento, van Ommeren and Tol2017). Working in collaboration with patients, clinicians, policy makers and other knowledge users may help researchers find the appropriate vocabulary to translate their findings into practical applications. The recent development of a ‘community informant detection tool’ in Nepal (Subba et al. Reference Subba, Luitel, Kohrt and Jordans2017; published shortly after our review) offers an excellent model for collaborative, culturally informed mental health work of this nature.
Finally, it is noteworthy that only three included publications had a Nepali first author. The small number of Nepali scholars who have published in this area has implications for the peer review process, as relying mainly on non-Nepali reviewers could result in the dissemination of limited or misleading interpretations of local terms and perspectives. Findings of this review thus lend support to calls for greater representation of scholars from low-income countries in the global mental health literature (Kohrt et al. Reference Kohrt, Upadhaya, Luitel, Maharjan, Kaiser, Macfarlane and Khan2014).
Limitations
This scoping review has several limitations. Nepali language search terms could have been transliterated in multiple ways and we did not include search terms in Devanagari script. Following Arskey & O'Malley (Reference Arksey and O'Malley2005), this study did not assess the quality of included texts; caution is therefore needed in applying findings. In addition to considering information summarized in Table 1, readers should refer to the full texts of publications. Our stringent inclusion criteria may have led to the exclusion of some relevant literature. Some potentially relevant work on emotions, coping, and self-hood that did not make an explicit link to mental health and illness was excluded (e.g. Mchugh, Reference Mchugh1989; Cole & Tamang, Reference Cole and Tamang1998; Cole et al. Reference Cole, Bruschi and Tamang2002; Chase et al. Reference Chase, Welton-Mitchell and Bhattarai2013). Some instrument validation studies that did not meet the criterion of ‘substantial original discussion’ of culture and mental health did make references to the culture and context and may be relevant for researchers planning to use these scales in Nepal (e.g. Kohrt et al. Reference Kohrt, Kunz, Koirala, Sharma and Nepal2002, Reference Kohrt, Kunz, Koirala and Sharma2003; Haroz et al. Reference Haroz, Jordans, de Jong, Gross, Bass and Tol2017; Sochos & Lokshum, Reference Sochos and Lokshum2017; see Chen et al. Reference Chen, Ganesan and Mckenna2013 for more on psychiatric scales used in Nepal). We recommend that all future studies reporting successful cross-cultural validation of instruments describe the translation process and adaptations made in detail. Finally, we note the exclusion of a rich body of ethnographic literature that explores suffering and healing in local Nepali terms, without employing the language of mental health and illness (e.g. Hitchcock, Reference Hitchcock1967; Hitchcock & Jones, Reference Hitchcock and Jones1976; Stone, Reference Stone1976; Desjarlais, Reference Desjarlais1989, Reference Desjarlais1992; Maskarinec, Reference Maskarinec1992; Subba, Reference Subba2007). More work is needed on ways to integrate this rich body of contextual knowledge in global mental health programs.
Conclusion
We identified 38 papers, book chapters and monographs that explicitly addressed cultural dimensions of mental health and illness in Nepal. As documentation of four decades of work focused on translating among divergent approaches to understanding and addressing mental suffering, this review speaks to ongoing debates about the significance of cultural variation in psychiatric distress and disorder. Although still modest, the available literature on Nepal does not support claims that service development initiatives have completely overlooked local cultures. On the contrary, applied work done by a new generation of clinician–researchers with interdisciplinary interests and training is refining our knowledge of how culture shapes the experience, expression, and interpretation of suffering and the translatability of biomedical diagnostic categories and treatments. While this review does not speak to how well available knowledge has been applied at the level of health systems or service delivery, it suggests there is a growing interest in culturally informed mental health research and practice in Nepal. At the same time, findings suggest that applied research geared toward mental health service development still needs to engage with long-term, ethnographic studies that attend holistically to local knowledge and experience. Gaps remain in our understanding of indigenous illness concepts and healing approaches. There is a continued need to build capacity in Nepal for research driven by the needs and concerns of local stakeholders, particularly people with mental health problems and traditional healers, and to engage with open-ended methods of inquiry that recognize diverse modes of understanding mental suffering and healing.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Dr Danielle Groleau who provided mentorship to the second author during early stages of planning and carrying out searches. We would like to thank Teodora Constantinescu, medical librarian at the Institute of Community & Family Psychiatry, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal Canada, for help in conducting searches. We are further thankful to four anonymous reviewers for Global Mental Health, whose input led to important improvements.
Financial support
This project was supported by the McGill Global Mental Health Program (www.mcgill.ca/gmh).
Conflict of interest
None.
Ethical standards
Not applicable.
Open access
