Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T09:49:20.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Secretion of byssal threads and attachment strength of Mytilus galloprovincialis: the influence of size and food availability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2008

Jose M.F. Babarro*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas CSIC, Eduardo Cabello 6, 36208 Vigo, Spain
María José Fernández Reiriz
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas CSIC, Eduardo Cabello 6, 36208 Vigo, Spain
Uxío Labarta
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas CSIC, Eduardo Cabello 6, 36208 Vigo, Spain
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Jose M.F. BabarroInstituto de Investigaciones Marinas CSICEduardo Cabello 6, 36208 Vigo, Spain email: jbabarro@iim.csic.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Byssogenesis rate and attachment strength of the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis were investigated in the laboratory considering different body sizes and feeding conditions. Byssal thread secretion was significantly higher in juveniles as compared to larger mussels of approximately 87 mm shell length. Asymptotic number of threads attached was obtained from approximately 72 hours onwards within a range of 42–46 and 27–31 for juveniles and larger experimental mussels, respectively (P < 0.05 ANOVA). Absorption efficiency values of control fed individuals dropped significantly from 0.78 in juveniles to 0.70 in larger mussels (P < 0.001 ANOVA) which pointed out energetic constraints of mussels with regard to their size and its probable effect on byssus secretion rates. Attachment force was 2.8 times higher in larger mussels than in juveniles (2.21 versus 0.78 N for both sizes, respectively; P < 0.001 ANOVA) which in turn followed the same order of magnitude than differences in the thread's thickness values of both experimental mussel sizes. Tenacity followed a reverse pattern with juveniles presenting two-fold higher values than larger mussels (P < 0.001 ANOVA) based on a lower increment of attachment force (x2.8) as compared to shell area (x6) for the comparison larger versus juvenile mussel size, which in turn might suggest that larger specimens secreted weaker threads. When animals were maintained unfed for a week, a significant drop in both byssus secretion and attachment force were observed in juveniles but was not the case for larger mussels most likely as a consequence of a relatively short period of maintenance under food availability stress for the latter individuals that showed significantly higher initial condition and/or energetic store values. Accordingly, the use of energetic reserves in juveniles kept unfed for a week together with a significant drop in byssus secretion and attachment force might suggest a link, i.e. transfer of energy between soft tissues and byssus under stress. Quantitative values of byssal threads, based on the significance of the byssus versus attachment force relationship, together with its morphometric value, i.e. thread's thickness, represented a primary mechanism to explain variability in attachment strength of M. galloprovincialis of the different body sizes studied here.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2008
Figure 0

Table 1. Values of corporal parameters shell length, dry weight (soft tissues and shell) and condition index (CI) as well as glycogen stores of the experimental individuals at arrival and after feeding and non-feeding periods in the laboratory. Shell area of specimens (cm2) and thread's thickness both obtained by image analysis (IA; see Materials and Methods) are also included. Different letters for CI and glycogen values mean significant differences in fed and unfed juvenile mussels.

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the attachment force recorder used in the laboratory (see Materials and Methods for detailed explanation).

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Byssal threads secretion (mean values ±SE) of control fed juveniles and large mussels (A), control fed and unfed juveniles (B) and, control fed and unfed large mussels (C) during the experimental time. The sum of attached and non-attached threads secreted by fed juveniles is included in (A) to highlight their mobility (see text).

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Absorption efficiency values (AE) and byssogenesis rate (for first 72 experimental hours) of control fed juvenile and large mussels. AE referred to mean values obtained for different sampling times during feeding of individuals (after 24, 72 and 96 hours).

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Attachment strength as force (Newtons N; A) and tenacity (N m−2; B) values for juveniles and large mussels maintained under feeding and non-feeding conditions at the laboratory. Bars at different level mean significant differences.

Figure 5

Table 2. Three-way ANOVA on logarithmic transformed values of attachment force as a function of mussel size (fixed factor: large versus small mussels), feeding condition (fixed factor: control fed versus unfed mussels) and considering the tank as random factor (see Materials and Methods).

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Relationship between attachment force and number of byssal threads secreted by individuals of both experimental sizes. Equations that corresponded to the linear fits shown in the Figure are reported in the main text (see Results section). Note different scaling of Y axis for juveniles (0–2.5 N) and large mussels (0–5 N).