Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T00:51:55.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fluid flow within the damage zone of the Boccheggiano extensional fault (Larderello–Travale geothermal field, central Italy): structures, alteration and implications for hydrothermal mineralization in extensional settings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2010

FEDERICO ROSSETTI*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Geologiche, Università Roma Tre, 00146 Rome, Italy
LUCA ALDEGA
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Geologiche, Università Roma Tre, 00146 Rome, Italy Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Sapienza Università di Roma, 00185 Rome, Italy
FRANCESCA TECCE
Affiliation:
Istituto di Geologia Ambientale e Geoingegneria, CNR, Rome, Italy
FABRIZIO BALSAMO
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Geologiche, Università Roma Tre, 00146 Rome, Italy
ANDREA BILLI
Affiliation:
Istituto di Geologia Ambientale e Geoingegneria, CNR, Rome, Italy
MAURO BRILLI
Affiliation:
Istituto di Geologia Ambientale e Geoingegneria, CNR, Rome, Italy
*
†Author for correspondence: rossetti@uniroma3.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Neogene extensional province of southern Tuscany in central Italy provides an outstanding example of fossil and active structurally controlled fluid flow and epithermal ore mineralization associated with post-orogenic silicic magmatism. Characterization of the hydrodynamic regime leading to the genesis of the polysulphide deposit (known as Filone di Boccheggiano) hosted within the damage zone of the Boccheggiano Fault is a key target to assess modes of fossil hydrothermal fluid circulation in the region and, more generally, to provide inferences on fault-controlled hydrothermal fluid flow in extensional settings. We provide a detailed description of the fault zone architecture and alteration/mineralization associated with the Boccheggiano ore deposit and report the results of fluid inclusion and stable oxygen isotope studies. This investigation shows that the Boccheggiano ore consists of an adularia/illite-type epithermal deposit and that sulphide ore deposition was controlled by channelling of hydrothermal fluids of dominantly meteoric origin within the highly anisotropic permeability structure of the Boccheggiano Fault. The low permeability structure of the fault core compartmentalized the fluid outflow preventing substantial cross-fault flow, with focused fluid flow occurring at the hangingwall of the fault controlled by fracture permeability. Fluid inclusion characteristics indicate that ore minerals were deposited between 280° and 350°C in the upper levels of the brittle extending crust (lithostatic pressure in the order of 0.1 GPa). Abundant vapour-rich inclusions in ore-stage quartz are consistent with fluid immiscibility and boiling, and quartz ore vein textures suggest that mineralization in the Boccheggiano ore deposit occurred during cyclic fluid flow in a deformation regime regulated by transient and fluctuating fluid pressure conditions. Results from this study (i) predict a strongly anisotropic permeability structure of the fault damage zone during crustal extension, and (ii) indicate the rate of secondary (structural) permeability creation and maintenance by active deformation in the hangingwall of extensional faults as the major factor leading to effective hydraulic transmissivity in extensional terranes. These features intimately link ore-grade mineralization in extensional settings to telescoping of hydrothermal flow along the hangingwall block(s) of major extensional fault zones.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010
Figure 0

Figure 1. Regional geological map of the Tuscan region with location of the study area (modified and readapted after Jolivet et al. 1998). The map also illustrates distribution and age of post-orogenic magmatism (after Dini et al. 2002).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Geology of the Larderello geothermal region (modified and re-adapted after Brogi et al. 2003) and the subsurface structural architecture as reconstructed from the LAR46 seismic line. The reflections interpreted as the subsurface prolongation of the Boccheggiano Fault fade into the Montieri pluton whose summit is also known from borehole data (modified and readapted after Rossetti et al. 2008). The inset shows the cross-section of the Campiano ore deposit, with location of the main ore deposits (after Masotti & Favilli, 1987).

Figure 2

Figure 3. (a) Studied exposure of the Boccheggiano Fault. The main ore deposit (Filone di Boccheggiano) is located in the immediate hangingwall of the fault. To the left: stereographic projections (Schmidt equal-area net, lower hemisphere) of representative structural data collected within the damage zone of the BF: (top) fault planes with slickenlines at the footwall of the fault (TMC); (bottom) fracture planes at the fault hangingwall. Fault and fracture planes as great circles; slickenlines as arrows. (b) Sub-horizontal quartz-sulphide breccia veins in the TMC at footwall of the BF. Note that extensional faults cut across the veins. (c) Enlargement of (b) showing the alteration halos surrounding the veins. (d) Sub-horizontal quartz veins and associated mineral alteration at the footwall of the BF. Note the sub-horizontal attitude of foliation in the TMC rocks. (e) Brittle tectonic fabric (fault fracture meshes) in the immediate hangingwall of the BF (i.e. about 5 m from the principal fault surface). (f) Sulphate mineralization decorating the fracture systems within the damage zone of the BF. See http://journals.cambridge.org/geo for a colour version of this figure.

Figure 3

Figure 4. (a) The fault core of the Boccheggiano Fault. Transition from a cohesive fault breccia to a fine-grained fault gouge is observed. (b) Thin-section microphotograph of the fault gouge (natural light) showing cataclastic fabric with survivor grains surrounded by a very fine-grained matrix. Contacts among coarse grains are absent or very rare. (c) Thin-section microphotograph of the Boccheggiano Fault breccia showing an early stage of the cataclastic process as inferred from the size of the grains (i.e. significantly larger than those forming the adjacent fault gouge) and from the numerous contacts among the coarse grains. Pr – pyrite; Qz – quartz.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Representative histograms showing the 2D grain size distribution within the fault gouge of the Boccheggiano Fault as determined after the image analyses of microphotographs. The measured grains are only those measurable in the considered photographs (i.e. only the coarsest grains; d – equivalent diameter of grains; n – number of grains). (a) Survivor grains. (b) Matrix grains.

Figure 5

Figure 6. (a) Photograph of rock slab showing textures of veins and breccias in the footwall of the Boccheggiano Fault, with abundant pyrite mineralization hosted by quartz. (b) Microtexture at the thin-section scale (natural light) of the rock slab shown in (a), showing brecciated wall-rock fragments (WRF), healed by quartz–pyrite ore. (c) Quartz microtextures in sample (a) show multiple episodes of healed microfractures, marked by arrays of fluid inclusions (crossed polars). (d) Multiphase fracturing and brecciation at the thin-section scale for sample shown in (a), healed by quartz–adularia sulphide ore (crossed polars). (e) Photograph of rock slab showing sulphide ore mineralization in the Filone di Boccheggiano, hosted by quartz–adularia–sericite gangue. (f) Thin-section of the sample shown in (e) showing euhedral quartz grain with well-preserved growth structures marked by dense arrays of fluid inclusions. Ad – adularia; Ms – muscovite; Pr – pyrite; Qz – quartz; WRF – wall-rock fragments.

Figure 6

Figure 7. (a) Schematic line drawing of the fluid inclusion types and characteristics hosted in the quartz crystals associated with the ore mineralization in the Filone di Boccheggiano (FIL sample). (b) Primary and secondary Type-2 inclusions hosted in quartz from brecciated sulphide veins at the footwall of the Boccheggiano Fault (F3 sample). (c) Decrepitated fluid inclusions hosted in quartz from brecciated sulphide veins from F3 sample.

Figure 7

Figure 8. Homogenization temperature (Th)–salinity diagram for quartz ore veins from both the fault hangingwall (FIL samples) and footwall (F3 samples).

Figure 8

Figure 9. (a) Schematic geological cross-section across the BF with sample locations. (b) Enlargement of (a) showing the fault rock architecture across the fault core with related mineralogical assemblages. (c) Selected X-ray diffraction patterns of the whole-rock composition (to the right) and of the oriented, air dried (AD) and ethylene glycol-solvated (EG) mounts (to the left) of samples F150, C6 and P50. Cal – calcite; Chl – chlorite; C-S – chlorite-smectite mixed layers; Go – goethite; I – illite; I-S – illite-smectite mixed layers; Jar – jarosite; K – kaolinite; KWM – K-white mica; Pg – paragonite; Qtz – quartz.

Figure 9

Table 1. Mineralogy of the whole-rock samples

Figure 10

Table 2. X-ray quantitative analysis of the <2 μm grain-size fraction

Figure 11

Table 3. Representative whole-rock data of altered and unaltered samples of footwall and hangingwall rocks from the damage zone of the Boccheggiano Fault

Figure 12

Figure 10. Element abundance within different portions of the damage zone of the BF versus original wall rock abundances, scaled by random factors. (a) Footwall of the fault; (b) and (c) hangingwall of the fault. Major element abundances are in wt% oxides; trace elements are in ppm. Dashed line is the constant mass reference frame. C0 – unaltered composition; CA – altered composition. Data from the profile shown in Figure 9 and reported in Table 3.

Figure 13

Figure 11. Pressure–temperature diagram with isochores for the different types of fluid inclusions: Type-1 CO2-bearing and aqueous Type-2 fluid inclusions hosted in quartz veins from the Boccheggiano ore deposit. Crossing of isochores of the two coeval immiscible fluids defines their trapping conditions. Also shown are lithostatic and hydrostatic thermobaric gradients based on a palaeogeothermal gradient of 90°C km−1 (see text for further details).

Figure 14

Figure 12. Curve showing the time integrated fluid flux q versus mass of quartz precipitated per 100 g of protolith (temperature of c. 300°C; rock density from Table 3) for the damage zone of the Boccheggiano Fault. The shaded areas represent the ranges of Si mobility for both footwall and hangingwall alteration (see text for further details).

Figure 15

Figure 13. Conceptual model for the sulphide mineralization and hydrothermal outflow within the damage zone of the Boccheggiano Fault. The inset shows the different features of the structural permeability across the damage zone of the BF under the prevailing extensional stress regime accompanying sulphide mineralization (see text for further details).

Supplementary material: File

Rossetti supplementary appendix

Rossetti supplementary appendix

Download Rossetti supplementary appendix(File)
File 1.5 MB
Supplementary material: Image

Rossetti supplementary figure 3

Rossetti supplementary figure 3

Download Rossetti supplementary figure 3(Image)
Image 5.8 MB