Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T00:29:59.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of hot deformation behavior and microstructure evolution of as-cast SiC nanoparticles reinforced magnesium matrix composite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2016

Ting Wang
Affiliation:
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, People's Republic of China
Kai-bo Nie*
Affiliation:
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, People's Republic of China; and Shanxi Key Laboratory of Advanced Magnesium-Based Materials, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, People's Republic of China
Kun-kun Deng
Affiliation:
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, People's Republic of China; and Shanxi Key Laboratory of Advanced Magnesium-Based Materials, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, People's Republic of China
Wei Liang
Affiliation:
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, People's Republic of China; and Shanxi Key Laboratory of Advanced Magnesium-Based Materials, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, People's Republic of China
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: kaibo.nie@gmail.com, niekaibo2015@163.com

Abstract

The hot deformation behavior of as-cast AZ91 magnesium alloy reinforced by SiC nanoparticles (SiCp/AZ91 nanocomposite) was investigated using hot compression test. Compared with unreinforced AZ91 alloy, peak stress of the SiCp/AZ91 nanocomposite achieved faster and high temperature deformation ability which was enhanced by the addition of SiC nanoparticles. The values of n for the AZ91 alloy and nanocomposite were 6.9 and 4.6, while the values of Q were 207.96 kJ/mol and 184.6 kJ/mol, respectively. The processing map showed the optimum processing conditions for the nanocomposite mainly concentrated at 523–673 K/0.018–0.001 s−1 and the maximum power dissipation efficiency was found to be 36% at a temperature of 673 K and the strain rate of 0.001 s−1. Based on the constitutive equation and processing map, the deformation mechanism for the present nanocomposite should be dominated by the mechanism of dynamic recrystalization.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. The engineering stress–engineering strain curves of AZ91 alloy and SiC/AZ91 nanocomposite at room temperature with the tensile rate of 0.5 mm/min.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. Ture stress–strain curves of SiC/AZ91 nanocomposite and AZ91 alloy: (a) at strain rate of 0.01 s−1, (b) at the temperature of 573 K.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. Peak stress versus strain for nanocomposite and AZ91 alloy under deformation conditions of 0.01 s−1 and different temperatures.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. As-cast microstructures of (a) AZ91 alloy (b) nanocomposite.

Figure 4

FIG. 5. Microstructures of nanocomposite and alloy compressed at different temperatures and 0.01 s−1: (a) (c) (e) AZ91 alloy, deformed at 523 K, 573 K, 623 K, respectively. (b) (d) (f) nanocomposite, deformed at 523, 573, 623 K, respectively.

Figure 5

FIG. 6. (a) Plot of $\ln (\dot \varepsilon )$ − lnσ0.2 and the calculated n value for nanocomposite (b) plot of lnZ versus lnσ0.2 based on the hyperbolic law for nanocomposite (c) comparison between calculated and measured σ0.2 values for nanocomposite.

Figure 6

FIG. 7. Processing maps at different strains for nanocomposite: (a) 0.2, (b) 0.3, (c) 0.4, (d) 0.5.

Figure 7

FIG. 8. SEM microstructure of nanocomposite at 523 K × 0.001 s−1. (a) At low magnification; (b) at high magnification.

Figure 8

FIG. 9. TEM microstructure of nanocomposite at 523 K × 1 s−1.

Figure 9

FIG. 10. Microstructures of nanocomposite compressed at different temperatures and strain rates: (a) 0.001 s−1 × 623 K, (b) 0.001 s−1 × 673 K.

Figure 10

FIG. 11. SEM microstructure of nanocomposite: (a) at 623 K × 0.1 s−1; (b) at 673 K × 0.1 s−1.

Figure 11

FIG. 12. Safe areas of different materials at strain of 0.5.