Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T09:38:34.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sow environment during gestation: part II. Influence on piglet physiology and tissue maturity at birth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2018

H. Quesnel*
Affiliation:
PEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
M.-C. Père
Affiliation:
PEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
I. Louveau
Affiliation:
PEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
L. Lefaucheur
Affiliation:
PEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
M.-H. Perruchot
Affiliation:
PEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
A. Prunier
Affiliation:
PEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
H. Pastorelli
Affiliation:
PEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
M. C. Meunier-Salaün
Affiliation:
PEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
D. Gardan-Salmon
Affiliation:
Deltavit CCPA Group, 35150 Janzé, France
E. Merlot
Affiliation:
PEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
F. Gondret
Affiliation:
PEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France

Abstract

Sow environment during gestation can generate maternal stress which could alter foetal development. The effects of two group-housing systems for gestating sows on piglet morphological and physiological traits at birth were investigated. During gestation, sows were reared in a conventional system on a slatted floor (C, 18 sows), demonstrated as being stressful for sows or in an enriched system in larger pens and on deep straw bedding (E, 19 sows). On gestation day 105, sows were transferred into identical individual farrowing crates on a slatted floor. Farrowing was supervised to allow sampling from piglets at birth. In each litter, one male piglet of average birth weight was euthanized immediately after birth to study organ development and tissue traits. Blood samples were collected from 6 or 7 piglets per litter at birth and 2 piglets per litter at 4 days of lactation (DL4). At birth, mean piglet BW did not differ between groups (P > 0.10); however, the percentage of light (<1.2 kg) and heavy (⩾2 kg) piglets was greater and lower, respectively, in C than in E litters (P < 0.01). Plasma concentrations of cortisol, IGF-I, T4, T3, lactate, NEFA, fructose and albumin did not differ (P > 0.10) between C and E piglets, but the insulin to glucose ratio was greater (P = 0.02) in C than in E piglets. Compared with E piglets, C piglets had a lighter gut at birth (P = 0.01) and their glycogen content in longissimus muscle was lower (P < 0.01). In this muscle, messenger RNA levels of PAX7, a marker of satellite cells and of PPARGC1A, a transcriptional coactivator involved in mitochondriogenesis and mitochondrial energy metabolism, were greater (P < 0.05), whereas the expression level of PRDX6, a gene playing a role in antioxidant pathway, was lower (P = 0.03) in C than in E piglets. Other studied genes involved in myogenesis did not differ between C and E piglets. No system effect was observed on target genes in liver and subcutaneous adipose tissue. On DL4, C piglets exhibited a lower plasma antioxidant capacity than E piglets (P = 0.002). In conclusion, exposure of sows to a stressful environment during gestation had mild negative effects on the maturity of piglets at birth.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2018 
Figure 0

Table 1 Body condition and reproductive performance of sows that were housed during gestation in a conventional (C) v. an enriched (E) system

Figure 1

Figure 1 Salivary concentrations of cortisol in sows (18 C and 19 E) reared during gestation in a conventional (C) v. an enriched (E) system. Saliva was collected on days 35, 105 and 107 of gestation (DG35, DG105 and DG107, respectively) and on day 4 of lactation (DL4). Data are expressed as least-squares means ± SEM of the square-root transformed values.

Figure 2

Table 2 Neonatal traits of piglets born from sows that were housed during gestation in a conventional (C) v. an enriched (E) system

Figure 3

Table 3 Plasma oxidative stress parameters of piglets born from sows that were housed during gestation in a conventional (C) v. an enriched (E) system

Figure 4

Table 4 Plasma concentrations of hormones and metabolites at birth in piglets born from sows that were housed during gestation in a conventional (C) v. an enriched (E) system

Figure 5

Table 5 Effects of gestating sow housing system on organ characteristics of piglets at birth when sows were housed during gestation in a conventional (C) v. an enriched (E) system

Figure 6

Figure 2 Messenger (mRNA) levels of factors involved in mitochondrial biogenesis and PAX7, a marker of satellite cells, in muscle of male piglets at birth (18 C and 19 E) when sows were housed during gestation in a conventional (C) v. an enriched (E) system. *P < 0.05.

Figure 7

Table 6 Bacteriological examination of the stomach and intestine contents in male piglets at birth when sows were housed during gestation in a conventional (C) v. an enriched (E) system

Supplementary material: File

Quesnel et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S4

Download Quesnel et al. supplementary material(File)
File 229.9 KB