Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T05:53:21.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Monitoring Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) in pilot-scale warehouses treated with β-cyfluthrin: are residual insecticides and trapping compatible?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

M.D. Toews*
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS Grain Marketing and Production Research Center, 1515 College Ave, Manhattan, KS, 66502-2736, USA
F.H. Arthur
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS Grain Marketing and Production Research Center, 1515 College Ave, Manhattan, KS, 66502-2736, USA
J.F. Campbell
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS Grain Marketing and Production Research Center, 1515 College Ave, Manhattan, KS, 66502-2736, USA
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +(229) 386-3086 E-mail: mtoews@uga.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Integrated pest management strategies for cereal processing facilities often include both pheromone-baited pitfall traps and crack and crevice applications of a residual insecticide such as the pyrethroid cyfluthrin. In replicated pilot-scale warehouses, a 15-week-long experiment was conducted comparing population trends suggested by insect captures in pheromone-baited traps to direct estimates obtained by sampling the food patches in untreated and cyfluthrin-treated warehouses. Warehouses were treated, provisioned with food patches and then infested with all life stages of Tribolium castaneum (Herbst). Food patches, both those initially infested and additional uninfested, were surrounded by cyfluthrin bands to evaluate if insects would cross the bands. Results show that insect captures correlated with population trends determined by direct product samples in the untreated warehouses, but not the cyfluthrin-treated warehouses. However, dead insects recovered from the floor correlated with the insect densities observed with direct samples in the cyfluthrin-treated warehouses. Initially, uninfested food patches were exploited immediately and after six weeks harbored similar infestation densities to the initially infested food patches. These data show that pest management professionals relying on insect captures in pheromone-baited traps in cyfluthrin-treated structures could be deceived into believing that a residual insecticide application was suppressing population growth, when the population was actually increasing at the same rate as an untreated population.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Arrangement of shelves, traps and food patches in pilot-scale warehouses. The arrow indicates the position of exterior door, gray rectangles indicate shelves, black circles indicate pitfall traps, and white circles indicate foot patches (situated under shelves). Drawing is not to scale.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Mean±SEM dead adults recovered weekly on the floor inside pilot-scale warehouses. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences between the control and cyfluthrin treatments by date (protected lsmeans test, P<0.05) (–•–, control; –○–, cyfluthrin).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Mean±SEM of (a) larvae and (b) adults captured weekly in pitfall traps. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences between the control and cyfluthrin treatments by date (protected lsmeans test, P<0.05) (–•–, control; –○–, cyfluthrin).

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Mean±SEM of (a) larvae, (b) pupae and (c) adults, per gram flour recovered in food patches per pilot-scale warehouse (includes north, south and east shelves) (–•–, control; –○–, cyfluthrin).

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Mean±SEM of (a) larvae, (b) pupae and (c) adults, per gram flour recovered in food patches under the north shelves only (initially infested) (–•–, control; –○–, cyfluthrin).

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Mean±SEM of (a) larvae, (b) pupae and (c) adults, per gram flour recovered in food patches under the south and east shelves only (initially uninfested). Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences between the control and cyfluthrin treatments by date (protected lsmeans test, P<0.05) (–•–, control; –○–, cyfluthrin).

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Line and scatter plots of (a) mean adult captures in traps vs. mean adults per gram flour recovered in food patches and (b) mean dead adults recovered on floors vs. mean adults per gram flour recovered in food patches in the control and cyfluthrin-treated warehouses. Lines were fitted for significant correlations only (•, control; ○, cyfluthrin).