Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T02:48:18.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Time course of appearance of markers of arrhythmia in patients with tetralogy of Fallot before and after surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2005

Rim Al Balkhi
Affiliation:
Paediatric Cardiac Unit, Hôpital des Enfants, Hôpitaux Universitaires, Geneva, Switzerland
Maurice Beghetti
Affiliation:
Paediatric Cardiac Unit, Hôpital des Enfants, Hôpitaux Universitaires, Geneva, Switzerland
Beat Friedli
Affiliation:
Paediatric Cardiac Unit, Hôpital des Enfants, Hôpitaux Universitaires, Geneva, Switzerland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sudden death and ventricular tachycardia are known to occur late after correction of tetralogy of Fallot. Abnormal dispersion of the QT interval, ventricular late potentials, and prolongation of the QRS complex, alone or in combination, are useful markers of the risk for such complications. Our present prospective study investigates the time course of appearance of two markers, dispersion of QT and JT, and ventricular late potentials, before and after corrective surgery. Dispersion of QT and JT, and signal averaged electrocardiographic parameters, were determined sequentially in 20 patients before, a mean of 9 ± 3 days after, and again 35 ± 11 days post-operatively. Dispersion of QT was already abnormal before surgery in two-fifths of the patients, but increased markedly in the later post-operative period. Ventricular late potentials were absent before surgery and in the immediate post-operative period, but were found in one-fifth of patients 1 month later. We conclude that abnormal dispersion of QT is, to some extent, a fact of the natural history of tetralogy of Fallot, but is significantly amplified by surgery. Ventricular late potentials, on the other hand, are absent before surgery, but appear with some delay after the operation, probably as a result of scarring rather than the surgical incision itself. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess the significance of these findings.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1.

Figure 1

Dispersion of the QT interval (a) and JT interval (b) before, immediately after surgery (post-op 1), and later (post-op 2). N = normal for our laboratory. *p < 0.01 vs normal; **p < 0.01 vs pre-op and early post-op.

Figure 2

Individual sequential measurements of the 3 signal averaged electrocardiographic parameters. (a) Filtered QRS. (b) Duration of low amplitude terminal signals less than 40 μV. (c) Root mean square of the last 40 ms.