Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T03:36:12.882Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructural insights into the hydraulic performance of in situ polymerized bentonites: towards sustainable barrier design for waste containment applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2026

S. Keerthana
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras , Chennai, India
Dali Naidu Arnepalli*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, BSB#112, Indian Institute of Technology Madras , Chennai 600 036, India
*
Corresponding author: Dali Naidu Arnepalli; Email: arnepalli@iitm.ac.in
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When exposed to chemically aggressive permeants, bentonite-polymer composites often exhibit progressive increases in hydraulic conductivity (k) due to polymer elution, thereby compromising their long-term barrier performance in waste-containment systems. In situ polymerized bentonites (IPBs) synthesized with a crosslinker-based polymer formulation have been developed to improve chemical compatibility and mitigate polymer elution. However, the mechanisms governing their sustained low k and non-eluting behavior under aggressive chemical environments are not well understood. The present study investigated the mechanisms responsible for the long-term superior hydraulic performance of IPBs through integrated macro- and micro-scale analyses. The IPBs containing different polymer dosages were permeated with AlCl3 solutions over a wide concentration range, with comparative assessments performed using identical concentrations of NaCl and CaCl2 solutions. The role of the crosslinker-based polymer formulation in governing clay–polymer interactions, pore structure evolution, and hydraulic response was assessed through advanced characterization and microstructural analyses. Results showed that the IPBs consistently maintained low k values, up to three orders of magnitude below the regulatory threshold limit of 1×10–9 m s–1, without exhibiting polymer elution during long-term permeation. The enhanced chemical resilience and non-eluting behavior of IPBs were attributed to the formation of a stable three-dimensional crosslinked polymer network, which strengthened clay-polymer bonding and restricted polymer mobility. The polymer interacted with clay through surface adsorption, without inducing intercalation into the clay lattice. The infrared absorption spectra confirmed a dual binding mechanism involving esterification and hydrogen bonding. Morphological analyses revealed heterogeneous microstructural evolution driven by variations in polymer dosage and pore-fluid chemistry. Based on the microstructural evidence, a multiscale mechanistic framework involving pore-clogging, polymer bridging, and encapsulation was established. The findings of the study provided new mechanistic insights for designing chemically resilient, sustainable, low-k barrier materials to ensure long-term environmental protection.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Clay Minerals Society
Figure 0

Figure 1. Variation of hydraulic conductivity with the concentration of permeant: (a) NaB; (b) IPB5; (c) IPB15; (d) IPB28. The dashed line indicates k of DW; data for the AlCl3 solution were obtained experimentally in this study, while the remaining datasets were adapted from Keerthana (2025) and other literature.Figure 1. long description.

Figure 1

Table 1. Properties of Na bentonite and in situ polymerized bentonitesTable 1. long description.

Figure 2

Figure 2. XRD patterns of virgin NaB and IPBs with varied polymer doses: (a) comparison of XRD traces presented in a stacked plot; (b) expanded scale showing the variation in d001 spacing with increased polymer dose.Figure 2. long description.

Figure 3

Table 2. Summary of XRD analysisTable 2. long description.

Figure 4

Figure 3. FTIR spectra of virgin NaB, SAP, and IPBs with varied polymer doses in the wavenumber range: (a) 3800 cm–1 to 2800 cm–1, (b) 1800 cm–1 to 1200 cm–1, (c) 1200 cm–1 to 800 cm–1.Figure 3. long description.

Figure 5

Figure 4. FTIR spectrum of virgin sodium bentonite.Figure 4. long description.

Figure 6

Table 3. Band assignment for FTIR spectra of Na bentonite and in situ polymerized bentonitesTable 3. long description.

Figure 7

Figure 5. Thermogravimetric response of virgin NaB and IPBs with varied polymer doses: (a) weight loss curve; (b) derivative of weight-loss curve.Figure 5. long description.

Figure 8

Table 4. Summary of thermogravimetric analysisTable 4. long description.

Figure 9

Figure 6. SEM images of soil specimens permeated with DW: (a) NaB, (b) IPB5, (c) IPB15, and (d) IPB28.Figure 6. long description.

Figure 10

Figure 7. SEM images of soil specimens permeated with NaCl solution: (a,b,c) NaB, (d,e,f) IPB5, (g,h,i) IPB15, and (j,k,l) IPB28.Figure 7. long description.

Figure 11

Figure 8. SEM images of soil specimens permeated with CaCl2 solution: (a,b,c) NaB, (d,e,f) IPB5, (g,h,i) IPB15, and (j,k,l) IPB28.Figure 8. long description.

Figure 12

Figure 9. SEM images of soil specimens permeated with AlCl3 solution: (a,b,c) NaB, (d,e,f) IPB5, (g,h,i) IPB15, and (j,k,l) IPB28.Figure 9. long description.

Figure 13

Figure 10. SEM–EDS overlay image of IPB28 specimen permeated with 20 mM AlCl3 solution. The enlarged view highlights the spatial correspondence between the hydrogel-filled pore in the SEM image and elemental mapping.Figure 10. long description.

Figure 14

Figure 11. Carbon element mapping of the IPB28 specimen permeated using 20 mM AlCl3 solution.Figure 11. long description.

Figure 15

Figure 12. Overlay of SEM micrograph with elemental mapping for the IPB28 specimen permeated using 20 mM AlCl3 solution.Figure 12. long description.

Figure 16

Figure 13. (a) Specific pore volume and (b) its derivative curves for NaB and IPBs permeated using DW.Figure 13. long description.

Figure 17

Figure 14. Pore-structure evolution in: (a,b,c) NaB, (d,e,f) IPB5, (g,h,i) IPB15, and (j,k,l) IPB28 permeated with: (a,d,g,j) NaCl, (b,e,h,k) CaCl2, and (c,f,i,l) AlCl3 solution.Figure 14. long description.

Figure 18

Table 5. Comparison of variation in pore-volume characteristics of Na bentonite and in situ polymerized bentonitesTable 5. long description.

Figure 19

Figure 15. Conceptual framework for multiscale mechanisms contributing to low k in IPBs.Figure 15. long description.

Supplementary material: File

Keerthana and Arnepalli supplementary material

Keerthana and Arnepalli supplementary material
Download Keerthana and Arnepalli supplementary material(File)
File 288.8 KB