Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-kwdml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T07:49:35.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the rotation of a circular porous particle in 2D simple shear flow with fluid inertia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2016

Chenggong Li
Affiliation:
Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, National Engineering Laboratory for MTO, iChEM (Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Materials), Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Dalian, 116023, China
Mao Ye*
Affiliation:
Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, National Engineering Laboratory for MTO, iChEM (Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Materials), Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Dalian, 116023, China
Zhongmin Liu
Affiliation:
Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, National Engineering Laboratory for MTO, iChEM (Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Materials), Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Dalian, 116023, China
*
†Email address for correspondence: maoye@dicp.ac.cn

Abstract

We investigate numerically the rotational behaviour of a circular porous particle suspended in a two-dimensional (2D) simple shear flow with fluid inertia at particle shear Reynolds number up to 108. We use the volume-averaged macroscopic momentum equation to formulate the flow field inside and outside the moving porous particle, which is solved by a modified single relaxation time lattice Boltzmann method. The effects of fluid inertia, confinement of the bounding walls, and permeability of the particle are studied. Our two-dimensional simulation results confirm that the permeability has little effect on the rotation of a porous particle in unbounded shear flow without fluid inertia (Masoud, Stone & Shelley, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 733, 2013, R6), but also suggest that the role of permeability cannot be neglected when the confinement effect is significant, or the fluid inertia is not negligible. The fluid inertia and the confined walls have similar effects on the rotation of a porous particle as that on a solid impermeable particle. The angular velocity decays with an increase in fluid inertia, and the confinement effect suppresses the angular velocity to a shear rate ratio below 0.5. A simple scaling argument based on the balance of torque exerted by fluid flows adjacent to the two bounding walls and that due to the flow recirculation can explain our results.

Information

Type
Rapids
Copyright
© 2016 Cambridge University Press 
Figure 0

Figure 1.Dimensionless torque acting on a circular porous particle as a function of $1/(2\sqrt{Da})$ for various confinement ratios $B$ at $Re_{p}=0.08$: (a) the particle is stationary in simple shear flow of shear rate $G$; (b) the particle has no translational motion but rotates with an angular velocity $G/2$ in a quiescent fluid.

Figure 1

Figure 2.Dimensionless angular velocity $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}/G$ (a) as a function of the confinement ratio $B$ for various $Da$ at $Re_{p}=0.08$, and (b) as a function of $Re_{p}$ for various $B$ at $Da=4.25\times 10^{-12}$, compared with results for a solid impermeable particle in the literature.

Figure 2

Figure 3.Comparison of the simulation results on the angular rate of a circular porous particle in a simple shear flow with various Darcy numbers at the same confinement ratio, (a) $B=2$, (b) $B=4$. Lines of slope $-0.26$, $-0.267$ and $-0.3$ at $B=2$, and slope $-0.273$, $-0.28$ and $-0.31$ at $B=4$ are also shown.

Figure 3

Figure 4.Dimensionless rotational angular velocity as a function of $Da$ at various $Re_{p}$ at the same confinement ratio (a) $B=2$, (b) $B=4$.

Figure 4

Figure 5.Streamlines for shear flow past a freely rotating circular porous particle with various $Da$ and $Re_{p}$ at $B=4$, (a–d) for $Re_{p}=5.574$, (e–h) for $Re_{p}=76.8$. $B=2$ presents similar results (not shown here).

Figure 5

Figure 6.(a) Dimensionless flow rate at steady state $Q_{porous}/Q_{tp}$ through the top-half of a porous particle as a function of $Re_{p}$ at various $Da$ with $B=4$; (b) value of $S_{2}/S_{1}$ as a function of $Re_{p}$ at various $Da$ and $B$; (c) locations of the stagnation points as a function of $Re_{p}$ at various $Da$ and $B$, $R_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}}$ is the distance between the stagnation point and the centre of the particle.