Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T06:47:42.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Synthetic bismuth silicate nanostructures: Photocatalysts grown from silica aerogels precursors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2013

Wei Wei
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China
Jimin Xie*
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China
Suci Meng
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China; and Institute of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, Key Laboratory of Mesoscopic Chemistry of MOE, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210093, China
Xiaomeng Lü
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China
Zaoxue Yan
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China
Jianjun Zhu
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China
Henglv Cui
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: xiejm391@sohu.com

Abstract

Bismuth silicate with two morphologies (nanoflowers/nanoplates) was successfully fabricated with silica aerogels via a hydrothermal method in polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)-mediated processes for the first time. The obtained nanomaterials were characterized using x-ray powder diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area analysis, and UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. It was found that the concentration of PVP plays an important role in the formation of the hierarchical nanoflowers. The formation mechanism for this novel morphology was proposed on the basis of experimental results. Moreover, the photocatalytic performances of Bi2SiO5 nanoflowers/nanoplates were also investigated. The results revealed that Bi2SiO5 nanoflowers exhibited higher activity than Bi2SiO5 nanoplates due to its suitable morphology, higher BET surface area.

Information

Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 
Figure 0

TABLE I. The lattice parameters and the atomic coordinates in orthorhombic (a) and tetragonal (b) Bi2SiO5 used in calculation.

Figure 1

FIG. 1. XRD patterns of as-prepared samples: (a) Bi2SiO5 nanoflowers, (b) Bi2SiO5 nanoplates, (c) sample using commercial SiO2 as precursors via PVP, (d) sample using commercial SiO2 as precursors without surfactant.

Figure 2

FIG. 2. (a) Low-magnification SEM image of the Bi2SiO5 nanoflowers, (b) Low-magnification SEM image of the Bi2SiO5 nanoplates, (c) EDX pattern of Bi2SiO5 nanoflowers, (d, e) AFM micrographs of the Bi2SiO5 nanoplates.

Figure 3

FIG. 3. The possible growth pattern and formation mechanism of Bi2SiO5 nanostructures.

Figure 4

FIG. 4. SEM images of Bi2SiO5 nanoflowers synthesized under different conditions: (a) the silica aerogels, (b) the silica aerogels with the PVP, (c) the precursor before the hydrothermal treatment, (d) the precursor at the temperature of 180 °C for 6 h; (e, f) the precursor at the temperature of 180 °C for 12 h, (g) the precursor at the temperature of 180 °C for 24 h, (h) the precursor at the temperature of 180 °C for 36 h.

Figure 5

FIG. 5. N2 absorption–desorpotion isotherms and pore size distribution plot (inset) of samples: (a) Bi2SiO5 nanoflowers, (b) Bi2SiO5 nanoplates.

Figure 6

FIG. 6. UV-vis DRS patterns of as-prepared samples and graph of samples replotted as (A × hν)1/2 versus (hν) (inset): (a) Bi2SiO5 nanoflowers, (b) Bi2SiO5 nanoplates.

Figure 7

FIG. 7. Unit-cell structure of orthorhombic (a) and tetragonal (b) Bi2SiO5, showing ball and stick (Red, purple, and yellow spheres represent O, Bi, and Si atoms, respectively). Energy band diagram and DOSs for orthorhombic (c) tetragonal (d) Bi2SiO5 structures calculated by DFT.

Figure 8

FIG. 8. (a) Fluorescence spectral changes observed during illumination of Bi2SiO5 nanoflowers in the solution of terephthalic acid (excitation at 312 nm, emission at 426 nm); (b) plot of the induced fluorescence intensity at 426 nm against irradiation time for terephthalic acid on the sample (A) Bi2SiO5 nanoflowers, (B) Bi2SiO5 nanoplates.

Figure 9

FIG. 9. (a) Decolorization rate of RhB over different samples, (b) ln (C0/C)–T for photocatalytic degradation of RhB (the structures of RhB in the inset); (c) UV-vis spectral changes observed during illumination of Bi2SiO5 nanoflowers.