Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T10:57:14.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Useful Sources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2021

Nora Ratzmann  and
Nina Sahraoui
Nora Ratzmann
Affiliation:
Centre for the Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK E-mail: n.ratzmann@lse.ac.uk
Nina Sahraoui
Affiliation:
Center for Sociological and Political Research in Paris (CRESPPA, CNRS UMR 7217), France E-mail: nina.sahraoui@cnrs.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information

Type
Themed Section: The (Un)deserving Migrant? Street-Level Bordering Practices and Deservingness in Access to Social Services
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , July 2021 , pp. 531 - 532
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

This section lists some additional key resources of theoretical and empirical street-level bureaucracy studies, focussing on the role of moral judgements in local decision-making and the representative street-level bureaucracy literature. It also provides a collection of sources on attitudinal research on deservingness, of both quantitative and qualitative nature, and on internal bordering practices. This list complements the references list of the state-of-the-art article.

References

On street-level bureaucracy and policy implementation practice

Brodkin, E. Z. and Majmundar, M. (2010) ‘Administrative exclusion. Organizations and the hidden costs of welfare claiming’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 4, 827–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, T. (2010) Professional Discretion in Welfare Services. Beyond Street-Level Bureaucracy, Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Fuglerud, O. (2004) ‘Constructing exclusion. The micro-sociology of an immigration department’, Social Anthropology, 12, 1, 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasenfeld, Y. (2000) ‘Organizational forms as moral practices. The case of welfare departments’, Social Service Review, 74, 3, 329–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mascia, C. (2020) ‘How bureaucracies shape access to rights: the implementation of family reunification in Belgium’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2020.1726734.Google Scholar
Oberfield, Z. W. (2014) Becoming Bureaucrats. Socialization at the Front Lines of government Service, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press (American governance).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberweis, T. and Musheno, M. C. (2001) Knowing Rights. State Actors’ Stories of Power, Identity and Morality, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Psimmenos, I. and Kassimati, K. (2003) ‘Immigration control pathways. Organisational culture and work values of Greek welfare officers’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 29, 2, 337–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweitzer, R. (2019) ‘Health care versus border care: justification and hypocrisy in the multilevel negotiation of irregular migrants’ access to fundamental rights and services’, Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies, 17, 1, 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spire, A. (2008) Accueillir ou reconduire. Enquête sur les guichets de l’immigration, Paris: Raisons d’Agir.Google Scholar
van der Aar, P. and van Berkel, R. (2015) ‘Fulfilling the promise of professionalism in street-level practice’, in Hupe, P., Hill, M. and Buffat, A. (eds.), Understanding Street-Level Bureaucrats, Bristol: Policy Press, 263–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wemyss, G., Yuval-Davis, N. and Cassidy, K. (2018) “Beauty and the beast’: everyday bordering and ‘sham marriage’ discourse’, Political Geography, 66, 51–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkens, V. M. and Wenger, J. B. (2015) ‘Street-level bureaucrats and client interaction in a just world’, in Hupe, P., Hill, M. and Buffat, A. (eds.), Understanding Street-Level Bureaucrats, Bristol: Policy Press, 55–168.Google Scholar
Zacka, B. (2017): When the State Meets the Street. Public Service and Moral Agency, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

On deservingness attitudes

Van Oorschot, W. (2006): ’Making the difference in social Europe: deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states’, Journal of European Social Policy, 16, 1, 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willen, S. (2012) ‘How Is health-related “Deservingness” reckoned? Perspectives from unauthorized im/migrants in Tel Aviv, Social Science and Medicine, 74, 6, 812–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

On internal bordering practices

Cassidy, K. (2019) ‘Everyday bordering: the internal reach of the UK’s borders’, Geography, 104, 100–02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eule, T., Loher, D. and Wyss, A. (2018) ‘Contested control at the margins of the state’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44, 16, 2717–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabini, G. (2019) ‘Internal bordering in the context of undeportability: border performances in Italy’, Theoretical Criminology, 23, 2, 175–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcés-Mascareñas, B. (2015) ‘Revisiting bordering practices: irregular migration, borders, and citizenship in Malaysia’, International Political Sociology, 9, 2, 128–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar