Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T07:03:45.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hyperbranched polyurethane/Fe3O4 nanoparticles decorated multiwalled carbon nanotube thermosetting nanocomposites as microwave actuated shape memory materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2013

Hemjyoti Kalita
Affiliation:
Advanced Polymer & Nanomaterial Laboratory, Department of Chemical Sciences, Tezpur University, Tezpur 784028, Assam, India
Niranjan Karak*
Affiliation:
Advanced Polymer & Nanomaterial Laboratory, Department of Chemical Sciences, Tezpur University, Tezpur 784028, Assam, India
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: karakniranjan@yahoo.com

Abstract

Hyperbranched polyurethane/Fe3O4 nanoparticles decorated multiwalled carbon nanotube (Fe3O4-MWCNT) nanocomposites were prepared by the in situ polymerization technique. The presence of Fe3O4 nanoparticles on the surface of the MWCNTs was confirmed by x-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopic studies. The saturation magnetization value of Fe3O4-MWCNT was 0.23 emu/g. The glycidyl ether of bisphenol-A epoxy cured thermosetting nanocomposites exhibited enhanced tensile strength (6.4–38.5 MPa), scratch hardness (3.0–8.5 kg), and thermal stability (241–292 °C) with the increase of loading of Fe3O4-MWCNT (0–2 wt%). The nanocomposites possess good shape fixity over the repeated cycles of test. The nanocomposites also showed good shape recovery under the application of microwave irradiation. The shape recovery speed was found to be increased with the increase of the content of Fe3O4-MWCNT. Thus, the studied thermosetting nanocomposites have potential to be used as noncontact shape memory materials.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 
Figure 0

TABLE I. Compositions and curing time of the nanocomposites at 120 °C.

Figure 1

FIG. 1. FTIR spectra with inset of magnified region from 3000 to 3600 cm−1 for (a) pristine MWCNT, (b) a-MWCNT, (c) Fe3O4, and (d) Fe3O4-MWCNT.

Figure 2

FIG. 2. FTIR spectra for (a) HBPU, (b) HBPU0.2 (before curing), (c) HBPU0.2, (d) HBPU1, and (e) HBPU2.

Figure 3

FIG. 3. Raman spectra for (a) pristine MWCNT, (b) a-MWCNT, and (c) Fe3O4-MWCNT.

Figure 4

FIG. 4. XRD diffractograms for (a) a-MWCNT, (b) Fe3O4, and (c) Fe3O4-MWCNT.

Figure 5

FIG. 5. XRD diffractograms for (a) HBPU, (b) HBPU0.2, (c) HBPU1, and (d) HBPU2.

Figure 6

FIG. 6. Magnetic hysteresis loops for (a) Fe3O4-MWCNT and (b) HBPU0.2.

Figure 7

FIG. 7. TEM images for (a) a-MWCNT, (b) and (c) Fe3O4-MWCNT, and (d) HBPU1.

Figure 8

FIG. 8. (a) TGA thermograms for (a) HBPU, (b) HBPU0.2, (c) HBPU1, and (d) HBPU2; and (b) DTG curves for (a) HBPU, (b) HBPU0.2, (c) HBPU1, and (d) HBPU2.

Figure 9

TABLE II. Thermal behaviors of the nanocomposites.

Figure 10

TABLE III. Mechanical properties of hyperbranched polyurethane and the nanocomposites.

Figure 11

FIG. 9. DSC curves for (a) HBPU, (b) HBPU0.2, (c) HBPU1, and (d) HBPU2.

Figure 12

FIG. 10. Shape memory behaviors of hyperbranched polyurethane and the nanocomposites under microwave stimulus (a) original shape and (b) fixed shape.

Figure 13

TABLE IV. Shape memory behaviors of hyperbranched polyurethane and the nanocomposites.

Figure 14

FIG. 11. Shape recovery curves of hyperbranched polyurethane and the nanocomposites.

Figure 15

SCHEME 1. Proposed cross-linking reactions.