Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T05:46:16.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Clinical and biological acceptance of a fibrocollagen-coated mersylene patch for tracheal repair in growing dogs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2014

F Villegas-Alvarez
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Cirugía Experimental, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Mexico City, Mexico Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
B Pérez-Guillé
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Cirugía Experimental, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Mexico City, Mexico
R E Soriano-Rosales
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Cirugía Experimental, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Mexico City, Mexico
M A Jiménez-Bravo-Luna
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Cirugía Experimental, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Mexico City, Mexico
A Gonzalez-Maciel
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Microscopía Electrónica, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Mexico City, Mexico
S L Elizalde-Velazquez
Affiliation:
Departamento de Radiología, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Mexico City, Mexico
R Aguirre-Hernández
Affiliation:
Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
A Ramos-Morales
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Microscopía Electrónica, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Mexico City, Mexico
R Reynoso-Robles
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Microscopía Electrónica, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Mexico City, Mexico
J F González-Zamora*
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Cirugía Experimental, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Mexico City, Mexico
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Jose Francisco González-Zamora, Los Angeles No. 15, Colonia Olímpica, Delegación Coyoacán CP 04710, México DF, México E-mail: jf.gonzalezzamora@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Collagen-covered prostheses can be used as a non-circumferential segmental tracheal replacement. However, the applicability of these implants in young subjects has not yet been reported.

Methods:

In this experimental, longitudinal study, dogs aged 29–32 days underwent limited segmental tracheal replacement with a polyester prosthesis or were allocated to a control, untreated group. The dogs were evaluated clinically, endoscopically and tomographically for up to one year.

Results:

Although there was evidence of tracheal growth in the experimental group, tomographic measurements were significantly smaller in this group than in the control group throughout the observation period. At the end of the study, there was no evidence of implant rejection, stenosis or collapse. Normal respiratory epithelium had grown across the implanted membrane in the experimental group.

Conclusion:

The homologous collagen mersylene membrane allowed for limited structural tracheal growth and was functionally integrated into the segmented tracheal wall in growing dogs.

Information

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2014 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Endoscopic view in the experimental group. (a) The recently implanted prosthesis is surrounded by ecchymosis at its junction with the tracheal wall. (b) One month later, the implant slightly protrudes into the lumen; it has a more friable appearance and is surrounded by hyaline mucus. (c) At the end of the study, the surface of the implant is smooth and is similar to the normal tracheal wall; it no longer projects into the lumen, but the contour of the trachea is still not circular in shape. (d) In dog number eight, part of the prosthetic lip, which initially protruded during implantation, exhibits a polyp appearance; it is similar in colour to the rest of the tracheal wall and was unchanged at the end of the study.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Growth curves for the four tracheal structural characteristics, for both groups (starting at 30 days of life): (a) circumference, (b) fore–back diameter, (c) transversal diameter and (d) area. These show the observed mean values (dashed lines) and predicted mean values (solid lines). Graphically, the absence of an interaction between group and time produces two parallel curves, while the presence of an interaction produces two diverging curves.

Figure 2

Table I Relative group differences in baseline tomographic characteristics and body weight

Figure 3

Table II Residual maximum likelihood estimates for fixed effects*

Figure 4

Table III Residual maximum likelihood estimates for residual terms and random effects

Figure 5

Fig. 3 Immunohistochemistry of the polyester mesh before implantation: (a) type I collagen (brown) is widely disseminated throughout the tissue, although its density is greatest around the polyester mesh; (b) type V collagen (purple) is also present, particularly under the mesh. (ABC Kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, California, USA) and 3′3′diaminobenzidine chromogen (Sigma Chemical, St Louis, Missouri, USA); ×400)

Figure 6

Fig. 4 Thickness of: (a) normal tracheal wall, (b) the prosthesis 12 months after implantation and (c) the prosthesis before implantation. The lines indicate the thickness from the mucosa (muc) to the adventitia (adv). As seen in part (b), the increase in prosthesis thickness seems to be at the expense of the extracellular matrix (collagen and glycosaminoglycans) and neovascularisation (nv). Some areas of submucosal tissue appear to be more compact (arrows) compared with the rest of the tracheal wall. Under the mucosa, there are many capillaries proximal to the prosthesis (arrowheads), as well as arteries and arterioles. As shown in part (c), type I collagen is expressed around the mesh, while the mucosa and adventitia are absent. (Masson's trichrome stain; ×50)

Figure 7

Fig. 5 At the end of the study, respiratory epithelium covers the surface of the trachea and implant in both the control (a) and experimental (b) groups. Ciliated epithelium covers the regenerated mucosa and is similar to that in the control trachea. Neovascular formation is evident under the mucosa (arrows). The arrowheads indicate regions of fibrocollagen covering the polyester mesh. Sub = submucosa; muc = mucosa; bv = blood vessels. (Toluidine blue; ×10, inset ×100)

Figure 8

Fig. 6 Features of dog number eight, showing sections of the trachea where the prosthesis was folded: a dense area of tissue protruding towards the lumen (a); the luminal surface covered with stratified ciliated cells (b) and pseudostratified cells (c); and between the prosthesis (arrowheads) and the connective tissue, where there are numerous blood vessels, mononuclear infiltrates and groups of macrophages (d). Bv = blood vessels. (Toluidine blue; ×5 in (a), ×20 in (b–d))

Figure 9

Fig. 7 Electron microscopy of the trachea, showing respiratory epithelium formed in the trachea (a) and over the implant (b). The same types of cells are present in both groups. The features of cilia in the normal trachea and in the implant are similar. CC = ciliated cells; GC = goblet cells; BC = basal cells