Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rngvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T10:03:49.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of slip on the three-dimensional instability of flow past an elongated superhydrophobic bluff body

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2017

Y. L. Xiong
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
D. Yang*
Affiliation:
School of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
*
†Email address for correspondence: dan_yang@hust.edu.cn

Abstract

The effects of superhydrophobic surfaces (SHSs), which consist of microgrates oriented transverse to the flow direction, on the onset of three-dimensional instability of flow past a bluff body were studied using Floquet analysis. The SHS was modelled on an air–water interface with a shear-free condition. The results showed that SHSs increased the vortex shedding frequency. Floquet analysis revealed that modes B $^{\prime }$ and S $^{\prime }$ were suppressed dramatically by the partial-slip condition compared with a regular no-slip body; however, mode A was less affected. Correspondingly, the critical spanwise wavelengths were not significantly affected by SHSs. A similar phenomenon was observed in flow past a circular cylinder coated by SHSs. The results also revealed that modes B $^{\prime }$ and S $^{\prime }$ were collapsed into mode A due to the increased width of the air–water region for flow past an elongated body. Furthermore, the critical Reynold numbers of different modes were diversely affected by gas fraction (GF) variations. The unstable modes with short wavelengths, such as modes B $^{\prime }$ and S $^{\prime }$ , stabilized with increasing GF. Conversely, the opposite was seen for the unstable mode A with a longer wavelength. The exact critical Reynolds number depended on the geometric configuration, which should be between the critical values of the two extreme cases. The application of SHSs could modify the transition route from two- to three-dimensionality by alternating different unstable modes. As the wavelength of the unstable mode decreases, the inhibition of three-dimensional instability becomes more efficient by SHSs.

Information

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2017 Cambridge University Press 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of a superhydrophobic surface with air trapped between the microfeatures. The air–water interface produces shear-free regions.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Schematic illustration of flow past an elongated bluff body. (a) The microgrates on the superhydrophobic surface were modelled using the upper and lower walls of a body consisting of repeating no-slip and slip boundary conditions. (b) Two superhydrophobic surface set-ups at the trailing edge. (c) One of the macroelement meshes used in the simulation.

Figure 2

Table 1. Convergence of global quantities with different order $N$ for case 1 ($AR=17.5$, $P/H=1.889$ and $\text{GF}=0.5$, at $Re=900$). The global quantities are the Strouhal number $St$ ($St=fH/U_{0}$, based on the thickness of the body), the means and root mean squares of the fluctuating drag coefficients $C_{D}$ and $C_{D}^{\prime }$ and the root mean square of the fluctuating lift coefficient $C_{L}^{\prime }$.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Instantaneous vorticity snapshots of (a) base flow for a regular body, (b) case 1 and (c) case 2 at $Re=700$ and $AR=17.5$. In both cases 1 and 2, $P/H=3.4$ and $\text{GF}=0.5$.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Strouhal number St as a function of pitch $P/H$, showing that the vortex shedding frequency is higher for a superhydrophobic than for a regular body ($AR=17.5$).

Figure 5

Figure 5. Roshko number $Ro$ as a function of the Reynolds number $Re$ based on $d^{\prime }$ ($AR=17.5$). The shaded area indicates the spread of experimental data produced by Eisenlohr & Eckelmann (1988).

Figure 6

Figure 6. Floquet multipliers for the dominant modes plotted against the spanwise wavelengths for a regular bluff body at different Reynolds numbers and $AR=17.5$.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Streamwise vorticity field for the wake for the Floquet mode for a regular body ($AR=17.5$, $Re=450$, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/H=2.0$). The images are separated by half the shedding cycle.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Neutral stability curves for a regular bluff body ($AR=17.5$).

Figure 9

Table 2. Critical Reynolds numbers and wavelengths for the three different instability modes for the wake behind an elongated bluff body ($AR=17.5$) found in this study and that of Ryan (2004).

Figure 10

Figure 9. Floquet multipliers for the dominant modes at a fixed GF of 0.5 for cases 1 and 2, with $AR=17.5$, and (a,b) $P/H=0.944$, (c,d) $P/H=1.214$, (e,f) $P/H=1.889$, (g,h) $P/H=3.4$, (i,j) $P/H=8.5$ and (k,l) $P/H=17$.

Figure 11

Figure 10. Neutral stability curves for $\text{GF}=0.5$ for cases 1 and 2, with $AR=17.5$, and (a,b) $P/H=0.944$, (c,d) $P/H=1.214$, (e,f) $P/H=1.889$ and (g,h) $P/H=3.4$.

Figure 12

Figure 11. Relationships between the critical values for the three-dimensional instabilities and the pitch at a fixed GF of 0.5 and a fixed $AR$ of 17.5. (a) and (b) The critical Reynolds numbers. (c) and (d) The dominant spanwise wavelengths.

Figure 13

Figure 12. Three-dimensional view of the streamwise and spanwise vortices at $Re=600$ (case 1, $AR=17.5$, $P/H=1.889$, and $\text{GF}=0.5$). Blue, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{x}=0.1$, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{z}=1.0$; red, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{x}=-0.1$, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{z}=-1.0$.

Figure 14

Figure 13. Floquet multipliers for the dominant modes at $AR=17.5$ for (a,c,e) case 1 and (b,d,f) case 2. (a,b) $P/H=1.889$ and $\text{GF}=0.75$. (c,d) $P/H=1.889$ and $\text{GF}=0.875$. (e,f) $P/H=3.4$ and $\text{GF}=0.75$.

Figure 15

Table 3. Gas fraction effect on the critical Reynolds number at $P/H=1.889$ and $AR=17.5$ for cases 1 and 2.

Figure 16

Figure 14. Critical Reynolds numbers for the different mode transitions plotted against the aspect ratios for (a) case 1 and (b) case 2. The curves are approximate fits to the data.

Figure 17

Figure 15. Wake streamwise vorticity field of the Floquet mode for mode A of case 1 ($AR=2.4$, $P/H=1.889$, $\text{GF}=0.5$, $Re=300$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/H=4.0$). The images are separated by half the shedding cycle.

Figure 18

Figure 16. (a) Superhydrophobic surface set-ups with $P/H=3.4$ and $\text{GF}=0.5$.(b) Floquet multipliers for the dominant modes for the cases shown in (a) and the regular body case. The Reynolds number was 500 in each case.

Figure 19

Figure 17. (a,b) Schematic illustrations of flow past a circular cylinder with different no-slip and shear-free boundary conditions. (c,d) Moduli of the Floquet multipliers plotted against the spanwise wavenumber $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$ ($\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}=2\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}D/l$, where $D$ is the cylinder diameter) for flow past circular cylinders with different pitches at (c) $Re=220$ and (d) $Re=280$. The results of a previous study (Barkley & Henderson 1996) are also shown for comparison.

Figure 20

Figure 18. Neutral stability curves and the most unstable wavelengths for flow past a circular cylinder. —— Posdziech & Grundmann (2001) (▫ neutral curve mode A, ♢ neutral curve mode B, ▿ the most unstable wavelength mode A, ▵ the most unstable wavelength mode B). The results of this work for the regular body ($\oplus$ mode A, ▪ the most unstable wavelength mode A, ○ mode B, ♦ the most unstable wavelength mode B), $P/D=0.349$ (▹ mode A, ▸ the most unstable wavelength mode A,  mode B,  the most unstable wavelength mode B), and $P/D=0.6283$ (◃ mode A, ◂ the most unstable wavelength mode A) are also shown.

Figure 21

Figure 19. Wake streamwise vorticity field of the Floquet mode for mode A ($P/D=0.6283$, $\text{GF}=0.5$, $Re=220$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=3.59$). The images are separated by half the shedding cycle.

Figure 22

Figure 20. Wake streamwise vorticity field of the Floquet mode for mode B ($P/D=0.349$, $\text{GF}=0.5$, $Re=280$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=0.785$). The images are separated by half the shedding cycle.