Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T20:57:19.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Floral biology, breeding systems and population genetic structure of three climbing Bauhinia species (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae) in Hong Kong, China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2009

Carol P. Y. Lau
Affiliation:
Division of Ecology and Biodiversity, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong
Richard M. K. Saunders
Affiliation:
Division of Ecology and Biodiversity, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong
Lawrence Ramsden*
Affiliation:
Division of Ecology and Biodiversity, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong
*
1Corresponding author. Email lramsden@hkucc.hku.hk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The pollination ecology, breeding system and population genetic structure of three climbing Bauhinia species B. championii (4 populations, 23 individuals), B. corymbosa (2 populations, 25 individuals) and B. glauca (8 populations, 76 individuals) were studied in Hong Kong, southern China. We hypothesize that the climbing Bauhinia species will attract targeted pollinators to achieve out-cross success and high levels of self-incompatibility will be expected to maintain diversity, with local population expansion relying on vegetative propagation. All three species have inflorescences consisting of numerous small, pale, fragrant flowers, which show diurnal anthesis. Field observations revealed that all three species are predominantly pollinated by bees (particularly Apis mellifera) and butterflies (Graphium and Papilio species), although B. championii is also pollinated by wasps and flies. Bauhinia corymbosa and B. glauca have sucrose-dominant nectar, whereas B. championii has hexose-dominant nectar. In controlled-pollination experiments fruit and seed set were generally highest following artificial out-crossing. The index of self-incompatibility of B. championii is 1.07, indicating self-compatibility; B. corymbosa and B. glauca were obligately self-incompatible. The population genetic structure and variation of the Bauhinia species was investigated using ISSR markers. Generally the three species have moderate within-population (mean HS = 0.206) and high among-population genetic variation (mean GST = 0.284). No correlation exists between the geographical and genetic distance, possibly due to the small local population size. All three species showed high levels of heterozygosity as expected for predominantly out-crossing long-lived K-selected species.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009
Figure 0

Figure 1. Geographical distribution of populations studied. Population codes given in Appendix 1.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Floral morphology of Bauhinia championii (a), B. corymbosa (b) and B. glauca (c).

Figure 2

Table 1. Measurements of floral characteristics (mean ± SD) of Bauhinia championii, B. corymbosa and B. glauca. N = number of individuals, n = number of flowers.

Figure 3

Table 2. Floral visitors and visitation rates (visits per flower h−1) for Bauhinia championii, B. corymbosa and B. glauca. Floral visitors with visitation rates < 0.01 for all three Bauhinia species are excluded. NH = total number of hours of observation, NF = total number of flowers under observations. Visitors were recorded at all sites used for the respective species except sites B, G and H.

Figure 4

Figure 3. Floral visitors to Bauhinia championii. Apis mellifera (honeybee) (a). Xylocopa iridipennis (bamboo carpenter bee) (b). Polistes sp. (paper wasp) (c). Eumenes pyriformis (common potter wasp) (d). Sphex fulvohirtus (burrowing wasp) (e). Hypolimnas bolina (common eggfly) (f). Vanessa indica (Indian red admiral) (g). Graphium doson (common jay) (h). Graphium antiphates (swordtail butterfly) (i).

Figure 5

Table 3. Percentage fruitset (mean ± SD) resulting from controlled-pollination experiments in Bauhinia championii, B. corymbosa and B. glauca. N = number of individuals; n = number of flowers. Superscript letters summarize the results of the Duncan's multiple range test; treatments within the same species with the same superscript letter do not differ significantly (P < 0.05).

Figure 6

Table 4. Average seed germination percentage, seed size and seed weight in Bauhinia championii, B. corymbosa and B. glauca, after different controlled-pollination treatments. N = number of fruits; n = number of seeds. Treatments were compared within species and superscript letters summarize the results of the Duncan's multiple range test; treatments with the same letters within the same column do not differ significantly (P < 0.05).

Figure 7

Table 5. Average genetic variability in populations of Bauhinia championii, B. corymbosa and B. glauca. Values are mean ± SD. N = number of populations, Pp = percentage of polymorphic loci, A = number of alleles per locus, Ae = effective number of alleles per locus, He = expected heterozygosity, and Ho = Shannon's Information Index.

Figure 8

Table 6. Genetic diversity at the species level in Bauhinia championii, B. corymbosa and B. glauca. Pp = percentage of polymorphic loci, A = number of alleles per locus, Ae = effective number of alleles per locus, HT = total gene diversity, HS = within population genetic diversity, DST = genetic diversity among populations, GST = coefficient of genetic differentiation, Ho = Shannon's Information Index, I = genetic identity and Nm = level of gene flow.

Figure 9

Figure 4. Dendrograms showing co-ancestry distances between populations of Bauhinia championii (a), and B. glauca (b). Population codes according to Appendix 1.

Figure 10

Appendix 1. Provenance of accessions sampled in Hong Kong, China. Location of populations as indicated in Figure 1. Voucher specimens deposited in HKU herbarium.