Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T04:39:06.358Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis and design of inclined fractal defected ground-based circularly polarized antenna for CA-band applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2020

Sonal Gupta
Affiliation:
Research Scholar, A. K.T.U., Lucknow (U.P.), India
Shilpee Patil*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics& Communication Engineering, Noida Institute of Engineering & Technology, Greater Noida, India
Chhaya Dalela
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics & communication Engineering, JSS Academy of Technical Education, Noida, India
Binod Kumar Kanaujia
Affiliation:
School of Computational & Integrative Sciences, JNU, New Delhi, India
*
Author for correspondence: Shilpee Patil, E-mail: shilpeepatil21@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Design of single-feed circularly polarized (CP) microstrip antenna is proposed in this article. The design employs the concept of E-shape patch with inclined fractal defected ground structure (IFDGS), which can improve the impedance bandwidth, gain, and axial ratio (AR) bandwidth. The excellent enhanced impedance bandwidth, axial ratio bandwidth, and gain are achieved by an inclined E-shaped fractal etched on the ground plane. The parameter studies of the E-shaped IFDGS are given to illustrate the way to obtain CP radiation. The third iterative IFDGS is fabricated on easily available FR4 substrate with a size of 0.494 λ0 × 0.494 λ0 × 0.019 λ0 (λ0 is the wavelength in free space at 3.624 GHz). The measured results verify the simulated results and show good agreement. The proposed antenna shows an impedance bandwidth of 12.7% at a centre frequency of 3.47 GHz and 3-dB AR bandwidth for this band is 2.39% at a centre frequency of 3.626 GHz. The measured peak gain for the proposed antenna is found as 8.1 dBi. The proposed antenna can be suitable for mobile WIMAX operation (IEEE 802.16e-2005 standard), wireless communication in CA-band and FCC.

Information

Type
Antenna Design, Modeling and Measurements
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Geometry of the proposed antenna with the third iterative IFDGS; (a) top view, and (b) bottom view.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Designed various stages of iteration of the inclined fractal-DGS; (a) first iteration, (b) second iteration, and (c) third iteration (proposed). l1 = l0/2, l2 = l1/2 or l2 = l0/4.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Fabricated proposed antenna; (a) top view, and (b) bottom view.

Figure 3

Table 1. Proposed antenna dimensions.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Simulated S11 and AR with varying IFDGS length l0.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Simulated S11 and AR with varying patch slot length ls.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Simulated S11 and AR with varying IFDGS angle θ.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Simulated S11 for different iterations of IFDGS.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Comparison of simulated S11 (with and without the third iterative IFDGS) and measured S11 of the CP proposed antenna.

Figure 9

Table 2. Comparison between iterations of inclined fractal DGS.

Figure 10

Fig. 9. Simulated axial ratio for different iterations of IFDGS.

Figure 11

Fig. 10. Simulated (with and without the third iterative IFDGS) and measured axial ratio of the CP proposed antenna.

Figure 12

Fig. 11. Simulated gain for different iterations of IFDGS.

Figure 13

Fig. 12. Simulated (with and without the third iterative IFDGS) and measured gain of the CP proposed antenna.

Figure 14

Fig. 13. Front to back ratio (with and without the third iterative IFDGS) of the CP proposed antenna.

Figure 15

Fig. 14. Simulated and measured radiation pattern of the proposed antenna at 2.61 GHz in (a) E-plane and (b) H-plane.

Figure 16

Fig. 15. Simulated surface current vector distribution on radiating patch of the proposed antenna at 3.626 GHz (a) ωt = 0°, (b) ωt = 90°, (c) ωt = 180°, and (d) ωt = 270°.

Figure 17

Fig. 16. Surface current vector distribution on the ground plane with IFDGS at ωt = 0°; (a) 1st iteration, (b) 2nd iteration, and (c) proposed 3rd iteration.

Figure 18

Table 3. Comparative study of circularly polarized microstrip antennas based on fractal DGS and fractal antenna.