INTRODUCTION
There is a strong intersection between cultural heritages and nationalism. While scholars on cultural patrimony have investigated heritage’s instrumentality in the materialization of the nation’s history, its identity, and continuity through time,Footnote 1 how cultural heritage plays in Yoruba nationalism and politics in southwestern Nigeria is yet to be intensively discussed. Thus, the translation of cultural heritage and patrimony into identity construction and nationalism among the Yoruba remains a topical issue. The intent of this paper is therefore to establish that the convergence of Yoruba nationals and the intensification of nationalism in southwestern Nigeria for self-assertion, political brokerage and power relation in colonial and post-colonial era were largely due to the projection of Yoruba cultural heritages, images and political perception of the people’s cultural patrimony. Thus, in the context of the ongoing discussion, Yoruba ancestors and heroes, cultural productions, literary icons, and political elites are presented as cultural heritage and patrimony that create a sense of political assertion and brokerage through which the Yoruba built a common consciousness of a nation and political identity in Nigeria.
In the context of this paper, patrimony refers to both material and non-material cultural elements, which establish a link between the past and the present and serve as people’s heritages. Such cultures are in the forms of artifacts, monuments and statutes, heroes and heroines, and texts, among others, that are expressive and create a sense of human memory, which in turn build a collective value for the community they serve. For cultural elements to become a heritage and patrimony, such elements must be culture specific, and express memories and functions attached to them.Footnote 2 In addition, a cultural patrimony and heritage must be capable of forming the traditions of a community. Reference to tradition, however, does not only suggest a distant age old culture but a particular way of life for which a community is known irrespective of their time of existence.Footnote 3 Irrespective of when the cultural item was recognized as representative of community cultural identity, it can become a patrimony in as much as such trait is identified as a common expression of the community’s memories and values. In addition such cultural trait must bear reference to everyday narratives of the community.Footnote 4
In nationalism projects, exhibitions of various cultural heritages act as a step towards the construction of a uniform national culture.Footnote 5 Since nations usually evolve, especially in Africa, from different regional and ethnic cultures, it is important to have representation of these heritages to develop a homogeneous vision of the nation, a standardized history of national variety, and a distinct national culture.Footnote 6 Usually expressed in the form of cultural patrimonies such as images of ancestors, heroes and heroines, local media productions, and local political elites, cultural patrimony represents political ideologies depicting pan-national ideals, values, and orientations. For instance as observed by Hess,Footnote 7 heritage attached to heroes and heroines can foster leadership spirit and create a sense of probity and unity as well as commonness in a nation. In addition, local media productions bind together all the constituent units of a nation, spread the idea of the nation, and project political elites, who then assert and confirm the political identity of a nation. The purpose of these cultural patrimonies is to make the nation visible, to render the nation respectable, and to convince the population of their commonness.Footnote 8
Cultural patrimony can express the symbolic and materiality of the nation’s politics, the official ideals of national culture as well as popular cultures of social actors in nation-building.Footnote 9 In essence, cultural patrimony can include certain cultural aspects depicting people’s nationality, officially defining the nation, and the symbolization of the institutions through which the “nation” comes into existence as well as one possible way of a nation’s imagination. Thus, according to Fricke,Footnote 10 it is a settled question as to whether African nations have national identities or not. While there are many other methods of building national identities, the national identities of African nations have emerged more from their distinct cultural patrimonies such as cultural heroes, cultural/literary productions and local political elites. The question that is still complex is what these cultural patrimonies are like and how they are lived, (re)produced, adapted, and negotiated in everyday national life.Footnote 11 In many African countries, different socio-political actors, who are mostly the national political elites, adjust national cultural patrimonies according to their own experiences and needs and thereby personalize the nation. Through this, the perceptions of nationality do not only change with new generations and historical events, but they are regularly shaped by everyday national politics as mostly experienced in Nigeria.
Nigeria is a nation-state, with a configuration of about 350 ethnic groups.Footnote 12 While each of the groups has distinct traditions, beliefs, values, and cultural perception of what constitutes a nation, very few have developed aspiration for nationalism. The construction of political separatism especially among the Yoruba, Ibo, Hausa-Fulani, and Ijaw in Nigeria is parochial and primordial as each of them constitutes and pursues agitations for separate nations through the use of ethnic nationalism, other than strengthening the broad based nation-state that requires civic nationalism. By virtue of their demographic strength, economic importance, and political history, ethnic groups that pursue ethnic nationalism in Nigeria developed a strong sense of nationalism, promoted and strengthened by a number of cultural agencies such as cultural heritages and patrimony. Inequitable access to federal political power and ethnic marginalization resulted from politics of ethnicity prevalent in Nigeria between 1960s and 2014; thus ethnic nationalism remains resilient in Nigerian nation-state and challenges Nigerian development. To strengthen the nation-state, the definition of nation-state culture from broad based cultural heritage and patrimony, which is inclusive of all ethnic groups in Nigeria, plays a crucial role in nation-building policies. Instead, each ethnic group in Nigeria has cultivated separate heritages and patrimony, developed separate senses of memories and nation, and pursued different self-determination.
The Yoruba of southwestern Nigeria is strong and vocal in the use of cultural heritages and patrimony to strengthen national unity, and mobilize and nationalize the Yoruba population. Starting from the 1920s, historical studies were carried out to support and establish the notion of a national history; in the 1940s the images and spirit of Oduduwa were reinvented; in the 1950s through 1990s, productions of musical heritages in support of Yoruba nationality were popular among artists; and between the 1990s and late 2000s, projection of Oduduwa, Awolowo, and Òrànmíyàn as Yoruba heroes lent more vigor and historical meaning to Yoruba nationalism.Footnote 13 Through this, cultural heritages and patrimony demonstrating Yoruba values and nationality were promoted.Footnote 14
In the ongoing discussion, we intend to examine forms of Yoruba political heritages that turn to cultural patrimony in shaping and reshaping Yoruba nationalism and political identity. Being a part of an ongoing broad-based study on Yoruba nationalism, this particular study draws on textual analysis and observation of materials collected in sampled locations in southwestern Nigeria.
CULTURAL LEGENDS AND MYTHOLOGY IN YORUBA NATIONALISM
The creation of a pan-Yoruba political identity in the early nineteenth century, which later became a strong nationalist agenda, can be situated in the long-range of history within which local heritages later translate to patrimonies. These patrimonies subsequently act as the agencies of contemporary Yoruba identity, nationalism, and local politics. Culture and civilization, which the diverse Yoruba sub-groups built over a long period of time before its British colonialism and maintained in the face of colonial occupation, became their heritage and legacy through which they constructed nationalism and civil politics.Footnote 15, Footnote 16 One of these legacies is the people’s pride in the villainy and prowess of their ancestors, many of whom have been recognized as gods and goddesses.Footnote 17 Yoruba is a hierarchical society with a centralized political system. The people are not only fond of ancestral cult, but are also engaged in reworking local history to suit their political expediencies. Thus, the political power of the ancestors is often perceived to be reincarnated in the living persons. As the people respect their ancestors, creating an idea of common ancestry binds the people together and political elites use this for their nationalist projects. Among the Yoruba ancestors that are still imbued with divine trans-Yoruba political powers are Oduduwa and Oranmiyan (both pre-colonial images) as well as, more recently, Awolowo (1909–1987) and Moshood Abiola (1937–1998). The belief in these ancestors cuts across all Yoruba sub-groups and diverse social and economic backgrounds. Yoruba mythological history traces the people to one ancestor—Oduduwa,Footnote 18 whose origin is still a subject of historical speculation and diverse interpretations.Footnote 19 Some believe that Oduduwa migrated from Mecca in Saudi Arabia down to Ile-Ife, the ancestral home, passing through Hausa land in northern Nigeria. Others think that Oduduwa descended directly from heaven to Ile-Ife, which was initially inhabited by the sixteen Yoruba principal divinities and their worshippers.Footnote 20 The first thesis was supported mostly by Yoruba Muslims who wanted to be actively involved in Yoruba cultural works and establish a cultural link with northern Nigerian Muslims who have dominated Nigerian politics since the 1960s.Footnote 21 The second thesis tends to insist on the hegemony of Yoruba autochthonous traditions and civilization, which Johnson, among others, propagated.Footnote 22 While the contested origins of Oduduwa have both political and religious connotations and serve as the basis for diverse interests in nationalism and politics, its registration as Yoruba patrimony that continues to drive Yoruba nationalism remains incontestable figure 1.
A bronze figurine head of Oduduwa. Photograph ©The Trustees of the British Museum.
Many contemporary Yoruba political elites believing in Oduduwa’s Muslim link drew political support from mostly northern Nigerian Muslims, the Nigerian political bloc believed to have strong political influence in Nigerian federal political power due to its demographic constitution and colonial and post-colonial power influence. Case in point is Moshood Abiola who himself became Yoruba political heritage and patrimony considering his reference and relevance in Yoruba day to day politics; the erection of his statue in the major Yoruba cities of Lagos (Ikeja and ikoyi), Abeokuta, and Ibadan; and above all, the naming of major streets after him in many Yoruba cities. This was possible because Abiola became recognized as a symbol of Yoruba political emancipation—a situation that made it possible for a Yoruba man to become the President of Nigeria through civil politics in the early twenty-first century.
On the other hand, Yoruba Christians and traditional religious worshippers mostly believe in the Yoruba autochthonous history and support a progressive political ideology. They themselves, like Obafemi Awolowo, another Yoruba political ancestor, acted upon their perceptions to draw local and grassroots political support among the Yoruba. Nonetheless, the religious division in politics and nationalism is not as prominent as the shared emphasis on political heroes as cultural patrimony.
ANCESTORS AS YORUBA PATRIMONIES FOR NATIONALISM
Oranmiyan, the grandson of Oduduwa, another Yoruba heritage and patrimony who extended the Yoruba frontiers to the Edo people in midwestern Nigeria, founded the Oyo Empire that became an imperial kingdom between the fourteenth and the seventeenth centuries.Footnote 23 It was through Oranmiyan’s influence that many city-states, such as Ijaye, Ogbomoso, Ibadan and Ede, so characteristic of Yoruba pre-colonial society were founded. This mythological history of Oranmiyan and the Oyo Empire helped to establish a pan-Yoruba identity starting from the 1900s. Johnson, one of the chief architects of this history, whose work The History of the Yorubas is foremost in Yoruba literary patrimonies,Footnote 24 noted that the main source of his history was the traditional kings’ ballads of Oyo that transmitted the Yoruba history through oral traditions.Footnote 25 Today, the political heritage of Oduduwa and Oranmiyan appeals to many Yoruba people. Both Obafemi Awolowo and Moshood Abiola drew on the Oduduwa and Oranmiyan legacies and acted in their cultural work to create and strengthen a pan-Yoruba political identity that Johnson had started.Footnote 26 Since the late nineteenth century, the initial cultural project has over time transformed into a political project in the form of locally-conceived nationalism, amidst the contestations surrounding the imagination of Yoruba as a nation. With the constant recreation of images and memory of both Oduduwa and Oranmiyan in the construction of nation and nationalism among the Yoruba, nationalist agencies, such as local nationalist movements, political groups, cultural associations, and Yoruba political personae, draw their identities and formations from these patrimonies. Through this construction, these agencies rely on their patrimonies to expand their frontiers and develop the consciousness of the larger Yoruba people across class and gender.
As nationalist movements became stronger, consciousness of ethnic commonality was established among the Yoruba, doing so through the symbolic recreation of Oduduwa as a Yoruba symbol of cultural, political, and economic unity. At first, during the era of slavery in Latin America, Yoruba slaves created a cultural awareness that connected with the descent of Oduduwa. Together with Christianity and colonial politics, as other sets of patrimonial instrumentation, Oduduwa patrimony was engaged in building a stronger Yoruba political identity and nationalism of the later era. According to Matory, the Yoruba who were exported to Brazil, North America, and the West Indies became increasingly aware that they came from the same descent traced to Oduduwa and also from the same slave depots in West Africa and were culturally similar.Footnote 27 When slavery was abolished, many of them were returned to Sierra Leone where they formed a group known as the Creoles. Eventually, they were taken to Lagos in an attempt to re-settle them within their areas of origin.Footnote 28
Among these newly freed slaves were some lucky ones who had benefited from Christianity and Western education—factors that later contributed to their becoming the elite of Lagos and Egba. It was these individuals who formed the first African clergy in Nigeria that pioneered early Yoruba nationalism as a cultural project beginning from 1896,Footnote 29 which eventually developed into political nationalism during the colonial era and sustained as “ethnic nationalism” in post-colonial Nigeria. Since its invention as cultural nationalism, Yoruba nationalism has been propagated and strengthened by both cultural and political patrimonies in southwestern Nigeria.
As of the late 1940s, the above began to crystallize into ethnic nationalism among the Yoruba. They cultivated pride in a primogenitor that became a pan-Yoruba god and symbol of the people’s identity. Thus, cultural movements were established and driven by the Yoruba consciousness of a united “nation” even though there are 22 distinct sub-ethnic groups that constitute the so called Yoruba nation in Nigeria. Notable among the movements were the Egbe Omo Oduduwa (Association of Oduduwa Descendants) which was established by Obafemi Awolowo and nurtured into a political party in 1951—which was the political spirit of the Yoruba people until 1964, when another socio-cultural group Egbe Afenifere replaced it—and Egbé Omo Olófin Footnote 30 (Association of Olofin) established in the 1960s.Footnote 31 Both associations used an image of Oduduwa as their symbol, drawing membership across the Yoruba land. The late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries saw the emergence of many of these patrimonial associations: Oduduwa Peoples’ Congress established in 1995; O’odua Youth Movement (OYM) founded in 1994; Bashorun Rock founded in 1995; O’odua Liberation Movement (OLM) founded in 1997; United Self- determination Platform for O’odua (USEPO) founded in 1999; The O’odua Assembly (TOAS) founded in 2000; and O’odua Republic Front (ORF) founded in 2001. All these socio-cultural groups were visible in Yoruba nationalism and politics in Nigeria.
LOCAL MEDIA AS LITERARY PATRIMONY AND YORUBA NATIONALISM
Clergy and Literacy
As an important agent in propagation of nationalism, cultural production seeks to build cultural unity among diverse peoples through the textualization and symbolic representations of culture. Among the Yoruba of southwestern Nigeria, the early beginning of Yoruba nationalism was the emergence of local intellectuals using their cultural productions as the touchstones of rebranded Yoruba images and language as powerful instruments of nationalism. The first crop of these intellectuals are the Yoruba freed slaves turned clergy, who engaged the then newly invented Yoruba orthography to produce texts and media monuments. Examples include Samuel Johnson, Samuel Ajayi Crowther, and Lipede who translated their sense of ethnic commonness into a project of Yoruba cultural nationalism. Among the new clergy, Samuel Ajayi Crowther, translated the English Bible into a Yoruba text to facilitate evangelization in the local context of southwestern Nigeria. As they were constrained by the lack of orthography, they borrowed from German and Latin alphabets and sounds, introducing writing in the Yoruba language with vocalization from the Oyo dialect. As most of these early clergymen had their origins in the old Oyo kingdom, their choice and use of the Oyo dialect came naturally. Through them the Oyo socio-cultural pattern became dominant Yoruba literary cum cultural patrimony as a medium of expression of common Yoruba values.Footnote 32 Throughout the periods of their evangelization in southwestern Nigeria, they used the Yoruba Oyo, which later became the standard Yoruba language and the local language of politics and nationalism in southwestern Nigeria.
These early clergy and Yoruba intellectuals are not just cultural patrimonies, but their cultural and literary productions, such as the orthographic representation of Oyo dialect of the Yoruba language, the use of Yoruba Oyo as a common language for 22 Yoruba subgroups in southwestern Nigeria, the production of Yoruba Bible, and its use in propagating Christianity in southwestern Nigeria, are also cultural patrimonies. Their usefulness transcends the religious realm, and includes building a sense of commonness through the use of a unified language among the people. The establishment of western education by European missionaries was further boosted by these cultural productions and more intellectuals who shaped Yoruba political nationalism in the twentieth century were produced. In all elementary schools in southwestern Nigeria Oyo Yoruba was taught and it became the official language unifying all the pre-colonial Yoruba sub-groups. Although vastly losing its strength over time, amidst local Yoruba dialects which individual Yoruba are accustomed to when in their villages, the Oyo dialect still exists as an official Yoruba language of education and a strong patrimony in all educational institutions in southwestern Nigeria.
Counting on the successes of the invention of a common language for the Yoruba, as language is an indispensable factor in nationalism, the language was used in production of the first local newspapers, such as Ìwé Ìròyìn established in 1859 and Akéde Yorùbá in the early 1900s. While Iwe Iroyin was established by Henry Townsend as a boost to Christian evangelism, Akede Yoruba was for the propagation of Yoruba cultural values. Since both religion and cultural ideologies are instruments of nationalism, and the two earliest Yoruba newspapers acted as frontiers of Yoruba nationalism, thus the two newspapers were in themselves cultural patrimonies. Numerous newspapers followed, including Nigerian Tribune founded in 1951, Daily Sketch founded in the 1970s, and The Nation founded in early 2000. While all these latter newspapers were not in the Yoruba language, their contributions to the propagation of Yoruba nationalism cannot be questioned. Between 1951 and 2002, the Nigerian Tribune, which is not only the oldest surviving newspaper in southwestern Nigeria but also the oldest in all of Nigeria, served as the media organ of Yoruba nationalism as it was driven by the Yoruba progressive political ideology captained by its founder Chief Obafemi Awolowo.
Music and Nationalism
Further boosting Yoruba nationalism were the crops of Yoruba artists who developed popular culture to express Yoruba values, dignity, and discontents against the emerging Yoruba marginalization starting from the late 1950s. Both the artists and their works have continued to reflect Yoruba sense of oneness as well as echo the Yoruba sense of power relations in Nigerian politics. At the earliest start of 1950s Yoruba ethnic politics was Hubert Ogunde who produced an album titled Yorùbá Ronú (Yoruba Must Think) in 1957, where he expressed the Yoruba plight of socio-political exclusion in Nigeria. Through theater, Ogunde canvassed for pan-Yoruba unity. As noted by Nolte, the dramatic play was sympathetic to Awolowo, thus the proscription of Ogunde’s popular performance by the then government of Western region.Footnote 33 Yet, the messages in Ogunde’s production, promoting a pan-Yoruba political identity, proved popular and desirable for Yoruba political control of Nigeria.
The monumental cultural production of Yorùbá Ronú was produced during the political crises between Awolowo and Akintola in 1957, an incidence that later led to the trial of Awolowo for treasonable felony and his eventual conviction and sentencing to prison in 1964. Through the genre, Ogunde lamented Yoruba’s betrayal of their fellow Awolowo and called on the Yoruba to close their ranks and salvage Yoruba society from its political marginalization in Nigeria. The artist further invoked the spirit of Oduduwa to come and help the Yoruba. Ogunde sang as follows:
Kín lódé sí Yorùbá?
Kín ló selè s’Ómo Odùduwà?
Yorùbá n sera won níitorí owó
Yorùbá n dara won nítorí ipò…….
Awon tón s’ògá télètélè
Won n padà s’éhìn s’omo òdò……
Yoruba ronú wò o o……
Oduduwa dáwa láre o
K’ágbórí ilè yípé o.
Translation:
What happened to Yoruba?
What is wrong with the sons of Oduduwa?
Yoruba betray themselves because of money;
Yoruba betray themselves because of power.
Those that were leaders before,
They are now followers.
Oduduwa please come and save us
Let us live long here on earth.
In 1963 Chief Isaiah Kehinde Dairo recorded an album titled Ká’á Sóra (Let’s Be Careful), where he maintained that the then political marginalization of some ethnic groups in Nigeria might explode into civil war. One of the lyrics is as follows: Bi eré bi ere, ilé ńwó; Bi ere bi ere, ile ńmì; Olómo ò m’omo mó; aláya ò m’aya mó. Translated: “Little by little, the house is falling; little by little the earth is shaking; the parents no longer recognize the children, and the husband has failed to recognize the wife”. Metaphorically, Dairo indicated that the political contrivances of the 1960s had put asunder ethnic relations in Nigeria.Footnote 34
Other notable Yoruba musicians in the ’70s and ’90s who lent their voices to the reawakening of Yoruba ethnic nationalism included Juju musicians such as King Sunny Ade and Chief Ebenezer Obey who used their cultural productions to echo Yoruba values and the peoples’ political travails in Nigeria.
Between the 1990s and 2000s there evolved another class of Yoruba musicians engaging their genres in the reinvention of Yoruba nationalism and sentiments against Nigerian bad governance. In this category are Fuji musicians such as Chief Sikiru Ayinde Barrister and Alhaji Wasiu Ayinde; the Afro beat star Bisade Ologunde popularly known as LagbajaFootnote 35; and Ewi exponents such as Tubosun Oladapo, Ologun Dudu and Lanrewaju Adepoju. While Fuji music was established from popular Islamic choral music known as Wéré, its initial focus was to propagate Islamic values and beliefs as well as Yoruba traditional values that are not against Islamic ones. It should be established that Fuji was not originally intended for Yoruba nationalist propagation, not until the 1980s following the second fall of Obafemi Awolowo from the Nigerian presidential race, having lost aspirations to become the Prime Minister of Nigeria in 1959. However, most Fuji musicians were not of the same religious and socio-political class as Obafemi Awolowo; neither were they in partisan politics. Nonetheless, as Yoruba literary and musical heritage producers, their expressed interests later became Yoruba legacy and can be scored as literary patrimony lending popular voices to Yoruba nationalism and identity construction. However, the nationalistic rhythms of Ayinde Barrister and Wasiu Ayinde who were the main Fuji actors were rendered around the political imbroglios of 1983 to 1993, when the Yoruba experienced political violence caused by massive election rigging and annulment of presidential elections in 1983 and 1993 respectively.
The language and music of popular culture contributed to grassroots mobilization among the Yoruba in southwestern Nigeria for support of its nationalism and politics.
YORUBA POLITICAL ELITES AS PATRIMONIES FOR NATIONALISM AND POLITICAL IDENTITY
In Yorubaland of southwestern Nigeria, local approval and popularity have been crucial to political and nationalist campaigns and access to the grassroots. Thus, through popular acclamation or counter-acclamation, Yoruba political elites have engaged in securing local approval and popularity that cut across social and religious boundaries. Hence, only Yoruba political elites who secured local approval and popularity among the Yoruba in southwestern Nigeria have dominated the nationalist struggles and mobilized grassroots support. Especially in the later nineteenth century, they have also defined their political characters and contextualized their experiences against the backdrop of national Nigerian politics to garner sympathy from local people in support of their nationalist aspirations and struggles. Thus, due to their political influence in both colonial and post-colonial Nigeria, employed in building political images and imaginations that command respect for the Yoruba in Nigeria, they are regarded as Yoruba political heritages and can be classified as the people’s patrimonies.
The most prominent example of these elites turned political patrimony is Chief Obafemi Awolowo. Born in 1909, Awolowo rose from a chain of ups and downs, which started shortly after his birth due to the untimely death of his father, to become a political colossus and a Yoruba political deity whose images were claimed to have appeared in the moon in the 1960s and the 1980s. The Ikenne-Remo born politician, Awolowo read law in London, where he imbibed the European idea of nation based on linguistic and cultural sameness. In 1947 while in London in his effort to start his pan-Yoruba political project, Awolowo established a pan-Yoruba socio-cultural group called Egbé Omo Yorùbá. On his return to Nigeria as a successful Ibadan-based lawyer, between 1948 and 1949, Awolowo re-launched the group in Lagos and Owo respectively as Egbé Omo Odùduwà drawing from Oduduwa’s mythological strength as Yoruba patrimony. The rise of Obafemi Awolowo as a Yoruba political nationalist in the 1950s, and his subsequent emergence as a Nigerian nationalist in the 1960s, lent a powerful force to Yoruba politics in Nigeria. Awolowo developed his political career from his personal aspirations to be a Yoruba hero. For him to be so, he needed to entrench himself in Yoruba consciousness of emphasizing belongingness to a common descent and valuing Yoruba cultural values and ideals, and translating such into ethnic domination and hegemony in Nigeria. Therefore as he established his political ground around the mythological personality of Oduduwa, the Yoruba progenitor, all Yoruba embraced him and launched his image, vision, and action into Yoruba patrimony. The people saw in him the virtues of Oduduwa as a redeemer and re-inventor of the people’s historical consciousness. Translating this into Yoruba nationalism and politics, Awolowo used Egbé Omo Odùduwà as a platform to establish his Yoruba-based political parties in 1951(Action Group) and 1978 (Unity Party of Nigeria) headed by Awolowo. Footnote 36
Although Awolowo did not win a presidential election in Nigeria, his opposition leadership in Nigeria between 1960 and 1966, and later between 1979 and 1983, increased popular recognition of Yoruba rhetoric of marginalization and outcry for socio-political emancipation in Nigeria. Thus, the Yoruba have been vocal in their political expression, even after Chief Obafemi Awolowo’s death in 1987. They have persistently called for socio-political restructuring in Nigeria following Nigeria’s socio-economic crises and the country’s elongated military regimes between 1964 and 1979, and again between 1984 and 1999. The two phases of military regime in Nigeria were characterized by civil war declared by the Ibos in 1967, turbulent ethnic political violence in 1983, and revolts following the annulment of general election in 1993.
Many other Yoruba political elites, including Chief Micheal Ajasin, Abraham Adesanya, Bola Ige, Moshood Abiola, Fredrick Faseun and Gani Adams, have significantly acted as agents of grassroots mobilization for Yoruba nationalism. In their pursuit of Yoruba nationalism, Ajasin, Adesanya, and Ige are difficult to distinguish from Awolowo’s nationalist ideas, especially in bridging the religious and political ideological camping on Yoruba nationalism. However, Abiola and Adams brought more inclusion to Yoruba nationalism. Abiola, a Muslim of the An sar udeen denomination, drew the attention of more Muslim elites to Yoruba nationalism and politics. Abiola’s agitations against the 12 June 1993 presidential election annulment endeared him in the political heart of the Yoruba and fostered him as Yoruba political heritage and patrimony. Faseun and Adams founded O’odua Peoples’ Congress (OPC) in 1995, a militant pan-Yoruba socio-cultural organization that legitimized the metaphoric and symbolic political strength of Oduduwa. To further entrench these political elites as political patrimony, upon their deaths, some, including Awolowo, Samuel Ladoke Akintola, and Abiola, have roads, public utilities, and educational institutions named after them. Statues of Awolowo, Akintola and Abiola have been erected as public monuments in many Yoruba cities and towns in southwestern Nigeria. Similarly the University of Ife in Ile-Ife was renamed Obafemi Awolowo University, Oyo State University of Technology, Ogbomoso renamed Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, and a polytechnic is presently named after Moshood Abiola in Abeokuta. Thus, legitimizing these political elites as never-to-be-forgotten Yoruba nationalist political symbols and, above all, heritages and patrimonies among the Yoruba of southwestern Nigeria.
CONCLUSION
The foregoing suggests that values are placed upon artifacts or activities by people who and when they view artifacts as heritage, doing so through a whole series of lenses—the most obvious of which are: nationality, religion, ethnicity, class, wealth, gender, personal history, and the most intrinsic and strange lens of ‘insideness’.Footnote 37 The validity of a particular lens may also be situationally determined rather than being constant with interpretations varying, depending on the situation of the observer in the context of time and space.Footnote 38 Thus, it is the meaning that gives value, either cultural or political, to heritage, and thus explains why certain artifacts, traditions, and memories have been selected from the near infinity of the past for adoption for contemporary political action. Thus, such heritage, having been sustained in context of values, time, and space, becomes cultural patrimony. As suggested by De Cesari, the key word here is “selected” in that a focused definition of patrimony has to avoid the commonsense way in which the term is often employed to refer to the totality of the inheritance of the past.Footnote 39 Thus not all the past is heritage or patrimony.
In the context of Yoruba nationalism and political identity, Yoruba ancestors and heroes, literary productions, and contemporary political elites have attracted political meanings that are used in political identity construction, produced and exchanged through social interaction in a variety of media, and created through everyday adaptation and utilization for the political creation and emancipation of the Yoruba. These meanings further regulate and organize the people’s conduct and practices by helping to determine rules, norms, and conventions, by constructing memories and attachment, and by accelerating the development of Yoruba nationalism and politics. The cults of Oduduwa and Oramiyan as Yoruba ancestors; the literary productions of Hubert Ogunde, King Sunny Ade, Sikiru Ayinde Barrister and Wasiu Ayinde among others; and the political aptitudes of Chief Obafemi Awolowo, Ladoke Akintola, and Moshood Abiola among others are, in no small way, Yoruba political legacies, heritages and patrimony in the twenty-first century southwestern Nigeria.
Underscoring the above is the view that heritage and patrimony in any given society will inevitably reflect that of the dominant political, social, religious, or ethnic issues. This is what Weiss refers to as the “authorized heritage discourse.”Footnote 40 In our final analysis, Yoruba cultural heritage and patrimony are therefore culture-specific and present-centered, created, shaped and managed by, and in response to, the demands of the present. As such, they are open to constant revision and change, as they are both sources and results of socio-political emancipation, identity creation, and nationalist pursuits among the Yoruba of southwestern Nigeria.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
The support from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, Bonn, Germany; the University of Ibadan Senate Research Grant (2010)-SRG/FS/2010/18A; the anonymous reviewers and the comments raised from the presentation of this paper during the conference organized by IFRA, University of Ibadan, on Cultural patrimony and Identity, in 2013 are appreciated. I also appreciate the residency fellowship enjoyed at Institute of Anthropos, Sankt Augustin, Germany (August- November 2012), where the foundation for this paper was laid. The final aspect of this paper was done at the Department of Africana Studies, University of North Carolina (UNC) at Charlotte, US in March–April 2014 during my visit as Visiting Research Professor. I thank Professor Akin Ogundiran for his support during my residence at UNC Charlotte.
