Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T05:24:52.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fragment-based approaches to TB drugs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2016

CHIARA MARCHETTI
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK
DANIEL S. H. CHAN
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK
ANTHONY G. COYNE*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK
CHRIS ABELL*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK. E-mail: ca26@cam.ac.uk; agc40@cam.ac.uk
*Corresponding author: Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK. E-mail: ca26@cam.ac.uk; agc40@cam.ac.uk

Summary

Tuberculosis is an infectious disease associated with significant mortality and morbidity worldwide, particularly in developing countries. The rise of antibiotic resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) urgently demands the development of new drug leads to tackle resistant strains. Fragment-based methods have recently emerged at the forefront of pharmaceutical development as a means to generate more effective lead structures, via the identification of fragment molecules that form weak but high quality interactions with the target biomolecule and subsequent fragment optimization. This review highlights a number of novel inhibitors of Mtb targets that have been developed through fragment-based approaches in recent years.

Information

Type
Special Issue Review
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Fragment elaboration strategies.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Fragment growing and merging strategies leading to the development of inhibitors of pantothenate synthetase (PS) (PDB codes: 3IMG, 4MUK).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. (a) Fragment merging strategies targeting CYP121 (PDB codes: 4G45, 4G44, 4G1X) (b) Fragment elaboration strategies targeting CYP121 (PDB codes: 4G47, 4KTL, 5IBE).

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Substrate activity screening targeting (A) MPtpB and (B) MPtpA.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. (A) Fragment optimization of a BioA inhibitor. (B) Fragment-based discovery of Ag85C inhibitors.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Fragment strategies to develop inhibitors of EthR. (A) Fragment growing, (B) fragment merging and fragment linking.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Fragment merging strategies to develop inhibitors of EthR.