Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-kv2lp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T03:48:49.953Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reactive impedance surface-based broadband circularly polarized Koch fractal boundary microstrip antenna

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2014

V. V. Reddy*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, National Institute of Technology Warangal, Telangana, India
N.V.S.N. Sarma
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, National Institute of Technology Warangal, Telangana, India
*
Corresponding authorV. V. Reddy Email: vvreddy2005@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A circularly polarized (CP) broadband antenna is proposed for wireless applications in the range of 2–3 GHz frequency. It consists of asymmetrical Koch fractal boundary patch over a reactive impedance surface (RIS) substrate. The simulations of single-layer Koch fractal antenna, dual layer with square and fractal RIS elements are carried out in a systematic way for broadband CP radiation and corresponding results are presented. For better CP characteristics, properties of fractal curves and dimensions of RIS elements are optimized. The antenna with fractal RIS iteration order one (iteration1) is experimentally studied. The 10-dB return loss bandwidth is 50.35%, whereas 3-dB axial ratio bandwidth is 7.45%, which indicate that by applying fractals concept to RIS technique, with a single probe feed, broadband CP radiation can be obtained.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2014 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Generation process of the Koch fractal curve.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Side and top views of the proposed antenna.

Figure 2

Table 1. Parameters of simulated antennas.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Single-layer fractal boundary antennas geometries: (a) square patch, (b) IO1 koch1, (c) IO1 koch2, and (d) IO2 koch1.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Simulated return loss curves of single-layer fractal boundary antennas.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. VSWR plots of square RIS IO1 koch1 antenna for 4 × 4, 5 × 5, and 6 × 6 RIS elements.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Dual-layer fractal boundary antennas with square RIS elements: (a) top view of metal patched 5 × 5 array forming RIS, (b) square RIS square patch, (c) square RIS IO1 koch1, and (d) square RIS IO1 koch2.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Simulated return loss curves of dual-layer square RIS elements antennas.

Figure 8

Table 2. The summarized simulation results of the proposed antennas.

Figure 9

Fig. 8. Koch fractal boundary antennas over RIS with optimized fractal elements: (a) metal-backed RIS with 5 × 5 fractal elements, (b) fractal RIS IO1 koch1, (c) fractal RIS IO1 koch2, and (d) fractal RIS IO2 koch1.

Figure 10

Fig. 9. Simulated return loss curves of Koch fractal boundary antennas over optimized fractal RIS.

Figure 11

Fig. 10. Simulated AR of IO1 antennas.

Figure 12

Fig. 11. Simulated AR of IO2 antennas.

Figure 13

Fig. 12. The simulated surface current distribution of fractal RIS IO1 iteration1 at 2.30 GHz: (a) at 0°, (b) at 90°, (c) at 180°, and (d) at 270°.

Figure 14

Fig. 13. Prototype of fabricated antennas. (a) RIS. (b) Fractal RIS IO1 iteration1 Koch antenna

Figure 15

Fig. 14. Comparison of simulated and measured results of fractal RIS IO1 iteration1: (a) return loss characteristics, (b) axial ratio, and (c) gain.

Figure 16

Fig. 15. The simulated and measured radiation patterns of fabricated fractal RIS IO1 iteration1: (a) at 2.3 GHz and (b) 2.4 GHz.