Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T08:56:19.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Cuyano proto-ocean between the Chilenia and Cuyania terranes: rifting and plume interaction during the Neoproterozoic – early Palaeozoic evolution of the SW Gondwana margin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2021

Sofía B. Pérez Luján*
Affiliation:
Grupo de Sismotectónica, Centro de Investigaciones de la Geósfera y la Biósfera (CIGEOBIO) - CONICET, San Juan J5402DCS, Argentina Departamento de Geología, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales - Universidad Nacional de San Juan, San Juan J5402DCS, Argentina
Florencia L. Boedo
Affiliation:
CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires, Instituto de Estudios Andinos “Don Pablo Groeber” (IDEAN), Buenos Aires C1428EGA, Argentina
Juan P. Ariza
Affiliation:
Departamento de Geología, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales - Universidad Nacional de San Juan, San Juan J5402DCS, Argentina Instituto Geofísico Sismológico Volponi – CONICET, Universidad Nacional de San Juan, San Juan 5407, Argentina
Graciela I. Vujovich
Affiliation:
CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires, Instituto de Estudios Andinos “Don Pablo Groeber” (IDEAN), Buenos Aires C1428EGA, Argentina Servicio Geológico Minero Argentino (SEGEMAR), Instituto de Geología y Recursos Minerales, Buenos Aires B1650KNA, Argentina
Patricia Alvarado
Affiliation:
Grupo de Sismotectónica, Centro de Investigaciones de la Geósfera y la Biósfera (CIGEOBIO) - CONICET, San Juan J5402DCS, Argentina Departamento de Geofísica y Astronomía, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales - Universidad Nacional de San Juan, San Juan J5402DCS, Argentina
Suzanne M. Kay
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences and INSTOC, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States
*
*Author for correspondence: Sofía B. Pérez Luján, Grupo de Sismotectónica, Email: sofiap.lujan@unsj-cuim.edu.ar
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Precordillera mafic–ultramafic belt (PMUB), located in central-western Argentina, comprises mafic and ultramafic bodies interlayered and/or in tectonic contact with marine siliciclastic units. Whole-rock, mineral geochemistry and Nd–Sr isotope analyses performed in magmatic rocks suggest a relatively different spatial and temporal evolution along the belt. The southern PMUB (south of 32° S) evolved as an intra-continental rifted margin with an enriched mid-ocean-ridge basalt (E-MORB) tholeiitic to alkaline magmatism, to a proto-ocean basin (the Cuyano proto-ocean) with tholeiitic normal-MORB geochemical signature. Based on neodymium model ages (TDM), the magmatic activity started during the late Neoproterozoic Era and continued into the early Palaeozoic Era. Instead, the northern PMUB (28–32° S) evolved as an intra-continental rifted margin with dominant tholeiitic E-MORB to continental flood basalt (CFB) magmatism during the early Palaeozoic Era. ϵNd values (+3.4 to +8.4), rare earth element trends and high-field-strength element systematics, together with an estimated potential mantle temperature of c. 50–100°C above ambient mantle, suggest the PMUB magmatism derived from an enriched mantle source related to the effect of a rising plume linked to the Iapetus Ocean opening. In particular, TDM estimations of 600–550 Ma agree with reported magmatism in central to southern Appalachians. The magmatism in the PMUB, and those registered in the Neoproterozoic Catoctin Formation and in the Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen in the conjugated Laurentian margin, seem to be contemporaneous, sharing a similar plume-enriched mantle source. In this context, the E-MORB signature identified along the PMUB can be described as a plume-distal ridge tectonic setting over an extended margin.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of central-western Argentina showing the different terranes accreted to the western Gondwana margin during early Palaeozoic time and the Río de la Plata craton (modified from Ramos et al. 1998). Dashed pink lines represent terrane boundaries and the pink area represents the Argentine Precordillera fold-and-thrust belt. Location of the Precordillera mafic-ultramafic belt (PMUB) localities are divided into a northern and a southern sector.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Geological map of the Argentine Precordillera (modified from Baldis et al. 1982). Black named squares show the location of the Precordillera mafic-ultramafic belt areas (see Fig. 1). Black squares with red border indicate U–Pb crystallization ages on zircon (Davis et al. 2000; Fauqué & Villar, 2003). Location of studied samples are also shown (Table 1).

Figure 2

Table 1. Summary table showing the dataset presented in this work, including analysed rock type, sample name, location, field relationship and study performed in each case

Figure 3

Table 2. Whole-rock major-element (wt %) calculated anhydrous and trace-element(ppm) analyses of basalts, gabbros, diorite and wehrlite from the Rodeo, Alto del Colorado, Sierra del Tigre and Sierra de la Invernada areas (Figs 1, 2; Table 1)

Figure 4

Table 3. Nd and Sr isotope data of mafic rocks from different localities of the PMUB (Figs 1, 2; Table 1). ϵNd(i) values are calculated using crystallization ages obtained in basalts (U–Pb on zircon) from the Jagüé-Bonete and Cortaderas areas (Davis et al.2000; Fauqué & Villar, 2003)

Figure 5

Fig. 3. Field relationship between igneous and metasedimentary rocks. (a) Yerba Loca Formation at the Sierra del Tigre area. Diorite and wehrlite sills interlayered with metagraywacke. (b) Yerba Loca Formation at the Sierra del Tigre area. Thick gabbro sill in tectonic contact with metapelitic layers. (c) Yerba Loca Formation at the Rodeo area. Basaltic lava flows (view from the top-side) with pillow-shaped structure. (d) Yerba Loca Formation at the Rodeo area. Thick basaltic flow with columnar-jointing. (e) Detail of the columnar-shaped jointing shown in (d). (f) Yerba Loca Formation at the Rodeo area. Sulphide-bearing metapelite layers. (g) Detailed view of sulphide-bearing metapelite. Sulphide layers consist of euhedral Py ± Ccp ± Po (mineral abbreviations after Whitney & Evans, 2010). (h) Sierra de la Invernada Formation at the homonymous area. Gabbro sill dissected by quartz-feldspathic vein. The yellow dashed lines in (a, b, d, f) separate mafic from metasedimentary units. The yellow dotted line in (h) separates a quartz-feldspathic vein corresponding to a gabbroic sill. See location areas in Figures 1 and 2.

Figure 6

Fig. 4. (a) Fine- to medium-grained diorite hand specimen showing dark-green acicular hornblende and tabular plagioclase crystals. (b) Cross-polarized light photomicrograph showing the diorite of (a). Subidiomorphic fine-grained texture consists of partially altered plagioclase, potassium feldspar, clinopyroxene and hornblende crystals. (c) Greenish coarse-grained gabbro hand specimen. (d) Cross-polarized light photomicrograph of the gabbro shown in (c), which shows subidiomorphic ophitic–subophitic texture. (e) Coarse-grained wehrlite outcrop showing onion-skinned weathering. (f) Cross-polarized light photomicrograph of the wehrlite shown in (e) exhibiting coarse-grained texture with partially serpentinized olivine and clinopyroxene crystals. Mineral abbreviations after Whitney & Evans (2010).

Figure 7

Fig. 5. Pyroxene classification diagram (Morimoto, 1988). Most analysed clinopyroxene crystals are augite, whereas only one measurement corresponds to a diopside composition with Wo > 45 (sample KMES3 from Calingasta area).

Figure 8

Fig. 6. Electron microprobe major-element mapping on pyroxene crystals of (a–d) sample QM208px02 from the Peñasco area and (e–h) sample QEA10 from the Sierra de la Invernada area. (a) Al distribution map. The black line indicates spot analysis along transverse a(rim) – g(core) – l(rim), as detailed in online supplementary Table S1. (b) Ca distribution map. (c) Fe distribution map. (d) Mg distribution map. The crystal (a–d) shows homogeneous magmatic zoning. (e) Backscattered electron image of pyroxene ‘px1’ of sample QEA10. The white line indicates spot analyses along transverse: a(rim) – i(core) – p(rim), as detailed in online supplementary Table S1. (f) Ca distribution map. (g) Fe distribution map. (h) Mg distribution map. Notice the heterogeneous zoning observed throughout fractures and cleavage surfaces (e–h).

Figure 9

Fig. 7. (a) SiO2 versus Al2O3 pyroxene diagram. Fields in dashed black lines are from Le Bas (1962). Analysed samples lie in the subalkaline ocean floor basalts field. (b) Ti versus Ca + Na discrimination diagram (Leterrier et al. 1982). Most of the data plot in the tholeiitic and calcalkali basalts field. (c) (TiO2–Na2O–SiO2)/100 discrimination diagram (Beccaluva et al.1989). The majority of the analysed crystals lie between the N-MORB to transitional and E-MORB fields. E-MORB – enriched mid-ocean-ridge basalt; N-MORB – normal mid-ocean-ridge basalt; WOPB – within-oceanic-plate basalt; IB – Iceland basalt; IAT – island-arc tholeiite; BON – bonninite; BA-A – basaltic andesite and andesite.

Figure 10

Fig. 8. Whole-rock major-element variations (wt%) versus Mg no. (=100 ×€MgO/(MgO+FeOt) calculated on a molar basis) for mafic and ultramafic samples from the Rodeo, Alto del Colorado (Al. Col.), Sierra del Tigre and Sierra de la Invernada areas (see details in Table 2 and locations in Figs 1 and 2). Note the negative correlations of SiO2, Na2O+K2O, Ti2O, and P2O5, and the positive correlation of Cr and Ni versus Mg no.

Figure 11

Fig. 9. (a) Zr/Ti versus Nb/Y discrimination diagram (Winchester & Floyd, 1977). Studied samples lie in the basic-subalkaline-basaltic field. (b) Th/Yb versus Zr/Y discrimination diagram (Ross & Bédard, 2009). Studied mafic rocks show a clear transitional signature. Some of them lie close to the tholeiitic field. (c) V–Ti diagram (after Shervais, 1982). Analysed samples (except ST55, ST27B and QLP5) plot in the continental flood basalts (CFB) and mid-ocean-ridge/back-arc-basin basalts (MORB-BAB) fields. BON – bonninite; IAT – island-arc tholeiitic basalts; OIB – oceanic-island basalts; OAB – oceanic-alkaline basalts. Legend as in Figure 8.

Figure 12

Fig. 10. (a) Primordial mantle-normalized (Sun & McDonough, 1989) incompatible trace-element patterns for the analysed mafic–ultramafic samples. The scattered distribution in Cs, Rb, Ba and K element concentrations is probably due to secondary alteration processes. (b) Chondrite-normalized (Sun & McDonough, 1989) REE patterns. REE contents in analysed rock samples are 10–35 higher than chondrite values. See Figures 1 and 2 for sample location.

Figure 13

Fig. 11. Initial Nd and Sr isotopic composition diagram. ϵNd,i and (87Sr/86Sr)i are calculated at 418, 454 and 576 Ma according to crystallization ages obtained in basalts (U–Pb on zircon) from the Jagüé-Bonete and Cortaderas areas (Fauqué & Villar, 2003; Davis et al.2000). End-member mantle components after Zindler & Hart (1986) are also shown. DM – depleted mantle; MORB – mid-ocean-ridge basalt; OIB – oceanic-island basalt; PREMA – prevalent mantle; HIMU – high-μ (μ = 238U/204Pb) mantle; BSE – bulk silicate earth; EMI – enriched mantle. Primitive continental flood basalt field from Condie (2001).

Figure 14

Fig. 12. (a) Chondrite-normalized (Sun & McDonough, 1989) REE patterns from the northern area of the PMUB (La Rioja, Rodeo, Alto del Colorado, Sierra del Tigre, Sierra de la Invernada and Calingasta). Also shown are REE data from Kay et al. (1984), Fauqué & Villar (2003), Boedo et al. (2013) and González-Menéndez et al. (2013). (b) Chondrite-normalized (Sun & McDonough, 1989) REE patterns for samples from the southern PMUB (Cerro Redondo, Peñasco, Cortaderas and Bonilla). Additional REE data are from Cortés & Kay (1994); Cortés et al. (1999); Boedo et al. (2013); Gregori et al. (2013). Ocean island basalts (OIB), continental flood basalts (CFB), E-MORB and N-MORB data (Thompson et al. 1983; Sun & McDonough, 1989) also plotted for comparison.

Figure 15

Fig. 13. Tectonic setting of mafic and ultramafic rock samples from the northern and southern PMUB. (a) Th/Yb versus Ta/Tb diagram (after Pearce, 1982). (b) 3Tb (ppm) – Th (ppm) – 2Ta (ppm) diagram (after Cabanis & Thiéblemont, 1988). Samples from Catoctin Formation from Badger & Sinha (2004), representing Neoproterozoic rift-related magmas from eastern North America, are shown for comparison. East African Rift and Rio Grande Rift samples from GEOROC (2020) (http://georoc.mpch-mainz.gwdg.de/georoc/), representing modern continental intra-plate settings related to mantle plume activity, are also shown for comparison. N-MORB – normal mid-ocean-ridge basalts; E-MORB – enriched mid-ocean-ridge basalts; WPB – within-plate basalts; PIAT – primitive island-arc tholeiites; OIB – ocean-island basalts; IAT – island-arc tholeiites; ICA – island-arc calc-alkaline basalts; SHO – island-arc shoshonites.

Figure 16

Fig. 14. Nd isotopic evolution diagram for mafic and ultramafic rocks from the PMUB. The green shaded area indicates extreme evolution lines (samples CR 37-15 and ST27B) for analysed samples. Depleted mantle evolution curve model is after DePaolo (1981). CHUR – chondritic uniform reservoir. Dotted lines represent the field for Grenville Province from Lambert et al. (1988); Smith et al. (1997); Goldberg & Dallmeyer (1997); Fisher et al. (2010). Dashed lines indicating the field for southern Appalachian from Fullagar et al. (1997). The pink shaded area indicates the field for mafic and ultramafic protoliths from the Pie de Palo basement and Pie de Palo Complex (Kay et al.1996; Rapela et al.2010). Samples from the Catoctin Formation (Badger et al.2010) and from Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen (Brueseke et al.2016) are shown for comparison.

Supplementary material: File

Pérez Luján et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Pérez Luján et al. supplementary material(File)
File 114.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Pérez Luján et al. supplementary material

Table S3

Download Pérez Luján et al. supplementary material(File)
File 13.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Pérez Luján et al. supplementary material

Table S2

Download Pérez Luján et al. supplementary material(File)
File 29.6 KB