1 Introduction
In [Reference BookerBoo16], the first author showed that the complete
$L$
-functions associated to classical holomorphic newforms have infinitely many simple zeros. The purpose of this paper is to extend that result to the remaining degree-
$2$
automorphic
$L$
-functions over
$\mathbb{Q}$
, that is, those associated to cuspidal Maass newforms. This also extends work of the second author [Reference ChoCho13] which established a quantitative estimate for the first few Maass forms of level
$1$
. When combined with the holomorphic case from [Reference BookerBoo16], we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 1.1. Let
$\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}}$
denote the adèle ring of
$\mathbb{Q}$
, and let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}$
be a cuspidal automorphic representation of
$\operatorname{GL}_{2}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$
. Then the associated complete
$L$
-function
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B})$
has infinitely many simple zeros.
The basic idea of the proof is the same as in [Reference BookerBoo16], which is in turn based on the method of Conrey and Ghosh [Reference Conrey and GhoshCG88]. Let
$f$
be a primitive Maass cuspform of weight
$k\in \{0,1\}$
for
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}_{0}(N)$
with nebentypus character
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D709}$
, and let
$L_{f}(s)$
be the finite
$L$
-function attached to
$f$
:
We define
Then it is easy to see that
$D_{f}(s)$
has a pole at some point if and only if
$L_{f}(s)$
has a simple zero there.
For
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}\in \mathbb{Q}$
and
$j\geqslant 0$
we define the additive twists
where
$\cos ^{(j)}$
denotes the
$j$
th derivative of the cosine function. Let
$q\nmid N$
be a prime and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}_{0}$
the principal character mod
$q$
. Then we have the following expansions of the trigonometric functions in terms of Dirichlet characters:
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \cos \biggl(\frac{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}n}{q}\biggr) & = & \displaystyle 1-\frac{q}{q-1}\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}_{0}(n)+\frac{\sqrt{q}}{q-1}\mathop{\sum }_{\substack{ \unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(modq) \\ \unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(-1)=1 \\ \unicode[STIX]{x1D712}\neq \unicode[STIX]{x1D712}_{0}}}\overline{\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(n),\nonumber\\ \displaystyle \sin \biggl(\frac{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}n}{q}\biggr) & = & \displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{q}}{q-1}\mathop{\sum }_{\substack{ \unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(modq) \\ \unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(-1)=-1}}\overline{\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(n),\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
where
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}}$
denotes the root number of the Dirichlet
$L$
-function
$L(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D712})$
. In particular, we have
$$\begin{eqnarray}D_{f}\biggl(s,\frac{1}{q},\cos \biggr)=D_{f}(s)-\frac{q}{q-1}D_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}_{0})+\frac{\sqrt{q}}{q-1}\mathop{\sum }_{\substack{ \unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(modq) \\ \unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(-1)=1 \\ \unicode[STIX]{x1D712}\neq \unicode[STIX]{x1D712}_{0}}}\overline{\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}}}D_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}),\end{eqnarray}$$
where
is the corresponding multiplicative twist.
By the non-vanishing results for automorphic
$L$
-functions [Reference Jacquet and ShalikaJS77], all non-trivial poles of
$D_{f}(s)$
and
$D_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D712})$
for
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}\neq \unicode[STIX]{x1D712}_{0}$
are located in the critical strip
$\{s\in \mathbb{C}:0<\Re (s)<1\}$
. However, for the case of the principal character, since
$D_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}_{0})$
has a pole at every simple zero of the local Euler factor polynomial,
$1-\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{f}(q)q^{-s}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D709}(q)q^{-2s}$
, at which
$L_{f}(s)$
does not vanish.
Since
$f$
is cuspidal, the Rankin–Selberg method implies that the average of
$|\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{f}(q)|^{2}$
over primes
$q$
is
$1$
, that is,
To see this, write
where
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}$
is the von Mangoldt function and
$a_{n}=0$
unless
$n$
is prime or a prime power. Then, by [Reference Liu and YeLY07, Lemma 5.2], we have
By the estimate of Kim and Sarnak [Reference KimKim03], we have
$|a_{n}|\leqslant n^{7/64}+n^{-7/64}$
, so the contribution of composite
$n$
to (2) is
$O(x^{23/32})$
. Since
$a_{q}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{f}(q)$
for primes
$q$
, this implies that
and (1) follows by partial summation and the prime number theorem.
In particular, there are infinitely many
$q\nmid N$
such that
$|\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{f}(q)|<2$
. For any such
$q$
, it follows that
$D_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}_{0})$
has infinitely many poles on the line
$\Re (s)=0$
. In view of the above,
$D_{f}(s,1/q,\cos )$
inherits these poles when they occur. On the other hand, under the assumption that
$L_{f}(s)$
has at most finitely many non-trivial simple zeros, we will show that
$D_{f}(s,1/q,\cos )$
is holomorphic apart from possible poles along two horizontal lines. The contradiction between these two implies the main theorem.
1.1 Overview
We begin with an overview of the proof. First, by [Reference Duke, Friedlander and IwaniecDFI02, (4.36)],
$f$
has the Fourier–Whittaker expansion
where
$W_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC},\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}}$
is the Whittaker function defined in [Reference Duke, Friedlander and IwaniecDFI02, (4.20)] and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}=\sqrt{{\textstyle \frac{1}{4}}-\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}}$
, where
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}$
is the eigenvalue of
$f$
with respect to the weight-
$k$
Laplace operator. When
$k=1$
, the Selberg eigenvalue conjecture holds, so that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}\in i[0,\infty )$
. When
$k=0$
the conjecture remains open, but we have the partial result of Kim and Sarnak [Reference KimKim03] that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}\in (0,{\textstyle \frac{7}{64}}]\cup i[0,\infty )$
.
Since
$f$
is primitive, it is an eigenfunction of the operator
$Q_{sk}$
defined in [Reference Duke, Friedlander and IwaniecDFI02, (4.65)], so that
for some
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}\in \{\pm 1\}$
. Further, we have
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}(n)=\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}(1)\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{f}(n)/\sqrt{n}$
. Choosing the normalization
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}(1)=\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}^{-k/2}$
and writing
$e(\pm nx)=\cos (2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}nx)\pm i\sin (2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}nx)$
, we obtain the expansion
where
$$\begin{eqnarray}V_{f}^{\pm }(y)=\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}^{-k/2}(W_{k/2,\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}(4\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}y)\pm \unicode[STIX]{x1D716}\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}^{k}W_{-k/2,\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}(4\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}y))=\left\{\begin{array}{@{}ll@{}}4\sqrt{y}K_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}y)\quad & \text{if }k=0\text{ and }\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}=\pm 1,\\ 0\quad & \text{if }k=0\text{ and }\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}=\mp 1,\\ 4yK_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}\pm \unicode[STIX]{x1D716}/2}(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}y)\quad & \text{if }k=1.\end{array}\right.\end{eqnarray}$$
Let
$\bar{f}(z):=\overline{f(-\bar{z})}$
denote the dual of
$f$
. Since
$f$
is primitive, it is also an eigenfunction of the operator
$\overline{W}_{k}$
defined in [Reference Duke, Friedlander and IwaniecDFI02, (6.10)], so we have
for some
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}\in \mathbb{C}$
with
$|\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}|=1$
.
Next we define a formal Fourier series
$F(z)$
associated to
$D_{f}(s)$
by replacing
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{f}(n)$
in the above by
$c_{f}(n)$
:
We expect
$F(z)$
to satisfy a relation similar to the modularity relation (5). To make this precise, we first recall the functional equation for
$L_{f}(s)$
. Define
Then the complete
$L$
-function
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{f}(s):=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{f}^{+}(s)L_{f}(s)$
satisfies
with
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}$
as above.
We define a completed version of
$D_{f}(s)$
by multiplying by the same
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}$
-factor:
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{f}(s):=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{f}^{+}(s)D_{f}(s)$
. Then, differentiating the functional equation (7), we obtain
where
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{f}(s):=(d/ds)\log \unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{f}^{+}(s)$
. In §2, we take a suitable inverse Mellin transform of (8). Under the assumption that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{f}(s)$
has at most finitely many simple zeros, this yields a pseudo-modularity relation for
$F$
of the form
for certain auxiliary functions
$A$
and
$B$
, where
$\overline{F}(z):=\overline{F(-\bar{z})}$
. Roughly speaking,
$A$
is the contribution from the correction term
$(\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{f}^{\prime }(s)-\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{\bar{f}}^{\prime }(1-s))\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{f}(s)$
in (8), and
$B$
comes from the non-trivial poles of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{f}(s)$
.
The main technical ingredient needed to carry this out is the following pair of Mellin transforms involving the
$K$
-Bessel function and trigonometric functions [Reference Gradshteyn and RyzhikGR15, 6.699(3) and 6.699(4)]:
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \int _{0}^{\infty }x^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}+1}K_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}}(ax)\sin (bx)\frac{dx}{x} & = & \displaystyle 2^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}}b\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}\biggl(\frac{2+\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}}{2}\biggr)\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}\biggl(\frac{2+\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}-\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}}{2}\biggr)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \cdot \,\operatorname{2F1}\biggl(\frac{2+\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}}{2},\frac{2+\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}-\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}}{2};\frac{3}{2};-\frac{b^{2}}{a^{2}}\biggr)\end{eqnarray}$$
and
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \int _{0}^{\infty }x^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}+1}K_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}}(ax)\cos (bx)\frac{dx}{x} & = & \displaystyle \frac{2^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}-1}}{a^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}+1}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}\biggl(\frac{1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}}{2}\biggr)\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}\biggl(\frac{1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}-\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}}{2}\biggr)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \cdot \,\operatorname{2F1}\biggl(\frac{1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}}{2},\frac{1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}-\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}}{2};\frac{1}{2};-\frac{b^{2}}{a^{2}}\biggr),\end{eqnarray}$$
where
is the Gauss hypergeometric function. The origin of these hypergeometric factors is explained in the introduction to [Reference Booker and ThenBT18], and the need to analyze them is the main difference between this paper and the holomorphic case from [Reference BookerBoo16] (for which the corresponding factors are elementary functions).
Specializing (9) to
$z=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}+iy$
for
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}\in \mathbb{Q}^{\times }$
, we have
We will take the Mellin transform of (13). Without difficulty the reader can guess that the transform of
$F(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}+iy)$
will be a combination of
$D_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC},\cos )$
and
$D_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC},\sin )$
. The calculation of the other terms is non-trivial, but ultimately we obtain the following proposition, which will play the role of [Reference BookerBoo16, Proposition 2.1].
Proposition 1.2. Suppose that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{f}(s)$
has at most finitely many simple zeros. Then, for every
$M\in \mathbb{Z}_{{\geqslant}0}$
and
$a\in \{0,1\}$
,
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle P_{f}(s;a,0)\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC},\cos ^{(a+k)})\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad -\,\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}(-\!\operatorname{sgn}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})^{k}(N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{2})^{s-1/2}\mathop{\sum }_{m=0}^{M-1}\frac{(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})^{m}}{m!}P_{f}(s;a,m)\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{\bar{f}}\biggl(s+m,-\frac{1}{N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}},\cos ^{(a+m)}\biggr)\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
is holomorphic for
$\Re (s)>{\textstyle \frac{3}{2}}-M$
except for possible poles for
$s\pm \unicode[STIX]{x1D708}\in \mathbb{Z}$
, where
$$\begin{eqnarray}P_{f}(s;a,m)=\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{f}^{(-)^{a}}(1-s)}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{f}^{(-)^{a}}(1-s-2\lfloor m/2\rfloor )}\left\{\begin{array}{@{}ll@{}}{\displaystyle \frac{s+2\lfloor m/2\rfloor -(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}}}\quad & \text{if }k=1\text{ and }2\nmid m,\\ 0\quad & \text{if }k=0\text{ and }(-1)^{a}=-\unicode[STIX]{x1D716},\\ 1\quad & \text{otherwise,}\end{array}\right.\end{eqnarray}$$
and
1.2 Proof of Theorem 1.1
Assuming Proposition 1.2 for the moment, we can complete the proof of Theorem 1.1 for the case of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}$
corresponding to a Maass cusp form,
$f$
. First, as noted above, we may choose a prime
$q\nmid N$
for which
$D_{f}(s,1/q,\cos )$
has infinitely many poles on the line
$\Re (s)=0$
. Then, by Dirichlet’s theorem on primes in an arithmetic progression, for any
$M\in \mathbb{Z}_{{>}0}$
there are distinct primes
$q_{0},q_{1},\ldots ,q_{M-1}$
such that
$q_{j}\equiv q(modN)$
and
$D_{\bar{f}}(s,-q_{j}/N,\cos ^{(a)})=D_{\bar{f}}(s,-q/N,\cos ^{(a)})$
for all
$j$
,
$a$
.
Let
$m_{0}$
be an integer with
$0\leqslant m_{0}\leqslant M-1$
. By the Vandermonde determinant, there exist rational numbers
$c_{0},c_{1},\ldots ,c_{M-1}$
such that
We fix
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}\in \{0,1\}$
and apply Proposition 1.2 with
$a\equiv \unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}+m_{0}(mod2)$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}=1/q_{j}$
for
$j=0,1,\ldots ,M-1$
. Multiplying by
$(-1)^{k}c_{j}(q_{j}^{2}/N)^{s-1/2}$
, summing over
$j$
and replacing
$s$
by
$s-m_{0}$
, we find that
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle \mathop{\sum }_{j=0}^{M-1}(-1)^{k}c_{j}\biggl(\frac{q_{j}^{2}}{N}\biggr)^{s-m_{0}-1/2}P_{f}(s-m_{0};\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}+m_{0},0)\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{f}\biggl(s-m_{0},\frac{1}{q_{j}},\cos ^{(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}+m_{0}+k)}\biggr)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad -\,\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}\frac{(-2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}N)^{m_{0}}}{m_{0}!}P_{f}(s-m_{0};\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}+m_{0},m_{0})\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{\bar{f}}\biggl(s,-\frac{q}{N},\cos ^{(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF})}\biggr)\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
is holomorphic on
$\{s\in \unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}:\Re (s)>\frac{3}{2}+m_{0}-M\}$
, where we set
Since
$D_{f}(s-m_{0},1/q_{j},\cos ^{(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}+m_{0}+k)})$
is holomorphic on
$\{s\in \unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}:\Re (s)<m_{0}-\frac{1}{2}\}$
, choosing
$m_{0}=2+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}+(1-\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2$
and
$M$
arbitrarily large, we conclude that
$D_{\bar{f}}(s,-q/N,\cos ^{(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF})})$
is holomorphic on
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}$
.
Next we apply Proposition 1.2 again with
$a=k$
,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}=1/q$
and
$M=2$
. When
$k=1$
or
$k=0$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}=1$
, we see that
$D_{f}(s,1/q,\cos )$
is holomorphic on
$\{s\in \unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}:\Re (s)=0\}$
. This is a contradiction, and Theorem 1.1 follows in these cases.
The remaining case is that of odd Maass forms of weight
$0$
. The above argument with
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}=1$
shows that
$D_{f}(s,-q/N,\sin )$
is entire apart from possible poles for
$s\pm \unicode[STIX]{x1D708}\in \mathbb{Z}$
. Applying Proposition 1.2 with
$a=1$
,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}=-q/N$
and
$M=3$
, we find that
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle -\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{f}\biggl(s,-\frac{q}{N},\sin \biggr)+\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}\biggl(\frac{q^{2}}{N}\biggr)^{s-1/2} [\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{\bar{f}}\biggl(s,\frac{1}{q},\sin \biggr)-2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}q\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{\bar{f}}\biggl(s+1,\frac{1}{q},\cos \biggr)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad -\,\frac{(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}q)^{2}}{2!}P_{f}(s;1,2)\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{\bar{f}}\biggl(s+2,\frac{1}{q},\sin \biggr)\!]\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
is holomorphic on
$\{s\in \unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}:\Re (s)>-\frac{5}{2}\}$
. Since
$D_{\bar{f}}(s,1/q,\sin )$
is holomorphic on the lines
$\Re (s)=-1$
and
$\Re (s)=1$
, we see that
$D_{\bar{f}}(s,1/q,\cos )$
is holomorphic on
$\{s\in \unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}:\Re (s)=0\}$
. This is again a contradiction, and concludes the proof.
2 Proof of Proposition 1.2
Using expansion (3), we take the Mellin transform of (5) along the line
$z=(\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}+i)y$
. First, the left-hand side becomes, for
$\Re (s)\gg 1$
,
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle \int _{0}^{\infty }f(\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}y+iy)y^{s-1/2}\frac{dy}{y}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =\mathop{\sum }_{n=1}^{\infty }\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{f}(n)}{\sqrt{n}}\int _{0}^{\infty }(V_{f}^{+}(ny)\cos (2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}n\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}y)+iV_{f}^{-}(ny)\sin (2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}n\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}y))y^{s-1/2}\frac{dy}{y}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =G_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})L_{f}(s),\end{eqnarray}$$
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle G_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =\int _{0}^{\infty }(V_{f}^{+}(y)\cos (2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}y)+iV_{f}^{-}(y)\sin (2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}y))y^{s-1/2}\frac{dy}{y}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =\left\{\begin{array}{@{}ll@{}}(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}i\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})^{(1-\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{f}^{+}(s)\operatorname{2F1}\biggl({\displaystyle \frac{s+(1-\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2+\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{s+(1-\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}{2}};1-{\displaystyle \frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}}{2}};-\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}^{2}\biggr)\quad & \text{if }k=0,\\ \unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{f}^{+}(s)\operatorname{2F1}\biggl({\displaystyle \frac{s+(1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2+\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{s+(1-\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}{2}};{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}};-\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}^{2}\biggr)\quad \\ \quad +\,2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}i\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{f}^{-}(s+1)\operatorname{2F1}\biggl({\displaystyle \frac{s+(3-\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2+\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{s+(3+\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}{2}};{\displaystyle \frac{3}{2}};-\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}^{2}\biggr)\quad & \text{if }k=1.\end{array}\right.\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle\end{eqnarray}$$
Note that we have
$G_{\bar{f}}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})=\overline{G_{f}(\bar{s},-\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})}$
.
On the other hand, the Mellin transform of the right-hand side of (5) is, for
$-\Re (s)\gg 1$
,
Making the substitution
$y\mapsto (N(\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}^{2}+1)y)^{-1}$
, this becomes
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle \unicode[STIX]{x1D702}\biggl(i\frac{|\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}+i|}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}+i}\biggr)^{k}(N(1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}^{2}))^{1/2-s}\int _{0}^{\infty }\bar{f}(-\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}y+iy)y^{1/2-s}\frac{dy}{y}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}\biggl(i\frac{|\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}+i|}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}+i}\biggr)^{k}(N(1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}^{2}))^{1/2-s}G_{\bar{f}}(1-s,-\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})L_{\bar{f}}(1-s).\end{eqnarray}$$
By (5), (14) and (16) must continue to entire functions and equal each other. In particular, taking
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}\rightarrow 0$
, we recover the functional equation (7). Equating (14) with (16) and dividing by (7), we discover the functional equation for the hypergeometric factor
$H_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}):=G_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})/\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{f}^{+}(s)$
:
Next, for
$z=x+iy\in \mathbb{H}$
, define
and
where the sum runs over all simple zeros of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{f}(s)$
, and
Lemma 2.1.
Proof. Fix
$z=x+iy\in \mathbb{H}$
, and put
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}=x/y$
. Applying Mellin inversion as in (14), we have
and
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle \unicode[STIX]{x1D702}\biggl(i\frac{|z|}{z}\biggr)^{k}\overline{F}\biggl(-\frac{1}{Nz}\biggr)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}\biggl(i\frac{|\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}+i|}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}+i}\biggr)^{k}\cdot \frac{1}{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}i}\int _{\Re (s)=2}G_{\bar{f}}(s,-\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})D_{\bar{f}}(s)(N(1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}^{2})y)^{s-1/2}\,ds\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}\biggl(i\frac{|\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}+i|}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}+i}\biggr)^{k}\cdot \frac{1}{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}i}\int _{\Re (s)=-1}H_{\bar{f}}(1-s,-\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{\bar{f}}(1-s)(N(1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}^{2})y)^{1/2-s}\,ds.\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
Applying (17) and (8), and using the fact that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{\bar{f}}^{\prime }(1-s)$
is holomorphic for
$\Re (s)\leqslant \frac{1}{2}$
, the last line becomes
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle \frac{1}{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}i}\int _{\Re (s)=-1}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}^{1-k}H_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{\bar{f}}(1-s)(Ny)^{1/2-s}\,ds\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =\frac{1}{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}i}\int _{\Re (s)=-1}H_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})[\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{f}(s)+(\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{f}^{\prime }(s)-\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{\bar{f}}^{\prime }(1-s))\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{f}(s)]y^{1/2-s}\,ds\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =\frac{1}{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}i}\int _{\Re (s)=-1}H_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})[\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{f}(s)+\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{f}^{\prime }(s)\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{f}(s)]y^{1/2-s}\,ds\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad -\,\frac{1}{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}i}\int _{\Re (s)=1/2}H_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{\bar{f}}^{\prime }(1-s)\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{f}(s)y^{1/2-s}\,ds.\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
Shifting the contour of the first integral to the right and using that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{f}^{\prime }(s)$
is holomorphic for
$\Re (s)\geqslant \frac{1}{2}$
, we get
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle \frac{1}{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}i}\int _{\Re (s)=2}H_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{f}(s)y^{1/2-s}\,ds-\frac{1}{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}i}\int _{{\mathcal{C}}}H_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{f}(s)+\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{f}^{\prime }(s)\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{f}(s))y^{1/2-s}\,ds\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad +\,\frac{1}{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}i}\int _{\Re (s)=1/2}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{f}^{\prime }(s)-\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{\bar{f}}^{\prime }(1-s))H_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{f}(s)y^{1/2-s}\,ds,\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
where
${\mathcal{C}}$
is the contour running from
$2-i\infty$
to
$2+i\infty$
and from
$-1+i\infty$
to
$-1-i\infty$
. Note that
which has a pole at every simple zero
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}$
of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{f}(s)$
, with residue
$-\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{f}^{\prime }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C})$
. Hence,
Next, writing
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{\mathbb{R}}(s)=(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}_{\mathbb{R}}^{\prime }/\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}_{\mathbb{R}})(s)$
, we have
Applying the reflection formula and Legendre duplication formula in the form
we derive
Thus,
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle \frac{1}{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}i}\int _{\Re (s)=1/2}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{f}^{\prime }(s)-\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{\bar{f}}^{\prime }(1-s))H_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{f}(s)y^{1/2-s}\,ds\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =A(z)-\frac{1}{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}i}\int _{\Re (s)=1/2}X_{f}(s)H_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{f}(s)y^{1/2-s}\,ds.\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
Rearranging terms completes the proof. ◻
Lemma 2.2. For any
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}\in \mathbb{Q}^{\times }$
,
continues to an entire function of
$s$
.
Proof. Define
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6F7}(s)=\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}^{\prime }(s+\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})+\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}^{\prime }(s-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})$
. Then we have
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6F7}(s)=\int _{1}^{\infty }\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(x)x^{1/2-s}\,dx$
, where
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(x)=\cosh (\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}\log x)\log x/\text{sinh}((1/2)\log x)$
. Applying (15) and the change of variables
$y\mapsto xt$
, we have
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \unicode[STIX]{x1D6F7}(s)G_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}) & = & \displaystyle \int _{1}^{\infty }\int _{0}^{\infty }\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(x)(V_{f}^{+}(y)\cos (2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}y)+iV_{f}^{-}(y)\sin (2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}y))\biggl(\frac{y}{x}\biggr)^{s-1/2}\frac{dy}{y}\,dx\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & = & \displaystyle \int _{0}^{\infty }\biggl(\int _{1}^{\infty }\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(x)(V_{f}^{+}(tx)\cos (2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}tx)+iV_{f}^{-}(tx)\sin (2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}tx))\,dx\biggr)t^{s-1/2}\frac{dt}{t}.\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
Hence, writing
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}/y$
, we have
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle A(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}+iy) & = & \displaystyle \frac{1}{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}i}\int _{\Re (s)=2}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{f}(s)\unicode[STIX]{x1D6F7}(s)H_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})y^{1/2-s}\,ds\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & = & \displaystyle \mathop{\sum }_{n=1}^{\infty }\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{f}(n)}{\sqrt{n}}\frac{1}{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}i}\int _{\Re (s)=2}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6F7}(s)G_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})(ny)^{1/2-s}\,ds\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & = & \displaystyle \mathop{\sum }_{n=1}^{\infty }\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{f}(n)}{\sqrt{n}}\int _{1}^{\infty }\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(x)(V_{f}^{+}(nxy)\cos (2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}nx)+iV_{f}^{-}(nxy)\sin (2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}nx))\,dx,\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
so that
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle \int _{0}^{\infty }A(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}+iy)y^{s-1/2}\frac{dy}{y}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =\mathop{\sum }_{n=1}^{\infty }\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{f}(n)}{\sqrt{n}}\int _{1}^{\infty }\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(x)\int _{0}^{\infty }(V_{f}^{+}(nxy)\cos (2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}nx)+iV_{f}^{-}(nxy)\sin (2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}nx))y^{s-1/2}\frac{dy}{y}\,dx\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =\mathop{\sum }_{n=1}^{\infty }\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{f}(n)n^{-s}\int _{1}^{\infty }\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(x)x^{1/2-s}(\widetilde{V}_{f}^{+}(s)\cos (2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}nx)+i\widetilde{V}_{f}^{-}(s)\sin (2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}nx))\,dx,\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
where
A case-by-case inspection of (6) shows that
$\widetilde{V}_{f}^{\pm }(s)/(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}(s+\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}(s-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}))$
is entire for both choices of sign.
Define
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{j}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{j}(x,s)$
for
$j\geqslant 0$
by
Then, applying integration by parts
$m$
times, we see that
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \int _{1}^{\infty }\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(x)\cos (2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}nx)x^{1/2-s}\,dx & = & \displaystyle \mathop{\sum }_{j=0}^{m-1}\frac{\cos ^{(j+1)}(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}n)}{(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}n)^{j+1}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{j}(1,s)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle +\,\int _{1}^{\infty }\frac{\cos ^{(m)}(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}nx)}{(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}n)^{m}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{k}(x,s)x^{1/2-m-s}\,dx\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
and
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \int _{1}^{\infty }\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(x)\sin (2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}nx)x^{1/2-s}\,dx & = & \displaystyle \mathop{\sum }_{j=0}^{m-1}\frac{\sin ^{(j+1)}(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}n)}{(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}n)^{j+1}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{j}(1,s)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle +\,\int _{1}^{\infty }\frac{\sin ^{(m)}(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}nx)}{(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}n)^{m}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{k}(x,s)x^{1/2-m-s}\,dx.\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
Thus,
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle \int _{0}^{\infty }A(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}+iy)y^{s-1/2}\frac{dy}{y}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =\widetilde{V}_{f}^{+}(s)(\mathop{\sum }_{j=0}^{m-1}\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{j}(1,s)L(f,s+j+1,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC},\cos ^{(j+1)})}{(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})^{j+1}}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad +\,\frac{1}{(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})^{m}}\mathop{\sum }_{n=1}^{\infty }\frac{a_{f}(n)}{n^{s+m}}\int _{1}^{\infty }\cos ^{(m)}(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}nx)\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{m}(x,s)x^{1/2-m-s}\,dx\!)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad +\,i\widetilde{V}_{f}^{-}(s)(\mathop{\sum }_{j=0}^{m-1}\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{j}(1,s)L(f,s+j+1,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC},\sin ^{(j+1)})}{(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})^{j+1}}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad +\,\frac{1}{(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})^{m}}\mathop{\sum }_{n=1}^{\infty }\frac{a_{f}(n)}{n^{s+m}}\int _{1}^{\infty }\sin ^{(m)}(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}nx)\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{m}(x,s)x^{1/2-m-s}\,dx\!).\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
It follows from [Reference Booker and KrishnamurthyBK11, Proposition 3.1] that
$L_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC},\cos )$
and
$L_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC},\sin )$
continue to entire functions. We see by induction that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{m}(x,s)\ll _{m}((1+|s|)(1+|\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}|))^{m}x^{-1}$
uniformly for
$x\geqslant 1$
, and thus the integral terms above are holomorphic for
$\Re (s)>\frac{1}{2}-m$
. Choosing
$m$
arbitrarily large, the lemma follows.◻
Lemma 2.3. For any
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}\geqslant 0$
and any
$l\in \mathbb{Z}_{{\geqslant}0}$
, we have
Proof. In view of (19), since
$|\Re (\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})|<\frac{1}{2}$
, for any
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}\geqslant 0$
we have the integral representation
Differentiating
$l$
times, we obtain
Using the estimate
we have
where the last inequality is justified by Stirling’s formula. ◻
Lemma 2.4. Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}\in \mathbb{Q}^{\times }$
and
$z=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}+iy$
for some
$y\in (0,|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}|/2]$
. Then, for any integer
$T\geqslant 0$
, we have
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle \biggl(i\frac{|z|}{z}\biggr)^{k}\overline{F}\biggl(-\frac{1}{Nz}\biggr)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =O_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC},T}(y^{T-1})+(i\operatorname{sgn}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}))^{k}\mathop{\sum }_{t=0}^{T-1}\frac{(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}iN\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})^{t}}{t!}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad \cdot \,\mathop{\sum }_{a\in \{0,1\}}\frac{i^{-a}}{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}i}\int _{\Re (s)=2}P_{f}(s;a+t,t)\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{\bar{f}}\biggl(s+t,-\frac{1}{N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}},\cos ^{(a)}\biggr)\biggl(\frac{y}{N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{2}}\biggr)^{1/2-s}\,ds.\end{eqnarray}$$
Proof. Let
$z=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}+iy$
,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}=-1/N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}$
and
$u=y/\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}$
. Then
so that
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \biggl(i\frac{|z|}{z}\biggr)^{k}\overline{F}\biggl(-\frac{1}{Nz}\biggr) & = & \displaystyle \biggl(i\operatorname{sgn}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})\frac{|1+iu|}{1+iu}\biggr)^{k}\overline{F}\biggl(\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}}{1+u^{2}}+i\frac{|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}u|}{1+u^{2}}\biggr)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & = & \displaystyle \biggl(i\operatorname{sgn}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})\frac{|1+iu|}{1+iu}\biggr)^{k}\mathop{\sum }_{n=1}^{\infty }\frac{c_{\bar{f}}(n)}{\sqrt{n}}\biggl(V_{\bar{f}}^{+}\biggl(\frac{|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}nu|}{1+u^{2}}\biggr)\cos \biggl(\frac{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}n}{1+u^{2}}\biggr)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle +\,iV_{\bar{f}}^{-}\biggl(\frac{|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}nu|}{1+u^{2}}\biggr)\sin \biggl(\frac{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}n}{1+u^{2}}\biggr)\!\biggr).\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
By Lemma 2.3, for any
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}\geqslant 0$
and any
$l_{0}\in \mathbb{Z}_{{\geqslant}0}$
, we have
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle V_{\bar{f}}^{\pm }\biggl(\frac{|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}nu|}{1+u^{2}}\biggr) & = & \displaystyle \mathop{\sum }_{l=0}^{\infty }\frac{1}{l!}(V_{\bar{f}}^{\pm })^{(l)}(|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}nu|)\biggl(\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}nu^{3}}{1+u^{2}}\biggr)^{l}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & = & \displaystyle \mathop{\sum }_{l=0}^{l_{0}-1}\frac{1}{l!}(V_{\bar{f}}^{\pm })^{(l)}(|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}nu|)\biggl(\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}nu^{3}}{1+u^{2}}\biggr)^{l}+O_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}}\biggl(|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}nu|^{-\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}}\mathop{\sum }_{l=l_{0}}^{\infty }\biggl(\frac{2u^{2}}{1+u^{2}}\biggr)^{l}\biggr)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & = & \displaystyle \mathop{\sum }_{l=0}^{l_{0}-1}\frac{1}{l!}(V_{\bar{f}}^{\pm })^{(l)}(|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}nu|)\biggl(\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}nu^{3}}{1+u^{2}}\biggr)^{l}+O_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC},\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E},l_{0}}(|nu|^{-\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}}u^{2l_{0}}).\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
Similarly, for any
$a\in \{0,1\}$
, we have
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \cos ^{(a)}\biggl(\frac{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}n}{1+u^{2}}\biggr) & = & \displaystyle \mathop{\sum }_{j=0}^{\infty }\frac{1}{j!}\cos ^{(j+a)}(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}n)\biggl(-\frac{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}nu^{2}}{1+u^{2}}\biggr)^{j}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & = & \displaystyle \mathop{\sum }_{j=0}^{j_{0}-1}\frac{1}{j!}\cos ^{(j+a)}(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}n)\biggl(-\frac{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}nu^{2}}{1+u^{2}}\biggr)^{j}+O\biggl(\frac{1}{j_{0}!}\biggl|\frac{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}nu^{2}}{1+u^{2}}\biggr|^{j_{0}}\biggr)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & = & \displaystyle \mathop{\sum }_{j=0}^{j_{0}-1}\frac{1}{j!}\cos ^{(j+a)}(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}n)\biggl(-\frac{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}nu^{2}}{1+u^{2}}\biggr)^{j}+O_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC},j_{0}}((nu^{2})^{j_{0}}),\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
by the Lagrange form of the error in Taylor’s theorem. Taking
$j_{0}=2(l_{0}-l)$
and applying Lemma 2.3 with
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}$
replaced by
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}+2(l_{0}-l)$
, we obtain
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle V_{\bar{f}}^{(-)^{a}}\biggl(\frac{|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}nu|}{1+u^{2}}\biggr)\cos ^{(a)}\biggl(\frac{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}n}{1+u^{2}}\biggr)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =\mathop{\sum }_{j+2l<2l_{0}}\frac{(-2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B})^{j}}{j!l!}(V_{\bar{f}}^{(-)^{a}})^{(l)}(|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}nu|)\cos ^{(j+a)}(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}n)u^{l}\biggl(\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}nu^{2}}{1+u^{2}}\biggr)^{j+l}+O_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC},\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E},l_{0}}(|nu|^{-\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}}u^{2l_{0}}).\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
Next, defining
$$\begin{eqnarray}b_{j,k,l,m}=\left\{\begin{array}{@{}ll@{}}\left(\begin{array}{@{}c@{}}j+l-1+\biggl\lfloor{\displaystyle \frac{m}{2}}\biggr\rfloor+{\displaystyle \frac{k}{2}}\\ \biggl\lfloor{\displaystyle \frac{m}{2}}\biggr\rfloor\end{array}\right)\quad & \text{if }k=1\text{ or }k=0\text{ and }2\mid m,\\ 0\quad & \text{otherwise},\end{array}\right.\end{eqnarray}$$
we have
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \biggl(\frac{|1+iu|}{1+iu}\biggr)^{k}(1+u^{2})^{-j-l} & = & \displaystyle (1-iu)^{k}(1+u^{2})^{-j-l-k/2}=\mathop{\sum }_{m=0}^{\infty }b_{j,k,l,m}(-iu)^{m}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & = & \displaystyle \mathop{\sum }_{m=0}^{m_{0}-1}b_{j,k,l,m}(-iu)^{m}+O\biggl(\mathop{\sum }_{m=m_{0}}^{\infty }2^{j+l+m/2}|u|^{m}\biggr)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & = & \displaystyle \mathop{\sum }_{m=0}^{m_{0}-1}b_{j,k,l,m}(-iu)^{m}+O_{j,l,m_{0}}(|u|^{m_{0}}).\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
Taking
$m_{0}=2l_{0}-j-2l$
and applying Lemma 2.3 with
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}$
replaced by
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}+j$
, we obtain
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle \biggl(i\operatorname{sgn}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})\frac{|1+iu|}{1+iu}\biggr)^{k}V_{\bar{f}}^{(-)^{a}}\biggl(\frac{|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}nu|}{1+u^{2}}\biggr)\cos ^{(a)}\biggl(\frac{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}n}{1+u^{2}}\biggr)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =(i\operatorname{sgn}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}))^{k}\mathop{\sum }_{j+2l+m<2l_{0}}\frac{(-2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B})^{j}(-i)^{m}}{j!l!}b_{j,k,l,m}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}nu)^{j+l}(V_{\bar{f}}^{(-)^{a}})^{(l)}(|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}nu|)\cos ^{(j+a)}(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}n)u^{j+2l+m}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad +\,O_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC},\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E},l_{0}}(|nu|^{-\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}}u^{2l_{0}}).\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
Recalling the definition of
$u$
, multiplying by
$c_{\bar{f}}(n)/\sqrt{n}$
and summing over
$n$
and both choices of
$a$
, the error term converges if
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}\geqslant 1$
, to give
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle \mathop{\sum }_{a\in \{0,1\}}i^{-a}\biggl(i\frac{|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}+iy|}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}+iy}\biggr)^{k}\mathop{\sum }_{n=1}^{\infty }\frac{c_{\bar{f}}(n)}{\sqrt{n}}V_{\bar{f}}^{(-)^{a}}\biggl(\frac{ny}{N(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{2}+y^{2})}\biggr)\cos ^{(a)}\biggl(\frac{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}n}{1+(y/\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})^{2}}\biggr)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =\mathop{\sum }_{j+2l+m<2l_{0}}(i\operatorname{sgn}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}))^{k}\mathop{\sum }_{a\in \{0,1\}}i^{-a}\mathop{\sum }_{n=1}^{\infty }\frac{c_{\bar{f}}(n)}{\sqrt{n}}\frac{(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}i)^{j}}{j!l!}b_{j,k,l,m}\biggl(\frac{ny}{N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{2}}\biggr)^{j+l}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad \cdot \,(V_{\bar{f}}^{(-)^{a}})^{(l)}\biggl(\frac{ny}{N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{2}}\biggr)\cos ^{(j+a)}(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}n)\biggl(\frac{y}{i\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}}\biggr)^{j+2l+m}+O_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC},\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E},l_{0}}(y^{2l_{0}-\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}})\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =\mathop{\sum }_{j+2l+m<2l_{0}}(i\operatorname{sgn}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}))^{k}\mathop{\sum }_{a\in \{0,1\}}i^{-a}\mathop{\sum }_{n=1}^{\infty }\frac{c_{\bar{f}}(n)}{\sqrt{n}}\frac{(-2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B})^{j}}{j!l!}b_{j,k,l,m}\biggl(\frac{ny}{N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{2}}\biggr)^{j+l}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad \cdot \,(V_{\bar{f}}^{(-)^{a+j}})^{(l)}\biggl(\frac{ny}{N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{2}}\biggr)\cos ^{(a)}(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}n)\biggl(\frac{y}{i\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}}\biggr)^{j+2l+m}+O_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC},\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E},l_{0}}(y^{2l_{0}-\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}}).\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
Taking the Mellin transform of a single term of the sum over
$j,l,m$
and making the change of variables
$y\mapsto N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{2}y/n$
, we get
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle (i\operatorname{sgn}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}))^{k}\mathop{\sum }_{a\in \{0,1\}}i^{-a}\int _{0}^{\infty }\mathop{\sum }_{n=1}^{\infty }\frac{c_{\bar{f}}(n)}{\sqrt{n}}\frac{(-2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B})^{j}}{j!l!}b_{j,k,l,m}\biggl(\frac{ny}{N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{2}}\biggr)^{j+l}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad \cdot \,(V_{\bar{f}}^{(-)^{a+j}})^{(l)}\biggl(\frac{ny}{N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{2}}\biggr)\cos ^{(a)}(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}n)\biggl(\frac{y}{i\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}}\biggr)^{j+2l+m}y^{s-1/2}\frac{dy}{y}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =(i\operatorname{sgn}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}))^{k}\mathop{\sum }_{a\in \{0,1\}}i^{-a}(N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{2})^{s-1/2}(-iN\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})^{j+2l+m}\frac{(-2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B})^{j}}{j!}b_{j,k,l,m}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad \cdot \,\mathop{\sum }_{n=1}^{\infty }\frac{c_{\bar{f}}(n)\cos ^{(a)}(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}n)}{n^{s+j+2l+m}}\int _{0}^{\infty }\frac{y^{l}}{l!}(V_{\bar{f}}^{(-)^{a+j}})^{(l)}(y)y^{s+2j+2l+m-1/2}\frac{dy}{y}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =(i\operatorname{sgn}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}))^{k}\mathop{\sum }_{a\in \{0,1\}}i^{-a}(N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{2})^{s-1/2}(-iN\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})^{t}\frac{(-2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B})^{j}}{j!}b_{j,k,l,m}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad \cdot \,D_{\bar{f}}(s+t,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD},\cos ^{(a)})\binom{\frac{1}{2}-s-t-j}{l}\widetilde{V}_{\bar{f}}^{(-)^{a+j}}(s+t+j),\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
where
$t=j+2l+m$
.
Next we fix
$t\in \mathbb{Z}_{{\geqslant}0}$
and sum over all
$(j,l,m)$
satisfying
$j+2l+m=t$
. When
$k=0$
,
$b_{j,k,l,m}$
vanishes unless
$m$
is even. Hence, defining
we get
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle (i\operatorname{sgn}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}))^{k}\mathop{\sum }_{a\in \{0,1\}}i^{-a}(N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{2})^{s-1/2}(-iN\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})^{t}\mathop{\sum }_{j+2l+m=t}I_{k}(t-j)\frac{(-2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B})^{j}}{j!}\binom{j+l-1+\lfloor \frac{m}{2}\rfloor +\frac{k}{2}}{\lfloor \frac{m}{2}\rfloor }\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad \cdot \,D_{\bar{f}}(s+t,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD},\cos ^{(a)})\binom{\frac{1}{2}-s-t-j}{l}\widetilde{V}_{\bar{f}}^{(-)^{a+j}}(s+t+j)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =(i\operatorname{sgn}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}))^{k}\mathop{\sum }_{a\in \{0,1\}}i^{-a}(N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{2})^{s-1/2}(-iN\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})^{t}\mathop{\sum }_{j=0}^{t}I_{k}(t-j)\frac{(-2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B})^{j}}{j!}D_{\bar{f}}(s+t,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD},\cos ^{(a)})\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad \cdot \,\widetilde{V}_{\bar{f}}^{(-)^{a+j}}(s+t+j)\mathop{\sum }_{l=0}^{\lfloor (t-j)/2\rfloor }\binom{j+\lfloor \frac{t-j}{2}\rfloor +\frac{k}{2}-1}{\lfloor \frac{t-j}{2}\rfloor -l}\binom{\frac{1}{2}-s-t-j}{l}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =(i\operatorname{sgn}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}))^{k}\mathop{\sum }_{a\in \{0,1\}}i^{-a}(N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{2})^{s-1/2}(-iN\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})^{t}\mathop{\sum }_{j=0}^{t}I_{k}(t-j)\frac{(-2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B})^{j}}{j!}D_{\bar{f}}(s+t,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD},\cos ^{(a)})\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad \cdot \,\widetilde{V}_{\bar{f}}^{(-)^{a+j}}(s+t+j)\binom{\lfloor \frac{t-j}{2}\rfloor +\frac{k-1}{2}-s-t}{\lfloor \frac{t-j}{2}\rfloor },\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
by the Chu–Vandermonde identity.
We now consider two cases according to the weight,
$k$
. When
$k=0$
, the inner sum vanishes identically when
$(-1)^{a+t}=-\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}$
, so we may assume that
$(-1)^{a+t}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}$
. Thus, in this case, we have
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle (N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{2})^{s-1/2}(iN\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})^{t}i^{-a}D_{\bar{f}}(s+t,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD},\cos ^{(a)})\mathop{\sum }_{\substack{ j\leqslant t \\ j\equiv t(mod2)}}\frac{(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B})^{j}}{j!}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{\bar{f}}^{(-)^{a+t}}(s+t+j)\binom{\frac{t-j}{2}-\frac{1}{2}-s-t}{\frac{t-j}{2}}. & & \displaystyle \nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
Put
$t=2n+b$
, with
$b\in \{0,1\}$
. Then, writing
$j=2r+b$
, the above becomes
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle (N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{2})^{s-1/2}(iN\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})^{t}i^{-a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{\bar{f}}(s+t,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD},\cos ^{(a)})\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad \cdot \,\mathop{\sum }_{r=0}^{n}\frac{(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B})^{2r+b}}{(2r+b)!}\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}_{\mathbb{R}}(s+t+2r+b+\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}_{\mathbb{R}}(s+t+2r+b-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}_{\mathbb{R}}(s+t+b+\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}_{\mathbb{R}}(s+t+b-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})}\binom{n-r-\frac{1}{2}-s-t}{n-r}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =(N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{2})^{s-1/2}(iN\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})^{t}i^{-a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{\bar{f}}(s+t,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD},\cos ^{(a)})(-1)^{n}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad \cdot \,\mathop{\sum }_{r=0}^{n}\biggl(\frac{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}}{2r+1}\biggr)^{b}\frac{(-4)^{r}r!^{2}}{(2r)!}\binom{-(s+t+b+\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{r}\binom{-(s+t+b-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{r}\binom{s+t-\frac{1}{2}}{n-r}.\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
Applying [Reference Booker and KrishnamurthyBK11, Lemma A.1(ii)–(iii)], we get
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle (N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{2})^{s-1/2}(iN\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})^{t}i^{-a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{\bar{f}}(s+t,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD},\cos ^{(a)})\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad \cdot \,\biggl(\frac{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}}{2n+1}\biggr)^{b}\frac{4^{n}n!^{2}}{(2n)!}\binom{(s+t-1-b+\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{n}\binom{(s+t-1-b-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{n}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =(N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{2})^{s-1/2}\frac{(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}iN\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})^{t}}{t!}i^{-a}\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{f}^{(-)^{a+t}}(1-s)}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{f}^{(-)^{a+t}}(1-s-2n)}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{\bar{f}}(s+t,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD},\cos ^{(a)}).\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
Turning to
$k=1$
, we have
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle i\operatorname{sgn}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})(N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{2})^{s-1/2}(-iN\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})^{t}\mathop{\sum }_{a\in \{0,1\}}i^{-a}\mathop{\sum }_{j=0}^{t}\frac{(-2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B})^{j}}{j!}D_{\bar{f}}(s+t,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD},\cos ^{(a)})\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad \cdot \,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{\bar{f}}^{(-)^{a+j}}(s+t+j)\binom{\lfloor \frac{t-j}{2}\rfloor -s-t}{\lfloor \frac{t-j}{2}\rfloor }\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =i\operatorname{sgn}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})(N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{2})^{s-1/2}(-iN\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})^{t}\mathop{\sum }_{a\in \{0,1\}}i^{-a}D_{\bar{f}}(s+t,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD},\cos ^{(a)})\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad \cdot \,\mathop{\sum }_{j=0}^{t}\frac{(-2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B})^{j}}{j!}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{\bar{f}}^{(-1)^{a+j}}(s+t+j)\binom{\lfloor \frac{t-j}{2}\rfloor -s-t}{\lfloor \frac{t-j}{2}\rfloor }.\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
Writing
$j=2r-c$
with
$c\in \{0,1\}$
, this is
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle i\operatorname{sgn}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})(N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{2})^{s-1/2}(-iN\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})^{t}\mathop{\sum }_{a\in \{0,1\}}i^{-a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{\bar{f}}(s+t,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD},\cos ^{(a)})\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad \cdot \,\mathop{\sum }_{c\in \{0,1\}}\mathop{\sum }_{2r-c\leqslant t}\frac{(-2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B})^{2r-c}}{(2r-c)!}\binom{n-r+\lfloor \frac{b+c}{2}\rfloor -s-t}{n-r+\lfloor \frac{b+c}{2}\rfloor }\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad \cdot \,\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}_{\mathbb{R}}(s+t+2r-c+(1-(-1)^{a+c}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2+\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}_{\mathbb{ R}}(s+t+2r-c+(1+(-1)^{a+c}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}_{\mathbb{R}}(s+t+(1-(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2+\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}_{\mathbb{R}}(s+t+(1+(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =i\operatorname{sgn}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})(N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{2})^{s-1/2}(-iN\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})^{t}\mathop{\sum }_{a\in \{0,1\}}i^{-a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{\bar{f}}(s+t,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD},\cos ^{(a)})\mathop{\sum }_{c\in \{0,1\}}(-1)^{n+bc}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad \cdot \,\mathop{\sum }_{2r-c\leqslant t}\frac{(-4)^{r}r!^{2}}{(2r)!}\binom{-(s+t+\frac{1-(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}}{2}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{r-c\frac{1-(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}}{2}}\binom{-(s+t+\frac{1+(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}}{2}-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{r-c\frac{1+(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}}{2}}\binom{s+t-1}{n+bc-r}.\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
For
$b=0$
, applying [Reference Booker and KrishnamurthyBK11, Lemma A.1(ii)], the sum over
$c$
becomes
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle (-1)^{n}\mathop{\sum }_{r=0}^{n}\frac{(-4)^{r}r!^{2}}{(2r)!}\binom{-(s+t-1+\frac{1-(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}}{2}-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{r}\!\binom{-(s+t-1+\frac{1+(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}}{2}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{r}\!\binom{s+t-1}{n-r}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =\frac{4^{n}n!^{2}}{(2n)!}\binom{(s+2n-2+\frac{1-(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}}{2}-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{n}\binom{(s+2n-2+\frac{1+(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}}{2}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{n}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =\frac{(-2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B})^{2n}}{(2n)!}\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}_{\mathbb{R}}(1-s+(1+(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2+\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}_{\mathbb{R}}(1-s-2n+(1+(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2+\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})}\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}_{\mathbb{R}}(1-s+(1-(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}_{\mathbb{R}}(1-s-2n+(1-(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =\frac{(-2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B})^{t}}{t!}\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{f}^{(-)^{a}}(1-s)}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{f}^{(-)^{a}}(1-s-2n)}=\frac{(-2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B})^{t}}{t!}\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{f}^{(-)^{a+t}}(1-s)}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{f}^{(-)^{a+t}}(1-s-2\lfloor t/2\rfloor )}.\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
For
$b=1$
and
$c=0$
, the inner sum is
Writing
$\binom{s+t-1}{n-r}=\binom{s+t}{n-r+1}-\binom{s+t-1}{n-r+1}$
and applying [Reference Booker and KrishnamurthyBK11, Lemma A.1(ii)], we get
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle (-1)^{n} [\frac{(-4)^{n+1}(n+1)!^{2}}{(2n+2)!}\binom{(s+t-\frac{1+(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}}{2}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{n+1}\binom{(s+t-\frac{1-(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}}{2}-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{n+1}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad -\,\frac{(-4)^{n+1}(n+1)!^{2}}{(2n+2)!}\binom{-(s+t+\frac{1-(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}}{2}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{n+1}\binom{-(s+t+\frac{1+(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}}{2}-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{n+1}\! ]\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad +\,(-1)^{n+1} [\mathop{\sum }_{r=0}^{n+1}\frac{(-4)^{r}r!^{2}}{(2r)!}\binom{-(s+t+\frac{1-(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}}{2}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{r}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad \times \,\binom{-(s+t+\frac{1+(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}}{2}-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{r}\binom{s+t-1}{n-r+1}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad -\,\frac{(-4)^{n+1}(n+1)!^{2}}{(2n+2)!}\binom{-(s+t+\frac{1-(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}}{2}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{n+1}\binom{-(s+t+\frac{1+(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}}{2}-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{n+1}\! ]\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =(-1)^{n}\frac{(-4)^{n+1}(n+1)!^{2}}{(2n+2)!}\binom{(s+t-1+(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{n+1}\binom{(s+t-(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{n+1}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad +\,(-1)^{n+1}\mathop{\sum }_{r=0}^{n+1}\frac{(-4)^{r}r!^{2}}{(2r)!}\binom{-(s+t-(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}+1)/2}{r}\binom{-(s+t+(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{r}\binom{s+t-1}{n-r+1}.\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
For
$b=1$
and
$c=1$
the inner sum is
and, adding this to the contribution from
$c=0$
, for
$b=1$
we obtain
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle (-1)^{n}\frac{(-4)^{n+1}(n+1)!^{2}}{(2n+2)!}\binom{(s+t-1+(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{n+1}\binom{(s+t-(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{n+1}+(-1)^{n+1}\binom{s+t-1}{n+1}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad +\,(-1)^{n+1}\mathop{\sum }_{r=1}^{n+1}\frac{(-4)^{r}r!^{2}}{(2r)!}\binom{1-(s+t-(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}+1)/2}{r}\binom{-(s+t+(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{r}\binom{s+t-1}{n-r+1}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =(-1)^{n}\frac{(-4)^{n+1}(n+1)!^{2}}{(2n+2)!}\binom{(s+t-1+(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{n+1}\binom{(s+t-(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{n+1}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad +\,(-1)^{n+1}\mathop{\sum }_{r=0}^{n+1}\frac{(-4)^{r}r!^{2}}{(2r)!}\binom{1-(s+t-(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}+1)/2}{r}\!\binom{-(s+t+(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{r}\!\binom{s+t-1}{n-r+1}.\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
Applying [Reference Booker and KrishnamurthyBK11, Lemma A.1(ii)], this is
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle -\frac{4^{n+1}(n+1)!^{2}}{(2n+2)!}\binom{(s+t-1+(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{n+1}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad \times \,\biggl[\binom{(s+t-(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{n+1}-\binom{(s+t-(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2-1}{n+1}\biggr]\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =-\frac{4^{n+1}(n+1)!^{2}}{(2n+2)!}\frac{(s+(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}+2n)/2}{n+1}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad \cdot \,\binom{(s+2n-2+\frac{1+(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}}{2}-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{n}\binom{(s+2n-2+\frac{1-(-1)^{a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}}{2}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2}{n}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =\frac{s+2\lfloor t/2\rfloor -(-1)^{a+t}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}}\frac{(-2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B})^{t}}{t!}\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{f}^{(-)^{a+t}}(1-s)}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{f}^{(-)^{a+t}}(1-s-2\lfloor t/2\rfloor )}.\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
In all cases, the result matches the formula for
$P_{f}(s;a+t,t)$
. Taking
$l_{0}=\lceil T/2\rceil$
,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}=1$
and applying Mellin inversion, we get (20), with
$T+1$
in place of
$T$
when
$T$
is odd. In that case, we estimate the final term of the sum by shifting the contour to
$\Re (s)=\frac{3}{2}-T$
, which yields
$O(y^{T-1})$
.◻
Lemma 2.5. Assume that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{f}(s)$
has at most finitely many simple zeros, and let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}\in \mathbb{Q}^{\times }$
and
$z=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}+iy$
for some
$y\in (0,|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}|/4]$
. Then there are numbers
$a_{j}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}),b_{j}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})\in \mathbb{C}$
such that, for any integer
$M\geqslant 0$
, we have
Proof. Let
$s\in \mathbb{C}$
with
$\Re (s)\in (0,1)$
, and set
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}/y$
. We will show that there are numbers
$a_{j}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC},s),b_{j}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC},s)\in \mathbb{C}$
satisfying
and
Let us assume this for now. Then, since
$y\leqslant |\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}|/4$
, we have
so that (by the trivial estimate
$|\Re (\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})|<{\textstyle \frac{1}{2}}$
),
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle H_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})y^{1/2-s} & = & \displaystyle O_{f,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC},M,\unicode[STIX]{x1D700}}((2e^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}/2})^{(1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D700})|s|}y^{M})\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle +\,\mathop{\sum }_{j=0}^{M-1}y^{j+1/2}\left\{\begin{array}{@{}ll@{}}a_{j}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC},s)+b_{j}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC},s)\log y\quad & \text{if }\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}=k=0,\\ a_{j}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC},s)y^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}+b_{j}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC},s)y^{-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}\quad & \text{otherwise}.\end{array}\right.\end{eqnarray}$$
We substitute this expansion into (18). By hypothesis,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{f}(s)$
has at most finitely many simple zeros, so the sum over
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}$
in (18) is a finite linear combination of the series (24) with
$s=\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}$
, which yields an expansion of the shape (21). As for the integral term in (18), by the convexity bound and Stirling’s formula, we have
Since
$2<e^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}}$
, the integral converges absolutely and again yields something of the shape (21).
It remains to show (22) and (23). First suppose that
$k=0$
. Then, by (15), we have
Applying the hypergeometric transformation [Reference Gradshteyn and RyzhikGR15, 9.132(2)] and the defining series (12), this is
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle (\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}i\operatorname{sgn}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}))^{(1-\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2}|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}|^{1/2-s}\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}^{1/2}\mathop{\sum }_{\pm }\frac{|y/\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}|^{1/2\pm \unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}(\mp \unicode[STIX]{x1D708})}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}(1-(s+(1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2\pm \unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2)\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}((s+(1-\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2\mp \unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2)}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad \cdot \,\operatorname{2F1}\biggl(\frac{s+(1-\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2\pm \unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}{2},\frac{s+(1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2\pm \unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}{2};1\pm \unicode[STIX]{x1D708};-\biggl(\frac{y}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}}\biggr)^{2}\biggr)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}i\operatorname{sgn}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}))^{(1-\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2}|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}|^{1/2-s}\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}^{1/2}\mathop{\sum }_{j=0}^{\infty }\mathop{\sum }_{\pm }\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}(\mp \unicode[STIX]{x1D708})}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}(1-(s+(1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2\pm \unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2)\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}((s+(1-\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2\mp \unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2)}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad \cdot \,\frac{\binom{-\frac{s+(1-\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2\pm \unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}{2}}{j}\binom{-\frac{s+(1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2\pm \unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}{2}}{j}}{\binom{-1\mp \unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}{j}}\biggl|\frac{y}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}}\biggr|^{2j+1/2\pm \unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}.\end{eqnarray}$$
To pass from this to (22), we replace
$2j$
by
$j$
and set
$a_{j}=b_{j}=0$
when
$j$
is odd.
When
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}\neq 0$
we use the estimates
and
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle (\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}i\operatorname{sgn}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}))^{(1-\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2}|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}|^{1/2-s}\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}^{1/2}\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}(\mp \unicode[STIX]{x1D708})}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}(1-(s+(1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2\pm \unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2)\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}((s+(1-\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2\mp \unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2)}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad \ll _{f,\unicode[STIX]{x1D700}}e^{(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}/2+\unicode[STIX]{x1D700})|s|}\quad \text{for all }\unicode[STIX]{x1D700}>0\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
to obtain (23).
When
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}=0$
, (25) has a singularity arising from the
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}(\pm \unicode[STIX]{x1D708})$
factors, but we can still understand the formula by analytic continuation. To remove the singularity, we replace
$y^{\pm \unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}$
by
$(y^{\pm \unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}-1)+1$
. Since
in the terms with
$y^{\pm \unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}-1$
we can simply take the limit and estimate the remaining factors as before; this gives the
$b_{j}$
terms in (22) and (23). The terms with
$1$
can be written in the form
$y^{2j+1/2}(h_{j}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})+h_{j}(-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}))$
, where
$h_{j}$
is meromorphic with a simple pole at
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}=0$
, and independent of
$y$
. Then
$h_{j}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})+h_{j}(-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})$
is even, so it has a removable singularity at
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}=0$
. By the Cauchy integral formula, we have
Since the above estimates hold uniformly for
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}\in \mathbb{C}$
with
$|\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}|=\frac{1}{2}$
, they also hold for
$\lim _{\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}\rightarrow 0}(h_{j}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})+h_{j}(-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}))$
. This concludes the proof of (22) and (23) when
$k=0$
.
Turning to
$k=1$
, by (15) we have
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle H_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D714})y^{1/2-s}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =\mathop{\sum }_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}\in \{0,1\}}\biggl|\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}}\biggr|^{1/2-s}(i\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}(s-\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}))^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad \cdot \,\operatorname{2F1}\biggl(\frac{s+(-1)^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}}((1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2)+\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}{2}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF},\frac{s+(-1)^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}}((1-\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2)-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}{2}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF};\frac{1}{2}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF};-\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}^{2}\biggr),\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
and applying [Reference Gradshteyn and RyzhikGR15, 9.132(2)], this becomes
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle \unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}^{1/2}|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}|^{1/2-s}\mathop{\sum }_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}\in \{0,1\}}\biggl(\frac{i\operatorname{sgn}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})(s-\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}\unicode[STIX]{x1D708})}{2}\biggr)^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}}\mathop{\sum }_{\pm }\biggl|\frac{y}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}}\biggr|^{1/2+(1\pm (-1)^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2\pm \unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad \times \,\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}(\mp (\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}+(-1)^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}/2)))}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}((s+(-1)^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}}((1\mp \unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2)\mp \unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF})\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}(1/2-(s+(-1)^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}}((1\pm \unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2)\pm \unicode[STIX]{x1D708})/2)}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad \cdot \,\operatorname{2F1} (\frac{s+(-1)^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}}((1\pm \unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2)\pm \unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}{2}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF},\frac{s+(-1)^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}}((1\pm \unicode[STIX]{x1D716})/2)\pm \unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}{2}+\frac{1}{2};\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \qquad 1\pm \biggl(\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}+(-1)^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}}\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}}{2}\biggr);-\biggl(\frac{y}{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}}\biggr)^{2} ).\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
In this case no singularity arises from the
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}$
-factor in the numerator, so expanding the final
$\operatorname{2F1}$
as a series and applying a similar analysis to the above, we arrive at (22) and (23).◻
With the lemmas in place, we can now complete the proof of Proposition 1.2. Let
$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}_{(0,|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}|/4]}(y)=\left\{\begin{array}{@{}ll@{}}1\quad & \text{if }y\leqslant {\displaystyle \frac{|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}|}{4}},\\ 0\quad & \text{if }y>{\displaystyle \frac{|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}|}{4}},\end{array}\right.\end{eqnarray}$$
and define
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle g(y) & = & \displaystyle F(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}+iy)+A(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}+iy)-\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}_{(0,|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}|/4]}(y)\mathop{\sum }_{j=0}^{M-1}y^{j+1/2}\left\{\begin{array}{@{}ll@{}}a_{j}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})+b_{j}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})\log y\quad & \text{if }\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}=k=0,\\ a_{j}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})y^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}+b_{j}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})y^{-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}\quad & \text{otherwise,}\end{array}\right.\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle -\,\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}(i\operatorname{sgn}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}))^{k}\mathop{\sum }_{t=0}^{M-1}\frac{(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}iN\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})^{t}}{t!}\mathop{\sum }_{a\in \{0,1\}}\frac{i^{-a}}{2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}i}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \cdot \,\int _{\Re (s)=2}P_{f}(s;a+t,t)\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{\bar{f}}\biggl(s+t,-\frac{1}{N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}},\cos ^{(a)}\biggr)\biggl(\frac{y}{N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{2}}\biggr)^{1/2-s}\,ds.\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
By Lemmas 2.1, 2.4 and 2.5, we have
$g(y)=O_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC},M}(y^{M-1})$
for
$y\leqslant |\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}|/4$
. On the other hand, shifting the contour of the above to the right, we see that
$g$
decays rapidly as
$y\rightarrow \infty$
. Hence,
$\int _{0}^{\infty }g(y)y^{s-1/2}(dy/y)$
converges absolutely and defines a holomorphic function for
$\Re (s)>\frac{5}{2}-M$
.
We have
By Lemma 2.2,
$\int _{0}^{\infty }A(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}+iy)y^{s-1/2}(dy/y)$
continues to a holomorphic function on
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}$
. Similarly,
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle \int _{0}^{\infty }y^{s-1/2}\frac{dy}{y}\cdot \unicode[STIX]{x1D712}_{(0,|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}|/4]}(y)\mathop{\sum }_{j=0}^{M-1}y^{j+1/2}\left\{\begin{array}{@{}ll@{}}a_{j}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})+b_{j}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})\log y\quad & \text{if }\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}=k=0,\\ a_{j}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})y^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}+b_{j}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})y^{-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}\quad & \text{otherwise,}\end{array}\right.\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad =\mathop{\sum }_{j=0}^{M-1}\left\{\begin{array}{@{}ll@{}}{\displaystyle \frac{|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}/4|^{s+j}}{s+j}}\biggl[a_{j}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})+b_{j}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})\biggl(\log |\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}/4|-{\displaystyle \frac{1}{s+j}}\biggr)\biggr]\quad & \text{if }\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}=k=0,\\ a_{j}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}){\displaystyle \frac{|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}/4|^{s+j+\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}}{s+j+\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}}+b_{j}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}){\displaystyle \frac{|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}/4|^{s+j-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}}{s+j-\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}}\quad & \text{otherwise},\end{array}\right.\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
is holomorphic on
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}$
. Hence, by Mellin inversion,
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle \mathop{\sum }_{a\in \{0,1\}}i^{-a}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC},\cos ^{(a)})\left\{\begin{array}{@{}ll@{}}1\quad & \text{if }k=1\text{ or }(-1)^{a}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D716},\\ 0\quad & \text{otherwise,}\end{array}\right.\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad -\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}(i\operatorname{sgn}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}))^{k}(N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{2})^{s-1/2}\mathop{\sum }_{t=0}^{M-1}\frac{(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}iN\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})^{t}}{t!}\mathop{\sum }_{a\in \{0,1\}}i^{-a}P_{f}(s;a+t,t)\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{\bar{f}}\biggl(s+t,-\frac{1}{N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}},\cos ^{(a)}\biggr)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle\end{eqnarray}$$
is holomorphic on
$\{s\in \unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}:\Re (s)>\frac{5}{2}-M\}$
.
Denoting (26) by
$h(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})$
, we consider the combination
$\frac{1}{2}(i^{k+a_{0}}h(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})+i^{-k-a_{0}}h(-\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}))$
for some
$a_{0}\in \{0,1\}$
. This picks out the term with
$a\equiv k+a_{0}(mod2)$
in the first sum over
$a$
, and
$a\equiv t+a_{0}(mod2)$
in the second. Therefore, since
we find that
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle P_{f}(s;a_{0},0)\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{f}(s,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC},\cos ^{(k+a_{0})})\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad -\,\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}(-\!\operatorname{sgn}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}))^{k}(N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{2})^{s-1/2}\mathop{\sum }_{t=0}^{M-1}\frac{(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})^{t}}{t!}P_{f}(s;a_{0},t)\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}_{\bar{f}}\biggl(s+t,-\frac{1}{N\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}},\cos ^{(t+a_{0})}\biggr)\end{eqnarray}$$
is holomorphic on
$\{s\in \unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}:\Re (s)>\frac{5}{2}-M\}$
. Finally, replacing
$M$
by
$M+1$
and discarding the final term of the sum, we see that (27) is holomorphic on
$\{s\in \unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}:\Re (s)>\frac{3}{2}-M\}$
, as required.


